Skip to main content
Log in

Song plasticity over time and vocal learning in clay-colored thrushes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Songbirds have been traditionally classified into close-ended or open-ended learning species according to the length of the sensitive period during which birds are able to memorize new vocalizations. Closed-ended learners are generally not capable of changing their song after the first year of life, while open-ended learners show song plasticity as adults. A few Turdus species have been suggested to be open-ended learners, but no long-term study has been conducted to investigate their song plasticity over time. We analyzed the songs of clay-colored thrushes, T. grayi, over four successive breeding seasons to assess song plasticity in their syllable repertoires within and between breeding seasons. A total of 16,262 syllables were classified through visual inspection of spectrograms and multidimensional scaling analysis based on spectrogram correlations. On average, 563 ± 153 (SD) syllables per male per breeding season were analyzed. Male repertoire size was 9–20 syllable types. Males were capable of modifying their syllable repertoire between the initial and final periods of the breeding season. Song plasticity within breeding seasons may be associated with imitation between neighboring males, suggesting song learning in males that were ≥2 years old. This short-term plasticity is not enough, however, to explain the high proportion of change (mean = 65 % syllable types) in repertoire composition between breeding seasons in adult males. Song plasticity resulting from annual changes in repertoire composition could be explained by open-ended learning, but another mechanism, extended memory and re-expression, could also explain long-term plasticity. Experimental studies controlling the acoustic environment are needed to determine which mechanism is responsible for such a high level of song plasticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araya-Salas M, Wright T (2013) Open ended song learning in a hummingbird. Biol Lett 9:20130625

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baptista LF, Schuchmann KL (1990) Song learning in the Anna Hummingbird (Calypte anna). Ethology 84:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher MD, Burt J (2004) The role of social interaction in bird song learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13:224–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard MS, Doupe AJ (2013) Translating birdsong: songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical research. Annu Rev Neurosci 36:489–517

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz E, Beecher MD (2005) Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends Neurosci 28:127–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK (1997) Female choice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc R Soc B 264:521–526

