Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prediction of mechanical and physical properties of some sedimentary rocks from ultrasonic velocities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, density, porosity, void ratio, and ultrasonic P- and S-wave first arrival times were measured on limestone, sandstone, and siltstone samples obtained by using mechanical soundings in the city of Zonguldak. Turkey. Fracture and fissure indexes of rocks were calculated from ultrasonic P- (Vp) and S-wave (Vs) velocities. Multi-parameter relationships occurred between ultrasonic velocities with seismic fracture and fissure indexes and physical and mechanical properties of the rocks. Root mean squared error (RMSE = 0.5–0.8%) values correlated between measured densities and densities calculated from Vp and Vs. The correlation coefficients of experimental relations between densities, void ratio, and porosity with seismic velocities that were obtained ranged from 78, 86, 67, and 84%, respectively. Consequently, natural, water-saturated and grain densities, porosity, and void ratio values were determined from new multi-parameter relationships obtained from the combined use of Vp and Vs. In addition, the results of this study suggest that the rock quality may wrongly be determined using the only Vp, whereas it can be obtained more accurately by using Vp and Vs together. The reason for this is that the P wave spreads in solid, liquid, and gas media, while the S-wave spreads only in solid media. Therefore, S-waves will not be altered by fracture filling (gas or liquid), while P-waves are affected by fracture filling. In the present study, the use of Vp and Vs together in relationships was more useful in determining the strength and hydraulic properties of rock mass that the use of either Vp or Vs alone. Also, Rock Quality Designation (RQD) and Rock Mass Rating (RMR) values can be correctly calculated from the combined use of Vp and Vs. As a result, interpretation of crack fill and classification of the rocks can be quickly performed using seismic velocities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altıntaş M (1996) The relations between the seismic parameters and some of the rock mechanics parameters. Master’s thesis. Graduate School of Science, Ankara University, Ankara (in Turkish)

  • ASTM D7263-09 (2018) Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Density (Unit Weight) of Soil Specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.09

  • ASTM International. D 2845-00 (n.d.) (2015). Standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock. In: Annual book of ASTM standards vol. 14.02. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM International (2002) ASTM D2938-95 (2002). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Babacan AE, Ersoy H, Gelisli K (2012) Physical properties of rocks, and time-frequency analysis techniques to determine ultrasonic velocity, beige limestone (NE Turkey) on a case study. J Eng Geol 36(1):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications—a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining civil, and petroleum engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch F (1966) Compressibility; elastic constants. In: Clark SP (ed) Handbook of physical constants. Geol Soc Am Mem 97:97–174

  • Brown ET (1981) Rock characterization testing and monitoring. International Society for Rock Mechanics suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Xu Z (2017) The ultrasonic P-wave velocity-stress relationship of rocks and its application. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76:661–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NJ (1982) Seismic velocities. In: Carmichael RS (ed) Handbook of physical properties of rocks vol. 2. CRC Press,.Inc, Baton Rouge, pp 2–227

  • Deere DU, Deere DW (1988) The RQD Index in Practice. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 984:91–101

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Classification and index properties of intact rock. Technical report AFWL-TR-65-116. AF Special Weapons Center, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico

  • Diethart-Jauk E, Gegenhuber N (2018) Shear weakening for different lithologies observed at different saturation stages. J Appl Geophys 148:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Naqa A (1996) Assessment of geomechanical characterization of a rock mass using a seismic geophysical technique. Geotech Geol Eng 14:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourmaintraux D (1976). Characterization of rocks laboratory tests. In: Panet M (ed) La Mechanique des roches applique aux ouvrages du genie civil. Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees, Paris, p 235

