Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental and economic assessment of utility poles using life cycle approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to increasing demand for utility poles and the banning of native forests logging in Australia, it is necessary to find sustainable alternatives to roundwood utility poles. Currently, steel and concrete are the most common alternatives. Veneer-based composite (VBC) is a newly developed product made from hardwood plantation mid-thinning. To assess the viability of VBC, comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) analysis were conducted. Two end-of-life scenarios for VBC pole were assessed: incineration with energy recovery and landfilling. Five impact categories were considered: global warming (GWP); acidification (AP); eutrophication (EP); fossil depletion (FDP) and human toxicity (HTP). VBC pole with incineration showed the best environmental performance, particularly on GWP (63.22 kg-CO2-eq), AP (0.29 kg-SO2-eq), FDP (30.78 kg-Oil-eq) and HTP (2.27 kg-1,4-DB-eq), which are less than half of concrete and steel poles. However, VBC had higher EP than concrete and steel due to use of adhesives and preservatives. VBC pole also had the lowest LCC ($1529), due to use of low-value materials and lower manufacturing cost. The LCC showed that both VBC scenarios performed equally on economic grounds. Sensitivity analysis showed that service life was the most sensitive parameter affecting both environmental and economic results, especially the VBC. Transportation distances and fossil fuel consumption also had significant effects on LCA result. Monte Carlo analysis further revealed that despite the high levels of uncertainties in the input parameters, the overall ranking of the options remained the same with VBC being the best performer and concrete the least.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hangyong Ray Lu.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 13, 14, 15 and 16.

Table 13 Life cycle cost of manufacturing one functional unit of concrete utility pole
Table 14 Life cycle cost of manufacturing one functional unit of steel utility pole
Table 15 Life cycle cost of hardwood plantation thinned logs per FU of pole
Table 16 Life cycle cost of VBC pole manufacturing per FU of pole

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, H.R., El Hanandeh, A. Environmental and economic assessment of utility poles using life cycle approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19, 1047–1066 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1299-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1299-4

Keywords

Navigation