Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Who are the real bird brains? Qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility between dogs (Canis familiaris) and pigeons (Columba livia)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pigeons given a simultaneous spatial discrimination reversal, in which a single reversal occurs at the midpoint of each session, consistently show anticipation prior to the reversal as well as perseveration after the reversal, suggesting that they use a less effective cue (time or trial number into the session) than what would be optimal to maximize reinforcement (local feedback from the most recent trials). In contrast, rats (Rattus norvegicus) and humans show near-optimal reversal learning on this task. To determine whether this is a general characteristic of mammals, in the present research, pigeons (Columba livia) and dogs (Canis familiaris) were tested with a simultaneous spatial discrimination mid-session reversal. Overall, dogs performed the task more poorly than pigeons. Interestingly, both pigeons and dogs employed what resembled a timing strategy. However, dogs showed greater perseverative errors, suggesting that they may have relatively poorer working memory and inhibitory control with this task. The greater efficiency shown by pigeons with this task suggests they are better able to time and use the feedback from their preceding choice as the basis of their future choice, highlighting what may be a qualitative difference between the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton RL, De Lillo C (2011) Association, inhibition, and object permanence in dogs’ (Canis familiaris) spatial search. J Comp Psychol 125:194–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentosela M, Mustaca AE (2007) Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans. Rev Lat Am Psico 39:375–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentosela M, Barrera G, Jakovcevic A, Elgier AM, Mustaca AE (2008) Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Process 78:464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentosela M, Jakovcevic A, Elgier AM, Mustaca AE, Papini MR (2009) Incentive contrast in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 123:125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman ME (1975) The comparative analysis of learning. Science 188:699–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman ME, Mackintosh NJ (1969) Habit-reversal and probability-learning: rats, birds and fish. In: Gilbert RM, Southerland NS (eds) Animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M (2009a) Learning and owner–stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Process 81:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Barrera G, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M (2009b) Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behav Process 81:402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdöhegyi A, Topál J, Virányi Z, Miklósi Á (2007) Dog-logic: inferential reasoning in a two-way choice task and its restricted use. Anim Behav 74:725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank H (2011) Wolves, dogs, rearing and reinforcement: complex interactions underlying species differences in training and problem-solving performance. Behav Gen 41:830–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossette RL, Gossette MF, Riddell W (1966) Comparisons of successive discrimination reversal among closely and remotely related avian species. Anim Behav 14:560–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laude JR, Pattison KF, Zentall TR (2012) Hungry pigeons make suboptimal choices, less hungry pigeons do not. Psychon Bull Rev 19:884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laude JR, Stagner JP, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall TR (2014) Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval. Learn Behav 42:40–46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1965) Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychol Bull 64:124–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1969) Comparative studies of reversal and probability learning: rats, birds, and fish. In: Gilbert RM, Southerland NS (eds) Animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 137–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ, McGonigle B, Holgate V, Vanderver V (1968) Factors underlying improvement in serial reversal learning. Can J Psychol 22:85–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL, Addessi E, Amici F, Anderson RC, Aureli F, van Schaik CP et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:E2140–E2148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson K, Roberts WA (2010) Spatial memory in dogs (Canis familiaris) on a radial maze. J Comp Psychol 124:47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi Á (2007) Dog behaviour, evolution and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2004) Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? Anim Behav 67:995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram NW (2003) Cognitive experience and its effect on age-dependent cognitive decline in beagle dogs. Neurochem Res 28:1677–1682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HC, Pattison KF, DeWall CN, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall TR (2010) Self-control without a “self”? Common self-control processes in humans and dogs. Psychol Sci 21:534–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HC, DeWall CN, Pattison K, Molet M, Zentall TR (2012) Too dog tired to avoid danger: self-control depletion in canines increases behavioral approach toward an aggressive threat. Psychon Bull Rev 19:535–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olton DS, Samuelson RJ (1976) Remembrance of places passed: spatial memory in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2:97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn-Reeves RM, Molet M, Zentall TR (2011) Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors. Learn Behav 39:125–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn-Reeves RM, Laude JR, Zentall TR (2013a) Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals. Behav Process 92:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn-Reeves RM, Stagner JP, Kirk CR, Zentall TR (2013b) Reversal learning in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia): qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility. J Comp Psychol 127:202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savastano HI, Miller RR (2004) Behavioral momentum in Pavlovian conditioning and the learning/performance distinction. Behav Brain Sci 27:694–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD, Odum AL (2006) Effects of prefeeding, intercomponent-interval food, and extinction on temporal discrimination and pacemaker rate. Behav Process 71:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JM (1965) The comparative psychology of learning. Annu Rev Psychol 16:95–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JM (1973) Learning in vertebrates. In: Dewsbury DA (ed) Comparative psychology: a modem survey. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp 471–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren JM (1974) Possibly unique characteristics of learning by primates. J Hum Evol 3:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0044, USA

    Jennifer R. Laude, Kristina F. Pattison, Rebecca M. Rayburn-Reeves, Daniel M. Michler & Thomas R. Zentall

Authors
  1. Jennifer R. Laude
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristina F. Pattison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca M. Rayburn-Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel M. Michler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thomas R. Zentall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas R. Zentall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laude, J.R., Pattison, K.F., Rayburn-Reeves, R.M. et al. Who are the real bird brains? Qualitative differences in behavioral flexibility between dogs (Canis familiaris) and pigeons (Columba livia). Anim Cogn 19, 163–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0923-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0923-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation