Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and heterogeneous disease affecting the skin and internal organs. SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) is a common and often early manifestation of SSc. This article discusses the rationale for a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) to the early identification and assessment of patients with SSc-ILD. Diagnosis of SSc-ILD is often challenging as patients with early disease can be asymptomatic, and SSc-ILD symptoms, such as exertional dyspnea and cough, are non-specific. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the lungs is the gold standard for diagnosis of SSc-ILD since pulmonary function tests lack sensitivity and specificity, especially in early disease. On HRCT, most patients with SSc-ILD have a non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern. In addition, findings of pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dysmotility may be present. The multi-organ involvement of SSc and the diverse spectrum of symptoms support an MDA for the diagnosis and assessment of patients with SSc-ILD, with input from rheumatologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, and other specialists.
Key Points • Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc). • Early diagnosis is key to reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with SSc-ILD and other manifestations of SSc. • The multi-organ involvement of SSc supports a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and assessment of patients with SSc-ILD, with input from rheumatologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, and other specialists. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune rheumatologic disease characterized by inflammation, fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, and vasculopathy [1]. SSc has an estimated prevalence rate of 3–24 per 100,000 [2]. Patients with SSc have an increased mortality rate. A recent study in France reported a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 5.73 among patients with SSc, with 28% dying within ten years of diagnosis [3]. Previous studies reported SMRs between 2.03 and 4.06 [4,5,6]. Pulmonary complications, i.e., pulmonary hypertension (PH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), are the leading causes of death in patients with SSc [7, 8]. The former occurs in about 10% of patients with SSc and results from vascular remodeling, while the latter results from chronic inflammation and scarring of the lung parenchyma [9]. Data from the EUSTAR database suggest that ILD may account for 17% of SSc-related mortality [10].
Depending on the cohort and the definition used, the prevalence of ILD in SSc may be as high as 52.3%, and although it can occur at any time, it is usually an early manifestation of SSc [11,12,13,14]. Clinical and laboratory risk factors that can predict the development of SSc-ILD have been described. Patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) and positivity for anti-topoisomerase antibody (ATA) are more likely to develop ILD. However, patients with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and negativity for ATA may still develop ILD [12, 13, 15]. The anti-centromere antibody, which tends to be associated with lcSSc, is associated with a lower likelihood of developing ILD [12, 13].
The course of SSc-ILD is variable [16]. Although risk factors for the progression of SSc-ILD have been identified, such as a greater extent of fibrosis on HRCT and lower FVC, the course of SSc-ILD in an individual patient remains unpredictable [17, 18]. Several biomarkers have been investigated as predictors for the development or outcomes of SSc-ILD, including cytokines (e.g., IL-6), chemokine ligands (CCL18, CCL2, CXCL4), matrix enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases 7 and 12), secretory products of pneumocytes (KL-6), and anti-Ro52 [10, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25]; however, none is widely available, perhaps with the exception of KL-6, which has been approved for clinical use in Japan.
Early diagnosis is key to reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with SSc-ILD. We believe that similar to what has been described for other types of ILD [26,27,28,29], a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) can improve the outcomes of patients with SSc-ILD through timely detection and initiation/escalation of therapy. This incorporates clinical, laboratory, and imaging data, with the potential contribution of serum biomarkers, and requires real-time interaction of different specialists to establish a comprehensive co-management model that can potentially change the course of the disease.
In this article, we aim to discuss the rationale for an MDA for diagnosing and assessing patients with SSc-ILD, focusing on the role of various clinical specialists, including rheumatologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, and radiologists.
SSc-ILD: clinical features
Patient presentation and referral
Being a systemic disorder, SSc has a heterogeneous range of manifestations: the lungs, kidneys, heart, and gastrointestinal tract may all be affected, complicating disease management. Manifestations of SSc may include skin thickening, Raynaud’s phenomenon, fingertip lesions, secondary Sjögren syndrome, musculoskeletal manifestations, gastrointestinal problems, and lung disease [30]. If pulmonary symptoms (such as shortness of breath or a chronic dry cough) are subtle or absent on initial presentation, then it is often a rheumatologist who will assess whether there is lung involvement and, if considered necessary, refer the patient to a pulmonologist for further assessment. If the patient has pulmonary symptoms, crackles on auscultation, lung abnormalities on a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan, and/or impaired lung function on pulmonary function tests, the patient is often referred to a pulmonologist. It is important to note that even in combination with a chest X-ray, the physical examination has sub-optimal sensitivity to detect SSc-ILD, especially in the early stages, and should not be used as a screening strategy [31].