  • Gardner GHF, Gardner LW, Gregory AR (1974) Formation velocity and density- the diagnostic basic for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics 39(6):770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaviglio P (1989) Longitudinal waves propagation in a limestone: The relationship between velocity and density. Rock Mech Rock Eng 22:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE (1976) Classification and index properties of rocks: Introduction to mechanics of rock, second printing. Translated by K. Kayabali). Published by John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • Harrison JP, Hudson FJA (2000) Cracks and semi-spherical projection. In: Engineering rock mechanics, vol. 2: solved examples. Translated by Kamil Kayabali and Hasan Arman. Published by Elsevier Science, p 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-043010-2.X5000-X

  • Huang X, Qi S, Guo S, Dong W (2014) Experimental study of ultrasonic waves propagating through a rock mass with a single joint and multiple parallel joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji S, Wang Q, Salisbury MH, Wang Y, Jia D (2017) P-wave velocities and anisotropy of typical rocks from the Yunkai Mts. (Guangdong and Guangxi, China) and constraints on the composition of the crust beneath the South China Sea. J Asian Earth Sci 141:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Yeken T (2008) Determination of physical properties of carbonate rocks from P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S, Soylemez M, Fener M (2008) Determination of fracture depth of rock blocks from P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpuz C, Paşamehmetoğlu AG (1997) Field characterization of weathered Ankara Andesites. Eng Geol 46(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JS, Yoon HK (2017) Characterization of rock weathering using elastic waves: a laboratory-scale experimental study. J Appl Geophys 140:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinaric S, Kostial P (1998) Contribution to the signal processing of ultrasonic pulses. J Phys 31(8):970–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen ST, To QD, Vu MN (2017) Extended analytical solutions for effective elastic moduli of cracked porous media. J Appl Geophys 140:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbağ N, Uyanık O (2017) Prediction of reinforced concrete strength by ultrasonic velocities. J Appl Geophys 141:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PK, Singh TN (2008) A correlation between P-wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi ZM, Liu L, Peng M, Liu CC, Tao FJ, Liu CS (2018) Non-destructive testing of full-length bonded rock bolts based on HHT signal analysis. J Appl Geophys 151:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøgren B, Øfsthus A, Sandberg J (1979) Seismic classification of rock mass qualities. Geophys Prospect 27:409–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song I, Suh M (2014) Effects of foliation and microcracks on ultrasonic anisotropy in retrograde ultramafic and metamorphic rocks at shallow depths. J Appl Geophys 109:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanvarachorn P, Srisuk K, Tassanasorn A-O, Lertsirivorakul R (1984) Dynamic elastic properties of the Phu Phan Sandstone. In: Thiramongkol N, Nakapadungrat S, Pisutha-Arnond V (eds) Conference on Applications of Geology and the National Development. Published by Department of Geology, Chulalongkorn University, Department of Mineral Resources, Geological Society of Thailand, Bangkok, pp 157–161

  • Thill RE, Bur TR (1969) An automated ultrasonic pulse measurement system. Geophysics 34:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toksöz MN, Cheng CH, Timur A (1976) Velocities of seismic waves in porous rocks. Geophysics 41(4):621–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk N, Dearman WR (1986) A suggested approach to rock characterization in terms of seismic velocities. In: Hartman AL (ed) 27th US Symp Rock Mechanics. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME), Littleton, pp 168–175

  • Uyanık O (1991) Importance of geophysical laboratory parameters of rock mechanics and the associating DEU. Thesis. Geophysical Engineering Department, Izmir (in Turkish)

  • Uyanık O (2011) The porosity of saturated shallow sediments from seismic compressional and shear wave velocities. J Appl Geophys 73(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyanık O, Çatlıoğlu B (2015) Determination of density from seismic velocities. Jeofizik 17:3–15 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J-H, Hung J-H, Dong J-J (2009) Seismic velocities, density, porosity, and permeability measured at a deep hole penetrating the Chelungpu fault in Central Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci 36(2–3):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li X (2015) Experimental study on cracking damage characteristics of a soil and rock mixture by UPV testing. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:775–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z (2002) Seismic anisotropy in sedimentary rocks, part 2: laboratory data. Geophysics 67(5):1423–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens R, Simmons G, Caruso L (1984) The ratio Vp/vs as a discriminant of composition for siliceous limestones. Geophysics 49:1850–1860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wanga E, Chena D, Li X, Li N (2016) The observation of AE events under uniaxial compression and the quantitative relationship between the anisotropy index and the main failure plane. J Appl Geophys 134:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Suleyman Demirel University, Engineering Faculty, 32260, Çünür, Isparta, Turkey

