Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of 1440-nm Nd:YAG laser on lower face and neck rejuvenation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reviewing the literatures, we did not found—to our knowledge—any study using the Nd:YAG laser with wavelength 1440 nm in assisted liposuction and rejuvenation of the head and neck region although of the higher absorption rate for fat and water. Evidence-based practice supports the benefits of laser-assisted liposuction over conventional liposuction with skin tightening in selected areas specifically the submental area and the neck. The aim of the work is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser wavelength (WL) 1440 nm on lipolysis of submental area and skin tightening of the lower face and neck area. Fifty-seven patients with submental localized fat deposits and mild to moderate skin laxity were subjected to laser liposuction using Nd:YAG laser with WL 1440 nm (SmartLipo Triplex)® device. The efficacy of skin laxity improvement was assessed together with the whole satisfaction rate for each patient. Overall satisfaction rate was 97% of the patients. One sample test regarding skin laxity showed significant improvement (34.6%) after 6 months follow-up (0.268 SD p < 0.05) (Table 4). Complications included edema, soreness, weakness in the lower lip, and ecchymosis that resolved conservatively except one case that complained of seroma which needed aspiration and healed without infection. In conclusions, Nd:YAG laser with WL 1440 nm can be used safely and effectively for submental-assisted liposuction and lower face and neck rejuvenation. Less laser energy was needed for lipolysis and skin tightening as the fat and water have a higher absorption rate at wavelength 1440 nm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The corresponding author and all co-authors agree to submit the manuscript in your respectable journal.

References

  1. Mordon S, Plot E (2009) Laser lipolysis versus traditional liposuction for fat removal. Expert Rev Med Devices 6(6):677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins PS, Moyer KE (2018) Evidence-Based Practice in Liposuction. Ann Plast Surg 80:S403–S405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Valizadeh N, Jalaly NY, Zarghampour M, Barikbin B, Haghighatkhah HR (2016) Evaluation of safety and efficacy of 980-nm diode laser-assisted lipolysis versus traditional liposuction for sub- mental rejuvenation: a randomized clinical trial. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18:41–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Youn JI, Holcomb JD (2013) Ablation efficiency and relative thermal confinement measurements using wavelengths 1,064, 1,320, and 1,444 nm for laser-assisted lipolysis. Lasers Med Sci 28:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeong JH, Hong JM, Pak CS, Kim JH, Heo CY (2014) Treatment of axillary osmidrosis using a laser with a 1,444-nm wavelength. Dermatol Surg 40(8):851–857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexiades-Armenakas M (2006) Phytides, laxity, and photodamage treated with a combination of radiofrequency, diode laser, and pulsed light and assessed with a comprehensive grading scale. J Drugs Dermatol 5(8):731–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexiades-Armenakas M (2006) A quantitative and comprehensive grading scale for rhytides, laxity, and photoaging. J Drugs Dermatol 5(8):808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarnoff DS (2013) Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel 1440nm Nd: YAG laser for neck contouring and skin tightening without liposuction. J Drugs Dermatol 12(12):1382–1388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexiades-Armenakas M (2012) Combination laser-assisted liposuction and minimally invasive skin tightening with temperature feedback for treatment of the submentum and neck. Dermatol Surg 38(6):871–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levi JR, Veerappan A, Chen B, Mirkov M, Sierra R, Spiegel JH (2011) Histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis comparing continuous wave vs pulsed lasers in an in vivo pig model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tark KC, Jung JE, Song SY (2009) Superior lipolytic effect of the 1,444 nm Nd: YAG laser: comparison with the 1,064 nm Nd: YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 41(10):721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayed Mandour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Statement of informed consent

Written informed consent for operation and photographs was obtained from all patients before their inclusion in the study and anonymity was ensured.

Additional information

The corresponding author and all co-authors confirm that the content of the manuscript has not been published or under consideration for publication with any other journal.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandour, S., El-Tatawy, R.A., Alborgy, A.F. et al. Efficacy and safety of 1440-nm Nd:YAG laser on lower face and neck rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 36, 1267–1274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03177-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03177-x

Keywords

Navigation