Physical and functional examination
Patients with SSc-ILD commonly present with exertional dyspnea and cough, but some patients with early SSc-ILD are asymptomatic [32, 33]. As the extent of pulmonary involvement increases, patients usually report fatigue and dyspnea on exertion and eventually at rest. In addition, chest auscultation may reveal dry crackles at the bases of the lungs [1].
Spirometry is non-invasive and cost-effective but has limitations in the setting of SSc-ILD. Assessment of forced vital capacity (FVC) lacks sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of the disease, given the wide range of normal values [34]. Moreover, it may be falsely normal in patients with coexisting emphysema [35] or falsely reduced in patients with extrapulmonary restriction [36]. The diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) may also be reduced, usually in proportion to the reduction in FVC. A disproportionate reduction in DLCO should raise suspicion for PH.
An assessment of functional capacity should be performed during SSc-ILD diagnosis. Although a comprehensive test such as a cardiopulmonary exercise test can provide excellent information on functional status and help predict patient outcomes [37], it may not be feasible due to resource limitations. However, a simple 6-min walk test can be performed in the office [38].
Resting and walking oximetry should be considered in patients with respiratory symptoms or abnormalities in imaging or spirometry. However, the reliability of finger oximetry is compromised in patients with poor peripheral circulation or Raynaud’s phenomenon [39]. Therefore, an alternative site, such as the earlobe or a forehead probe, should be considered.
Radiological features of SSc-ILD
HRCT is the gold standard for diagnosing SSc-ILD. On HRCT, most patients with SSc-ILD have non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern, while a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is found in a minority (7.5%) of cases [40]. Ground-glass opacity (GGO) is the dominant feature of NSIP (Fig. 1a). It is usually symmetric in distribution, primarily subpleural, but can be diffuse (Fig. 1b), with a lower lobe predominance. During the early stages of SSc-ILD, prone images help differentiate between an increased density due to ILD and gravity-dependent atelectasis at the posterior lung bases (Fig. 1c). In patients with fibrotic NSIP, peribronchovascular and subpleural reticular opacities are found in the lower lobes (Fig. 1d). Honeycomb cystic changes can be detected in up to a third of patients with SSc-ILD [41]. The most specific sign of the NSIP pattern is subpleural sparing (Fig. 1e) [42]. In up to two-thirds of patients with SSc-ILD, GGO evolves into coarse reticular changes and traction bronchiectasis/traction bronchiolectasis (Fig. 2) [43]. The traction bronchiectasis in NSIP tends to be more central versus peripheral in UIP (Fig. 3a). The UIP pattern is characterized by basilar (occasionally diffuse) and subpleural predominant coarse reticular abnormalities, peripheral traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing (Fig. 3b) [44]. GGO occurs in a minority (15%) of patients with UIP [45].
The presence of the “straight-edge” sign (Supplementary Fig. 1a), “exuberant honeycombing” sign (Supplementary Fig. 1b), or “anterior upper lobe” sign (Supplementary Fig. 1c) increases the likelihood of connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) as opposed to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [44]. Multi-compartment involvement in HRCT scans suggests an underlying CTD. Esophageal dilatation on HRCT scans is predictive of an SSc diagnosis [46]. A dilated or patulous esophagus containing fluid, gas, and/or debris indicates esophageal dysmotility (Supplementary Fig. 2) [47]. Esophageal dysmotility predisposes patients to pulmonary aspiration [48], which presents with findings of bronchopneumonia and bronchiolitis in the posterior lung on CT (Supplementary Fig. 3) [49]. Associations between esophageal diameter and ILD severity may indicate that repetitive micro-aspiration of stomach content into the lungs can increase the risk of ILD progression [50].
An increased diameter of the main pulmonary artery (MPA), or the ratio of the MPA diameter relative to that of the ascending aorta (Supplementary Fig. 4), indicates PH [51]. A high MPA diameter and a segmental artery-to-bronchus diameter ratio above 1 in three to four pulmonary lobes have very high specificity for PH [51]. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is an essential consideration in SSc because PVOD-like involvement has been associated with a worse prognosis [52].
Despite the central role of HRCT in diagnosing and assessing SSc-ILD, there are concerns about potential harm associated with radiation exposure. The last decade has seen an evolution of imaging protocols and procedures to lower the radiation dose. The HRCT slice number can be reduced without jeopardizing the assessment of lung fibrosis (severity or extent) [53, 54].
