Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Level and avidity of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies specific to lactoferrin are useful biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate specificity, level, and avidity of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There are no studies of ANCA avidity in SLE.

Methods

Level (ELISA) and avidity (ELISA) of myeloperoxidase (MPO-), proteinase 3 (PR3-), lactoferrin (LF-), cathepsin G, elastase (EL-), and bactericidal/permeability increasing protein (BPI)-ANCA in 142 SLE patients were studied. SLE activity was measured by SLEDAI-2 K. 25/40 ANCA-positive patients were immunoserologically followed (12 ± 2 months).

Results

40/142 (28.2%) SLE patients were ANCA-positive: LF- (21/40), MPO- (19/40), EL- (6/40), PR3- (3/40), and BPI-ANCA (1/40). Only LF-ANCA were associated with renal manifestations (p < 0.05), and positive predictive value for renal involvement in ANCA-positive SLE was 76.2%. LF-ANCA-positive patients had higher SLEDAI-2 K (p < 0.05) and more frequently had anti-dsDNA (p < 0.05), low C3 (p < 0.001), and low C4 (p < 0.05) than LF-ANCA-negative patients. LF-ANCA level was in a positive correlation with SLEDAI-2 K, anti-dsDNA, and anti-C1q (p < 0.01) and in a negative correlation with C3 and C4 (p < 0.05). LF-ANCA avidity was higher than MPO-, EL-, PR3-, and BPI-ANCA avidity (p < 0.01). In LF-ANCA-positive patients, renal manifestations were associated with higher LF-ANCA level (p < 0.01) and avidity (p < 0.05). Based on LF-ANCA level and avidity, the receiver operating characteristic curves for discriminating patients with and without renal involvement had areas under the curves of 0.988 (95% CI: 0.949–1.00) and 0.813 (95% CI: 0.607–1.00), respectively. After the follow-up period, number of LF-ANCA-positive patients decreased (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In contrast to other ANCAs, only LF-ANCA level correlated with activity and standard serological SLE markers. LF-ANCA level and avidity might be biomarkers of renal involvement in SLE. LF-ANCA are promising serological marker in SLE.

Key Points

• LF- and MPO-ANCA were most frequently found, while EL-, PR3-, and BPI-ANCA were rarely detected in SLE.

• In contrast to other ANCAs, only LF-ANCA were associated with renal involvement, and their level correlated with the activity and standard serological markers of SLE.

• LF-ANCA avidity was higher than other ANCAs’ avidity; LF-ANCA level and avidity might be useful biomarkers of renal manifestations in SLE.

