Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reservoir sediment as a secondary raw material in concrete production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper summarizes the physical and chemical properties of sediments dredged from the small water reservoir Klusov (Slovakia) and their potential use as a secondary raw material in concrete production. The effects of the sediment addition on the concrete technological properties (compressive and flexural strength, freeze–thaw resistance) have been determined. Concrete specimens were pressed and cured for 2, 7, 28 and 365 days. Results show that progress of compressive strength of concrete mixture, prepared from 20 wt% natural aggregate replacement by coarse-grained sediments, was similar to the control concrete mixture. Specimens containing fine-grained sediment as a cement replacement, at a 40:60 sediment/cement weight ratio, achieved compressive strength values below 35 % in comparison to that of the previous mixtures. The flexural strengths of concrete specimen prepared as a natural aggregate replacement were higher when compared to the reference mixture at all ages of hardening and have achieved a value of 6.59 MPa after 365 days of curing. Flexural strengths of the other samples were at about 4.0 MPa. All tested concrete specimens resistant to freeze–thaw attack achieved frost resistance coefficient values above 0.85 according to the standard requirements. The weight loss values after 50 cycles of freeze–thaw testing were in range from 1.33 to 2.5 % and hence the standard requirement of maximum 5 % weight loss was also fulfilled. The results of the frost resistance coefficient and the weight loss after 50 cycles of freeze–thaw testing show that the tested concrete specimens meet the standard requirements for frost-resistant concrete class XF2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arevalo E, Cesaro R, Stichnothe H, Hakstege AL, Calmano W (2007) Summary: treatment and disposal of dredged material. Sustain Manag Sedim Resour 2:202–208. doi:10.1016/S1872-1990(07)80022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates ME, Fox-Lent C, Seymour L, Wender BA, Linkov I (2015) Life cycle assessment for dredged sediment placement strategies. Sci Total Environ 511(1):309–318. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HJ, Yang MD, Tang CW, Wang SY (2012) Producing synthetic lightweight aggregates from reservoir sediments. Constr Build Mater 28:387–394. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford A (2004) Beneficial reuse of Baltimore dredged sediments as vertical cutoff wall backfill material. Master degree Thesis. University of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

  • Dalton JL, Gardner KH, Seager TP, Weimer ML, Spear JCM, Magee BJ (2004) Properties of Portland cement made from contaminated sediment. Resour Conserv Recycl 41:227–241. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deibel I, Lampe C, Ulbricht JP, Cnudde T, Dessel G (2007) Beneficial use. Sustain Manag Sedim Resour 2:119–132. doi:10.1016/S1872-1990(07)80017-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derman JD, Schlieper HA (1999) Decontamination and beneficial reuse of dredged material using existing infrastructure for the manufacture of lightweight aggregate. J Dredg Eng 1(2):3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K, Karius V (2002) Brick production with dredged harbour sediments. An industrial-scale experiment. Waste Manag 22:521–530. doi:10.1016/S0956-053X(01)00048-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer K, Hadeler A, Muschalla T, Schroter J, Timmer G (2003) Light weight aggregates made from dredged harbour sediments. Leaching behaviour of inorganic pollutants and constructional characteristics. J Soils Sedim 4:284–291. doi:10.1065/jss2003.04.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe JK, Ishida KP, Clark MM (2002) Use of ATR/FTIR spectrometry to study fouling of microfiltration membranes by natural waters. Desalination 147:251–255. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00545-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junak J, Stevulova N (2013) Natural aggregate replacement by recycled materials in concrete production. Visnik Nacionaľnogo universitetu Ľvivska politechnika: teorija i praktika budovnictva 756:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc C (2012) A study on sediment accumulation and environmental pollution of Fethiye Gulf in Turkey. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(1):97–106. doi:10.1007/s10098-011-0381-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mensinger MC (2008) Cement-lock® technology for decontaminating dredged estuarine sediments. Topical report on beneficial use of ecomelt from Passaic river sediment at Montclair State University, New Jersey. Gas Technology Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA

