Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A non-linear relationship between blood pressure and mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals: A cohort study based on the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey (CLHLS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hypertension is an established risk factor for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in elderly individuals. Nevertheless, the impact of different levels of blood pressure on the progression of MCI remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the non-linear relationship between blood pressure and MCI in the elderly and detect the critical blood pressure threshold, thus, improving blood pressure management for individuals at high risk of MCI.

Methods

Data was obtained from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) cohort. We chose normal cognitive elderly individuals who entered the cohort in 2014 for a 5-year follow-up to observe the progression of MCI. Subsequently, we utilized the Cox regression model to identify risk factors for MCI and conducted a Cox-based restricted cubic spline regression (RCS) model to examine the non-linear relationship between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with MCI, determining the critical blood pressure threshold for MCI progression.

Results

In the elderly population, female (HR = 1.489, 95% CI: 1.017–2.180), lacking of exercise in the past (HR = 1.714, 95% CI: 1.108–2.653), preferring animal fats (HR = 2.340, 95% CI: 1.348–4.061), increased age (HR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.038–1.084), increased SBP (HR = 1.036, 95% CI: 1.024–1.048), and increased DBP (HR = 1.056, 95% CI: 1.031–1.081) were associated with MCI progression. After adjusting factors such as gender, exercise, preferred types of fats, and age, both SBP (P non-linear < 0.001) and DBP (P non-linear < 0.001) in elderly individuals exhibited a non-linear association with MCI. The risk of MCI rose when SBP exceeded 135 mmHg and DBP was in the range of 80–88 mmHg. However, when DBP exceeded 88 mmHg, there was a declining trend in MCI progression, although the HR remained above 1. The identified critical blood pressure management threshold for MCI was 135/80 mmHg.

Conclusion

In this study, we discovered that risk factors affecting the progression of MCI in elderly individuals comprise gender (female), preferring to use animal fat, lack of exercise in the past, increased age, increased SBP, and increased DBP. Additionally, a non-linear relationship between blood pressure levels and MCI progression was confirmed, with the critical blood pressure management threshold for MCI onset falling within the prehypertensive range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Any data not published within the article is available in a public repository.

References

  1. Li X, Zhang ZJ (2015) Neuropsychological and neuroimaging characteristics of amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtypes: a selective overview. CNS Neurosci Ther 21:776–783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiu S, Joshi PS, Miller MI et al (2020) Development and validation of an interpretable deep learning framework for Alzheimer’s disease classification. Brain 143:1920–1933. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagaraj S, Duong TQ (2021) Deep Learning and Risk Score Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 80:1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.09.20226746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ward DD, Wallace LM, Rockwood K (2021) Frailty and risk of dementia in mild cognitive impairment subtypes. Ann Neurol 89:1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCollum L, Karlawish J (2020) Cognitive impairment evaluation and management. Medical Clinics 104:807–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2020.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin X, He W, Zhang Y et al (2021) Association of APOE ε4 genotype and lifestyle with cognitive function among Chinese adults aged 80 years and older: A cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 18:e1003597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Santisteban MM, Iadecola C, Carnevale D (2023) Hypertension, neurovascular dysfunction, and cognitive impairment. Hypertension 80:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.18085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE et al (2011) Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:2672–2713. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Biessels GJ, Despa F (2018) Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes mellitus: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol 14:591–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-018-0048-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zackova L, Jani M, Brazdil M et al (2021) Cognitive impairment and depression: meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage: Clin 32:102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordani C, Young VM, Arienti C et al (2022) Cognitive impairment, anxiety and depression: A map of Cochrane evidence relevant to rehabilitation for people with post COVID-19 condition. EuropEan J Phys Rehabil Med 58:880. https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07813-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McInnes K, Friesen CL, MacKenzie DE et al (2017) Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 12:e0174847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lövdén M, Fratiglioni L, Glymour MM et al (2020) Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychol Sci Publ Interes 21:6–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620920576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vanek J, Prasko J, Genzor S et al (2020) Obstructive sleep apnea, depression and cognitive impairment. Sleep Med 72:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2016.01.134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A et al (2020) Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. The Lancet 396:413–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Si J-P, Jiang H, Li Y-Y (2020) Correlation between effectual time and the curative effect in patients with all frequency descending sudden deafness after treatment. Am J Otolaryngol 41:102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qin J, He Z, Wu L et al (2021) Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Res 44:1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00704-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Peng G, Wang X (2023) Relationship between blood pressure variability and mild cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with hypertension. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis 25:988–990

