Abstract
Studies have shown that both cotton-top tamarins as well as rats can discriminate between two languages based on rhythmic cues. This is similar to the capabilities of young infants, who also rely on rhythmic cues to differentiate between languages. However, the animals in these studies did not have long-term language exposure, so these studies did not specifically assess the role of language experience. In this study, we used companion dogs, who have prolonged exposure to human language in their home environment. These dogs came from homes where either English or Spanish was primarily spoken. The dogs were then presented with speech in English and in Spanish in a Headturn Preference Procedure paradigm to examine their language discrimination abilities as well as their language preferences. Dogs successfully discriminated between the two languages. In addition, dogs showed a novelty effect with their language preference such that Spanish-hearing dogs listened longer to English, and English-hearing dogs listened longer to Spanish. It is unclear what particular cue dogs are utilizing to discriminate between the two languages; future studies should explore dogs’ utilization of phonological and rhythmic cues for language discrimination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie D (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh University Press
Andics A, Gábor A, Gácsi M, Faragó T, Szabó D, Miklósi Á (2016) Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs. Science 353(6303):1030–1032. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3777
Ben-Aderet T, Gallego-Abenza M, Reby D, Mathevon N (2017) Dog-directed speech: why do we use it and do dogs pay attention to it? Proc Royal Soc B 284(1846):20162429. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2429
Benjamin A, Slocombe K (2018) ‘Who’s a good boy?!’ Dogs prefer naturalistic dog-directed speech. Anim Cogn 21(3):353–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1172-4
Bosch L, Sebastián-Gallés N (1997) The role of prosody in infants’s native-language discrimination abilities: the case of two phonologically close languages. 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. Eurospeech ’97: 231–234
Byers-Heinlein K, Bergmann C, Savalei V (2021) Six solutions for more reliable infant research. Infant Child Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2296
Cuaya LV, Hernández-Pérez R, Boros M, Deme A, Andics A (2022) Speech naturalness detection and language representation in the dog brain. Neuroimage 248:118811. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2021.118811
DeCasper AJ, Fifer WP (1980) Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Am Assoce Adv Sci 208(4448):1174–1176. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7375928
DeCasper AJ, Spence MJ (1986) Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant Behav Dev 9(2):133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(86)90025-1
Delattre P, Olsen C (1969) Syllabic features and phonic impression in English, German, French, and Spanish. Lingua 22:160–175
Farran LK, Lee CC, Yoo H, Oller DK (2016) Cross-cultural register differences in infant-directed speech: An initial study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151518
Ferguson CA (1964) Baby talk in six languages. Am Anthropol 66(6):103–114. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00060
Griebel U, Oller DK (2012) Vocabulary learning in a Yorkshire terrier: Slow mapping of spoken words. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030182
Houston-Price C, Nakai S (2004) Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant Child Dev 13(4):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.364
Hutchinson SP (1973) The learning of English suprasegmental rules for stress and final syllables by Spanish speakers. Mid-American Linguistics Conference
Jusczyk PW, Cutler A, Redanz NJ (1993) Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Soc Res Child Dev 64(3):675–687
Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping.” Science 304(5677):1682–1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859
Kampstra P (2008) Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. JSS J Stat Softw 28 http://www.jstatsoft.org/
Kaulfuß P, Mills DS (2008) Neophilia in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and its implication for studies of dog cognition. Anim Cogn 11:553–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0128-x
Kemler Nelson DG, Jusczyk PW, Mandel DR, Myers J, Turk A, Gerken L (1995) The head-turn preference for testing auditory perception. Infant Behav Dev 18:111–116
Kluender KR, Lotto AJ, Holt LL (2006) Contributions of nonhuman animal models to understanding human speech perception. In: Greenberg S, Ainsworth W (Eds.), Listening to speech: An auditory perspective (Vol. 33, pp. 369–374). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
Kutsumi A, Nagasawa M, Ohta M, Ohtani N (2012) Importance of puppy training for future behavior of the dog. J Vet Med Sci 75(2):141–149. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.12-0008
Magyari L, Huszár Z, Turzó A, Andics A (2020) Event-related potentials reveal limited readiness to access phonetic details during word processing in dogs. R Soc Open. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200851
Mallikarjun A, Shroads E, Newman RS (2019) The cocktail party effect in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01255-4
Mallikarjun A, Shroads E, Newman RS (2020) The role of linguistic experience in the development of the consonant bias. Anim Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01436-6
