Skip to main content
Log in

Papillary muscle rupture after myocardial infarction during left ventricular assist device support

  • Case Report
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a rare case of papillary muscle rupture due to myocardial infarction during left ventricular assist device support. A 69-year-old woman with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was transferred for further surgical intervention. Six days after the event, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was decannulated, and an extracorporeal left ventricular assist device was implanted. On postoperative day 11, she suffered from sudden onset hypoxia due to pulmonary edema. Transesophageal echocardiography showed new onset severe mitral regurgitation. No further surgical intervention was performed according to the family’s wishes, and she passed away on the 22nd postoperative day. Autopsy findings revealed papillary muscle rupture. Although the left ventricle is unloaded by the left ventricular assist device, papillary muscle rupture should be recognized as a possible complication after myocardial infarction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acharya D, Loyaga-Rendon RY, Pamboukian SV, Tallaj JA, Holman WL, Cantor RS, Naftel DC, Kirklin JK. Ventricular assist device in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1871–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tchantchaleishvili V, Schubmehl H, Swartz MF, Hallinan W, Massey HT. Evolving strategies in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction-induced cardiogenic shock. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3:606–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Badiwala MV, Ross HJ, Rao V. An unusual complication of support with a continuous-flow cardiac assist device. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:936–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. French JK, Hellkamp AS, Armstrong PW, Cohen E, Kleiman NS, O’Connor CM, Holmes DR, Hochman JS, Granger CB, Mahaffey KW. Mechanical complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (from APEX-AMI). Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:59–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kato TS, Chokshi A, Singh P, Khawaja T, Cheema F, Akashi H, Shahzad K, Iwata S, Homma S, Takayama H, Naka Y, Jorde U, Farr M, Mancini DM, Schulze PC. Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:546–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Karabatsch T, Schweiger M, Dandel M, Stepanenko A, Drews T, Potapov E, Pasic M, Weng YG, Huebler M, Hetzer R. Is bridge to recovery more likely with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices than with nonplusatile-flow sysgems? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1335–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Nitta D, Hatano M, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, Ono M. Advantage of pulsatility in left ventricular reverse remodeling and aortic insufficiency prevention during left ventricular assist device treatment. Circ J. 2015;79:1994–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stulak JM, Tchantchaleishvili V, Haglund NA, Davis ME, Schirger JA, Cowger JA, Shah P, Aaronson KD, Pagani FD, Maltais S. Uncorrected pre-operative mitral valve regurgitation is not associated with adverse outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka A, Onsager D, Song T, Cozadd D, Kim G, Sarswat N, Adatya S, Sayer G, Uriel N, Jeevanandam V, Ota T. Surgically corrected mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with low recurrence rate and improved midterm survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:725–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taghavi S, Hamad E, Wilson L, Clark R, Jayarajan SN, Uriel N, Goldstein DJ, Takayama H, Naka Y, Mangi AA. Mitral valve repair at the time of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation confers meaningful decrement in pulmonary vascular resistance. ASAIO J. 2013;59:469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroto Kitahara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunioka, S., Kitahara, H., Kanda, H. et al. Papillary muscle rupture after myocardial infarction during left ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs 20, 263–265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0951-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-017-0951-z

Keywords

Navigation