Pathologic features in SSc-ILD
Pathology is rarely, if ever, required to establish a diagnosis of SSc-ILD. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure [55], surgical lung biopsy should only be performed in exceptional cases, e.g., to exclude malignancy or where there is a suspicion of PVOD. When a biopsy is obtained, the microscopic patterns reflect the imaging. The most common pattern is NSIP, observed in 64–77% of patients [56, 57]. There is no evidence that the pattern on a biopsy has any prognostic value [56].
Gastrointestinal manifestations of SSc-ILD
Up to 90% of patients with SSc have GI tract involvement [58]. The entire GI tract can be affected, but the most common sites are the esophagus (80%), small intestine (40–90%), and stomach (20–50%) [59].
Diagnosing and managing GI manifestations of SSc, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysmotility from an early stage, is of paramount importance, as they may lead to significant morbidity [60]. A gastroenterologist with expertise in GI dysmotility should evaluate all patients with SSc early in the disease course. Patients with SSc-ILD have higher esophageal acid exposure and higher numbers of reflux episodes than patients with SSc without ILD [61]. A modified barium swallow can help rule out oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with swallowing issues [58]. Upper endoscopy is indicated in patients with dysphagia to identify GERD/esophagitis [62]. Patients with SSc with severe esophageal dysmotility appear to have lower DLCO and a higher prevalence of ILD [63]. Esophageal manometry should be considered to determine the severity of esophageal dysmotility in patients with esophageal dysphagia.
Screening for and monitoring SSc-ILD
The high prevalence of ILD among patients with SSc, and the significant morbidity and mortality associated with SSc-ILD, make it essential to screen for SSc-ILD to improve patient outcomes. Different approaches exist; however, it is obvious that some type of advanced imaging is necessary, given the disappointing results of an approach based solely on physical examination, chest radiography, and pulmonary function testing [31, 34]. Protocols based on a limited number of slices seem to perform similarly to traditional HRCTs and are associated with radiation exposure similar to a plain chest X-ray (0.05 mSv) [53]. The advent of lung ultrasound has provided another tool to investigate the lung in SSc. Although ultrasonography is operator-dependent, and its validity and reliability in detecting SSc-ILD require further investigation [64], it performs well in the hands of experienced operators [65]. Its value is expected to increase as more pulmonology trainees graduate from their training programs proficient in this modality.
In a Delphi consensus study, experts in the field of SSc-ILD recommended that all patients with SSc should be screened for ILD with HRCT as the primary tool, supported by auscultation, pulmonary function testing, and assessment of symptoms [66]. Other expert groups have suggested a similar approach [30, 66,67,68,69]. In addition, all patients with SSc without a diagnosis of ILD should be screened regularly with pulmonary function tests at a frequency guided by risk assessment [66]. Spirometry and DLCO should be assessed every 3–6 months for the first 3–5 years after diagnosis of SSc when the risk of developing ILD is most significant [67].
Patients with SSc-ILD should be monitored closely to ascertain progression. Unfortunately, there is no established protocol for monitoring patients with SSc-ILD. Therefore, a multifaceted approach is required [66]. It is generally recommended that symptoms, FVC and DLCO, and exercise-induced oxygen desaturation be assessed approximately every 6–12 months, with repeat HRCT scans as clinically indicated [30, 66, 68,69,70]. The information gained from these assessments should guide decisions about treatment initiation, change, or escalation [66].
Advantages of an MDA in the assessment of patients with SSc-ILD
Diagnosis and assessment of SSc-ILD, based on evaluation of clinical data, lung function tests, and imaging, requires collaboration among, at a minimum, a rheumatologist, a pulmonologist, and a radiologist. Assessment of the severity of ILD and risk factors for progression can have important implications for the patient’s prognosis, monitoring, and management [66]. Close collaboration between rheumatology and pulmonology helps personalize disease management and may result in earlier referrals for therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and lung transplantation. Given the systemic nature of SSc, an MDA is also essential for assessing other organ manifestations. A gastroenterologist should evaluate all patients with SSc early in the disease course. Patients with SSc and potential cardiac involvement should be evaluated by a cardiologist [71]. An MDA approach is necessary to ensure a holistic approach to care, which is valued by patients [72, 73]. A summary of our recommendations is provided in Table 1.
