Skip to main content
Log in

Strength variations due to re-liquefaction—indication from cyclic tests on undisturbed and remold samples of a liquefaction-recurring site

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to historical records, the soil in the Xinhua District of Tainan City, Taiwan, has been liquefied several times in 1946, 2010, and 2016. To assess the soil liquefaction resistance and understand the recurring liquefaction mechanism of this site, this study conducts a series of experimental tests, including the undrained dynamic triaxial tests on undisturbed and remolded soil samples retrieved from the site. Different fines contents, dry densities, and effective confining pressures are considered for the remolded samples during the test program to investigate their influence on the soil liquefaction resistance. A complete experimental soil liquefaction resistance curve of the site is constructed based on the test results. The liquefaction resistances of the undisturbed and remolded samples were found to be similar at the recurring liquefaction site in the present study. Besides, the experimental soil liquefaction resistance curve of the recurring liquefaction site was lower than the in situ empirical soil liquefaction resistance curve that is based on all site conditions, including the aging effect. This observation agrees with the other laboratory test and field investigation that the triggered liquefaction leads to the “reset” of the aging effect that lowers the liquefaction resistance. The finding of this study may explain why a recurring liquefaction site is more vulnerable to liquefaction in a seismic event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amini PF, Huang D, Wang G, Jin F (2021) Effects of strain history and induced anisotropy on reliquefaction resistance of toyoura sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002588

  • Anbazhagan P, Uday A, Moustafa SSR, Al-Arif NSN (2016) Correlation of densities with shear wave velocities and SPT N values. J Geophys Eng 13:320–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arango I, Migues RE (1996) Investigation of the seismic liquefaction of old sand deposits. Bechtel Corporation, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2007) Evaluation of cyclic softening in silts and clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 133:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Sancio RB (2006) Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bwambale B, Andrus RD, Cubrinovski M (2017) Influence of age on liquefaction resistance of Holocene alluvial and marine soils in Christchurch and Kaiapoi, New Zealand. In: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on performance-based design in earthquake geotechnical engineering (PBD-III), Vancouver, Canada

  • Cetin KO, Bilge HT (2012) Cyclic large strain and induced pore pressure models for saturated clean sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, You P (2004) Evaluation of liquefaction potential by the test results of in-situ frozen samples. In: Matsui TCJ, Michel JL, Allersma H (ed) International society of offshore and polar engineers (ISOPE). Cupertino, California 2004: proceedings of the 14th international offshore and polar engineering conference, Toulon, France, pp 563–570

  • Dobry R, Abdoun T (2015) Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor Kσ. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 141:04015047–04015041 to -04015018

  • Dobry R, Abdoun T, Stokoe IKH, Moss RES, Hatton M, El Ganainy H (2015) Liquefaction potential of recent fills versus natural sands located in high-seismicity regions using shear-wave velocity. Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 141:04014112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby KM, Boulanger RW, DeJong JT, Bronner JD (2019) Progressive changes in liquefaction and cone penetration resistance across multiple shaking events in centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145:04018112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001995

  • El-Sekelly W, Abdoun T, Dobry R (2016a) Liquefaction resistance of a silty sand deposit subjected to preshaking followed by extensive liquefaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 142:04015101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000144404015101

  • El-Sekelly W, Dobry R, Abdoun T, Steidl JH (2016b) Centrifuge modeling of the effect of preshaking on the liquefaction resistance of silty sand deposits. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 142:04016012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000143004016012

  • Goto S, Towhata I (2014) Acceleration of aging effect of drained cyclic pre – shearing and high temperature consolidation on liquefaction resistance of sandy soils. Geotechnical Eng J, JGS 9:707–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder LF, Boulanger RW (1997) Application of Kσ and Kα correction factors. In: proceedings, NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils

  • Hayati H, Andrus RD (2009) Updated liquefaction resistance correction factors for aged sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135:1683–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari T, Andrus RD (2012) Liquefaction potential assessment of pleistocene beach sands near Charleston, South Carolina. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138:1196–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JH, Yang CW (2001) Verification of critical cyclic strength curve by Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:115–130

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2007) SPT- and CPT-based relationships for the residual shear strength of liquefied soils. In: KD Pitilakis (ed) Proc., 4th int. conf. on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Springer, New York, pp 1–22

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008a) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI monograph. EERI

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008b) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Paper presented at the Monograph MNO-12, earthquake engineering research institute, Berkeley, CA

  • Ishihara K (1985) Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In: AA B (ed) 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Rotterdam, pp 321–376

  • Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43:351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyota T, Koseki J, Sato T, Kuwano R (2009) Aging effects on small strain shear moduli and liquefaction properties of in-situ frozen and reconstituted sandy soils. Soils Found 49:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (2016) Major advances in liquefaction research by laboratory tests compared with insitu behavior. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 91:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Nagao Y, Ito F, Fukuyama T (2012) Aging effect on sand liquefaction observed during the 2011 earthquake and basic laboratory studies. In: proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 great Japan earthquake. Tokyo, Japan, pp 759–770

  • Kondo Y (2013) Effects of sand ageing on liquefaction resistance in young reclaimed land in Urayasu City, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese)

  • Ladd R (1982) Geotechnical laboratory testing program for study and evaluation of liquefaction ground failure using stress and strain approaches: heber road site, October 15, 1979 imperial valley earthquake geological survey. vol I Wayne (NJ): woodward-clyde consultants. Award no: 14–08–001–19788 sponsored by the US geological survey

