Abstract
Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are lower cost and more sustainable alternatives for lithium-ion batteries. However, despite the high research attention to the development of the synthesis procedures of the electrode materials for SIBs, there has been less focus on the environmental burdens of each production route which is a vital aspect for large-scale industrial applications. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) with a cradle-to-gate approach was performed here to evaluate the environmental impacts of the production phase of a promising cathode material with the chemical formula of Na3MnCO3PO4 (NMCP), which was previously studied in SIBs. LCA was used to compare the environmental impacts of three strategies for the production of NMCP nanomaterials, including ball milling, hydrothermal, and stirring-assisted hydrothermal. Results demonstrated that in hydrothermal-based methods, sodium carbonate showed a considerably high impact in almost all categories owing to its high consumption in these processes. In ball milling and stirring-assisted hydrothermal methods, electricity is one of the main environmental weaknesses. By scaling the results for an equivalent functionality and considering 1 kWh of energy storage capacity as the functional unit, ball milling showed the least environmental impact in all seven categories except acidification, eutrophication, and carcinogenics. Furthermore, Global warming impact as the most investigated category in the field of batteries was in the range of 14–20 kg CO2-eq. per kg of the synthesized NMCP nanomaterials prepared via the three studied methods which suggest the appropriate design of the applied procedures.
Graphical abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghamohammadi H, Hassanzadeh N, Eslami-Farsani R (2022) A comprehensive review study on pure titanium niobium oxide as the anode material for Li-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 911:165117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165117
Arshad F, Lin J, Manurkar N et al (2022) Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries: a critical review. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106164
Carvalho ML, Mela G, Temporelli A et al (2022) Sodium-ion batteries with Ti1Al1TiC185 MXene as negative electrode: life cycle assessment and life critical resource use analysis. Sustainability 14:5976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105976
Chen H, Hautier G, Ceder G (2012a) Synthesis, computed stability, and crystal structure of a new family of inorganic compounds: carbonophosphates. J Am Chem Soc 134:19619–19627. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3040834
Chen H, Hautier G, Jain A et al (2012b) Carbonophosphates: a new family of cathode materials for Li-ion batteries identified computationally. Chem Mater 24:2009–2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm203243x
Dunn JB, Gaines L, Kelly JC et al (2015) The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction. Energy Environ Sci 8:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee03029j
Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK (2021) Magnetic stirring assisted hydrothermal synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4 cathode material for sodium-ion battery. Ceram Int 47:26929–26934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.104
Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK, Chen G (2016a) In-situ hydrothermal synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4/rGO hybrid as a cathode for Na-ion battery. Electrochim Acta 208:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.028
Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK, Chen G (2016b) Ball mill assisted synthesis of Na3MnCO3PO4 nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxide for sodium ion battery cathodes. Electrochim Acta 220:683–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.160
Hassanzadeh N, Sadrnezhaad SK, Ghorbanzadeh M (2018) An investigation of crystallization kinetics of the Na3MnCO3PO4 cathode material, synthesized by the hydrothermal method. Mater Chem Phys 214:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.04.070
Lopez S, Akizu-Gardoki O, Lizundia E (2021) Comparative life cycle assessment of high performance lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. J Clean Prod 282:124528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124528
Majeau-Bettez G, Hawkins TR, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 45:5454. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2015082
Malara A, Pantò F, Santangelo S et al (2021) Comparative life cycle assessment of Fe2O3-based fibers as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Environ Dev Sustain 23:6786–6799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00891-y
Papadaki D, Foteinis S, Mhlongo GH et al (2017) Life cycle assessment of facile microwave-assisted zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.019
Peters J, Buchholz D, Passerini S, Weil M (2016) Life cycle assessment of sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 9:1744–1751. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ee00640j
Peters JF, Baumann M, Binder JR, Weil M (2021) On the environmental competitiveness of sodium-ion batteries under a full life cycle perspective-a cell-chemistry specific modelling approach. Sustain Energy Fuels 5:6414–6429. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1se01292d
Porzio J, Scown CD (2021) Life-cycle assessment considerations for batteries and battery materials. Adv Energy Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100771
Rey I, Iturrondobeitia M, Akizu-Gardoki O et al (2022) Environmental impact assessment of Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode production for sodium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Sustain Res 2:2200049. https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202200049
Sharma V, Biswas S, Sundaram B et al (2019) Electrode materials with highest surface area and specific capacitance cannot be the only deciding factor for applicability in energy storage devices: inference of combined life cycle assessment and electrochemical studies. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:5385–5392. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06413
Trotta F, Wang GJ, Guo Z et al (2022) A comparative techno-economic and lifecycle analysis of biomass-derived anode materials for lithium- and sodium-ion batteries. Adv Sustain Syst 2200047:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202200047
Wu F, Zhou Z, Hicks AL (2019) Life cycle impact of titanium dioxide nanoparticle synthesis through physical, chemical, and biological routes. Environ Sci Technol 53:4078–4087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06800
Yin R, Hu S, Yang Y (2019) Life cycle inventories of the commonly used materials for lithium-ion batteries in China. J Clean Prod 227:960–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.186
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
“The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.”
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mozaffarpour, F., Hassanzadeh, N. & Vahidi, E. Comparative life cycle assessment of synthesis routes for cathode materials in sodium-ion batteries. Clean Techn Environ Policy 24, 3319–3330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02381-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02381-3