Abstract
The social environment is thought to have a strong impact on cognitive functions. In the present study, we investigated whether social enrichment could affect rats’ memory ability using the “Different Objects Task (DOT),” in which the levels of memory load could be modulated by changing the number of objects to be remembered. In addition, we applied the DOT to a social discrimination task using unfamiliar conspecific juveniles instead of objects. Animals were housed in one of the three different housing conditions after weaning [postnatal day (PND) 21]: social-separated (1 per cage), standard (3 per cage), or social-enriched (10 per cage) conditions. The object and social recognition tasks were conducted on PND 60. In the sample phase, the rats were allowed to explore a field in which 3, 4, or 5 different, unfamiliar stimuli (conspecific juveniles through a mesh or objects) were presented. In the test phase conducted after a 5-min delay, social-separated rats were able to discriminate the novel conspecific from the familiar ones only under the condition in which three different conspecifics were presented; social-enriched rats managed to recognize the novel conspecific even under the condition of five different conspecifics. On the other hand, in the object recognition task, both social-separated and social-enriched rats were able to discriminate the novel object from the familiar ones under the condition of five different objects. These results suggest that social enrichment can enhance social, but not object, memory span.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker TH, George RP, Howarth GS, Whittaker AL (2017) Assessment of housing density, space allocation and social hierarchy of laboratory rats on behavioural measures of welfare. PLoS ONE 12:e0185135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185135
Brennan P, Keverne EB (2015) Biological complexity and adaptability of simple mammalian olfactory memory systems. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 50:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.020
Croney CC, Newberry RC (2007) Group size and cognitive processes. Appl Anim Behav Sci 103:215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.023
Crooks VC, Lubben J, Petitti DB, Little D, Chiu V (2008) Social network, cognitive function, and dementia incidence among elderly women. Am J Public Health 98:1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.115923
Engelmann M, Wotjak CT, Landgraf R (1995) Social discrimination procedure: an alternative method to investigate juvenile recognition abilities in rats. Physiol Behav 58:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)00053-L
Ferguson JN, Young LJ, Insel TR (2002) The neuroendocrine basis of social recognition. Front Neuroendocrinol 23:200–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.2002.0229
Fratiglioni L, Wang HX, Ericsson K, Maytan M, Winblad B (2000) Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet 355:1315–1319
Fullwood S, Hicks TA, Brown JC, Norman RL, McGlone JJ (1998) Floor space needs for laboratory mice: C57/6males in solid-bottom cages with bedding. ILAR J 31:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/liar.39.1.29
Gao XM, Elmer GI, Adams-Huet B, Tamminga CA (2009) Social memory in mice: disruption with an NMDA antagonist and attenuation with antipsychotic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.11.016
Gusmão ID, Monteiro BMM, Cornélio GOS, Fonseca CS, Moraes MFD, Pereira GS (2012) Odor-enriched environment rescues long-term social memory, but does not improve olfaction in social isolated adult mice. Behav Brain Res 228:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.040
Halpern M (1987) The organization and function of the vomeronasal system. Annu Rev Neurosci 10:325–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.001545
Heinrich LM, Gullone E (2006) The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 26:695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002
Johnston RE, Peng A (2008) Memory for individuals: hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) require contact to develop multicomponent representations (concepts) of others. J Comp Psychol 122:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.121
Kogan JH, Frankland PW, Silva AJ (2000) Long-term memory underlying hippocampus-dependent social recognition in mice. Hippocampus 10:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(2000)10
Monteiro BMM, Moreira FA, Massensini AR, Moraes MFD, Pereira GS (2014) Enriched environment increases neurogenesis and improves social memory persistence in socially isolated adult mice. Hippocampus 24:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22218
Moura PJ, Meirelles ST, Xavier GF (2010) Long-term social recognition memory in adult male rats: factor analysis of the social and non-social behaviors. Braz J Med Biol Res 43:663–676. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2010007500047
Noack J, Richter K, Laube G, Haghgoo HA, Veh RW, Engelmann M (2010) Different importance of the volatile and non-volatile fractions of an olfactory signature for individual social recognition in rats versus mice and short-term versus long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 94:568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2010.09.013
Pena RR, Pereira-Caixeta AR, Moraes MFD, Pereira GS (2014) the olfactory bulb and dorsal hippocampus impaired social recognition memory consolidation in different time-points. Brain Res Bull 109:151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2014.10.009
Popik P, van Ree JM (1998) Neurohypophyseal peptides and social recognition in rats. Prog Brain Res 119:415–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61585-X
Richter K, Wolf G, Engelmann M (2005) Social recognition memory requires two stages of protein synthesis in mice. Learn Mem 12:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.97505
Sannino S, Russo F, Torromino G, Pendolino V, Calabresi P, De Leonibus E (2012) Role of the dorsal hippocampus in object memory load. Learn Mem 19:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.025213.111
Schrijver NCA, Pallier PN, Brown VJ, Wurbel H (2004) Double dissociation of social and environmental stimulation on spatial learning and reversal learning in rats. Behav Brain Res 152:307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.016
Sugita M, Yamada K, Iguchi N, Ichitani Y (2015) Hippocampal NMDA receptors are involved in rats’ spontaneous object recognition only under high memory load condition. Brain Res 1624:370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.001
Taylor J (1969) The effects of population density upon correlates of emotionality and learning efficiency. J Gen Psychol 80:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1969.9710487
Thor D, Holloway W (1982) Social memory of the male laboratory rat. J Comp Physiol Psych 96:1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.96.6.1000
Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, Schneider JA, Kelly JF, Barnes LL et al (2007) Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiat 64:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.234
Wysocki CJ, Wellington JL, Beauchamp GK (1980) Access of urinary nonvolatiles to the mammalian vomeronasal organ. Science 207:781–783. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7352288
Zhao X, Sun L, Jia H, Meng Q, Wu S, Li N, He S (2009) Isolation rearing induces social and emotional function abnormalities and alters glutamate and neurodevelopment-related gene expression in rats. Prog Neuro Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:1173–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.06.016
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP15K04180, JP16K04419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All behavioral experiments and housing conditions carried out in this study were approved by the University of Tsukuba Committee on Animal Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toyoshima, M., Yamada, K., Sugita, M. et al. Social enrichment improves social recognition memory in male rats. Anim Cogn 21, 345–351 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1171-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1171-5