Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of fracture frequency and RQD for the fractured rock mass using drilling logging data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractures in rock mass provide the dominant role in its mechanical properties. In this paper, an in situ experiment is carried out to investigate the specific energy of rock mass, from which the response of the specific energy on the open and in-filled fractures is analysed. The effect of the intact core and the open and in-filled fractures on the specific energy is studied, presenting the link between the fracture frequency and the specific energy. The result shows that the relationship between the fracture frequency and the specific energy is proposed for evaluating the fracture frequency and rock quality designation (RQD). A standard deviation of 0.18 for the specific energy can be used as a critical point to distinguish between the segment of the intact core and the fracture segment. A new prediction method is proposed to determinate the fracture frequency and RQD of rock mass, and its utilization for RQD prediction can overcome the limitations of the original RQD. This method is applied in the water conservancy project and demonstrated to be reliable and accurate by comparative studies with previous work, thus providing a low-cost and simple approach for rock quality evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

M :

torque (N·m)

w :

rotation speed (rpd)

F :

drilling force (N)

e :

specific energy (N/mm2)

v :

Penetration rate (mm/min)

A :

excavation area (mm2)

f :

standard deviation of the specific energy

s min :

minimum value of the standard deviation

s max :

maximum value of the standard deviation

λ :

Fracture frequency

N :

fracture sets number

λ i :

fracture frequency normal to set i

θ i :

fracture orientation

t :

selected threshold value

ζ :

fitting parameter of relationship curve between the fracture frequency and the standard deviation of specific energy

References

  • Araghi MS, Samani FB, Goudarzi MT. (2006) A proposal for the modification of RQD (MRQD). In: Proceeding of 4th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Rock Mechanics in Underground Construction. ISRM International Symposium

  • Aydan Ö, Dalgic S. (1998) Prediction of deformation behavior of 3-lanes Bolu tunnels through squeezing rocks of North Anatolian fault zone (NAFZ). In: Proceedings of Regional Symposium on Sedimentary Rock Engineering, p. 228–233. Taipei, China

  • Azimian A (2016) A new method for improving the RQD determination of rock core in borehole. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr MV (1984) Instrumented horizontal drilling for tunneling site investigations. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, U.K, 1984

  • Barton N. (1990) Scale effects or sampling bias? In: Proc. Int. Workshop Scale Effects in Rock Masses. 1990. pp 31–55. Balkema Publ., Rotterdam

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech. Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Loset F, Lien R, Lunde J. (1980) Application of Q-system in design decisions. In: Bergman M, editor. Subsurface space, vol 2. Proceedings of the International Symposium, 1980. p. 553–561. 2. Pergamon Press

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(5):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classification: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. Wiley, New York, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Fan JH, Liu D (2005) Review and prospect on the application and research of RQD. Rock Soil Mech 26(S.2):249–252 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi SY, Park HD (2004) Variation of rock quality designation (RQD) with scanline orientation and length: a case study in Korea. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon RF, Merritt AH. (1970) Predicting in situ modulus of deformation using rock quality indexes. In: Determination of the in situ modulus of deformation of rock. 1970. 154-173. ASTM International

  • Deere DU (1963) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Eng Geol 1(1):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1989) Rock quality designation (RQD) after 20 years. US Army Corps of Engineers Contract Report GL-89-1. 1989. 67. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

  • Deere DU, Deere DW (1988) The rock quality designation (RQD) index in practice. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Rock Class, Engineering Purposes. 1988. 984, 91–10. ASTM Special Technical Publications

  • Deere DU, Hendron AJ, Patton FD, Cording EJ (1967) Design of surface and near surface constructions in rock. In: Fairhurst C (ed) Proceedings of 8th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. AIME, Hack, R, New York, pp 237–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Elci H, Turk N (2014) Rock mass block quality designation for marble production. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 69:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE (1993) Engineering geology. Rock in engineering construction. Wiley, New York, p 385

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack R (2002) Keynote Lecture: an evaluation of slope stability classification. In: Dinis da Gama C, Ribeira e Sousa L (eds) Proceedings of ISRM EUROCK’2002, Portugal, Madeira, Funchal. Sociedade Portuguesa de Geotecnia, Lisboa, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftani M, Chehreh HA, Mehinrad A, Binazadeh K (2016) Practical investigations on use of weighted joint density to decrease the limitations of RQD measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1551–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JP (1999) Selection of the threshold value in RQD assessments. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(5):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. News J ISRM 2(2):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Bray JW (1981) Rock slope engineering. revised, 3rd edn. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock MechMin Sci 43(2):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Dai F, Liu Y, Li A (2021a) Fast marching method for microseismic source location in cavern containing rockmass: performance analysis and engineering application. Engineering. Available online 21 January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.10.019