  • Mezencevova A, Yeboah NN, Burns SE, Kahn LF, Kurtis KE (2012) Utilization of Savannah harbor river sediment as the primary raw material in production of fired brick. J Environ Manag 113:128–136. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MMO-Marine Management Organisation (2014) Use of beneficial dredged materials in the South inshore and South offshore marine plan areas. A report produced for the Marine Management Organisation. Project No: 1073, Cornwall, UK

  • PIANC-World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (1992) Beneficial uses of dredged material—a practical guide. Report of Working Group 19, Brussels, Belgium

  • PIANC-World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (2009) Dredged material as a resource. Options and constraints. Report no. 104, Brussels, Belgium

  • Romero M, Andrés A, Alonso R, Viguri J, Rincón JM (2009) Valorisation of contaminated marine sediments to produce ceramic construction materials. In: Spanish National Conference on Advances in Materials Recycling and Eco-Energy, pp 45–48

  • Samara M, Lafhaj Z, Chapiseau Ch (2009) Valorization of stabilized river sediments in fired clay bricks: factory scale experiment. J Hazard Mater 163:701–710. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Šestinová O, Findoráková L, Hančuľák J (2012) Toxicity testing of sediments. Nova Biotechnol Chim 11(2):111–116. doi:10.2478/v10296-012-0012-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang HS, Yi TH (2013) Freeze–thaw durability of air-entrained concrete. Sci World J 2013:650791. doi:10.1155/2013/650791

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevulova N, Junak J (2014) Alkali-activated binder based on coal fly ash (in Slovak). Chemicke Listy 108:620–623

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • STN EN 73 1322 (1968) Determination of frost resistance of concrete

  • STN EN 206-1 (2002) Concrete. Part 1: specification, performance, production and conformity

  • STN EN 12 620 (2008) Aggregates for concrete

  • Tangprasert W, Jaikaew S, Supakata N (2015) Utilization of dredged sediments from Lumsai Canal with rice husks to produce bricks. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6(3):217–220. doi:10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.593

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres P, Manjate RS, Fernandes HR, Olhero SM, Ferreira JMF (2009) Incorporation of river silt in ceramic tiles and bricks. Ind Ceram 29(1):5–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-United States Department of Agriculture (1987) Soil mechanics level I. Module 3. USDA textural classification. Study guide. United States Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaculíková L, Plevová E (2005) Identification of clay minerals and micas in sedimentary rocks. Acta Geodyn Geomater 2(2):167–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Yan C, Xu B, Ruan X, Wei Z (2014) The use of urban river sediments as a primary raw material in the production of highly insulating brick. Ceram Int 40:8833–8840. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.01.105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Li Y, Liu X, Sun H, Jiang S, Feng Ch (2014) Performance and energy calculation on a green cementitious material composed of coal refuse. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(2):281–290. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0620-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeheyis M, Hewage K, Alam MS, Eskicioglu C, Sadiq R (2013) An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(1):81–91. doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Ch, Li H, Jia X, Chen B, Li Q, Zhang J (2014) Heavy metal flows in multi-resource utilization of high-alumina coal fly ash: a substance flow analysis. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0832-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacco A, Gianoncelli A, Ardesi R, Sacrato S, Guerini L, Bontempi E, Tomasoni G, Alberti M, Depero LE (2012) Use of colloidal silica to obtain a new inert from municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash: first results about reuse. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14:291–297. doi:10.1007/s10098-011-0401-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zentar R, Dubois V, Abriak NE (2008) Mechanical behaviour and environmental impacts of a test road built with marine dredged sediments. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(6):947–954. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out in terms of the project NFP 26220120037 supported by the European Union Structural Funds and it has been supported by the Slovak Grant Agency for Science (Grant No. 1/0563/15) and the Cultural and Education Grant Agency (contract No. 073TUKE-4/2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Junakova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junakova, N., Junak, J. & Balintova, M. Reservoir sediment as a secondary raw material in concrete production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 1161–1169 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0943-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0943-8

Keywords

Navigation