Abstract
Background and purpose
Face pareidolia is described as an interpretation of any unrelated object seen for the first time as a face. It is still unclear how to face pareidolia is processed. In this study, the neural basis of face and face pareidolia processing was investigated through recording event-related potentials (ERPs).
Methods
The ERPs were recorded from 35 right-handed and healthy participants in response to faces and face pareidolia. Amplitudes and latencies of N170, vertex-positive potential (VPP), and N250 components were analyzed, and current source density (CSD) maps relevant to these components were obtained.
Results
N170 response was earlier and larger in response to faces compared to face pareidolias. VPP is also evoked earlier in response to faces as in the case of N170; however, the VPP amplitude was larger for face pareidolias than for faces. Statistical analyses did not reveal any differences between faces and face pareidolias in terms of N250 component.
Conclusion
The results indicated that faces and face pareidolias are processed in the early stages of visual perception. In addition, the N250 component does not reflect the neural processing of faces and face pareidolias.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Windhager S, Slice DE, Schaefer K, Oberzaucher E, Thorstensen T, Grammer K (2008) Face to face: the perception of automotive designs. Hum Nat 19:331–346
Ichikawa H, Kanazawa S, Yamaguchi MK (2011) Finding a face in a face-like object. Perception 40:500–502
O’Craven KM, Kanwisher N (2000) Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J Cogn Neurosci 12:1013–1023
Liu J, Li J, Feng L, Li L, Tian J, Lee K (2014) Seeing Jesus in toast: neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia. Cortex 53:60–77
Hadjikhani N, Kveraga K, Naik P, Ahlfors SP (2009) Early (M170) activation of the face-specific cortex by face-like objects. Neuroreport 20:403–407
Proverbio AM, Galli J (2016) Women are better at seeing faces where there are none: an ERP study of face pareidolia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 11:1501–1512
Liu T, Mu S, He H, Zhang L, Fan C, Ren J et al (2016) The N170 component is sensitive to face-like stimuli: a study of Chinese Peking opera makeup. Cogn Neurodyn 10:535–541
Nihei Y, Minami T, Nakauchi S (2018) Brain activity related to the judgment of face-likeness: correlation between EEG and face-like evaluation. Front Hum Neurosci 16:12–56
Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 8:551–565
Eimer M (2000a) Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clin Neurophysiol 111:694–705
Eimer M (2000b) The face-specific N170 component reflects late stage in the structural encoding of face. NeuroReport 11:2319–2324
Halgren E, Raij T, Marinkovic K, Jousmäki V, Hari R (2000) Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb Cortex 10:69–81
Rossion B, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Despland P, Bruyer R, Linotte S, Crommelinck M (2000) The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 11:69–74
Rebaï M, Poiroux S, Bernard C, Lalonde R (2001) Event-related potentials for category-specific information during passive viewing of faces and objects. Int J Neurosci 106:209–226
Liu J, Harris A, Kanwisher N (2002) Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 5:910–916
Rousselet GA, Macé MJM, Fabre-Thorpe M (2004) Animal and human faces in natural scenes: how specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component. J Vis 4:13–21
Joyce C, Rossion B (2005) The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: the effect of reference electrode site. Clin Neurophysiol 116:2613–2631
Itier RJ, Latinus M, Taylor MJ (2006) Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity? NeuroImage 29:667–676
Caharel S, Leleu A, Bernard C, Viggiano M-P, Lalonde R, Rebaï M (2013) Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component. Int J Psychophysiol 90:157–164
Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2004) N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebr Cortex 14:132–142
Sagiv N, Bentin S (2001) Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: holistic and part-based processes. J Cogn Neurosci 13:937–951
Eimer M, Gosling A, Nicholas S, Kiss M (2011) The N170 component and its links to configural face processing: a rapid neural adaptation study. Brain Res 1376:76–87
Bötzel K, Grüsser OJ (1989) Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for "face-specific" EEG-potentials. Exp Brain Res 77(2):349–360
Jeffreys DA (1989) A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Exp Brain Res 78(1):193–202
Itier RJ, Taylor MJ (2002) Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage 15(2):353–372
George N, Jemel B, Fiori N, Chaby L, Renault B (2005) Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24(3):663–673
Grainger J, Holcomb PJ (2009) An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Res 1270:45–53
Proverbio AM, Del Zotto M, Zani A (2007) The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition. BMC Neurosci 8:24
Wheatley T, Weinberg A, Looser C, Moran T, Hajcak G (2011) Mind perception: real but not artificial faces sustain neural activity beyond the N170/VPP. PLoS One 6(3):e17960
Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Jentzsch I, Burton AM, Kaufmann JM (2002) Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14(3):398–409
Schweinberger SR, Huddy V, Burton AM (2004) N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport 28:1501–1505
Scott LS, Tanaka JW, Sheinberg DL, Curran T (2006) A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing. J Cogn Neurosci 18(9):1453–1465
Scott LS, Tanaka JW, Sheinberg DL, Curran T (2008) The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: a behavioral and neurophysiological study. Brain Res 1210:204–215
Churches O, Baron-Cohen S, Ring H (2009) Seeing face-like objects: an event-related potential study. NeuroReport 20(14):1290–1294
Rossion B, Jacques C (2008) Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. Neuroimage 39(4):1959–1979
Bötzel K, Schulze S, Stodieck SR (1995) Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res 104(1):135–143
Halgren E, Baudena P, Heit G, Clarke GM, Marinkovic K (1995) Spatiotemporal stages in face and word processing: I. depth-recorded potentials in the human occipital, temporal and parietal cortex. J Physiol 99:1–50
Pierce LJ, Scott LS, Boddington S, Droucker D, Curran T, Tanaka JW (2011) The n250 brain potential to personally familiar and newly learned faces and objects. Front Hum Neurosci 5:111
Kanwisher N, Yovel G (2006) The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 361:2109–2128
Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 115:107–117
Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ (2002) The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 6:255–260
Tanaka JW (2001) The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:534–543
Tanaka JW, Sengco JA (1997) Features and their configuration in face recognition. Mem Cogn 25:583–592
Mesraoua B, Deleu D, Al Hail H, Melikyan G, Boon P, Haider HA, Asadi-Pooya AA (2019) Electroencephalography in epilepsy: look for what could be beyond the visual inspection. Neurol Sci 40:2287–2291
Funding
The present work was supported by the Research Fund of Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University. Project No: 2656.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akdeniz, G. Brain activity underlying face and face pareidolia processing: an ERP study. Neurol Sci 41, 1557–1565 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04232-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04232-4