Skip to main content
Log in

Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advantage of using laser for assisted hatching in routine assisted reproductive technology (ART) practice is debatable. Recently, it has been shown that laser-manipulated mouse embryos had compromised genetic integrity. However, the impact of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on the epigenetic integrity of the preimplantation embryos is not elucidated so far. Since continuous thermal stress on embryos was found to lower mRNA levels of de novo (bovine) methyl transferases in embryos, we hypothesize that thermal energy induced during LAH may alter the epigenetic signature through abnormal de novo methyl transferases (Dnmts) levels. Thus, using mouse model, we made an attempt to look into the expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in laser-manipulated embryos and their effects on global methylation. This experimental prospective study used mouse embryos from varying developmental stages (2-cell, 6–8-cell, and blastocyst) which were subjected to LAH using a 1480-nm diode laser. Two pulses of 350 μs frequency were applied to breach the zona pellucida, and then, embryos were assessed for the expression of two de novo methyl transferases (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) and LINE-1 (long interspersed element-1) methylation when LAH embryos developed to blastocyst stage. Results from this study have shown that blastocysts subjected to LAH at two-cell stage had significantly lower mRNA transcripts of Dnmt3a (P < 0.01) and Dnmt3b (P < 0.05) whereas LAH at six- to eight-cell and blastocyst stages did not affect the mRNA level significantly. On the other hand, LINE-1 methylation did not change significantly between LAH and control group in all the stages studied. These results suggest that two-cell-stage laser manipulation of embryos changes the mRNA level of Dnmts without affecting the global DNA methylation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansour RT, Rhodes CA, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Kamal A (2000) Transfer of zona-free embryos improves outcome in poor prognosis patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 15:1061–1064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balakier H, Mandel R, Sojecki A, Motamedi G, Zaver S, Librach C (2009) Laser zona thinning in women aged ≤37 years: a randomized study. Fertil Steril 914:1479–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM (2009) Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001894

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hagemann AR, Lanzendorf SE, Jungheim ES, Chang AS, Ratts VS, Odem RR (2010) A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of assisted hatching in women younger than 38 years undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 93:586–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B (2010) Effect of laser zona thinning on vitrified-warmed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a prospective, randomized study. Reprod BioMed Online 20:234–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martins WP, Rocha IA, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO (2011) Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update 17:438–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carney SK, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM, Nelson L (2012) Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD001894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2008) The role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a review of the literature. A Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 90:S196–S198