Conclusions
We believe that establishing an MDA as a gold standard for diagnosing and assessing patients with SSc-ILD is advantageous for both patients and clinicians. Clinicians across specialties benefit from a better understanding of the significance of lung abnormalities in patients with SSc. The course of SSc-ILD is unpredictable, and patients should be monitored regularly to assess disease progression. An MDA is valuable to consider the totality of the information obtained from monitoring and agree on how that individual patient should be managed. Working together encourages cross-collaboration among clinical specialties in assessing and managing patients with SSc-ILD, which would ultimately benefit patients. We suggest that the multidisciplinary team should include, at a minimum, a rheumatologist, a pulmonologist, a thoracic radiologist, and a gastroenterologist.
A case study describing the challenges of managing a patient with multiple manifestations of SSc is provided in the supplementary material.
Data availability
No further data are available.
References
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J et al (2013) 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 65:2737–2747. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38098
Ranque B, Mouthon L (2010) Geoepidemiology of systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 9:A311–A318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2009.11.003
Pokeerbux MR, Giovannelli J, Dauchet L et al (2019) Survival and prognosis factors in systemic sclerosis: data of a French multicenter cohort, systematic review, and meta-analysis of the literature. Arthritis Res Ther 21:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1867-1
Alba MA, Velasco C, Simeon CP et al (2014) Early- versus late-onset systemic sclerosis: differences in clinical presentation and outcome in 1037 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 93:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000018
Hao Y, Hudson M, Baron M et al (2017) Early mortality in a multinational systemic sclerosis inception cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:1067–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40027
Hoffmann-Vold AM, Molberg O, Midtvedt O, Garen T, Gran JT (2013) Survival and causes of death in an unselected and complete cohort of Norwegian patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 40:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.121390
Steen VD, Medsger TA (2007) Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002. Ann Rheum Dis 66:940–944. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.066068
Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M et al (2010) Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1809–1815. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.114264
Nihtyanova SI, Denton CP (2020) Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease. J Scleroderma Relat Disord 5:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397198320903867
Elhai M, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Avouac J et al (2019) Performance of candidate serum biomarkers for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:972–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40815
Bergamasco A, Hartmann N, Wallace L, Verpillat P (2019) Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Epidemiol 11:257–273
Nihtyanova SI, Schreiber BE, Ong VH et al (2014) Prediction of pulmonary complications and long-term survival in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:1625–1635. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S191418
Nihtyanova SI, Sari A, Harvey JC et al (2020) Using autoantibodies and cutaneous subset to develop outcome-based disease classification in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol 72:465–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41153
Jaeger VK, Wirz EG, Allanore Y et al (2016) Incidences and risk factors of organ manifestations in the early course of systemic sclerosis: a longitudinal EUSTAR study. PLoS One 11:e0163894
Frantz C, Huscher D, Avouac J et al (2020) Outcomes of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients: results on more than 12,000 patients from the EUSTAR database. Autoimmun Rev 19:102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102452
Hoffmann-Vold AM, Allanore Y, Alves M et al (2021) Progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in the EUSTAR database. Ann Rheum Dis 80:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217455
Goh NS, Desai SR, Veeraraghavan S et al (2008) Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a simple staging system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200706-877OC
Hoffmann-Vold AM, Fretheim H, Halse AK et al (2019) Tracking impact of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis in a complete nationwide cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200:1258–1266. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201903-0486OC
Becker MO, Radic M, Schmidt K et al (2019) Serum cytokines and their predictive value in pulmonary involvement of systemic sclerosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 36:274–284. https://doi.org/10.36141/svdld.v36i4.7612
Wu M, Baron M, Pedroza C et al (2017) CCL2 in the circulation predicts long-term progression of interstitial lung disease in patients with early systemic sclerosis: data from two independent cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:1871–1878. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40171
van Bon L, Affandi AJ, Broen J et al (2014) Proteome-wide analysis and CXCL4 as a biomarker in systemic sclerosis. N Engl J Med 370:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1114576
Moinzadeh P, Krieg T, Hellmich M et al (2011) Elevated MMP-7 levels in patients with systemic sclerosis: correlation with pulmonary involvement. Exp Dermatol 20:770–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01321.x
Manetti M, Guiducci S, Romano E et al (2012) Increased serum levels and tissue expression of matrix metalloproteinase-12 in patients with systemic sclerosis: correlation with severity of skin and pulmonary fibrosis and vascular damage. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200837
Volkmann ER, Tashkin DP, Kuwana M et al (2019) Progression of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: the importance of pneumoproteins Krebs von den Lungen 6 and CCL18. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41020