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJR (2008) Bird song biological themes and variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken M, Bohner J, Marler P (1994) Repertoire turnover and the timing of song acquisition in European starlings. Behaviour 128:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charif RA, Waack AM, Strickman AM (2010) Raven Pro 1.4 user’s manual. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement P (2001) Thrushes. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer ERA (2013) Measuring consistency: spectrogram cross-correlation versus targeted acoustic parameters. Bioacoustics 22:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK, Lampe HM, Langmore NE, Holland J (1998) Quiet song in song birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics 9:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A (1993) Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc R Soc B 254:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeWolfe BB, Baptista LF, Petrinovich L (1989) Song development and territory establishment in Nuttall’s white-crowned sparrows. Condor 91:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyrcz A (1983) Breeding ecology of the clay-coloured Robin Turdus grayi in lowland Panama. Ibis 125:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen A, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM (2011) Vocal plasticity—are pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, open-ended learners? Ethology 117:188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espmark YO, Lampe HM (1993) Variations in the song of the pied flycatcher within and between breeding seasons. Bioacoustics 5:33–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farabaugh SM, Dooling RJ (1996) Acoustic communication in parrots: laboratory and field studies of budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulates. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing Associates, New York, pp 97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco P, Slabbekoorn H (2009) Repertoire size and composition in great tits: a flexibility test using playbacks. Anim Behav 77:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt SLL, Baptista LF, Sánchez JE, Hernandez D (1994) Song learning as evidenced from song sharing in two hummingbird species (Colibri coruscans and C. thalassinus). Auk 111:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geberzahn N, Hultsch H, Todt D (2002) Latent song type memories are accessible through auditory stimulation in a hand-reared songbird. Anim Behav 64:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Gahr M (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Slater PJB (2000) Song organisation and singing patterns of the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Behaviour 137:759–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil D, Cobb JLS, Slater PJB (2001) Song characteristics are age dependent in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim Behav 62:689–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski GL (1979) Vocalizations of the Rufous-backed thrush (Turdus rufopalliatus) in Guerrero, Mexico. Condor 81:409–416  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough GE, Nelson DA, Volman SF (2000) Re-expression of songs deleted during vocal development in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys. Anim Behav 60:279–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RD (1974) The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mockingbird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution 28:428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S (2006) Do American Robins acquire songs by both imitating and inventing? Wilson J Ornithol 118:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer S, Sommer C, Scharff C, Kipper S, Mundry R (2009) Tuning towards tomorrow? Common nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos change and increase their song repertoires from the first to the second breeding season. J Avian Biol 40:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipper S, Kiefer S (2010) Age-related changes in birds’ singing styles: on fresh tunes and fading voices? Adv Stud Behav 41:77–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipper S, Mundry R, Hultsch H, Todt D (2004) Long-term persistence of song performance rules in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos): a longitudinal field study on repertoire size and composition. Behaviour 141:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs J, Ashcroft R, Webber M (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence in the great tit. Nature 271:539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE (1982) Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2, song learning and its consequences. Academic Press, Boston, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroodsma DE, Liu W, Goodwin E, Bedell P (1999) The ecology of song improvisation as illustrated by North American Sedge Wrens. Auk 116:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe HM, Saetre G (1995) Female pied flycatchers prefer males with larger song repertoires. Proc R Soc B 262:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner S, Voigt C, Gahr M (2001) Seasonal changes in the song pattern of the non-domesticated island canary (Serinus canaria), a field study. Behaviour 138:885–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch A (1996) The population memetics of birdsong. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing Associates, New York, pp 181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (1970) A comparative approach to vocal learning: song development in white-crowned sparrows. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology Monograph 71:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Peters S (1981) Sparrows learn adult song and more from memory. Science 213:780–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Peters S (1982) Subsong and plastic song: their role in the vocal learning process. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2, song learning and its consequences. Academic Press, Boston, pp 25–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P, Mundinger P, Waser MS, Lutjen A (1972) Effects of acoustical stimulation and deprivation on song development in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Anim Behav 20:586–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1982) Mating and song types in the great tit. Nature 297:60–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molles LE, Vehrencamp SL (1999) Repertoire size, repertoire overlap, and singing modes in the Banded Wren (Thryothorus pleurostictus). Auk 116:677–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE (1995) Extended song learning in wild European starlings. Anim Behav 49:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DA (1992) Song overproduction and selective attrition lead to song sharing in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson JS, Buchanan KL, Marshall RC, Catchpole CK (2007) Song sharing and repertoire size in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus: changes within and between years. Anim Behav 74:1585–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordby JC, Campbell SE, Beecher MD (2001) Late song learning in song sparrows. Anim Behav 61:835–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nottebohm F (2004) The road we travelled: discovery, choreography, and significance of brain replaceable neurons. Ann NY Acad Sci 1016:628–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nottebohm F, Nottebohm ME, Crane L (1986) Development and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. Behav Neural Biol 46:445–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki S, Nelson DA (1990) Defining natural categories in acoustic signals: comparison of three methods applied to ‘chick-a-dee’ call notes. Ethology 86:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (1996) Song traditions in indigo buntings: origin, improvisation, dispersal, and extinction in cultural evolution. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock Publishing Associates, New York, pp 198–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB, Payne LL (1997) Field observations, experimental design, and the time and place of learning bird songs. In: Snowdon CT, Hausberger M (eds) Social influences on vocal development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff JA, Zanette L, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, MacDougall-Shackleton EA (2007) Song repertoire size varies with HVC volume and is indicative of male quality in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc R Soc B 274:2035–2040

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rassmussen R, Dabelsteen T (2002) Song repertoires and repertoire sharing in a local group of blackbirds. Bioacoustics 13:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Saranathan V, Hamilton D, Powell GVN, Kroodsma DE, Prum RO (2007) Genetic evidence supports song learning in the three-wattled bellbird Procnias tricarunculata (Cotingidae). Mol Ecol 16:3689–3702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA (1992) Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am Zool 32:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:507–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Beecher MD (2009) Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds. Anim Behav 78:1282–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorjonen J (1987) Temporal and spatial differences in traditions and repertoires in the song of the thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). Behaviour 102:196–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles FG, Skutch AF (1989) A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury BJM, Morton ES, Piper WH (1998) Extra-pair mating system of a synchronously breeding tropical songbird. J Avian Biol 29:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung H, Park S (2005) Explaining avian vocalizations: a review of song learning and song communication in male-male interactions. Integrative Biosciences 9:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todt D, Geberzahn N (2003) Age-dependent effects of song exposure: song crystallization sets a boundary between fast and delayed vocal imitation. Anim Behav 65:971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Castro LE (2015) Spatial pattern of syllable sharing in white-throated thrushes: implications for song learning and dispersal behaviours. Behaviour 152:775–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Castro LE, Sánchez NV, Barrantes G (2012) Repertoire size and syllable sharing in the song of the clay-colored Thrush (Turdus grayi). Wilson J Ornithol 124:446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Oficina de Seguridad y Transito of the University of Costa Rica for providing logistical support. Bill Eberhard, Eric Fuchs, and Bill Searcy made helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Laura Strickman and Dean Hawthorne helped to configure a sound detector in Raven. Jeff Woodman and Tim Burr provided recording equipment.

Ethical standard

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis E. Vargas-Castro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas-Castro, L.E., Sánchez, N.V. & Barrantes, G. Song plasticity over time and vocal learning in clay-colored thrushes. Anim Cogn 18, 1113–1123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0883-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0883-z

Keywords

Navigation