Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating MCDM and GIS for renewable energy spatial models: assessing the individual and combined potential for wind, solar and biomass energy in Southern Spain

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 October 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

The present study aims to develop an integrated methodology using multi-criteria decision-making methods and geographical information systems for a renewable energy spatial planning model. This methodology has been applied to the province of Malaga (Southern Spain), which is characterised by high energy demand for both residential and touristic use. Criteria and restrictions are defined, weighed and combined in order to identify high potential areas for the construction of single- or combined wind power, solar power and biomass generation facilities. Finally, a cluster analysis is carried out in order to classify municipalities within the province according to the availability of medium and high potential land for the construction of these facilities. Results suggest that for the three types of energy analysed (wind, solar and biomass), single- or combined solar and wind power facilities are the best options in the province of Malaga. The breakdown of these results at the municipality level is of great interest from the point of view of spatial planning. For instance, in some municipalities less than 1 km2 is regarded as having a medium-to-high potential in terms of renewables. Some of these municipalities, situated on the Costa del Sol, must meet high current- and future energy demands, owing both to population density and the volume of touristic demand, which is the highest in the region of Andalusia. The methodology used can be applied to other regions and will be of interest for planners, managers and investors, all of whom can use this information for spatial- and energy planning, and the definition of targets and strategies, and, therefore, as and to aid decision-making.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 23 October 2019

    In the original article by Díaz et al. (2019), the authors have become aware of an error in the application of Equation 4, aimed at checking the validity of the method.

References

  • AAE (2016) Estrategia Energética de Andalucía 2020. Seville (Spain)

  • Agencia Andaluza de la Energía—AAE (2018a) Datos energéticos de Andalucía 2017. Seville (Spain)

  • AAE (2018b) Informe de Infraestructuras Energéticas de la provincial de Málaga. https://www.agenciaandaluzadelaenergia.es/sites/default/files/documentos/informe_prov_ma_miea_2018_12_31.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2019

  • AAE (2018c) Mapa de potencial de biomasa de Andalucía. https://www.agenciaandaluzadelaenergia.es/biomasa/biomasa/init.do?prefix=/biomasa&name=potencial. Accessed May 24, 2019

  • Act 2/1989, of 18 July, approving the Inventory of Protected Natural Spaces of Andalusia and establishing additional measures for its protection. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía, BOJA, 60. Spain

  • Act 2/2007, of 27 March, on the promotion of renewable energies and energy saving and efficiency in Andalusia, BOJA, 70. Spain

  • Act 3/1995, of 24 March, about cattle tracks. BOE, 71. Spain

  • Act 4/1989, of 27 March, on the conservation of Natural Spaces and of Wild Flora and Fauna. Boletín Oficel del Esttado, BOE, 74. Spain

  • Act 8/2001, of 12 July, about roads in Andalusia. BOJA, 85. Spain

  • Act 9/2006, of 30 December, about railway services in Andalusia, BOJA, 251. Spain

  • Act 37/2015, of 29 September, about roads. BOE, 234. Spain

  • Afshari AR, Yusuff RM (2012) A review of spatial multi criteria decision making. In: SASTech 6th international symposium on advances is sciences and technology; March 21–25. Khavaran Institute of Higher Education, Kuala Lumpur

  • Al Garni HZ, Awasthi A (2017) Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Appl Energy 206:1225–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsayed M, Cacciato M, Scarcell G, Scelba G (2014) Design of hybrid power generation systems based on multi criteria decision analysis. Sol Energy 105:548–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arán J, Espín A, Aznar F, Zamorano M, Rodríguez M, Ramos A (2008) Environmental decision-support systems for evaluating the carrying capacity of land areas: optimal site selection for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:2358–2380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atici KB, Simsek AB, Ulucan A, Tosun MU (2015) A GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis approach for wind power plant site selection. Util Polic 37:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2015.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consejería de Obras Públicas y Transportes—COPT (2006a) Plan de Ordenación del territorio de Andalucía. Seville (Spain)

  • COPT (2006b) Plan de Ordenación del Territorio de la Costa del Sol Oriental-Axarquía. Seville (Spain)

  • Council Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and European Council, of 14 March, for the establishment of an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe (INSPIRE). Belgium

  • Davtalab M, Alesheik A (2018) Spatial optimization of biomass power plant site using fuzzy analytic network process. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1531-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz P (2013) Energía renovable y territorio. Potencialidades apra la implantación de parques eólicos en Andalucía. Dissertation, Universidad de Sevilla

  • Díaz P, Biberacher M, Domínguez J, Schardinger I (2018a) Developing a wind energy potential map on a regional scale using GIS and multi-criteria decision methods: the case of Cadiz (south of Spain). Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1539-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz P, Camarillo JM, Pérez JP (2018b) Relational spatial database and multi-criteria decision methods for selecting optimum locations for photovoltaic power plants in the province of Seville (Southern Spain). Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1889–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1587-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, L328/82

  • European Commission (2007) An energy policy for Europe. Brussels (Belgium)

  • European Commission (2010) Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels (Belgium)

  • Garcia M, Villar A, Cruz E (2019) A place in the sun: the British housing market’s (de) construction of Andalusia. Tourism Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1545249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho D, Newell G, Walker A (2005) The importance of property-specific attributes in assessing CBD office building quality. J Prop Invest Financ 23:424–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongxing Y, Wei Z, Chengzhi L (2009) Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of a hybrid solar–wind power generation system. Appl Energ 86(2):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía—IECA (2019a) Padrón Municipal de Habitantes. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia. Accessed May 24, 2019