Hudson M, Pope J, Mahler M et al (2012) Clinical significance of antibodies to Ro52/TRIM21 in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther 14:R50. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3763
Jo HE, Glaspole IN, Levin KC et al (2016) Clinical impact of the interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary service. Respirology 21:1438–1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12850
Povitz M, Li L, Hosein K, Shariff S, Mura M (2019) Implementing an interstitial lung disease clinic improves survival without increasing health care resource utilization. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 56:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2019.03.012
Ageely G, Souza C, De Boer K, Zahra S, Gomes M, Voduc N (2020) The impact of multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) in the diagnosis and management of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Can Respir J 2020:9026171. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9026171
Biglia C, Ghaye B, Reychler G et al (2019) Multidisciplinary management of interstitial lung diseases: a real-life study. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 36:108–115. https://doi.org/10.36141/svdld.v36i2.8107
Denton CP, Khanna D (2017) Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 390:1685–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30933-9
Steele R, Hudson M, Lo E, Baron M, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (2012) Clinical decision rule to predict the presence of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21583
Cheng JZ, Wilcox PG, Glaspole I et al (2017) Cough is less common and less severe in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease compared to other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Respirology 22:1592–1597. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13084
Hu S, Hou Y, Wang Q, Li M, Xu D, Zeng X (2018) Prognostic profile of systemic sclerosis: analysis of the clinical EUSTAR cohort in China. Arthritis Res Ther 20:235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1735-4
Suliman YA, Dobrota R, Huscher D et al (2015) Brief report: pulmonary function tests: high rate of false-negative results in the early detection and screening of scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 67:3256–3261. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39405
Ariani A, Silva M, Bravi E et al (2019) Overall mortality in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema related to systemic sclerosis. RMD Open 14(5):e000820. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000820
Wells A, Devaraj A, Renzoni EA et al (2019) Multidisciplinary evaluation in patients with lung disease associated with connective tissue disease. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 40:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1684020
Ewert R, Ittermann T, Habedank D et al (2019) Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with systemic sclerosis. BMC Pulm Med 19:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-1003-7
Pugnet G, Marjanovic Z, Deligny C et al (2018) Reproducibility and utility of the 6-minute walk test in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 45:1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170994
Garg R, Verma S (2008) Pulse oximetry in scleroderma patients: concerns. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 52:1303–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01720.x
Yamakawa H, Hagiwara E, Kitamura H et al (2016) Clinical features of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia with systemic sclerosis-related autoantibody in comparison with interstitial pneumonia with systemic sclerosis. PLoS One 11:e0161908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161908
Goldin JG, Lynch DA, Strollo DC et al (2008) High-resolution CT scan findings in patients with symptomatic scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease. Chest 134:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2444
Ebner L, Christodoulidis S, Stathopoulou T et al (2020) Meta-analysis of the radiological and clinical features of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). PLoS One 15:e0226084
Launay D, Remy-Jardin M, Michon-Pasturel U et al (2006) High resolution computed tomography in fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 33:1789–1801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226084
Chung JH, Cox CW, Montner SM et al (2018) CT features of the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern: differentiating connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:307–313. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18384
Chung JH, Oldham JM, Montner SM et al (2018) CT-pathologic correlation of major types of pulmonary fibrosis: insights for revisions to current guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18947
Vonk MC, van Die CE, Snoeren MM et al (2008) Oesophageal dilatation on high-resolution computed tomography scan of the lungs as a sign of scleroderma. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1317–1321. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.081612
Strollo D, Goldin J (2010) Imaging lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 12:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-010-0095-0
Farrokh D, Abbasi B, Fallah-Rastegar Y, Mirfeizi Z (2015) The extrapulmonary manifestations of systemic sclerosis on chest high resolution computed tomography. Tanaffos 14:193–200
Komiya K, Ishii H, Umeki K et al (2013) Computed tomography findings of aspiration pneumonia in 53 patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 13:580–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00940.x
Richardson C, Agrawal R, Lee J et al (2016) Esophageal dilatation and interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 46:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.02.004
Goerne H, Batra K, Rajiah P (2018) Imaging of pulmonary hypertension: an update. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8:279–296. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2018.01.10
Gunther S, Jais X, Maitre S et al (2012) Computed tomography findings of pulmonary venoocclusive disease in scleroderma patients presenting with precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Arthritis Rheum 64:2995–3005. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34501
