Skip to main content
Log in

Double-session micropulse transscleral laser (CYCLO G6) for the treatment of glaucoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of double-session micropulse transscleral (MP3) laser for the treatment of glaucoma. This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent MP3 laser with the standard protocol and were within at least 12 months of their follow-up appointments. Eyes were treated at 2000 mW with 31.3% duty cycle for 80 s per treatment session, with double sessions in each hemifield alternating between upper and lower and upper and lower. Success criterion was defined as a greater than 20% reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) and an IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg at the end of the follow-up period. Eighty-nine eyes of seventy-six glaucoma patients were included; 31 of which were considered primary, i.e., no previous glaucoma surgery. The average pre-treatment IOP was 29.9 ± 6.4 mmHg. At around 16.7 ± 3.1 months of follow-up, the average IOP was 14.8 ± 4.7 mmHg (p < 0.001) (28.8 ± 7.4 to 15.7 ± 5.3 mmHg, p < 0.001, at 17.0 ± 3.1 months in the primary eyes). The number of topical glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.6 ± 0.5 to 1.9 ± 0.9 at the last evaluation (p < 0.001). The best corrected visual acuity in logMAR ranged from 0.41 ± 0.34 preoperatively to 0.45 ± 0.44 at the last visit (p = 0.2), and also remained stable in primary eyes. Success was obtained in 86.5% of the eyes, with 1.5 ± 0.8 procedures, and in 90.3% with 1.2 ± 0.5 MP3 laser procedures in the primary eye group. MP3 laser in two consecutive 80-s sessions was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of glaucoma. Primary eyes required lower number of MP3 laser procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quigley HA, Broman AT (2006) The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 90(3):262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY (2014) Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121(11):2081–2090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM (2017) Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12(8):e0183142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group (2012) Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153(5):789–803 e782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan RI, De Moraes CG, Cioffi GA, Al-Aswad LA, Blumberg DM (2015) Comparative cost-effectiveness of the baerveldt implant, trabeculectomy with mitomycin, and medical treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol 133(5):560–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Egbert PR, Fiadoyor S, Budenz DL, Dadzie P, Byrd S (2001) Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation as a primary surgical treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 119(3):345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rotchford AP, Jayasawal R, Madhusudhan S, Ho S, King AJ, Vernon SA (2010) Transscleral diode laser cycloablation in patients with good vision. Br J Ophthalmol 94(9):1180–1183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Tschiderer H, Ritch R, Ruckhofer J, Grabner G (2001) Diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 10(4):288–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlote T, Derse M, Rassmann K, Nicaeus T, Dietz K, Thiel HJ (2001) Efficacy and safety of contact transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation for advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma 10(4):294–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams AL, Moster MR, Rahmatnejad K, Resende AF, Horan T, Reynolds M, Yung E, Abramowitz B, Kuchar S, Waisbourd M (2018) Clinical efficacy and safety profile of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 27(5):445–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan AM, Chockalingam M, Aquino MC, Lim ZI, See JL, Chew PT (2010) Micropulse transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of refractory glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 38(3):266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JH, Shi Y, Amoozgar B, Aderman C, De Alba CA, Lin S, Han Y (2017) Outcome of micropulse laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation on pediatric versus adult glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 26(10):936–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuchar S, Moster MR, Reamer CB, Waisbourd M (2016) Treatment outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in advanced glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci 31(2):393–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Emanuel ME, Grover DS, Fellman RL, Godfrey DG, Smith O, Butler MR, Kornmann HL, Feuer WJ, Goyal S (2017) Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation: initial results in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 26(8):726–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aquino MC, Barton K, Tan AM, Sng C, Li X, Loon SC, Chew PT (2015) Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 43(1):40–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yelenskiy A, Gillette TB, Arosemena A, Stern AG, Garris WJ, Young CT, Hoyt M, Worley N, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS (2018) Patient outcomes following micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: intermediate term results. J Glaucoma. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001023

  17. Zaarour K, Abdelmassih Y, Arej N, Cherfan G, Tomey KF, Khoueir Z (2019) Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in uncontrolled glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 28(3):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen AT, Maslin J, Noecker RJ (2019) Early results of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol:1120672119839303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119839303

  19. Sarrafpour S, Saleh D, Ayoub S, Radcliffe N (2019) Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: a look at long-term effectiveness and outcomes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2(3):167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2019.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnstone M, Wang R, Padilla S, Wen K (2017) Transcleral laser induces aqueous outflow pathway motion and reorganization. American Glaucoma Society 27th meeting—poster

  21. Hodapp E, Parrish II RK, Anderson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in Glaucoma. Year Book, Inc. St. Louis, Missouri, USA

  22. Cross EM, Chaffin WW (1982) Use of the binomial theorem in interpreting results of multiple tests of significance. Educ Psychol Meas 42(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Awan MA, Agarwal PK, Watson DG, McGhee CN, Dutton GN (2009) Penetration of topical and subconjunctival corticosteroids into human aqueous humour and its therapeutic significance. Br J Ophthalmol 93(6):708–713. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.154906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Varikuti VNV, Shah P, Rai O, Chaves AC, Miranda A, Lim BA, Dorairaj SK, Sieminski SF (2019) Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in eyes with good central vision. J Glaucoma 28(10):901–905. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Isabela Piza Danielsen for important contribution in the manuscript revision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leopoldo Magacho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted after approval by the Ethics Committee of both institutions. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

For this type of study, retrospective chart review, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magacho, L., Lima, F.E. & Ávila, M.P. Double-session micropulse transscleral laser (CYCLO G6) for the treatment of glaucoma. Lasers Med Sci 35, 1469–1475 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02922-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02922-1

Keywords

Navigation