Abstract
The increasing complexity of urban planning projects today requires new approaches to better integrate stakeholders with different professional backgrounds throughout a city. Traditional tools used in urban planning are designed for experts and offer little opportunity for participation and collaborative design. This paper introduces the concept of geospatial tangible user interfaces (GTUI) and reports on the design and implementation as well as the usability of such a GTUI to support stakeholder participation in collaborative urban planning. The proposed system uses physical objects to interact with large digital maps and geospatial data projected onto a tabletop. It is implemented using a PostGIS database, a web map server providing OGC web services, the computer vision framework reacTIVision, a Java-based TUIO client, and GeoTools. We describe how a GTUI has be instantiated and evaluated within the scope of two case studies related to real world collaborative urban planning scenarios. Our results confirm the feasibility of our proposed GTUI solutions to (a) instantiate different urban planning scenarios, (b) support collaboration, and (c) ensure an acceptable usability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
iGUESS® is a registered Trademark in the European Union Intellectual Property Office.
References
Al-kodmany K (2001) Visualization tools and methods for participatory planning and design. J Urban Technol 8(2):1–37
Arias E, Eden H, Fischer G, Gorman A, Scharff E (2000) Transcending the individual human mindcreating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 7(1):84–113
Balram S, Dragicevic S, Meredith T (2003) Achieving effectiveness in stakeholder participation using the gis-based collaborative spatial delphi methodology. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 5(3):365
Balram S, Dragicevic S, Feick R (2009) Collaborative GIS for spatial decision support and visualization. J Environ Manag 90(6):1963–1965
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual sus scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123
Bortolaso C, Oskamp M, Graham TN, Brown D (2013) Ormis: a tabletop interface for simulation-based training. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, ITS ’13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 145–154
Brooke J (1996) Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Ind 189(194):4–7
Bugs G, Granell C, Fonts O, Huerta J, Painho M (2010) An assessment of public participation GIS and web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities 27(3):172–181
Burns C, Seyed T, Bradley K, Duncan R, Balasch A, Maurer F, Sousa MC (2012) Multi-surface visualization of fused hydrocarbon microseep and reservoir data. In: GeoConvention
Davies S, Selin C, Gano G, Pereira G (2012) Citizen engagement and urban change: three case studies of material deliberation. Cities 29:351–357
de Sousa L, Eykamp C, Leopold U, Baume O, Braun C (2012) iGUESS—A web based system integrating Urban Energy Planning and Assessment Modelling for multi-scale spatial decision making. In: International congress on environmental modelling and software managing resources of a limited planet, sixth biennial meeting, Leipzig, Germany, p 8
Djajadiningrat T, Wensveen S, Frens J, Overbeeke K (2004) Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8(5):294–309
Elbakidze M, Dawson L, Andersson K, Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Stjernquist I, Teitelbaum S, Schlyter P, Thellbro C (2015) Is spatial planning a collaborative learning process? A case study from a ruralurban gradient in sweden. Land Use Policy 48:270–285
Esteves A, Scott M, Oakley I (2013) Supporting offline activities on interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, TEI ’13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 147–154
Fernaeus Y, Tholander J (2006) looking at the computer but doing it on land: childrens interactions in a tangible programming space. In: McEwan T, Gulliksen J, Benyon D (eds) People Comput XIX Big Pict. Springer, London, pp 3–18
Goodchild MF (2015) Space, place and health. Ann GIS 21(2):97–100
Guerlain C, Cortina S, Renault S (2015) Towards a collaborative geographical information system to support collective decision making for urban logistics initiatives. In: The 9th international conference on city logistics. Elsevier
Horn MS, Solovey ET, Crouser RJ, Jacob RJ (2009) Comparing the use of tangible and graphical programming languages for informal science education. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’09, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 975–984
International Organization for Standardization (2002) ISO/TR 16982:2002—Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Usability methods supporting human-centred design
Ishii H (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, number March, pp 234–241
Jones CE, Maquil V (2016) Towards geospatial tangible user interfaces: An observational user study exploring geospatial interactions of the novice. Springer, Cham, pp 104–123
Jones CE, Haklay M, Griffiths S, Vaughan L (2009) A less-is-more approach to geovisualization-enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23(8):1077–1093
Kaltenbrunner M, Bovermann T, Bencina R, Costanza E (2005) TUIO: a protocol for table-top tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on gesture in human–computer interaction and simulation
Kingston R, Carver S, Evans A, Turton I (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24(2):109–125
Klemmer SR, Hartmann B, Takayama L (2006) How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, ACM, pp 140–149
Kobayashi K, Narita A, Hirano M, Kase I, Tsuchida S, Omi T, Kakizaki T, Hosokawa T (2006) Collaborative simulation interface for planning disaster measures. In: CHI ’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’06, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 977–982
Longley PA, Goodchild M, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2010) Geographic information systems and science, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Loorbach D (2012) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183
Maquil V (2015) Towards understanding the design space of tangible user interfaces for collaborative urban planning. Interact Comput 28(3):332–351
Matulic F, Caspar D, Norrie MC (2014) Spatial querying of geographical data with pen-input scopes. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, ITS ’14, New York, NY, USA. ACM, pp 89–98
Mitasova H, Mitas L, Ratti C, Ishii H, Alonso J, Harmon RS (2006) Real-time landscape model interaction using a tangible geospatial modeling environment. Comput Graph Appl IEEE 26(4):55–63
Open Geospatial Consortium (2005) OGC catalogue services specification. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/cat
Open Geospatial Consortium (2006) OpenGIS Web map server implementation specification. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wms
Open Geospatial Consortium (2007) OpenGIS Web processing service. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wps
Open Geospatial Consortium (2010) OpenGIS Web feature service 2.0 interface standard. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wfs
Open Geospatial Consortium (2012) OGC WCS 2.0 interface standard- core: corrigendum. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wcs
Piper B, Ratti C, Ishii H (2002) Illuminating clay: a 3-d tangible interface for landscape analysis. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 355–362
Rantanen H, Kahila M (2009) The SoftGIS approach to local knowledge. J Environ Manag 90(6):1981–1990
Rinner C, Keler C, Andrulis S (2008) The use of web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32(5):386–395
Roorda C, Wittmayer J (2014) Transition management in five European cities—an evaluation. Technical report, Dutch Research Institute for Transitions, Rotterdam, http://j.mp/1xrggtI
Schneider B, Jermann P, Zufferey G, Dillenbourg P (2011) Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction. Learn Technol IEEE Trans 4(3):222–232
Sun Y, Li SB (2016) Real-time collaborative gis: a technological review. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115:143–152
Terrin J-J (2009) Conception collaborative pour innover en architecture: processus, méthodes, outils. Editions L’Harmattan
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maquil, V., Leopold, U., De Sousa, L.M. et al. Towards a framework for geospatial tangible user interfaces in collaborative urban planning. J Geogr Syst 20, 185–206 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-018-0265-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-018-0265-6
Keywords
- Geographical information systems
- Human computer interaction
- Geospatial tangible user interfaces
- Interactive tabletops
- Collaborative urban planning
- Participatory urban planning