Frauenfelder T, Winklehner A, Nguyen TD et al (2014) Screening for interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: performance of high-resolution CT with limited number of slices: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:2069–2073. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205637
Nguyen-Kim TDL, Maurer B, Suliman YA et al (2018) The impact of slice-reduced computed tomography on histogram-based densitometry assessment of lung fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis. J Thorac Dis 10:2142–2152. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.04.39
Fisher JH, Shapera S, To T et al (2019) Procedure volume and mortality after surgical lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J 53:1801164. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01164-2018
Bouros D, Wells AU, Nicholson AG et al (2002) Histopathologic subsets of fibrosing alveolitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and their relationship to outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:1581–1586. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2106012
Fischer A, Swigris JJ, Groshong SD et al (2008) Clinically significant interstitial lung disease in limited scleroderma: histopathology, clinical features, and survival. Chest 134:601–605. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0053
Kirby DF, Chatterjee S (2014) Evaluation and management of gastrointestinal manifestations in scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 26:621–629. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000117
McFarlane IM, Bhamra MS, Kreps A et al (2018) Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Sunnyvale) 8:235. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1149.1000235
Thoua NM, Bunce C, Brough G et al (2010) Assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with systemic sclerosis in a UK tertiary referral centre. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:1770–1775. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq147
Savarino E, Bazzica M, Zentilin P et al (2009) Gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma: a study using pH-impedance monitoring. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179:408–413. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200808-1359OC
Denaxas K, Ladas SD, Karamanolis GP (2018) Evaluation and management of esophageal manifestations in systemic sclerosis. Ann Gastroenterol 31:165–170. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2018.0228
Marie I, Dominique S, Levesque H et al (2001) Esophageal involvement and pulmonary manifestations in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 45:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4%3c346::AID-ART347%3e3.0.CO;2-L
Gutierrez M, Soto-Fajardo C, Pineda C et al (2020) Ultrasound in the assessment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review by the OMERACT Ultrasound Group. J Rheumatol 47:991–1000. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180940
Tardella M, Di Carlo M, Carotti M et al (2018) Ultrasound B-lines in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: cut-off point definition for the presence of significant pulmonary fibrosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e0566. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010566
Hoffmann-Vold AM, Maher TM, Philpot EE et al (2020) The identification and management of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: evidence-based European consensus statements. Lancet Rheumatol 2:E71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30144-4
Perelas A, Silver RM, Arrossi AV, Highland KB (2020) Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Lancet Respir Med 8:304–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30480-1
Roofeh D, Lescoat A, Khanna D (2021) Treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 33:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000795
Fischer A, Patel NM, Volkmann ER (2019) Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: focus on early detection and intervention. Open Access Rheumatol 11:283–307. https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S226695
Nambiar AM, Walker CM, Sparks JA (2021) Monitoring and management of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review for practicing clinicians. Ther Adv Respir Dis 15:1753466621103977. https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666211039771
Bissell LA, Anderson M, Burgess M et al (2017) Consensus best practice pathway of the UK Systemic Sclerosis Study group: management of cardiac disease in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:912–921. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew488
Jeong SO, Uh ST, Park S, Kim HS (2018) Effects of patient satisfaction and confidence on the success of treatment of combined rheumatic disease and interstitial lung disease in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. Int J Rheum Dis 21:1600–1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13331
McLean AEB, Webster SE, Fry M et al (2021) Priorities and expectations of patients attending a multidisciplinary interstitial lung disease clinic. Respirology 26:80–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13913
Acknowledgements
Editorial support was provided by Melanie Stephens, and Wendy Morris of FleishmanHillard, London, UK, which was contracted and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Boehringer Ingelheim was given the opportunity to review the article for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations. The authors did not receive payment for the development of this article.
Funding
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. would support the page processing/open-access charges for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors were involved in the writing and critical review of this article and have approved the final version. The authors meet the criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
SC, DFK, and AS have nothing to disclose. AP reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and United Therapeutics, research funding (for investigator-initiated studies) from Boehringer Ingelheim, and research funding (for sponsor-initiated studies) from Genentech. RY reports fees from Bioclinica, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Genentech.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chatterjee, S., Perelas, A., Yadav, R. et al. Viewpoint: a multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Rheumatol 42, 653–661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06408-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06408-4