Abstract
The United Nations 2030 agenda states various sustainable development goals (SDGs) to counter climate change affecting individuals' health and economies. It puts forward various policy guidelines and tools to help in the mitigation process and orientation towards green growth. In this context, this study examines the influence of carbon taxes and innovation (mitigation technologies) on demand, supply and total emissions in OECD regions for a sample spanning from 2000 to 2018. The preliminary data testing employed second-generation approaches, whereas the long-run relationship among the variables is tested using error correction-based modeling approaches due to cross-sectional dependences. IPAT and STIRPAT models are used to test the demand- and production-based emissions, while PMG-ARDL is employed for total carbon emissions. The results confirm the presence of a long-run relationship among variables. Moreover, water and wastewater technologies neutralize production-based emissions by 68%, production and processing innovation by 62%, energy generation/transmission limit it by 39%, and transportation-related technologies lowered demand-based emissions by 15% in OECD states. Environmental taxes have a more dominant effect in lowering carbon emissions in the short run (25%) than in the long run (10%); however, energy consumption remains the main polluter in all sectors. In sum, the results reveal that the policy target achievement tends to be sub-region specific (Asia-Oceania, America, Europe). Nevertheless, carbon taxes and mitigation technologies are helping in achieving SDGs of carbon mitigation.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used is open access and available on OECD sources and their yearly annual books. The sources are mentioned in data section.
References
Abbas M, Pires D, Peters A, Morel CM, Hurst S, Holmes A, Pittet D (2018) Conflicts of interest in infection prevention and control research: no smoke without fire. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med 44(10):1679–1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5361-z
Avagyan AB (2017) Environmental building policy by the use of microalgae and decreasing of risks for Canadian oil sand sector development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(25):20241–20253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9864-x
Avagyan AB (2018) Algae to energy and sustainable development. Technologies, resources, economics and system analyses. New design of global environmental policy and live conserve industry. Amazon, ISBN-13, 978-1718722552
Avagyan AB (2021) Theory of bioenergy accumulation and transformation: application to evolution, energy, sustainable development, climate change, manufacturing, agriculture, military activity and pandemic challenges. Athens J Sci 8:57–80. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.8-1-4
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029
Blakeney M (2022) Agricultural Innovation and Sustainable Development. Sustainability 14(5):2698
Carlos FS, Schaffer N, Andreazza R, Morris LA, Tedesco MJ, Boechat CL, Camargo FADO (2018) Treated industrial wastewater effects on chemical constitution maize biomass, physicochemical soil properties, and economic balance. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49(3):319–333
CBO (2020) Impose a tax on emissions of greenhouse gases, Congressional Budget Office. United States. https://www.cbo.gov/budget-options/56873
Chang Y (2002) Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. J Econ 110(2):261–292
Chen Z, Zan Z, Jia S (2022) Effect of urban traffic-restriction policy on improving air quality based on system dynamics and a non-homogeneous discrete grey model. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02319-9
Connell RW (1998) Masculinities and Globalization. Men Masc 1(1):3–23
Cozzi L, Gould T, Bouckart S, Crow D, Kim TY, Mcglade C, Wetzel D (2020) World Energy Outlook 2020. 2050, 1–461
de Andrade RL, Bø K, Antonio FI, Driusso P, Mateus-Vasconcelos ECL, Ramos S, Ferreira CHJ (2018) An education program about pelvic floor muscles improved women’s knowledge but not pelvic floor muscle function, urinary incontinence or sexual function: a randomised trial. J Physiother 64(2):91–96
