Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Did Suetonius really call gout morbus dominorum? A philological and historico-medical reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An EDITORIAL to this article was published on 06 September 2023

Abstract

Current scientific literature often defines gout as morbus dominorum, in agreement with the Greek-Roman representation of podagra (ποδάγρα, literally “foot-trap”) as a consequence of gluttony and libertinage. Several authors place the origins of this expression with the Roman writer Suetonius, without however quoting any specific primary source. We have investigated this problem again and scrutinized primary sources ranging from the Roman World to the early Middle Ages. A search on the database of Latin texts for the expression morb* domin* failed to identify any positive correspondence, not only in Suetonius’ works but also in those of other Latin authors. As a matter of fact, the expression morbus dominorum appeared for the first time in the literature on podagra in 1661 in Jakob Balde’s book Solatium Podagricorum. Since then, this definition has been endlessly repeated in seventeenth- to eighteenth-century literature on gout. In 1866, while lecturing on the diseases of the elderly, the French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot first ascribed the expression morbus dominorum to Suetonius. However, this attribution is unsupported by primary sources. In conclusion, Suetonius never used the wording morbus dominorum, which was probably coined by Jakob Balde in 1661. The origin of this erroneous ascription dates to Jean-Martin Charcot’s lectures in 1866.

Key Points

• Albeit a much-quoted sentence in rheumatology,the Roman author Suetonius never called gout morbusdominorum.

• When referencing historical point in rheumatology, a careful perusal of the primary sources should beimplemented to avoid misquoting and false myths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholtens M (2008) The glorification of gout in 16th- to 18th-century-literature. CMAJ 179(8):804–805. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080312

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Savica V, Santoro D, Ricciardi B, Ricciardi CA, Calo LA, Bellinghieri G (2013) Morbus dominorum: gout as the disease of lords. J Nephrol 26(Suppl 22):S113–S116. https://doi.org/10.5301/jn.5000349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKenzie R (2015) Gout and hyperuricemia: an historical perspective. Curr Treat Options Rheumatol:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-015-0012-9

  4. Pasero G, Marson P (2005) I geni e la gotta. Reumatismo 57(3):137–141. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2011.199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marson P (2002) “La Goutte et l’Araignée” di Jean de La Fontaine (1621-1695), ovvero le metamorfosi di un apologo reumatologico. Reumatismo 54(4):372–380. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2002.372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marson P, Pasero G (2011) Some historical remarks on microcrystalline arthritis (gout and chondrocalcinosis). Reumatismo 63(4):199–206. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2011.199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutler RG, Camandola S, Malott KF, Edelhauser MA, Mattson MP (2015) The role of uric acid and methyl derivatives in the prevention of age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Top Med Chem 15(21):2233–2238. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026615666150610143234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Leca A-P (1984) Histoire illustrée de la rhumatologie: goutte, rhumatismes and rhumatisants. Editions Roger Dacosta, Paris

  9. Bernabeo R (1980) La gotta Presupposti storici alle concezioni moderne. Minerva Med 71:2739–2743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tranquillo GS (1844). In: Opere tradotte ed illustrate, Tipografia di G. Antonelli Venezia

  11. Tranquillo GS (1878) Opere di C. Tranquillo Svetonio tradotte da Emanuele Rocco. Roux e Favale, Torino

  12. CDS (2014) Brepols Cross Database Searchtool. Brepols Publishers, Turnhout

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rühli FJ, Galassi FM, Haeusler M (2016) Palaeopathology: current challenges and medical impact. Clin Anat 29(7):816–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Drabkin I (1950) Caelius Aurelianus. On acute Diseases and chronic Diseases. University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 922–939

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barney S, Lewis W, Beach J, Berghof O (2006) The Etymologies of Isidorus of Seville. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482113

  16. Balde J (1661) Solatium podagricorum. Typis Lucæ Straub, Monachi

    Google Scholar 

  17. Juchius PH (1670) Dissertatio medica de Morbo Dominorum or Domino Morborum, Typis Johannis Nisii, Jena

  18. Wedell GW (1674) Disputatio inauguralis De Arthritide vaga scorbutica. Stanno Nisiano, Jena

  19. Allen PS (1947) Opus epistolarum des Erasmi Roterdami. Oxford, Clarendon Press 2:181

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brodaeus J (1549) Epigrammatum Graecorum Annotationibus Ioanni Brodaei Libri VII. Frobenius & Episcopius, Basileae

  21. van Helmont JB (1648) Ortus Medicinae. id est Initia Physyca Inaudita. Apud Ludovicum Elzeviirium, Amsterodami

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zalc B (2018) One hundred and fifty years ago Charcot reported multiple sclerosis as a new neurological disease. Brain 141(12):3482–3488. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy287

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Théodoridés J (1994) Charcot dans le sillage de Rayer. Hist Sci Med 28(4):313–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ball B (1867) Lectures on chronic diseases and the diseases of old age delivered at La Salpétriere by dr. Charcot. On the causes of gout, vol 2. Medical Times and Gazette, pp 217–218

    Google Scholar 

  25. Charcot J (1867) Eziologia della gotta. Giornale Veneto di Scienze mediche VI:148–156

  26. Charcot JM, Ball B (1867) Leçons cliniques sur les maladies des viellards et les maladies chroniques. Delahaye, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dechambre A (1876) Rhumatisme. In: Masson G, Asselin P (eds) Dictionnaire Encyclopédique des Sciences Médicales, vol 4, Paris, p 474

  28. Proust A, Mathieu A (1896) L’hygiène du gotteux. Masson et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert A (1840) Traité théorique et pratique du rhumatisme, de la goutte, et des maladies des nerfs. J-B Baillière, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lechorché E (1884) Traité théorique et pratique de la goutte. Delahaye et Lecrosnier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Damiani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damiani, E., Galassi, F.M. & Elice, M. Did Suetonius really call gout morbus dominorum? A philological and historico-medical reconstruction. Clin Rheumatol 42, 3153–3158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06688-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-023-06688-4

Keywords

Navigation