• Detection of ANCA specificity, level, and avidity may help in the diagnosis of particular clinical SLE phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsokos GC (2020) Autoimmunity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Immunol 21(6):605–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-0677-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sangaletti S, Tripodo C, Chiodoni C, Guarnotta C, Cappetti B, Casalini P, Piconese S, Parenza M, Guiducci C, Vitali C, Colombo MP (2012) Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate transfer of cytoplasmic neutrophil antigens to myeloid dendritic cells toward ANCA induction and associated autoimmunity. Blood 120(15):3007–3018. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-416156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Romo GS, Caielli S, Vega B, Connolly J, Allantaz F, Xu Z, Punaro M, Baisch J, Guiducci C, Coffman RL, Barrat FJ, Banchereau J, Pascual V (2011) Netting neutrophils are major inducers of type I IFN production in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Transl Med 3(73):73ra20. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakazawa D, Tomaru U, Suzuki A, Masuda S, Hasegawa R, Kobayashi T, Nishio S, Kasahara M, Ishizu A (2012) Abnormal conformation and impaired degradation of propylthiouracil-induced neutrophil extracellular traps: implications of disordered neutrophil extracellular traps in a rat model of myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum 64(11):3779–3787. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Podolska MJ, Biermann MH, Maueröder C, Hahn J, Herrmann M (2015) Inflammatory etiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. J Inflamm Res 8:161–171. https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s70325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Okubo K, Kamiya M, Urano Y, Nishi H, Herter JM, Mayadas T, Hirohama D, Suzuki K, Kawakami H, Tanaka M, Kurosawa M, Kagaya S, Hishikawa K, Nangaku M, Fujita T, Hayashi M, Hirahashi J (2016) Lactoferrin suppresses neutrophil extracellular traps release in inflammation. EBioMedicine 10:204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schauer C, Janko C, Munoz LE, Zhao Y, Kienhöfer D, Frey B, Lell M, Manger B, Rech J, Naschberger E, Holmdahl R, Krenn V, Harrer T, Jeremic I, Bilyy R, Schett G, Hoffmann M, Herrmann M (2014) Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps limit inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines. Nat Med 20(5):511–517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan HF, Fang XH, Wu GC, Li WX, Zhao XF, Li XP, Xu JH, Ye DQ (2008) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Inflammation 31(4):260–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-008-9073-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Huang X, Cai J, Xie L, Wang W, Tang S, Yin S, Gao X, Zhang J, Zhao J, Huang Y, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J (2016) Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of lupus nephritis with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody: a retrospective study. Medicine 95(4):e2580. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000002580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Galeazzi M, Morozzi G, Sebastiani GD, Bellisai F, Marcolongo R, Cervera R, De Ramòn Garrido E, Fernandez-Nebro A, Houssiau F, Jedryka-Goral A, Mathieu A, Papasteriades C, Piette JC, Scorza R, Smolen J (1998) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in European patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, clinical associations and correlation with other autoantibodies. European Concerted Action on the Immunogenetics of SLE. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 16(5):541–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Čučnik S, Kveder T, Artenjak A, Ulcova Gallova Z, Swadzba J, Musial J, Iwaniec T, Stojanovich L, Alessandri C, Valesini G, Avčin T, Cohen Tervaert JW, Rozman B, Božič B (2012) Avidity of anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus 21(7):764–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203312440057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andrejevic S, Jeremic I, Sefik-Bukilica M, Nikolic M, Stojimirovic B, Bonaci-Nikolic B (2013) Immunoserological parameters in SLE: high-avidity anti-dsDNA detected by ELISA are the most closely associated with the disease activity. Clin Rheumatol 32(11):1619–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2330-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SS, Lawton JW, Chan CE, Li CS, Kwan TH, Chau KF (1992) Antilactoferrin antibody in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Rheumatol 31(10):669–673. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/31.10.669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caccavo D, Rigon A, Picardi A, Galluzzo S, Vadacca M, Ferri GM, Amoroso A, Afeltra A (2005) Anti-lactoferrin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: isotypes and clinical correlates. Clin Rheumatol 24(4):381–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-1040-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chikazawa H, Nishiya K, Matsumori A (2000) Hashimoto K (2000) Immunoglobulin isotypes of anti-myeloperoxidase and anti-lactoferrin antibodies in patients with collagen diseases. J Clin Immunol 4:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006667703202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40(9):1725. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780400928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petri M, Buyon J, Kim M (1999) Classification and definition of major flares in SLE clinical trials. Lupus 8(8):685–691. https://doi.org/10.1191/096120399680411281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB (2002) Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 29(2):288–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Romero-Díaz J, Vargas-Vóracková F, Kimura-Hayama E, Cortázar-Benítez LF, Gijón-Mitre R, Criales S, Cabiedes-Contreras J, Iñiguez-Rodríguez Mdel R, Lara-García EA, Núñez-Alvarez C, Llorente L, Aguilar-Salinas C, Sánchez-Guerrero J (2012) Systemic lupus erythematosus risk factors for coronary artery calcifications. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(1):110–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemna MJ, Schlumberger W, van Paassen P, Dähnrich C, Damoiseaux JG, Cohen Tervaert JW (2016) The avidity of PR3-ANCA in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis during follow-up. Clin Exp Immunol 185(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bosch X, Guilabert A, Font J (2006) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Lancet (London, England) 368(9533):404–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69114-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gajic-Veljic M, Bonaci-Nikolic B, Lekic B, Skiljevic D, Ciric J, Zoric S, Stojimirovic B, Nikolic M (2015) Importance of low serum DNase I activity and polyspecific anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in propylthiouracil-induced lupus-like syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54(11):2061–2070. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyriakidi KS, Tsianos VE, Karvounis E, Christodoulou DK, Katsanos KH, Tsianos EV (2016) Neutrophil anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody proteins: bactericidal increasing protein lactoferrin cathepsin and elastase as serological markers of inflammatory bowel and other diseases. Ann Gastroenterol 29(3):258–267. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dobric S, Popovic D, Nikolic M, Andrejevic S, Spuran M, Bonaci-Nikolic B (2011) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) specific for one or several antigens: useful markers for subtypes of ulcerative colitis and associated primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Chem Lab Med 50(3):503–509. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schnabel A, Csernok E, Isenberg DA, Mrowka C, Gross WL (1995) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus Prevalence specificities and clinical significance. Arthritis Rheum 38(5):633–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishiya K, Chikazawa H, Nishimura S, Hisakawa N, Hashimoto K (1997) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus is unrelated to clinical features. Clin Rheumatol 16(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02238766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spronk PE, Bootsma H, Horst G, Huitema MG, Limburg PC, Tervaert JW, Kallenberg CG (1996) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Rheumatol 35(7):625–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/35.7.625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao MH, Liu N, Zhang YK, Wang HY (1998) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA) and their target antigens in Chinese patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(11):2821–2824. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/13.11.2821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Molnár K, Kovács L, Kiss M, Husz S, Dobozy A, Pokorny G (2002) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol 27(1):59–61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0307-6938.2001.00964.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinico RA, Pozzi C, Radice A, Tincani A, Li Vecchi M, Rota S, Comotti C, Ferrario F, D’Amico G (1993) Clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies with specificity for lactoferrin in renal diseases. Am J Kidney Dis 22(2):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70314-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pradhan VD, Badakere SS, Bichile LS, Almeida AF (2004) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, clinical associations and correlation with other autoantibodies. J Assoc Physicians India 52:533–537

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Su F, Xiao W, Yang P, Chen Q, Sun X, Li T (2017) Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. An Bras Dermatol 92(4):466–469. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu YW, Liu ZR, Xie D, Chen SX, Li HY (2006) Clinical significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 26(6):833–836

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jarrot PA, Chiche L, Hervier B, Daniel L, Vuiblet V, Bardin N, Bertin D, Terrier B, Amoura Z, Andrés E, Rondeau E, Hamidou M, Pennaforte JL, Halfon P, Daugas E, Dussol B, Puéchal X, Kaplanski G, Jourde-Chiche N (2016) Systemic lupus erythematosus and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis overlap syndrome in patients with biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(22):e3748. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Flores-Mendoza G, Sansón SP, Rodríguez-Castro S, Crispín JC, Rosetti F (2018) Mechanisms of tissue injury in lupus nephritis. Trends Mol Med 24(4):364–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2018.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fu HL, Hsu TC, Chang CC, Tsay GJ (2001) Antigenic specificity of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. J Formos Med Assoc 100(1):35–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Manolova I, Dancheva M, Halacheva K (2001) Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, antigen specificity, and clinical associations. Rheumatol Int 20(5):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002960100108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Turner-Stokes T, Wilson HR, Morreale M, Nunes A, Cairns T, Cook HT, Pusey CD, Tarzi RM, Lightstone L (2017) Positive antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody serology in patients with lupus nephritis is associated with distinct histopathologic features on renal biopsy. Kidney Int 92(5):1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chin HJ, Ahn C, Lim CS, Chung HK, Lee JG, Song YW, Lee HS, Han JS, Kim S, Lee JS (2000) Clinical implications of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody test in lupus nephritis. Am J Nephrol 20(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000013557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng Y, Lin Y, Wang X, Zhang Y, Peng F, Wang J, Jiang L, Liang S, Xiao Y (2020) Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol 39(9):2619–2629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05040-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoshida M, Sasaki M, Nakabayashi I, Akashi M, Tomiyasu T, Yoshikawa N, Kojima T, Ohno N, Yamada M (2009) Two types of myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies with a high affinity and a low affinity in small vessel vasculitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27(Suppl 52):S28–S32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pyo JY, Jung SM, Song JJ, Park YB, Lee SW (2019) ANCA positivity at the time of renal biopsy is associated with chronicity index of lupus nephritis. Rheumatol Int 39(5):879–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04263-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Audrain MA, Gourbil A, Muller JY, Esnault LM (1996) Anti-lactoferrin autoantibodies: relation between epitopes and iron-binding domain. J Autoimmun 9(4):569–574. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaut.1996.0076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No. 175065 (M Nikolic, B Bonaci-Nikolic, and M Gajic-Veljic). The Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MGV, BL, and BBN contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript. MN was involved in planning and supervised the work. BS interpreted renal function tests. BL and JL performed the statistical analyses and participated in the interpretation of the results. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branka Bonaci-Nikolic.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mirjana Gajic-Veljic and Branislav Lekic contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gajic-Veljic, M., Lekic, B., Nikolic, M. et al. Level and avidity of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies specific to lactoferrin are useful biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol 41, 709–720 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05926-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-021-05926-x

Keywords

Navigation