  • IECA (2019b) Encuesta de ocupación hotelera 2018. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia. Accessed May 24, 2019

  • Ilbahar E, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2019) A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strateg Rev 25:18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto de Ahorro y Diversificación Energética (2011) Plan de energías renovables (2011–2020). Madrid (Spain)

  • Lejeune P, Feltz C (2008) Development of a decision support system for setting up a wind energy policy across the Walloon Region (southern Belgium). Renew Energy 33:2416–2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limones N, Marzo J, Pita MF, Díaz P (2018) The impact of climate change on air conditioning requirements in Andalusia at a detailed scale. Theor Appl Climato 134:1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2324-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang ZX (2009) The development and application practice of wind–solar energy hybrid generation systems in China. Renew Sust Energ Strat Rev 13:1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorente R, Montávez JP, Jerez S, Gómez JJ, Jiménez P, Jiménez PA, Jimenez JA, García-Valero F, Gomariz-Castillo F, Alonso-Sarria F (2012) EOLMAP: a web tool to assess the wind resource over Spain. Renew Energies Power Qual J 1:1264–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett A, Appleton K (2007) GIS for environmental decision-making. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhamediyev RI, Kiseleva SV, Kireeva R, Yakunin KO, Muhamedijeva JL, Mustakaeyv RR (2018) Geo-informational system for support of decision-making for renewable energy development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Comput Model Eng Sci 18:00–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorollahi Y, Yousefi H, Mohammadi M (2016) Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 13:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmas C, Siewert A, von Haaren C (2015) Exploring the decision-space for renewable energy generation to enhance spatial efficiency. Environ Impact Asses Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez IJ, García E, Fernández LA, Zorzano PJ, Monteiro C, Miranda V (2008) Promotion of new wind farms based on a decision support system. Renew Energy 33:558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Decree 9/2008, of 16 January, modifying the Regulation of the Public Hydraulic Domain, approved by Royal Decree 849/1986. BOE, 14. Spain

  • Royal Decree 1071/2007, of 27 July, regulating the official geodetic reference system in Spain. BOE, 207. Spain

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 5:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1989) Group decision making and the AHP. In: Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (eds) Analytic hierarchy process. Springer, Berlin, pp 59–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Ozdemir MS (2003) Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math Comput Model 38:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadegui M, Karimi M (2016) GIS-based solar and wind turbine site selection using multi-criteria decision analysis: case study Tehran, Iran. Paper presented at: the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, volume XLII-4/W4, 2017 Tehran’s Joint ISPRS conferences of GI research, SMPR and EOEC; 7–10 October 2017, Tehran

  • Sánchez JM, Teruel J, Soto PL, García MS (2013) Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: case study in south-eastern Spain. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 24:544–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, Henggeler C, García MS, Dias LC (2014) GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI: evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain. Renew Energy 66:478–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siksnelyte I, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D, Sharma D (2018) An overview of multi-criteria decision-making methods in dealing with sustainable energy development. Energies 11(10):2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sliz-Szkliniarz B, Vogt J (2011) GIS-based approach for the evaluation of wind energy potential: a case study for the Kujawsko–Pomorskie Voivodeship. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojčić M, Zavadskas E, Pamučar D, Stević Ž, Mardani A (2019) Application of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: a literature review 2008–2018. Symmetry (Basel) 11:350–374. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunak Y, Höfer T, Siddique H, Madlener R, De Doncker RW (2015) A GIS-based decision support system for the optimal siting of wind farm projects. EON Energy Res Cent Ser RWTH Aachen Univ 7(2):1–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahri M, Hakdaoui M, Maan M (2015) The evaluation of solar farm locations applying geographic information system and multi-criteria decision methods: case study in southern Morocco. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:1354–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tégani I, Aboubou A, Ayad MI, Becherif M, Saadi R, Kraaa O (2014) Optimal sizing design and energy management of stand-alone photovoltaic/wind generator systems. Energ Proc 50:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyan M (2013) GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 28:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyan M (2017) Optimal site selection for solar power plants using multi-criteria evaluation: a case study from the Ayranci region in Karaman, Turkey. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:2231–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1405-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villacreses G, Gaona G, Martínez J, Jijón DJ (2017) Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: the case of continental Ecuador. Renew Energy 109:275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JJW, Hudson MD (2015) Regional scale wind and solar farm suitability assessment using GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation. Landsc Urban Plan 138:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmler C, Hejazi G, de Oliveira Fernandes E, Moreira C, Connors S (2015) Multi-criteria decision support methods for renewable energy systems on Islands. J Clean Energy Technol 3(3):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue CD, Wang SS (2006) GIS-based evaluation of multifarious local renewable energy sources: a case study of the Chigu area of southwestern Taiwan. Energy Policy 34:730–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their comments which have undoubtedly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pilar Díaz-Cuevas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz-Cuevas, P., Domínguez-Bravo, J. & Prieto-Campos, A. Integrating MCDM and GIS for renewable energy spatial models: assessing the individual and combined potential for wind, solar and biomass energy in Southern Spain. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21, 1855–1869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01754-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01754-5

Keywords

Navigation