Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric study of integrity on the mechanical properties of transversely isotropic rock mass using DEM

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of the mechanical properties of a transversely isotropic rock mass is a challenging task in practical engineering. This paper aims to study the relationships between the integrity parameters and mechanical properties of a transversely isotropic rock mass. The rock mass quality designation (RQD) is an important index and reference for rock mass quality evaluation that was introduced to establish the numerical models of a jointed rock mass with different integrities. The numerical models of a transversely isotropic rock mass were established using the bonded particle model (BPM) and smooth joint model (SJM) embedded into the Particle Flow Code software (PFC2D). After calibrating the microscopic parameters of the intact rock and structural planes, a series of compression tests of a transversely isotropic rock mass was carried out to determine compressive strength and deformation modulus, and main factors were considered including the RQD, inclined angle of structural planes, structural plane thickness, structural plane properties, intact rock properties, and confining pressure. The experimental results showed that the mechanical parameters and failure modes of a transversely isotropic rock mass were controlled by the integrity parameters. By comparing the value of σcmc (ratio of the compressive strength of rock mass to rock mass) and Em/Er (ratio of the deformation modulus of rock mass to rock mass) with field test results, the results obtained from the discrete element method were demonstrated to be reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allegre CJ, Le Mouel JL, Provost A (1982) Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction. Nature 297(6):47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadei B, Savage WZ (1993) Effect of joints on rock mass strength and deformability. In: Comprehensive Rock Engineering: principles, practice and projects: 331-365

  • Amadei B, Savage WZ (1993) Effect of joints on rock mass strength and deformability. Comprehensive rock engineering: principles, practice and projects: 331–365

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1996) Standard specifications for highway bridges, sixteenth edn. AASHTO, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Dalgic S (1998) Prediction of deformation behavior of 3-lanes Bolu tunnels through squeezing rocks of North Anatolian fault zone (NAFZ). In: Proceedings of Regional Symposium on Sedimentary Rock Engineering. Taipei, China: 228-233

  • Aydan Ö, Ulusay R, Tokashiki N (2014) A new rock mass quality rating system: rock mass quality rating (RMQR) and its application to the estimation of geomechanical characteristics of rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1255–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahaaddini M, Hagan PC, Mitra R, Hebblewhite BK (2014) Scale effect on the shear behaviour of rock joints based on a numerical study. Eng Geol 181:212–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Loset F, Lien R, Lunde J (1980) Application of Q-system in design decisions concerning dimensions and appropriate support for underground installations. In: Bergman M, ed. Subsurface Space: Environmental Protection, Low Cost Storage, Energy Savings. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium. Pergamon Press, pp: 553-561

  • Bhasin R, Grimstaad E (1996) The use of stress-strength relationship in the assessment of tunnel stability. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 11(1):93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15(5):237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho N (2008) Discrete element modeling of rock pre-peak fracturing and dilation. University of Alberta(phd)

  • Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC (2008) Development of a shear zone in brittle rock subjected to direct shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1335–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon RF, Merritt AH (1970) Predicting in situ modulus of deformation using rock quality indexes. In: Determination of the In-Situ Modulus of Deformation of Rock. ASTM International:154-173

  • Cui Y (2019) Effect of joint type on the shear behavior of synthetic rock. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(5):3395–3412

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Gdotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan DQ, Konietzky H (2014) Numerical simulations and interpretations of Brazilian tensile tests on transversely isotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Debecker B, Vervoort A (2013) Two-dimensional discrete element simulations of the fracture behaviour of slate. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 1(1):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelbro C, Sjoberg J, Nordlund E (2006) A quantitative comparison of strength criteria for hard rock masses. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 22:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum AF (1985) Effective elastic properties for a randomly jointed rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 22(6):467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JA, Dusseault MB (1989) Rock engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK (1994) Correlations for predicting support pressures and closures in tunnels (phd). Thesis Nagpur, India: Nagpur University

  • Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabasi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):701–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi M, Moghaddas S, Ajalloeian R (2010) Application of rock mass characterization for determining the mechanical properties of rock mass: a comparative study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • He MC, Leal e Sousa R, Müller A, Vargas E, Ribeiro e Sousa L, Xin C (2015) Analysis of excessive deformations in tunnels for safety evaluation. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 45:190–202

    Google Scholar 

  • He MM, Li N, Zhang ZQ, Yao XC, Chen YS, Zhu CH (2019) An empirical method for determining the mechanical properties of transversely isotropic rocks using drilling energy. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 116:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition.In: Bawden HRW, Curran J and Telsenicki M, eds. In: Proceedings of the Fifth North American Rock Mechanics Society (NARMS-TAC 2002) Symposium. Toronto, Canada: Mining Innovation and Technology: 267-273

  • Hoek E, Marinos PG, Benissi M (1998) Applicability of the geological strength index (GSI) classification for weak and sheared rock masses-the case of the Athens schist formation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57(2):151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition.In: Bawden HRW, Curran J and Telsenicki M, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth North American Rock Mechanics Society (NARMS-TAC 2002) Symposium. Toronto, Canada: Mining Innovation and Technology: 267-273