  • Lee WF, Ishihara K, Chen CC (2012) Liquefaction of silty sand – preliminary studies from recent Taiwan, New Zealand, and Japan earthquakes. In: proceedings of the international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 great east Japan earthquake. Tokyo, Japan

  • Liu AH, Stewart JP, Abrahamson NA, Moriwaki Y (2001) Equivalent number of uniform stress cycles for soil liquefaction analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:1017–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Solymer ZV (1984) Time-dependent strength gain in freshly deposited or densified sand. J Geotech Engng, ASCE 110:1559–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RES, Thornhill DM, Nelson AI, Levulett DA (2008) Influence of aging on liquefaction potential: preliminary results. Geotech Earthq Eng Soil Dyn IV Congr ASCE:1–10. GSP 181

  • Okamura M, Nelson F, Watanabe S (2019) Pre-shaking effects on volumetric strain and cyclic strength of sand and comparison to unsaturated soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 124:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price AB, DeJong JT, Boulanger RW (2017) Cyclic loading response of silt with multiple loading events. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143:04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley MC, Bastin S, Bradley BA (2013) Recurrent liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Geology 41:419–422. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1979) Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 105:201–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1983) Earthquake-resistant design of earth dams. In: proc., symp. seismic des. of earth dams and caverns, ASCE, New York, pp 41–64

  • Seed RB et al (2003) Recent advances in soil liquefaction engineering: a unified and consistent framework. Paper presented at the 26th annual geotechnical spring seminar, Los Angeles section of the geoInstitute, American society of civil engineers, Queen Mary, Long Beach, CA

  • Tatsuoka F, Kato H, Kimura M, Pradhan TBS (1988) Liquefaction strength of sands subjected to sustained pressure. Soils and Foundations 28(1):119–131

  • Teparaksa J, Koseki J (2018) Effect of past history on liquefaction resistance of level ground in shaking table test. Géotech Lett 8:256–261. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M (2015) The geotechnical characterization of Christchurch sands for advanced soil modeling [dissertation]. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor ML, Cubrinovski M, Haycock I (2012) Application of new ‘gel-push’ sampling procedure to obtained high quality laboratory test data for advanced geotechnical analyses. In: proc. 12th New Zealand soc. of earthquake eng. conf., Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Towhata I, Taguchi Y, Hayashida T, Goto S, Shintaku Y, Hamada Y, Aoyama S (2017) Liquefaction perspective of soil ageing. Geotechnique 2017(67):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso J, Ishihara K, Verdugo R (1988) Aging effects on cyclic shear strength of tailings materials. In: proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol. III. Japan: Tokyo-Kyoto, pp 121–126

  • Tsai C-C, Hwang Y-W, Lu C-C (2020) Liquefaction, building settlement, and residual strength of two residential areas during the 2016 southern Taiwan earthquake. Acta Geotechnica 15:1363–1379

  • Tsai C-C, Kishida T, Kuo C-H (2019) Unified correlation between SPT–N and shear wave velocity for a wide range of soil types considering strain-dependent behavior. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 126

  • Tsai CC, Hsu SY, Wang KL, Yang HC, Chang WK, Chen CH, Hwang YW (2017) Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2016 ML6.6 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan. J Earthq Eng

  • Ueng T-S, Lee C-A (2015) Pore pressure generation in saturated sand induced by one- and two-dimensional shakings. J Geo Eng 10(2):53, 10:53–61

  • Umehara Y, Chiaro G, Kiyota T, Hosona Y, Yagiura Y, Chiba H (2015) Effectiveness of ‘gel-push’ sampling technique to retrieve undisturbed sandy specimens for liquefaction test. In: 6th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Wahyudi S, Koseki J, Sato T, Chiaro G (2016) Multiple-liquefaction behavior of sand in cyclic simple stacked-ring shear tests. Int J Geomech 16:C4015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakamatsu K (2012) Recurrence of liquefaction at the same site induced by the 2011 great east Japan earthquake compared with previous earthquakes. Paper presented at the paper presented at the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering Lisbon Portugal

  • Wichtmann T (2016) Soil behaviour under cyclic loading - experimental observations, constitutive description and applications. Karlsruhe Insitude of Technology

  • Wichtmann T, Niemunis A, Triantafyllidis T, Poblete M (2005) Correlation of cyclic preloading with the liquefaction resistance. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye B, Hu H, Bao X, Lu P (2018) Reliquefaction behavior of sand and its mesoscopic mechanism. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 114:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL (1984) Recurrence of liquefaction at the same site. In: proceedings of the 8th world conference on earthquake engineering. San Francisco, CA. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc, pp 231–238

  • Youd TL, Hoose SN (1977) Liquefaction susceptibility and geologic setting. In: proc., 6th world conf. on earthquake engrg. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp 2189–2194

  • Youd TL et al (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127:817–833

  • Youd TL, Perkins DM (1978) Mapping of liquefactioninduced ground failure potential. J Geotech Engrg Div, ASCE 104:433–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Central Geological Survey (CGS) in the framework of the “probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis and its application” project. The financial support by the CGS is gratefully acknowledged. The tests have been performed with the help of W.C. Lin, who is a research assistant at the NCHU soil mechanics laboratory and graduate students of NTU, Y.H Yang, and Y.H. Lin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Chin Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, FK., Tsai, CC., Ge, L. et al. Strength variations due to re-liquefaction—indication from cyclic tests on undisturbed and remold samples of a liquefaction-recurring site. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 117 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02621-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02621-2

Keywords

Navigation