Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conditional discrimination and response chains by worker bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson, Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We trained worker bumblebees to discriminate arrays of artificial nectaries (one, two, and three microcentrifuge tubes inserted into artificial flowers) from which they could forage in association with their location in a three-compartmental maze. Additionally, we challenged bees to learn to accomplish three different tasks in a fixed sequence during foraging. To enter the main three-compartmented foraging arena, they had first to slide open doors in an entry box to be able to proceed to an artificial flower patch in the main arena where they had to lift covers to the artificial nectaries from which they then fed. Then, the bees had to return to the entrance way to their hive, but to actually enter, were challenged to rotate a vertically oriented disc to expose the entry hole. The bees were adept at associating the array of nectaries with their position in the compartmental maze (one nectary in compartment one, two in two, and three in three), taking about six trials to arrive at almost error-free foraging. Over all it took the bees three days of shaping to become more or less error free at the multi-step suite of sequential task performances. Thus, they had learned where they were in the chain sequence, which array and in which compartment was rewarding, how to get to the rewarding array in the appropriate compartment, and finally how to return as directly as possible to their hive entrance, open the entrance, and re-enter the hive. Our experiments were not designed to determine the specific nature of the cues the bees used, but our results strongly suggest that the tested bees developed a sense of subgoals that needed to be achieved by recognizing the array of elements in a pattern and possibly chain learning in order to achieve the ultimate goal of successfully foraging and returning to their colony. Our results also indicate that the bees had organized their learning by a hierarchy as evidenced by their proceeding to completion of the ultimate goal without reversing their foraging paths so as to return to the colony without food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balleine BW, Garner C, Gonzalez F, Dickinson A (1995) Motivational control of heterogeneous instrumental chains. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 21:203–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Shai N, Keasar T, Shmida A (2011a) How do solitary bees forage in patches with a fixed number of food items? Anim Behav 82:1367–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Shai N, Keasar T, Shmida A (2011b) The use of numerical information by bees in foraging tasks. Behav Ecol 22:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch H (1945) The relation of previous experience to insightful problem-solving. J Comp Psychol 38:367–383. doi:10.1037/h0056104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterman ME (1984) Migration and learning in fishes. In: McCleave ID, Arnold GP, Dodson II, Neill WH (eds) Mechanisms of migration in fishes. Plenum, New York, pp 397–420

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Born DG, Snow ME, Herbert EW (1969) Conditional discrimination learning in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 12:119–125

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne R, Byrne A (1993) Complex leaf-gathering skills of mountain gorillas (Gorilla g. berengei): variability and standardisation. Am J Primatol 31:521–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne R, Russon A (1998) Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci 21:667–721. doi:10.1017/S0140525X98001745

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DE, Werner TJ (1978) Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav 29:565–601

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chameron S, Schatz B, Pastergue-Ruiz I, Beugnon G, Collett TS (1998) The learning of a sequence of visual patterns by the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2309–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Geiger K (1995) Can honeybees count landmarks? Anim Behav 49:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Thomson JD (1996) The ecology of bumble bees in T-mazes. In: Elsner N, Schnitzler H (eds) Göttingen Neurobiol Rep., Thieme, Stuttgart, p 130

  • Collett TS, Fry SN, Wehner R (1993) Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172:693–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon PA, Biiterman ME (1988) Compound-component and conditional discrimination of colors and odors by honeybees: further tests of a continuity model. Anim Learn Behav 16:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1989) Reciprocal overshadowing in the discrimination of color–odor compounds by honeybees: further tests of a continuity model. Anim Learn Behav 17:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1991) How honeybees make choices. In: Goodman JL, Fischer RC (eds) The behaviour and physiology of bees. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 116–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacke M, Srinivasan MV (2008) Evidence for counting in insects. Anim Cogn 11:683–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (1999) The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney PF, Reder LM, Staszewski JJ, Ritter FE (1998) The strategy specific nature of improvement: the power law applies by strategy within task. Psychol Sci 9(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döhl J (1968) Über die Fähigkeit einer Schimpansin Umwege mit selbstständigen Zwischenzielen zu überblicken (the ability of a female chimpanzee to overlook intermediate goals). Z Tierpsychol 25:89–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domjan M (2015) The principles of learning and behavior, 7th edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R (1987) The spontaneous interconnection of four repertoires of behavior in a pigeon (Columba livida). J Comp Psychol 101:197–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R, Kirshnit CE, Lanza RP, Rubin LC (1984) ‘Insight’ in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance. Nature 308:61–62. doi:10.1038/308061a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funayama ES, Couvillon PA, Bitterman ME (1995) Compound conditioning in honeybees: blocking tests of the independence assumption. Anim Learn Behav 23:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (1995) Effect of flower complexity on relearning flower-handling skills in bumble bees. Can J Zool 73:2052–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gegear RJ, Laverty TM (1998) How many flower types can bumblebees work at the same time? Can J Zool 76:1358–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Núñez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Núñez JA (1993) Visual modulation of a scent-marking activity in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Naturwissenschaften 80:376–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso FW, Basil JA (2009) The evolution of flexible behavioral repertoires in cephalopod mollusks. Brain Behav Evol 74:231–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross HJ, Pahl M, Si A, Zhu H, Tautz J, Zhang S (2009) Number based visual generalisation in the honeybee. PLoSONE 4(1):e4263. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote A, Brown S, Mewhort DJK (2000) The power law repealed: the case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonom Bull Rev 7(2):185–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” in bumblebees: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Macmillan & Co., London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Black CA, Weinbaum SA (2000) How 17-year cicadas keep track of time. Ecol Lett 3:253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler W (1925) The mentality of apes. 2nd ed. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York (transl. from German by E. Winter)