  • Hofmann H, Babadagli T, Yoon JS, Zang A, Zimmermann G (2015) A grain based modeling study of mineralogical factors affecting strength, elastic behavior and micro fracture development during compression tests in granites. Eng Fract Mech 147:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang TH, Chang CS, Yang ZY (1995) Elastic moduli for fractured rock mass. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28(3):135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2014) PFC2D manual, version 5.0 Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Kalamaras GS, Bieniawski ZT (1993) A rock mass strength concept for coal seams. In: Peng SS, ed. 12th Conf. Ground Control in Mining. Morgantown: 274–283

  • Kim H, Cho JW, Song I, Min KB (2012) Anisotropy of elastic moduli, P-wave velocities, and thermal conductivities of Asan Gneiss, Boryeong Shale, and Yeoncheon Schist in Korea. Eng Geols 147–148(5):68–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyama T, Jing L (2007) Effects of model scale and particle size on micro-mechanical properties and failure processes of rocks - a particle mechanics approach. Eng Anal Bound Elem 31(5):458–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1987) Foundations in rock. In: Bell FG (ed) Ground engineer’s reference book, vol 55. Butterworths, London, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C (2001) A method for graphically presenting the deformation modulus of transversely isotropic rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 34(1):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin ZN, Xun WY, Wang W, Wang HL, Wang RB, Ji H et al (2018) Determination of strength and deformation properties of columnar transversely isotropic rocks using physical model tests. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(9):3302–3311

    Google Scholar 

  • Masahide O, Catherine O, Tom S (2017) Empirical assessment of the critical time increment in explicit particulate discrete element method. Comput Geotech 86:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitri HS, Edrissi R, Henning J (1994) Finite element modeling of cable bolted stopes in hard rock ground mines. Presented at the SME Annual Meeting. Albuquerque, USA: 94–116

  • Nicholson GA, Bieniawski ZT (1990) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8(3):181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Min KB (2015) Bonded-particle discrete element modeling of mechanical behavior of transversely isotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 76:243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO (2015) The bonded-particle model as a tool for rock mechanics research and application: current trends and future directions. Geosyst Eng 18(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(8):1329–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD, Hudson J (1976) Discontinuity spacing in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 13(5):135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw CE, Park JC (1997) Effect of mechanical interactions on the scaling of fracture length and aperture. Nature 386(3):482–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheorey PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheory PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criterion. Oxford IBH Publishing co and AA. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B (1993) Workshop on Norvegian method of tunneling. CSMRS, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Viladkar MN, Samadhiya NK, Mehrotra VK (1997) Rock mass strength parameters mobilized in tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 12(1):47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Soga K, Alonso E, Yerro A, Kumar K, Bandara S (2016) Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method. Géotechnique 66(3):248–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan X, Konietzky H, Frühwirt T, Dan DQ (2015) Brazilian tests on transversely isotropic rocks: laboratory testing and numerical simulations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(4):1341–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Gutierrez M (2010) Discrete element simulations of direct shear specimen scale effects. Géotechnique 60(5):395–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Sloan SW, Tang CA, Zhu WC (2012) Numerical simulation of the failure mechanism of circular tunnels in transversely isotropic rock masses. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 32:231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Zeng Y (2018) Parametric study of smooth joint parameters on the mechanical behavior of transversely isotropic rocks and research on calibration method. Comput Geotech 98:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao WM, Deng RG, Zhong ZB, Fu XM, Wang CY (2014) Experimental study on the mechanical properties of simulated columnar transversely isotropic rocks. J Geophys Eng 12(1):80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong MT, Tsao PF (2000) Preparation and mechanical properties of artificial transversely isotropic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(6):1001–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong MT, Ming CK, Juang CH (2006) An experimental investigation of the failure mechanism of simulated transversely isotropic rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(8):1163–1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudbir F, Lemanza W, Prinzel F (1983) An empirical failure criterion for rock masses. In: Proc. 5th Int. Cong. ISRM, Melbourne. Rotterdam: Balkema: 131-138

  • Zhang LY (2010) Estimating the strength of transversely isotropic rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(4):391–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Cui YF, Chan D, Taslagyan K (2018) DEM simulation of vibrational fluidization of granular material. Granul Matter 20(71)

  • Zheng J, Yang XJ, Lü Q, Zhao Y, Deng JH, Ding ZJ (2018) A new perspective for the directivity of rock quality designation (RQD) and an anisotropy index of jointing degree for rock masses. Eng Geol 240:81–94

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11902249, 11572246, and 51179153) and Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (17JS091 and 2019JQ395).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-ming He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huan, Jy., He, Mm., Zhang, Zq. et al. Parametric study of integrity on the mechanical properties of transversely isotropic rock mass using DEM. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 2005–2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01679-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01679-9

Keywords

Navigation