De Hoyos RE, Sarafidis V (2006) Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stand Genomic Sci 6(4):482–496
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94(1):175–179
Duan WQ, Khan Z, Gulistan M, Khurshid A (2021a) Neutrosophic exponential distribution: modeling and applications for complex data analysis. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5970613
Duan W, Khurshid A, Rauf A, Khan K, Calin AC (2021b) How geopolitical risk drives exchange rate and oil prices? A wavelet-based analysis. Energy Sources Part B 16(9):861–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2021.1965262
Duan W, Khurshid A, Nazir N, Calin AC (2021c) Pakistan’s energy sector—from a power outage to sustainable supply. Examining the role of China-Pakistan economic corridor. Energy Environ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211044785
Duan W, Khurshid A, Nazir N, Khan K, Calin AC (2022) From gray to green: energy crises and the role of CPEC. Renew Energy 190:188–207
Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217
Godil et al (2021) The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. J Environ Manag 285:112208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112208
Goldthau A, Hughes L (2020) Saudi on the Rhine? Explaining the emergence of private governance in the global oil market. Rev Int Polit Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1748683
Hodson EL, Brown M, Cohen S, Showalter S, Wise M, Wood F, Cleary K (2018) US energy sector impacts of technology innovation, fuel price, and electric sector CO2 policy: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison study. Energy Econ 73:352–370
IEA (2020) International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2020. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics
Khan K, Chi-Wei SU, Khurshid A, Rehman AU (2018) Can the fisher effect theory work in Pakistan? Appl Econ J 25(1):50–64
Khan K, Su CW, Khurshid A (2022) Do booms and busts identify bubbles in energy prices? Resour Policy 76:102556
Khurshid A, Deng X (2021) Innovation for carbon mitigation: A hoax or road toward green growth? Evidence from newly industrialized economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(6):6392–6404
Khurshid A, Khan K (2021) How COVID-19 shock will drive the economy and climate? A data-driven approach to model and forecast. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(3):2948–2958
Khurshid A, Rauf A, Calin AC, Qayyum S, Mian AH, Fatima T (2022a) Technological innovations for environmental protection: role of intellectual property rights in the carbon mitigation efforts. Evidence from western and southern Europe. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19(5):3919–3934
Khurshid A, Qayyum S, Calin AC, Saleem SF, Nazir N (2022b) The role of pricing strategies, clean technologies, and ecological regulation on the objectives of the UN 2030 Agenda. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(21):31943–31956
Khurshid A, Rauf A, Qayyum S, Calin AC, Duan W (2022c) Green innovation and carbon emissions: the role of carbon pricing and environmental policies in attaining sustainable development targets of carbon mitigation—evidence from Central-Eastern Europe. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02422-3
Khurshid A, Kedong Y, Călin AC, Zhaosu ME, Nazir N (2018) Remittances inflows, gain of foreign exchange or trade loss? New evidence from low, lower-middle and middle-income groups. ESPERA 21(1)
Koberg E, Longoni A (2019) A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J Clean Prod 207:1084–1098
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1):1–24
Li K, Ma M, Xiang X, Feng W, Ma Z, Cai W, Ma X (2022) Carbon reduction in commercial building operations: a provincial retrospection in China. Appl Energy 306:118098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118098
Martínez García de Leaniz P, Herrero Crespo Á, Gómez López R (2018). Customer responses to environmentally certified hotels: The moderating effect of environmental consciousness on the formation of behavioral intentions. J Sustain Tour 26(7):1160-1177.
Meckling J, Allan BB (2020) The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 10(5):434–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7
Mehmet S, Ekrem AY, Gokcen O (2014) Cross sectional dependence and cointegration analysis among the GDP-Foreign direct investment and aggregate credits: evidence from selected developing countries. Asian Econ Financ Rev 4(11):1485–1501
Mensah CN, Long X, Boamah KB, Bediako IA, Dauda L, Salman M (2018) The effect of innovation on CO 2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(29):29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
Mensah CN, Long X, Dauda L, Boamah KB, Salman M, Appiah-Twum F, Tachie AK (2019) Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. J Clean Prod 240:118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204
OECD Statistics (2021) Emissions of air pollutants. https://stats.oecd.org/
Persyn D, Westerlund J (2008) Error-correction–based cointegration tests for panel data. Stand Genomic Sci 8(2):232–241
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634
Pesaran MH (2003) Estimation and inference in large heterogenous panels with cross section dependence. Available at SSRN 385123
Phenrat T, Soratana K, Kumar V, Kanel SR, Landis AE (2022) Technological and policy innovations toward cleaner development. Clean Technol Environ Policy 24(4):1009–1011
Qiang S, Khurshid A, Calin AC, Khan K (2019) Do Remittances contribute to the development of financial institutions? New evidence from the developing world. Roman J Econ Forecast 22(2):78
Rodríguez M, Robaina M, Teotónio C (2019) Sectoral effects of a green tax reform in Portugal. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 104:408–418
Sharma GD, Shah MI, Shahzad U, Jain M, Chopra R (2021) Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. J Environ Manag 297:113316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113316
Stoknes PE, Rockström J (2018) Redefining green growth within planetary boundaries. Energy Res Soc Sci 44:41–49
Sun Z, Ma Z, Ma M, Cai W, Xiang X, Zhang S, Chen L (2022) Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in the building sector: a bibliometric review. Buildings 12(2):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020128
Tsai WT (2017) Green public procurement and green-mark products strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions—experience from Taiwan. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 22(5):729–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9695-3
Wang Y, Zhao T (2018) Impacts of urbanization-related factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from China’s three regions with varied urbanization levels. Atmos Pollut Res 9(1):15–26
Wang X, Khurshid A, Qayyum S, Calin AC (2022) The role of green innovations, environmental policies and carbon taxes in achieving the sustainable development goals of carbon neutrality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(6):8393–8407
Wenqi D, Khurshid A, Rauf A, Calin AC (2022) Government subsidies’ influence on corporate social responsibility of private firms in a competitive environment. J Innov Knowl 7(2):100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100189
Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69:709–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x
World Bank (2018) World development report 2019: the changing nature of work. The World Bank
Xia W, Apergis N, Bashir MF, Ghosh S, Doğan B, Shahzad U (2021) Investigating the role of globalization, and energy consumption for environmental externalities: empirical evidence from developed and developing economies. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.084
Xiang X, Ma X, Ma Z, Ma M (2022a) Operational carbon change in commercial buildings under the carbon neutral goal: a LASSO–WOA approach. Buildings 12(1):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010054
Xiang X, Ma X, Ma Z, Ma M, Cai W (2022b) Python-LMDI: a tool for index decomposition analysis of building carbon emissions. Buildings 12(1):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010083
Xuan X, Khan K, Su CW, Khurshid A (2021) Will COVID-19 threaten the survival of the airline industry? Sustainability 13(21):11666
Zhang J, Zeng W, Wang J, Yang F, Jiang H (2017) Regional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO2 emissions. J Clean Prod 163:202–211
Zhang H, Khurshid A, Xinyu WA, Băltăţeanu AM (2021) Corporate financial risk assessment and role of big data; new perspective using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J Econ Forecast 2:181–199
Zhang S, Ma M, Li K, Ma Z, Feng W, Cai W (2022) Historical carbon abatement in the commercial building operation: China versus the US. Energy Econ 105:105712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105712
Acknowledgements
The article is supported by Beijing Social Science Foundation, Youth Project No. 21jjc021. The grant is received by Xinyu Wang.
Funding
The article is supported by Beijing Social Science Foundation, Youth Project No. 21JJC021. The grant is received by Xinyu Wang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AK and ZL done conceptualization; AK and AR did methodology; ZL, SQ and XW done formal analysis and investigation; AK, SQ and LAI Writing—original draft preparation; ACC and LAI were involved in writing—review and editing; Funding acquisition: No Funding; resources were nil; AK and XW contributed to supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethics approval
This is non-human subject research and waived the need for informed consent.
Consent to participate/publish
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Z., Khurshid, A., Rauf, A. et al. Climate change and the UN-2030 agenda: Do mitigation technologies represent a driving factor? New evidence from OECD economies. Clean Techn Environ Policy 25, 195–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02396-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02396-w