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heizhati M, Li N, Wang L et al (2021) Association of Hypertension with mild cognitive impairment in population from less-developed areas of multiethnic Northwest China. Neuroepidemiology 55:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tzourio C, Dufouil C, Ducimetière P et al (1999) Cognitive decline in individuals with high blood pressure: a longitudinal study in the elderly. Neurology 53:1948–1948. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.53.9.1948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waldstein SR, Giggey PP, Thayer JF et al (2005) Nonlinear relations of blood pressure to cognitive function: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension 45:374–379. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000156744.44218.74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thorvaldsson V, Skoog I, Hofer SM et al (2012) Nonlinear blood pressure effects on cognition in old age: separating between-person and within-person associations. Psychol Aging 27:375. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang M, Lv X, Chen Y et al (2022) Excessive sleep increased the risk of incidence of cognitive impairment among older Chinese adults: a cohort study based on the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Int Psychogeriatr 34:725–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610221000168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. An R, Liu GG (2016) Cognitive impairment and mortality among the oldest-old Chinese. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 31:1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu M, Shu X, Yu G et al (2021) A risk prediction model based on machine learning for cognitive impairment among Chinese community-dwelling elderly people with normal cognition: development and validation study. J Med Internet Res 23:e20298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu X, Zhang W, Kobayashi LC (2021) Duration of subjective poverty in relation to subsequent cognitive performance and decline among adults aged ≥64 in China, 2005–2018. Soc Sci Med 283:114188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Feng T, Feng Z, Liu Q et al (2021) Drinking habits and water sources with the incidence of cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly population: The Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. J Affect Disord 15:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bai W, Chen P, Cai H et al (2022) Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies. Age Ageing 51:afa173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang J, Zhao X, Sui H et al (2021) High prevalence and low awareness of mild cognitive impairment in a suburban community in Shanghai. Neurol India 69:1693. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.333524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Song M, Wang Y-M, Wang R et al (2021) Prevalence and risks of mild cognitive impairment of Chinese community-dwelling women aged above 60 years: A cross-sectional study. Arch Women’s Mental Health 24:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu S, Xie B, Song M et al (2014) High prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in the elderly: a community-based study in four cities of the Hebei Province, China. Neuroepidemiology 42:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Overton M, Pihlsgård M, Elmståhl S (2019) Prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment across subtypes, age, and sex. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 47:219–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sakurai K, Shen C, Shiraishi I et al (2021) Consumption of oleic acid on the preservation of cognitive functions in Japanese elderly individuals. Nutrients 13:284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Marti A, Fortique F (2019) Omega-3 fatty acids and cognitive decline: a systematic review. Nutr Hosp 36:939–949. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maltais M, Lorrain D, Leveille P et al (2022) Long-chain Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and cognitive performance throughout adulthood: A 6-month randomized controlled trial. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 178:102415. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu R-z, Chen M-q, Zhang Z-w et al (2021) Dietary fatty acids and risk for Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and mild cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort meta-analysis. Nutrition 90:111355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) Self-reported increased confusion or memory loss and associated functional difficulties among adults aged≥ 60 years-21 states, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:345–350

    Google Scholar 

  38. Langa KM, Levine DA (2014) The diagnosis and management of mild cognitive impairment: a clinical review. JAMA 312:2551–2561. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.13806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Anheyer D, Klose P, Koch AK et al (2020) Comparative efficacy of different exercise interventions in chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 10:e036050. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ungvari Z, Toth P, Tarantini S et al (2021) Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: from pathophysiology to public health. Nat Rev Nephrol 17:639–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-021-00430-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. de Menezes ST, Giatti L, Brant LCC et al (2021) Hypertension, prehypertension, and hypertension control: association with decline in cognitive performance in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. Hypertension 77:672–681. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ou Y-N, Tan C-C, Shen X-N et al (2020) Blood pressure and risks of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 209 prospective studies. Hypertension 76:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data used in this study was derived from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) cohort (https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS). Launched in 1998, the CLHLS conducted follow-up surveys in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008-2009, 2011-2012, 2014, and 2017-2018. This cohort spans the majority of the provinces in China and aims to investigate the factors associated with healthy human longevity. It offers a wealth of comprehensive information, including socio-demographic characteristics, health status, and daily activities of the elderly.

Funding

The study was supported by the Key Science and Technology Program Projects of Zigong, China (2022ZCNKY19).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The paper was and written by FY. FY and YG were responsible for the overall idea design of the paper. XL, YY, QX, and YY reviewed and substantively revised the paper. QZ and CL were responsible for data acquisition and analysis, MN and QW responsible for quality evaluation of kinds of literature. YZ served as the overall lead and took responsibility for the paper. All authors listed made significant contributions to the work, both in terms of direct involvement and intellectual input.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanfang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and Informed consent

The CLHLS cohort study has obtained approval from Peking University’s Research Ethics Committee (IRB00001052-13074). All participants or their authorized representatives have provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

This manuscript has been approved for publication by all authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 23 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 101 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4

Table 4 The CMMSE utilized in the CLHLS cohort

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, F., Gao, Y., Liu, X. et al. A non-linear relationship between blood pressure and mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals: A cohort study based on the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey (CLHLS). Neurol Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07539-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07539-z

Keywords

Navigation