Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Kerman and adjacent areas in the west of Lut block, Central-East Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is the first attempt to apply fault-based and time-dependent seismicity models cooperatively for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) of the Kerman and adjacent areas (54–59° E, 28.5–34° N). For this study, almost all available literature and databases have been investigated to compile reliable information reported as instrumental, historical, and paleoseismological events, together with the geometry and kinematics information for active faults. This information systematically is integrated and contributed to PSHA. Conditional probabilities of occurrence for earthquakes greater than the maximum earthquake from which its standard deviation is deducted (M > Mmax − σMmax) are computed based on a Brownian passage time (BPT) model. The spatial distribution of the time-dependent peak ground acceleration (PGA) has been calculated, and spectral accelerations have been computed for three selected cities (Kerman, Rafsanjan, Ravar), with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. The time-dependent PSHA map for PGA shows variations from − 21 along the Gowk fault to + 32% near the Sabzevaran fault segments in comparison with the corresponding time-independent PGAs. The difference between the time-dependent and time-independent PGAs at most parts of the study area is negligible, especially at sites farther away from the faults, where the differences vary from − 7 to + 7%. Moreover, the difference between the time-dependent and time-independent spectral accelerations for Ravar and Rafsanjan cities is insignificant. However, this difference at periods of 0.1–0.3 s is significant in Kerman city. The results of this study provide a stimulus for considering time-dependency assumption and fault-based approach in future earthquake-resistant constructions required in Kerman and adjacent areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in this article are from the International Seismological Center (ISC; http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscbulletin, last accessed December 2016; http://www.isc.ac.uk/iscgem/, last accessed April 2017), GCMT earthquake data bulletins (http://www.globalcmt.org/CMTsearch.html, last accessed December 2016), National Earthquake Information Center of the US Geological Survey, (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/, last accessed December 2016), The Iranian Seismological Center (http://irsc.ut.ac.ir/bulletin.php, last accessed May 2017), and International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (http://www.iiees.ac.ir/iiees/EQsearch/EventQuery.aspx, last accessed April 2016). Other data are from published documents referred to them in the electronic supplement or references. All plots were made using MATLAB (v.2016b) at http://www.mathworks.com (last accessed December 2016).

References

  • Ambraseys NN, Jackson JA (1998) Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int 133:390–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N, Melville C (1982) A history of Persian earthquakes. Cambridge Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson HL (1989) A physicist’s desk reference. American Institute of Physics, New York

  • Anderson JG, Wesnousky SG, Stirling MW (1996) Earthquake size as a function of fault slip rate. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2011) Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzaro R, Barberi G, D'Amico S, Pace B, Peruzza L, Tuvè T (2017) When probabilistic seismic hazard climbs volcanoes: the Mt Etna case, Italy part I: model components for sources parametrization. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci Discuss:1–28. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2017-127

  • Berberian M (2005) The 2003 Bam urban earthquake: a predictable seismotectonic pattern along the western margin of the rigid Lut Block, southeast Iran. Earthquake Spectra 21:35–99. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2127909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M (2014) Earthquakes and coseismic faulting on the Iranian plateau: a historical, social and physical approach Elsevier series development in earth surface processes. Amsterdam

  • Berberian M, Yeats RS (1999) Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian plateau. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:120–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberian M, Jackson JA, Fielding E et al. (2001) The 1998 March 14 Fandoqa earthquake (Mw 6.6.) in Kerman province, Southeast Iran: Re-rupture of the 1981 Sirch earthquake fault, triggering of slip on adjacent thrusts and the active tectonics of the Gowk fault zone Geophys J Int 146: 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01459.x

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24:99–138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthquake Spectra 24:139–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 30:1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913eqs175m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 24:173–215. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 30:1117–1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813eqs219M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CH, Petersen MD, Cao T, Toppozada TR, Reichle M (2000) A time-dependent probabilistic seismic-hazard model for California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119980087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan-Manshadi SH, Mirzaei N, Eskandari-Ghadi M, Shabani E (2017) Investigation of the use of slip rate on time-independent seismic hazard macrozonation of Kerman region, west of Lut Block. Iranian J Geophys 11:36–62 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Field EH, Jackson DD, Dolan JF (1999) A mutually consistent seismic-hazard source model for Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:559–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Field EH, Jordan TH, Cornell CA (2003) OpenSHA: a developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 74:406–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field EH et al (2015) Long-term time-dependent probabilities for the third uniform California earthquake rupture forecast (UCERF3). Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:511–543. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroutan M, Sébrier M, Nazari H et al (2012) New evidence for large earthquakes on the Central Iran plateau: paleoseismology of the Anar fault. Geophys J Int 189:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05365.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroutan M, Meyer B, Sébrier M et al (2014) Late Pleistocene-Holocene right slip rate and paleoseismology of the Nayband fault, western margin of the Lut block, Iran. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:3517–3560. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi MR (2016) Surface ruptures of the Iranian earthquakes 1900-2014: insights for earthquake fault rupture hazards and empirical relationships. Earth-Sci Rev 156:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 84:2348–2350. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior I (2005) Summary of magnitude working group recommendations on standard procedures for determining earthquake magnitudes from digital data

  • Jackson J, Bouchon M, Fielding E et al. (2006) Seismotectonic, rupture-process, and earthquake-hazard aspects of the 26 December 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake Geophys J Int 163:90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03056.x

  • Kale Ö, Akkar S, Ansari A, Hamzehloo H (2015) A ground-motion predictive model for Iran and Turkey for horizontal PGA, PGV, and 5% damped response spectrum: investigation of possible regional effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:963–980. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17(3):897–911