Mehler J, Jusczyk P, Lambertz G, Halsted N, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C (1988) A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29(2):143–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90035-2
Moon C, Cooper RP, Fifer WP (1993) Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behav Dev 16(4):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(93)80007-U
Nazzi T, Bertoncini J, Mehler J (1998) Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(3):756–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.756
Nazzi T, Jusczyk PW, Johnson EK (2000) Language discrimination by english-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. J Mem Lang. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2698
Newman RS, Shroads E, Morini G, Johnson EK, Onishi KH, Tincoff R (2019) BITTSy: Behavioral infant & toddler testing system (1.0). http://go.umd.edu/BITTSy
Newman RS, Shroads EA, Johnson EK, Kamdar J, Morini G, Onishi KH, Smith E, Tincoff R (2021) Introducing BITTSy: The behavioral infant & toddler testing system. Behav Res Methods 53:2604–2614. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01583-9/Published
Ortega-Llebaria M, Prieto P (2007) Disentangling stress from accent in Spanish. In: Prieto P, Mascaró J, Solé M.-J (Eds.) Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology (pp. 155–176). John Benjamins Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1075/CILT.282.11ORT
Pegg JE, Werker JF, McLeod PJ (1992) Preference for infant-directed over adult-directed speech: Evidence from 7-week-old infants. Infant Behav Dev 15(3):325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(92)80003-D
Pierce LJ, Klein D, Chen JK, Delcenserie A, Genesee F (2014) Mapping the unconscious maintenance of a lost first language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(48):17314–17319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409411111
Pilley JW (2013) Border collie comprehends sentences containing a prepositional object, verb, and direct object. Learn Motiv 44(4):229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2013.02.003
Pilley JW, Reid AK (2011) Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behav Proc 86(2):184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.11.007
Prichard A, Cook PF, Spivak M, Chhibber R, Berns GS (2018) Awake fMRI reveals brain regions for novel word detection in dogs. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00737
Prieto P, Vanrell MDM, Astruc L, Payne E, Post B (2012) Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Commun 54(6): 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPECOM.2011.12.001
Racca A, Amadei E, Ligout S, Guo K, Meints K, Mills D (2010) Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 13(3):525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0303-3
Ramus F, Hauser MD, Miller C, Morris D, Mehler J (2000) Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5464.349
Reeve C, Jacques S (2019) Knowledge of spoken words by domestic dogs: A new instrument for use with dog owners. Soc Res Child Dev
Reeve C, Jacques S (2022) Responses to spoken words by domestic dogs: A new instrument for use with dog owners. Appl Anim Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105513
Saffran J, Aslin R, Newport E (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274(5294):1926–11928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
Tannen D (2010) Research on language & social interaction talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional tesources in family discourse. Language 1813:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704
Thiessen ED, Saffran JR (2007) Learning to learn: Infants’ acquisition of stress-based strategies for word segmentation. Lang Learn Dev 3(1):73–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440709337001
Tincoff R, Hauser M, Tsao F, Spaepen G, Ramus F, Mehler J (2005) The role of speech rhythm in language discrimination: further tests with a non-human primate. Dev Sci 8(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-7687.2005.00390.X
Toro JM, Trobalon JB, Sebastián-Gallés N (2003) The use of prosodic cues in language discrimination tasks by rats. Anim Cogn 6(2):131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0172-0
Toro JM, Trobalon JB, Sebastián-Gallés N (2005) Effects of backward speech and speaker variability in language discrimination by rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.95
Walton GE, Bower NJA, Bower TGR (1992) Recognition of familiar faces by newborns. Infant Behav Dev 15(2):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(92)80027-R
Werker JF, McLeod PJ (1989) Infant preference for both male and female infant-directed talk: A developmental study of attentional and affective responsiveness. Canad J Psychol. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1990-00963-001.pdf
Wetherford MJ, Cohen LB (1973) Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity. Soc Res Child Dev 44(3):416–424
Wightman CW, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Ostendorf M, Price PJ (1998) Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. J Acoust Soc Am 91(3):1707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402450
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Amritha Mallikarjun, Emily Shroads, and Rochelle S. Newman all declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mallikarjun, A., Shroads, E. & Newman, R.S. Language preference in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 26, 451–463 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01683-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01683-9