    Google Scholar 

  9. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2014) Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril 102:348–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Salathé RP, Senn A, Nocera D, Germond M, De Grandi P, Fakan S (1996) Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48-microns diode laser. Lasers Surg Med 18:52–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levin I, Almog B, Shwartz T, Gold V, Ben-Yosef D, Shaubi M, Amit A, Malcov M (2012) Effects of laser polar-body biopsy on embryo quality. Fertil Steril 97:1085–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montag M, van der Ven H (1999) Laser-assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. Croat Med J 40:398–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong BC, Boyd CA, Lanzendorf SE (2003) Randomized controlled study of human zona pellucida dissection using the zona infrared laser optical system: evaluation of blastomere damage, embryo development, and subsequent hatching. Fertil Steril 80:1249–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Han TS, Sagoskin AW, Graham JR, Tucker MJ, Liebermann J (2003) Laser-assisted human embryo biopsy on the third day of development for preimplantation genetic diagnosis: two successful case reports. Fertil Steril 80:453–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartshorn C, Anshelevich A, Wangh LJ (2005) Laser zona drilling does not induce hsp70i transcription in blastomeres of eight-cell mouse embryos. Fertil Steril 84:1547–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uppangala S, D’Souza F, Pudakalakatti S, Atreya HS, Raval K, Kalthur G, Adiga SK (2016) Laser assisted zona hatching does not lead to immediate impairment in human embryo quality and metabolism. Syst Biol Reprod Med 62:396–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Honguntikar SD, Uppangala S, Salian SR, Kalthur G, Kumar P, Adiga SK (2015) Laser-assisted hatching of cleavage-stage embryos impairs developmental potential and increases DNA damage in blastocysts. Lasers Med Sci 30:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox GF, Burger J, Lip V, Mau UA, Sperling K, Wu BL, Horsthemke B (2002) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 72:162–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maher ER, Afnan M, Barratt CL (2003) Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: epigenetics, imprinting, ART and icebergs? Hum Reprod 18:2508–2511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludwig M, Katalinic A, Gross S, Sutcliffe A, Varon R, Horsthemke B (2005) Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J Med Genet 42:289–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazaraviciute G, Kauser M, Bhattacharya S, Haggarty P, Bhattacharya S (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis of DNA methylation levels and imprinting disorders in children conceived by IVF/ICSI compared with children conceived spontaneously. Hum Reprod Update 20:840–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T (2000) Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403:501–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, Kim M, Woods C, Fiala E, Ehrlich M, Laird PW (2005) Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res 33:6823–6836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Douglas-Hamilton DH, Conia J (2001) Thermal effects in laser-assisted pre-embryo zona drilling. J Biomed Opt 6:205–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skjærven KH, Hamre K, Penglase S, Finn RN, Olsvik PA (2014) Thermal stress alters expression of genes involved in one carbon and DNA methylation pathways in Atlantic cod embryos. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 173C:17–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang AS, Estécio MR, Doshi K, Kondo Y, Tajara EH, Issa JP (2004) A simple method for estimating global DNA methylation using bisulfite PCR of repetitive DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res 32:e38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J (2001) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 10:1089–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith ZD, Chan MM, Mikkelsen TS, Gu H, Gnirke A, Regev A, Meissner A (2012) A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484:339–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith ZD, Chan MM, Humm KC, Karnik R, Mekhoubad S, Regev A, Eggan K, Meissner A (2014) DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo. Nature 511:611–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99:247–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kato Y, Kaneda M, Hata K, Kumaki K, Hisano M, Kohara Y, Okano M, Li E, Nozaki M, Sasaki H (2007) Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum Mol Genet 16:2272–2280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Watanabe D, Suetake I, Tada T, Tajima S (2002) Stage- and cell-specific expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b during embryogenesis. Mech Dev 118:187–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guenatri M, Duffié R, Iranzo J, Fauque P, Bourc’his D (2013) Plasticity in Dnmt3L-dependent and -independent modes of de novo methylation in the developing mouse embryo. Development 140:562–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Petrussa L, Van de Velde H, De Rycke M (2014) Dynamic regulation of DNA methyltransferases in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos after assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod 20:861–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. He ZM, Li J, Hwa YL, Brost B, Fang Q, Jiang SW (2014) Transition of LINE-1 DNA methylation status and altered expression in first and third trimester placentas. PLoS One 9:e96994

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li MW, Kinchen KL, Vallelunga JM, Young DL, Wright KD, Gorano LN, Wasson K, Lloyd KC (2013) Safety, efficacy and efficiency of laser-assisted IVF in subfertile mutant mouse strains. Reproduction (Cambridge, England) 145:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Grant No. 2010-00020. Funding agency did not have any role in designing the experiment, data analysis and interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SH has performed the experiments and analyzed the data. SS, FD, and SU have performed the experiment. GK has assisted in designing the study. SKA has designed the study, analyzed the data, and written the manuscript. SH is the guarantor of this work and as such had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish Kumar Adiga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All experiments and animal handling were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines for animal experimentation after obtaining prior approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC/KMC/110/2012).

Informed consent

Not applicable as no human subjects were involved in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honguntikar, S., Salian, S.R., D’Souza, F. et al. Epigenetic changes in preimplantation embryos subjected to laser manipulation.. Lasers Med Sci 32, 2081–2087 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2334-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2334-3

Keywords

Navigation