  • Jiang R, Dai F, Liu Y, Li A, Feng P (2021b) Frequency characteristics of acoustic emissions induced by crack propagation in rock tensile fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng. Published February 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02351-5

  • Li L, Ouellet S, Aubertin M. (2009) An improved definition of rock quality designation, RQDc. In: Proceedings of the 3rd CANUS Rock Mechanics Symposium, Toronto, May. 2009

  • Mitri HS, Edrissi R, Henning J. (1994) Finite element modeling of cablebolted stopes in hard rock ground mines. Presented at the SME Annual Meeting. 94–116. Albuquerque, USA. 1994

  • Nicholson GA, Bieniawski ZT (1980) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8(3):181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A (1982) The volumetric joint count—a useful and simple measure of the degree of jointing. In: Proceedings of international congress of IAEG, 221–228. New Delhi

  • Palmstrom A. (1985) Application of the volumetric joint count as a measure of rock mass jointing. Proc. Int. Symp. on Fundamentals of Rock Joints, 1985. 103–110. Bjorkliden

  • Palmstrom A (1986) A general practical method for identification of rock masses to be applied in evaluation of rock mass stability conditions and TBM boring progress. In: Proc. Conf. on Fjellsprengingsteknikk, Bergmekanikk. Geoteknikk, Oslo, Norway, 1986; 31.1–31.31

  • Palmstrom A. (1995) RMi—a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Department of Geology. 1995

  • Palmstrom A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunnels Undergr Space Technol 20:362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister P (1985) Recording drilling parameters in ground engineering. Geodri Uing 10:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (1993) Discontinuity analysis for rock engineering. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD, Hudson JA (1976) Discontinuity spacings in rock. Int J Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunnesson H (1990) Drill process monitoring in percussive drilling--a multivariate approach to data analysis. Licentiate thesis 1990:08L, Lule University of Technology. 1990

  • Schunnesson H (1996) RQD predictions based on drill performance parameters. Tunn Underg sp Tech 11(3):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoble MJ, Peck J (1987) A technique for ground characterization using automated production drill monitoring. Int J Surf Mining 1:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z (1990) Cumulative core index for rock quality evaluations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z (1993) RQD-fracture frequency chart based on a Weibull distribution. Int J Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(5):555–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z, Eissa EA (1992) Rock quality charts for long—normally distributed block size. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z, Kazi A (1984) Discontinuity spacing and RQD estimates from finite length scanlines. Int J Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 21(4):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Consideration of the geomechanical classification of Bieniawski. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Engineering Geology and Underground Construction, vol. 1. 3–44. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. 1983

  • Sheorey PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Teale R (1965) The concept of specific energy in rock drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Gao S, Li S, He M, Gao H, Jiang B, Jiang Y (2018a) Upper bound analytic mechanics model for rock cutting and its application in field testing. Tunnel Undergr Sp Tech 73:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Gao S, Jiang B, Li S, He M, Gao H, Qin Q (2018b) Rock-cutting mechanics model and its application based on slip-line theory. Int J Geomech 18(5):04018025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Gao HK, Yu HC, Jiang B, Liu BH (2019) Method for measuring rock mass characteristics and evaluating the grouting-reinforced effect based on digital drilling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yudhbir WL, Prinzl F (1983) An empirical failure criterion for rock masses. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, 1: B1–8. Melbourne. 1983

  • Yue ZQ, Lee CF, Law KT, Tham LG (2004) Automatic monitoring of rotary-percussive drilling for ground characterization-illustrated by a case example in Hong Kong. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(4):573–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2010) Estimating the strength of jointed rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(4):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Yang XJ, Lü Q, Zhao Y, Deng JH, Ding ZJ (2018) A new perspective for the directivity of Rock Quality Designation (RQD) and an anisotropy index of jointing degree for rock masses. Eng Geol 240:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Wang X, Lü Q, Liu J, Guo J, Liu T, Deng J (2020) A contribution to relationship between volumetric joint count (Jv) and rock quality designation (RQD) in three-dimensional (3-D) space. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(3):1485–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 11902249 and 11872301), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (Shaanxi Province Natural Science Foundation) (Grant No. 2019JQ395), and Education Bureau of Shaanxi Province | Scientific Research Plan Projects of Shaanxi Education Department in China (Grant No. 20JS093).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingming He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Author information

Reprints and permission information are available. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.M. He (hemingming@xaut. edu.cn).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, M., Zhang, Z. & Li, N. Prediction of fracture frequency and RQD for the fractured rock mass using drilling logging data. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 4547–4557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02240-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02240-3

Keywords

Navigation