    Osman Uyanık & Nevbahar Sabbağ

  2. Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Aksu Mehmet Süreyya Demiraslan Vocational School, Aksu/Isparta, Turkey

    N. Ayten Uyanık

  3. Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Isparta, Turkey

    Ziya Öncü

Authors
  1. Osman Uyanık
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nevbahar Sabbağ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. Ayten Uyanık
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziya Öncü
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osman Uyanık.

Appendix: Complete citations for studies reported in Fig. 3

Appendix: Complete citations for studies reported in Fig. 3

  • Altındağ R (2012) Correlation between P-wave velocity and some mechanical properties for sedimentary rocks. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 112(3):229–237.

  • Chary KB, Sarma LP, Lakshmi KJP, Vıjayakumar NA, Lakshmi VN, Rao MVMS (2006) Evaluation of engineering properties of rock using ultrasonic pulse velocity and uniaxial compressive strength. In: Rao MVMS (ed) Proc National Seminar on Non-Destructive Evaluation. Published by Indian Society for Non-Destructive Testing Hyderabad, Hyderabad, pp 379–385.

  • Christaras B, Mariolakos I, Foundoulis J, Athanasias S, Dimitriou A (1997) Geotechnical input for the protection of some Macedonian tombs in Greece. In: Moropoulou A, Zezza F, Kollias E, Papachristodoulou I (eds) Proc The 6th Int Symp Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin. Published by Technical Chamber of Greece, Rhodes, pp 125–132.

  • Çobanoğlu I, Çelik SB (2008) Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:491–498.

  • Göktan RM (1988) Theoretical and practical analysis of rock rippability. PhD thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul (in Turkish).

  • Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994.

  • Kılıç A, Teymen A (2008) Determination of mechanical properties of rocks using simple methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:237–244.

  • Sousa LMO, Rıo LMS, Calleja L, Argandona VGR, Rey AR (2005) Influence of microfractures and porosity on the physico-mechanical properties and weathering of ornamental granites. Eng Geol 77:153–168.

  • Tercan AE, Ünver B, Tiryaki B, Özbilgin D (2005) A study of relationships among mechanical, index and petrographic properties of some sandstones using canonical correlation analysis (in Turkish). Mining 44:3–14.

  • Tugrul A, Zarif H (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Eng Geol 51(4):303–317.

  • Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Alves CAS, Pamplona J (2008) Ultrasonic evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of granites. Ultrasonics 48:453–466.

  • Yağız S (2011) P-wave velocity test for assessment of geotechnical properties of some rock materials. Bull Mater Sci 34(4):947–953

  • Yaşar E, Erdoğan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with the density, compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:871.

  • Yaşar E, Erdoğan Y (2003) Yapı-kaplama kayalarının P dalga hızı ile fiziko-mekanik özellikleri arasındaki ilişkilerin istatiksel analizi, Türkiye IV. In: Ersoy M (ed) Marble Symposium (Mersem’2003). Published by TMMOB Maden Mühendisleri Odası, pp 353–362 (in Turkish).

  • Zukui L, Xinxu Z, Jinhai Z, Daixu T, Yongsong T, Jing Y, Yanqing L (2001) The experiment investigation of the correlation of acoustic logging and rock mechanical and engineering characteristics. In: Sijing W, Bingiun F, Zangkui L (eds) Frontiers of rock mechanics and sustainable development in the 21st Century. Published by CRC press, pp 89–92.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uyanık, O., Sabbağ, N., Uyanık, N.A. et al. Prediction of mechanical and physical properties of some sedimentary rocks from ultrasonic velocities. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 6003–6016 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01501-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01501-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation