Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the performance of lignosulfonate-treated high plastic clay under static and cyclic loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional stabilizers such as cement and gypsum have been reported to increase the strength; however, make the soil excessively brittle which is undesirable in case of structures subjected to cyclic loading. Therefore, an alternative material that can improve the strength and durability without altering the ductility of soil specimens is required. In the present study, a lignin-based chemical, lignosulfonate, has been used to stabilize high plastic clay, and its performance has been evaluated under static and cyclic loading for different parameters. Test results indicated a significant increase in the unconfined compressive strength under static loading and reduction in axial strains and rate of axial strain development under cyclic loading for stabilized soil specimens. The reductions in rate of axial strain development for stabilized specimens indicate a slow rutting of subgrade soil and hence increase in the longevity of traffic infrastructures. Based on the variation of unconfined compressive strength of treated soil with lignosulfonate contents and curing time, a novel three-parameter compressive strength model was developed as a function of lignosulfonate to water content ratio and time. Also, a power model was used to illustrate the rate of strain development for both treated and untreated specimens under cyclic loading, and model constants were evaluated at different confining pressures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alazigha DP, Indraratna B, Vinod JS, Ezeajugh LE (2016) The swelling behaviour of lignosulfonate-treated expansive soil. Proc Inst Civ Eng-Ground Improve 169(3):182–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D5311 (2013) Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • Bhuvaneshwari S, Robinson RG, Gandhi SR (2019) Resilient modulus of lime treated expansive soil. Geotech Geol Eng 37:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B (2004) Polymer–clay nanocomposites: an overview with emphasis on interaction mechanisms. Br Ceram Trans 103(6):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Zhou Z, Kong L, Zhang X, Yin S (2018) Undrained dynamic behaviour of peaty organic soil under long-term cyclic loading, part I: experimental investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 107(1):279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Indraratna B (2015) Deformation behavior of lignosulfonate-treated sandy silt under cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng 141(1):06014015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choobbasti AJ, Vafaei A, Soleimani KS (2018) Static and cyclic triaxial behavior of cemented sand with nanosilica. J Mater Civ Engng 30(10):04018269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consoli NC, Prietto PD, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(12):1211–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. Released (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

  • Indraratna B, Athukorala R, Vinod J (2013) Estimating the rate of erosion of silty sand treated with lignosulfonate. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng 139(5):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indraratna B, Muttuvel T, Khabbaz H, Armstrong R (2008) Predicting the erosion rate of chemically treated soil using a process simulation apparatus for internal crack erosion. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(6);837–844

  • IS 2720 – Part IV (1985) Methods of test for soils – part IV: grain size analysis. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards

  • IS 2720 – Part VII (1980) Methods of test for soils – part VII: determination of water content–dry density relation using light compaction. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards

  • IS 2720 – Part VII (1991) Methods of test for soils – part VII: determination of unconfined compressive strength. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards

  • IS 2720 – Part XI (1993) Determination of the shear strength parameters of a specimen tested in unconsolidated undrained triaxial compression without the measurement of pore water pressure

  • Khoury NN, Zaman MM (2004) Correlation between resilient modulus, moisture variation, and soil suction for subgrade soils. Transp Res Rec 1874:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Kim JR (2007) Resilient behavior of compacted subgrade soils under the repeated triaxial test. Constr Build Mater 21:1470–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Gopalakrishnan K, Ceylan H (2011) Moisture susceptibility of subgrade soils stabilized by lignin-based renewable energy coproduct. J Transport Eng 138(11):1283–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkiala TL, Dawson A (2007) Relating full-scale pavement rutting to laboratory permanent deformation testing. Int J Pavement Eng 81:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MJ, Choi SK, Lee W (2009) Shear strength of artificially cemented sands. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 27(3):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekarp F, Isacsson U, Dawson A (2000) State of the art. I: resilient response of unbound aggregates. J Transp Engng 126(1):66–75

  • Nalbantoglu Z, Tuncer ER (2001) Compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of chemically treated expansive clay. Can Geotech J 38(1):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Zhou C, Yuan Q, Xu J (2013) Resilient modulus of unsaturated subgrade soil: experimental and theoretical investigations. Can Geotech J 50(50):223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppala AJ, Saride S, Chomtid S (2009) Experimental and modelling studies of permanent strains of subgrade soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(10):1379–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollings RS, Burkes JP, Rollings MP (1999) Sulfate attack on cement-stabilized sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng 125(5):364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshan K, Choobbasti AJ, Kutanaei SS (2020) Evaluation of the impact of fiber reinforcement on the durability of lignosulfonate stabilized clayey sand under wet-dry condition. Transp Geotech 23:100359

  • Santoni RL, Tingle JS, Nieves M (2005) Accelerated strength improvement of silty sand with non-traditional additives. Transp Res Rec 1936(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sariosseiri F, Muhunthan B (2009) Effect of cement treatment on geotechnical properties of some Washington State soils. Eng Geol 104(1):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaid F, Prietto PD, Consoli NC (2001) Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharmila B, Bhuvaneshwari S, Landlin G (2021) Application of lignosulphonate—a sustainable approach towards strength improvement and swell management of expansive soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02323-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood PT (1993) Soil stabilization with cement and lime: state-of the art review. Transport Research Laboratory, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

  • Ta’negonbadi B, Noorzad R (2017) Physical and geotechnical long-term properties of lignosulfonate- stabilized clay: an experimental investigation. Transp Geotech 17:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingle JS, Santoni RL (2003) Stabilization of clay soils with non-traditional additives. Transp Res Rec 1819:72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinod JS, Indraratna B (2011) A conceptual model for lignosulfonate treated soils. In: Khalili N, Oeser M (eds) 13th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics. Australia, Sydney, pp 296–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinod JS, Indraratna B, Al Mahamud MA (2010) Stabilization of an erodible soil using a chemical admixture. Proc the ICE – Ground Improve 163(1):43–51

  • Yang SR, Lin HD, Kung HS, Huang WH (2008) Suction-controlled laboratory test on resilient modulus of unsaturated compacted subgrade soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(9):1375–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Cai G, Liu S (2017) Application of lignin-based by-product stabilized silty soil in highway subgrade: a field investigation. J Clean Prod 142:4243–4257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Cai G, Liu S (2018) Reclaimed lignin-stabilized silty soil: undrained shear strength, atterberg limits, and microstructure characteristics. J Mater Civ Eng 30(11):04018277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagdish Prasad Sahoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A.K., Sahoo, J.P. A study of the performance of lignosulfonate-treated high plastic clay under static and cyclic loading. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 8265–8278 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02444-7

Keywords

Navigation