Skip to main content
Log in

Reproducible measurement of vancomycin MICs within the susceptible range in Staphylococcus aureus by a broth microdilution method with a “quasi-continuum” gradient of antibiotic concentrations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of reproducible broth microdilution (BMD) methods including inter log2 antibiotic dilutions for measuring Staphylococcus aureus (SA) vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) within the susceptible range is needed to elucidate the impact of vancomycin MICs on clinical outcomes of invasive SA infections. Here, we report on the development of a very precise BMD method that incorporates the following incremental antibiotic concentrations: 0.50, 0.62, 0.75, 0.87, 1.0, 1.25, 1.40, 1.50, 1.60, 1.75, and 2.0 μg/mL. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of this method were around 20%. The mean of the differences in MIC values for all isolates obtained across two independent runs performed at one center was 0.04 μg/mL [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.011–0.07 μg/mL] and that for ten isolates measured at two different centers was 0.04 μg/mL (95% CI, 0–13 μg/mL). Vancomycin MIC values differed by less than 0.1 μg/mL between runs for most isolates. Storage of isolates at −20 °C for up to 3 months had no impact on the vancomycin MIC values. The mean vancomycin MIC values obtained by the Etest using a standard inoculum (0.5 McFarland) were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.001) than those measured by BMD and the MIC values measured by the two methods correlated poorly (Rho, 0.319; p = 0.148). Nevertheless, the mean MIC values measured by the Etest using lower inocula (107 or 106 CFU/mL) and those measured by BMD were comparable and correlated significantly (p = 0.004 for 107 CFU/mL and p = 0.029 for 106 CFU/mL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodríguez-Créixems M, Alcalá L, Muñoz P, Cercenado E, Vicente T, Bouza E (2008) Bloodstream infections: evolution and trends in the microbiology workload, incidence, and etiology, 1985–2006. Medicine (Baltimore) 87:234–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL (2012) The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 54:755–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacob JT, DiazGranados CA (2013) High vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in adults with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis 17:e93–e100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalil AC, Van Schooneveld TC, Fey PD, Rupp ME (2014) Association between vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and mortality among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 312:1552–1564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Falcón R, Madrid S, Tormo N, Casañ C, Albert E, Gimeno C, Navarro D (2015) Intra- and interinstitutional evaluation of an Etest for vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration measurement in Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates. Clin Infect Dis 61:1490–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruzel MC, Lewis CT, Welsh KJ, Lewis EM, Dundas NE, Mohr JF, Armitige LY, Wanger A (2011) Determination of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs by different testing methods for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 49:2272–2273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Muñoz-Cobo B, Sancho-Tello S, Costa E, Bravo D, Torregrosa I, de Lomas JG, Navarro D (2011) Differences in vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations for Staphylococcus aureus obtained with the automated Phoenix™ system, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method and the standard Etest. Int J Antimicrob Agents 37:278–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlton CL, Hindler JA, Turnidge J, Humphries RM (2014) Precision of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and effect of subculture and storage. J Clin Microbiol 52:3898–3905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Falcón R, Martínez A, Albert E, Madrid S, Oltra R, Giménez E, Soriano M, Vinuesa V, Gozalbo D, Gil ML, Navarro D (2016) High vancomycin MICs within the susceptible range in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia isolates are associated with increased cell wall thickness and reduced intracellular killing by human phagocytes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 47:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2012) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Approved standard—Ninth edition. CLSI document M07-A9. CLSI, Wayne

  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2014) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-fourth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. CLSI, Wayne

  12. Ludwig F, Edwards B, Lawes T, Gould IM (2012) Effects of storage on vancomycin and daptomycin MIC in susceptible blood isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 50:3383–3387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shoji H, Maeda M, Shirakura T, Takuma T, Ugajin K, Fukuchi K, Ishino K, Niki Y (2015) More accurate measurement of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration indicates poor outcomes in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 46:532–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hos NJ, Jazmati N, Stefanik D, Hellmich M, AlSael H, Kern WV, Rieg S, Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H, Kaasch AJ (2017) Determining vancomycin Etest MICs in patients with MRSA bloodstream infection does not support switching antimicrobials. J Infect 74:248–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reed GF, Lynn F, Meade BD (2002) Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1235–1239

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rybak MJ, Vidaillac C, Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Salimnia H, Briski LE, Wanger A, Jones RN (2013) Evaluation of vancomycin susceptibility testing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of Etest and three automated testing methods. J Clin Microbiol 51:2077–2081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the residents of the Microbiology Service of Hospital Clínico Universitario. Estela Giménez holds a Río Hortega research contract from the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII) (ref. CM16/00200). Eva María Mateo is grateful to the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Spanish Government) for a postdoctoral contract “Juan de la Cierva” (ref. FJCI-2015-25992).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Navarro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This work uses clinical bacterial isolates from human infections. No tissue material or other biological material was stored from the patients, only subcultured bacterial isolates. This local ethical committee does not require approval for the type of study in our setting. All information regarding these isolates was anonymized.

Funding

The current study received no direct funding.

Informed consent

Not applicable (as discussed with the institutional medical ethical committee).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falcón, R., Mateo, E.M., Talaya, A. et al. Reproducible measurement of vancomycin MICs within the susceptible range in Staphylococcus aureus by a broth microdilution method with a “quasi-continuum” gradient of antibiotic concentrations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36, 2355–2360 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3067-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3067-8

Keywords

Navigation