  • Lashlev KS (1938) Conditional reactions in the rat. J Psychol 6:311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppik EE (1953) The ability of insects to distinguish numbers. Amer Nat 87:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1974) Psychology of animal learning. Academic Press, USA

  • Martin H (1965) Leistungen des topochemischen sinnes bei der Honigbiene. Z vergl Physiol 50:254–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1990) Learning, memory and ‘cognition’ in honey bees. In: Kesner RP, Olten DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Erlbaum Inc., Hillsdale, pp 237–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirwan HB, Kevan PG (2014) Problem solving by worker bumblebees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Anim Cogn 17:1053–1061. doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0737-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirwan HB, Kevan PG (2015) Maze learning and route memorization by worker bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson (Hymenoptera: Apidae)). J Insect Behav 28:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostofsky DI (1965) Stimulus generalization. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Rosenbloom PS (1981) Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson JR (ed) Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Erlbaum Inc., Hillsdale, pp 1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • North AI, Maller O, Hughes C (1958) Conditional discrimination and stimulus patterning. J Comp Physiol Psychol 51:711–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl M, Si A, Zhang S (2013) Numerical cognition in bees and other insects. Front Psychol 4:1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM (2008) Animal learning and cognition: an introduction. Psychology Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter FE, Schooler LJ (2002) The learning curve. In: International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, pp 8602–8605. http://www.iesbs.com/

  • Saavedra MA (1975) Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit. Learn Motiv 6:314–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrier AM, Thompson CR (1980) Conditional discrimination learning: a critique and amplification. J Exp Anal Behav 33:291–298

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms: AN experimental analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1953) Science and human behavior. The Macmillan Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MP (1951) The stimulus-trace gradient in visual discrimination learning. J Comp Physiol Psych 44:154–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel R, McLaren IPL (2006) Associative sequence learning in humans. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 32:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun R (2001) Introduction to sequence learning: sequence learning. Lecture notes in computer science. Comput Sci 1828/2001

  • Sun R, Giles CL (2001) Sequence learning: from recognition and prediction to sequential decision making. IEEE Intelligent Systs Their Appl 16(4):2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Elliffe D, Hunt GR, Gray RD (2010) Complex cognition and behavioural innovation in New Caledonian crows. Proc R Soc B 277:2637–2643

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1987) Chunking by a pigeon in a serial learning task. Nature 325:149–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1991) Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon: I. Basic evidence. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 17:81–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DR, Curran PJ, Russell RJ (1988) Factors affecting conditional discrimination learning by pigeons: II. Physical and temporal characteristics of stimuli. Anim Learn Behav 6:468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisman RG, Dodd PWD, Wasserman EA, Larew MB (1980) Representation and retention of two-event sequences in pigeons. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 6:312–325

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Canadian Pollination Initiative (NSERC-CANPOLIN for which this is publication No. 135) for funding some of this research reported. HM thanks the Libyan Ministry of Education and Canadian Bureau for International Students for scholarships received. BioBest Biological Systems, Leamington, Ontario, kindly provided colonies of the test subjects. We are especially grateful to Drs T. Woodcock and Francesco Leri, CANPOLIN, and Psychology Department, respectively, of the University of Guelph for critical reviews and help in preparing this paper. The studies reported herein comply with Canadian ethical standards, and those of the University of Guelph, for research and treatment of experimental animals

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Sciences and The Canadian Pollination Initiative, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada

    Hamida B. Mirwan & Peter G. Kevan

Authors
  1. Hamida B. Mirwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter G. Kevan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Kevan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest with any of the sponsors of the research reported herein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirwan, H.B., Kevan, P.G. Conditional discrimination and response chains by worker bumblebees (Bombus impatiens Cresson, Hymenoptera: Apidae). Anim Cogn 18, 1143–1154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0887-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0887-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation