Abstract
In previous research concerned on mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), the fractal curves of six fractal models tended to have segmentation characteristics. However, most of these models are rarely applied to loess pores and often have inconsistent results. Therefore, this paper used a combination of techniques to study the loess pore structure and permeability properties, including routine tests, MIP analysis, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) image analysis. The results indicate that different models have various goodness of fit and fractal dimensions. Among them, the Zhang-Li model had the best fractal features. However, there are certain similar segmentation diameters between different fractal curves, suggesting that the segmentation diameters are determined by the pore structure, rather than by the fractal models. By using a new modeling detection method, the paper determined that the segmentation diameters are centrally distributed around two diameters: d1 (7.08 μm) and d2 (0.035 μm). The pore structure is divided into three regions based on these two diameters. Furthermore, the paper proposes a new parameter λ, the relative content for pores with diameters larger than d2 (0.035 μm), which is used to correct effective porosity and permeability prediction. The traditional K-C equation is only 68.41% of the goodness of fit in predicted and measured values. After correcting the porosity, it rises to 77.99%, while the correcting prediction equation based on the pore-size distribution function is 80.46%. These results prove that our new segmentation method for loess pore structure and effective porosity correction is reasonable for permeability estimation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.
Change history
06 December 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-03034-x
References
Carman PC (1939) Permeability of saturated sands, soils and clays. J Agric Sci 29:262–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600051789
Chalmers G, Bustin RM, Powers I (2009) A pore by any other name would be as small: the importance of meso- and microporosity in shale gas capacity (abs.). AAPG Search and Discovery Article 90090
Chen F, Feng Z, Zhang J (2000) Loess particle size data indicative of stable winter monsoons during the last interglacial in the western part of the Chinese loess plateau. CATENA 39:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00083-7
Childs EC, Collis-George N, Taylor GI (1950) The permeability of porous materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 201:392–405. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1950.0068
Ding H, Li Y, Yang Y, Jia X (2019) Origin and evolution of modern loess science – 1824 to 1964. J Asian Earth Sci 170:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.10.024
Dou W, Liu L, Jia L, Xu Z, Wang M, Du C (2021) Pore structure, fractal characteristics and permeability prediction of tight sandstones: a case study from Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. China Mar Pet Geol 123:104737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104737
Friesen WI, Mikula RJ (1987) Fractal dimensions of coal particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 120:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(87)90348-1
Fu X, Qin Y, Zhang W, Wei C, Zhou R (2005) Fractal classification and natural classification of coal pore structure based on migration of coal bed methane. Chin Sci Bull 50:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184085
Gan H, Nandi SP, Walker PL (1972) Nature of the porosity in American coals. Fuel 51:272–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(72)90003-8
GB/T29171–2012 (2012) Rock capillary pressure measurement (in Chinese)
GB/T50123–2019 (2019) Standard for geotechnical testing method (in Chinese)
Han W, Zhou G, Gao D, Zhang Z, Wei Z, Wang H, Yang H (2020) Experimental analysis of the pore structure and fractal characteristics of different metamorphic coal based on mercury intrusion-nitrogen adsorption porosimetry. Powder Technol 362:386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.092
Hao L, Tang J, Wang Q, Tao H, Ma X, Ma D, Ji H (2017) Fractal characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs: a case from the upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China. J Petrol Sci Eng 158:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.060
Hao Q, Oldfield F, Bloemendal J, Guo Z (2008) Particle size separation and evidence for pedogenesis in samples from the Chinese loess plateau spanning the past 22 m.Y. Geology 36:727–730. https://doi.org/10.1130/g24940a.1
Hu Y, Guo Y, Shangguan J, Zhang J, Song Y (2020) Fractal characteristics and model applicability for pores in tight gas sandstone reservoirs: a case study of the upper paleozoic in ordos basin. Energy Fuels 34:16059–16072. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03073
Lai J, Wang G (2015) Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 24:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.027
Li H, Feng Z, Zhang C, Zhao P (2022) Characterization of coal pore structure and matrix compressibility by water vapor injection. Nat Resour Res 31:2869–2883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-022-10109-9
Li K (2010) Analytical derivation of Brooks-Corey type capillary pressure models using fractal geometry and evaluation of rock heterogeneity. J Petrol Sci Eng 73:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.002
Li K, Horne RN (2006) Fractal modeling of capillary pressure curves for the geysers rocks. Geothermics 35:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2006.02.001
Li P, Zheng M, Bi H, Wu S, Wang X (2017) Pore throat structure and fractal characteristics of tight oil sandstone: a case study in the Ordos Basin, China. J Petrol Sci Eng 149:665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.015
Li XA, Li L, Song Y, Hong B, Wang L, Sun J (2019) Characterization of the mechanisms underlying loess collapsibility for land-creation project in Shaanxi province, China—a study from a micro perspective. Eng Geol 249:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.12.024
Li XA, Li L (2017) Quantification of the pore structures of Malan loess and the effects on loess permeability and environmental significance, Shaanxi province, China: An experimental study. Environ Earth Sci 76:523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6855-7
Li Y, He S, Deng X, Xu Y (2018) Characterization of macropore structure of Malan loess in NW China based on 3d pipe models constructed by using computed tomography technology. J Asian Earth Sci 154:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.028
Liu CJ, Wang GX, Sang SX, Gilani W, Rudolph V (2015) Fractal analysis in pore structure of coal under conditions of co2 sequestration process. Fuel 139:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.035
Mahamud MM (2006) Textural characterization of active carbons using fractal analysis. Fuel Process Technol 87:907–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.06.006
Mahamud MM, García V (2018) Textural characterization of chars using fractal analysis of n2 and co2 adsorption. Fuel Process Technol 169:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.10.013
Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1982
Mou P, Pan J, Niu Q, Wang Z, Li Y, Song D (2021) Coal pores: methods, types, and characteristics. Energy Fuels 35:7467–7484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00344
Neimark A (1992) A new approach to the determination of the surface fractal dimension of porous solids. Physica A 191:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(92)90536-Y
Pfeifer P, Avnir D (1983) Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I Fractal Theory of Heterogeneous Surfaces 79:3558–3565. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.446210
Pittman ED (1992) Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection capillary pressure curves for sandstones. AAPG Bull 76:2. https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF87A4-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
Qu Y, Sun W, Tao R, Luo B, Chen L, Ren D (2020) Pore–throat structure and fractal characteristics of tight sandstones in Yanchang Formation. Ordos Basin Marine and Petroleum Geology 120:104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104573
Robinson RB (1966) Classification of reservoir rocks by surface texture1. AAPG Bull 50:547–559. https://doi.org/10.1306/5d25b4a7-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d
Rootare HM, Prenzlow CF (1967) Surface areas from mercury porosimeter measurements. J Phys Chem 71:2733–2736. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100867a057
Shen P, Li K, Jia F (1995) Quantitative description for the heterogeneity of pore structure by using mercury capillary pressure curves. Int Meeting on Pet Engi
Urumović K, Urumović K Sr (2014) The effective porosity and grain size relations in permeability functions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 2014:6675–6714. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-6675-2014
Urumović K, Urumović K Sr (2016) The referential grain size and effective porosity in the Kozeny-Carman model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:1669–1680. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1669-2016
Walker PL, Verma SK, Rivera-Utrilla J, Davis A (1988) Densities, porosities and surface areas of coal macerals as measured by their interaction with gases, vapours and liquids. Fuel 67:1615–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(88)90204-9
Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.17.273
Wei YN, Fan W, Yu N, Deng LS, Wei T (2020) Permeability of loess from the south jingyang plateau under different consolidation pressures in terms of the three-dimensional microstructure. Bull Eng Geol Env 79:4841–4857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01875-y
Wei Y, Lan R, Gu T, Wang H, Luo X (2017) Surface reconstruction of blood vessel from 2d cross-sections with recurrence images. 2017 International Conference on Virtual Reality and Visualization (ICVRV), pp 423–424
Xiao T, Li P, Shao S (2022) Fractal dimension and its variation of intact and compacted loess. Powder Technol 395:476–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2021.09.069
Yu B, Fan W, Dijkstra TA, Wei YN, Deng LS (2021) Heterogeneous evolution of pore structure during loess collapse: insights from x-ray micro-computed tomography. CATENA 201:105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105206
Zhai Q, Rahardjo H (2015) Estimation of permeability function from the soil–water characteristic curve. Eng Geol 199:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.11.001
Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A (2018) A pore-size distribution function based method for estimation of hydraulic properties of sandy soils. Eng Geol 246:288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.031
Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A (2017) Effect of bimodal soil-water characteristic curve on the estimation of permeability function. Eng Geol 230:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.025
Zhang B, Li S (1995) Determination of the surface fractal dimension for porous media by mercury porosimetry. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:1383–1386. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00043a044
Zhang K, Pang X, Zhao Z, Shao X, Zhang X, Li W, Wang K (2018) Pore structure and fractal analysis of lower carboniferous carbonate reservoirs in the Marsel area, Chu-Sarysu basin. Mar Pet Geol 93:451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.03.027
Zhang ZL, Cui ZD (2018) Effects of freezing-thawing and cyclic loading on pore size distribution of silty clay by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Cold Reg Sci Technol 145:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.002
Zhang Z, Weller A (2014) Fractal dimension of pore-space geometry of an eocene sandstone formation. Geophysics 79:D377–D387. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0143.1
Zhao C, Ma S, Jia X, Zhang C (2016) Particle size distribution of soils (0–500cm) in the loess plateau, China. Geoderma Reg 7:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.05.003
Zhou J, Tang Y (2018) Experimental inference on dual-porosity aggravation of soft clay after freeze-thaw by fractal and probability analysis. Cold Reg Sci Technol 153:181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.06.001
Zhu X, Li Y, Peng X, Zhang S (1983) Soils of the loess region in China. Geoderma 29:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(83)90090-3
Zhuang J, Peng J, Wang G, Javed I, Wang Y, Li W (2018) Distribution and characteristics of landslide in loess plateau: a case study in Shaanxi province. Eng Geol 236:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.001
Zou M, Wei C, Zhang M, Shen J, Chen Y, Qi Y (2013) Classifying coal pores and estimating reservoir parameters by nuclear magnetic resonance and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Energy Fuels 27:3699–3708. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400421u
Funding
This research was financed by the China Geological Survey project “Geo-hazards investigation in Hequ-Hancheng zone in Jinshan loess plateau” (No. DD20190642) and the China Shaanxi Province key research program “Research and application of key technologies of geohazards mechanism and risk assessment based on big data” (No. 2019ZDLSF07-07–02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UL was responsible for data curation, methodology, software, and writing of the original draft; YT contributed to the conceptualization, process, and supervision; YT helped with reviewing and editing the manuscript; and HR assisted with software, visualization, and editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: The above article was published with error. The presentation of the equation 17 was incorrectly displayed. This has been updated now.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, T., Tang, Ym., Ren, Hy. et al. A new method to determine the segmentation of pore structure and permeability prediction of loess based on fractal analysis. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-03016-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-03016-z