  • Kijko A (2011) Seismic hazard. In: Gupta H (ed) Encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CF, Ye H, Zhou Q (1997) On the potential seismic hazard in Hong Kong. Episodes 20:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard M (2014) Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations: update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:2953–2965. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Xu W, Wu J, Gao M (2016) Using new models to assess probabilistic seismic hazard of the North–South Seismic Zone in China. Nat Hazards 82:659–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2212-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MV, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA (2002) A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2233–2250. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClusky SC, Reilinger R, Mahmoud S, Sari DB, Tealeb A (2003) GPS constraints on Africa (Nubia) and Arabia plate motions. Geophys J Int 155:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02023.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1995) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1275–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: Major seismotectonic provinces. J Earthq Pred Res 7:465–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei N, Gheitanchi MR, Naserieh S, Raeesi M, Zarifi Z, Tabaei SG (2002) Basic parameters of earthquakes in Iran. Danesh Negar Publications, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi-Bafrouei SH, Mirzaei N, Shabani E (2014) A declustered earthquake catalog for the iranian plateau. Ann Geophys:57. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6395

  • Nalbant SS, Steacy S, McCloskey J (2006) Stress transfer relations among the earthquakes that occurred in Kerman province, southern Iran since 1981. Geophys J Int 167:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIST/SEMATECH (2012) e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, accessed Dec 26, 2012, at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/

  • Ordaz M, Martinelli F, D'Amico V, Meletti C (2013) CRISIS2008: a flexible tool to perform probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. Seismol Res Lett 84:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220120067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace B, Peruzza L, Lavecchia G, Boncio P (2006) Layered seismogenic source model and probabilistic seismic-hazard analyses in central Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:107–132. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace B, Visini F, Peruzza L (2016) FiSH: MATLAB tools to turn fault data into seismic-hazard models. Seimol Res Lett 87:374–386. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill GA, Garcia J (2014) The OpenQuake-engine book: hazard. Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Technical Report https://doi.org/10.13117/GEM.OPENQUAKE.TR2014.08

  • Parsons T (2008) Monte Carlo method for determining earthquake recurrence parameters from short paleoseismic catalogs: example calculations. J Geophys Res:113. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB004998

  • Peruzza L, Pace B, Cavallini F (2010) Error propagation in time-dependent probability of occurrence for characteristic earthquakes in Italy. J Seismol 14:119–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-008-9131-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzza L, Pace B, Visini F (2011) Fault-based earthquake rupture forecast in Central Italy: remarks after the L’Aquila Mw 6.3 event. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD, Cao T, Campbell KW, Frankel AD (2007) Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard assessment for the state of California: uniform California earthquake rupture forecast model 1.0. Seimol Res Lett 78:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.1.99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raeesi M, Zarifi Z, Nilfouroushan F, Boroujeni SA, Tiampo K (2016) Quantitative analysis of seismicity in Iran. Pure Appl Geophys 174:793–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1435-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid HF (1910) The mechanics of the earthquake, the California earthquake of April 18, 1906: report to the State Earthquake Investigation Commission 2 Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C

  • Shahvar MP, Zare M, Castellaro S (2013) A Unified Seismic Catalog for the Iranian Plateau (1900-2011). Seismol Res Lett 84(2):233–249

  • Shoja-Taheri J, Naserieh S, Hadi G (2010) A test of the applicability of NGA models to the strong ground-motion data in the Iranian plateau. J Earthq Eng 14:278–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903086051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling M, Goded T, Berryman K, Litchfield N (2013) Selection of earthquake scaling relationships for seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:2993–3011. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahernia N, Khodabin M, Mirzaei N, Eskandari-ghadi M (2012) Statistical models of interoccurrence times of Iranian earthquakes on the basis of information criteria. J Earth Syst Sci 121(2):463–474

  • Talebian M et al (2006) The Dahuiyeh (Zarand) earthquake of 2005 February 22 in central Iran: reactivation of an intramountain reverse fault. Geophys J Int 164:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02839.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernant P, Nilforoushan F, Chéry J et al (2004) Present-day crustal deformation and plate kinematics in the Middle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and northern Oman. Geophys J Int 157:381–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02222.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Jackson J, Baker C (2003) Surface expression of thrust faulting in eastern Iran: Source parameters and surface deformation of the 1978 Tabas and 1968 Ferdows earthquake sequences Geophys J Int 152: 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01886.x

  • Walker R, Jackson J (2004) Active tectonics and late Cenozoic strain distribution in central and eastern Iran. Tectonics 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003TC001529

  • Walker RT, Talebian M, Saiffori S, Sloan RA, Rasheedi A, MacBean N, Ghassemi A (2010) Active faulting, earthquakes, and restraining bend development near Kerman city in southeastern Iran. J Struct Geol 32:1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2010.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnousky SG (2008) Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: issues and implications for seismic-hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:1609–1632. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities [WGCEP] (2003) Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region: 2002–2031 US Geol Surv Open-File Rept:03–214

  • Wu S-C, Cornell CA, Winterstein SR (1995) A hybrid recurrence model and its implication on seismic hazard results. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarani H, Ghafoori SMM (2013) Probabilistic assessment of strong earthquake recurrence in the Iranian plateau. J Earthq Eng 17:449–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.725389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller G, Hainzl S, Holschneider M (2008) Recurrent large earthquakes in a fault region: what can be inferred from small and intermediate events? Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:2641–2651. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080146l

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Hadi Dehghan-Manshadi.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 59 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehghan-Manshadi, S.H., Mirzaei, N., Eskandari-Ghadi, M. et al. Time-dependent probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Kerman and adjacent areas in the west of Lut block, Central-East Iran. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 5079–5094 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01897-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01897-6

Keywords

Navigation