Skip to main content
Log in

Repair of umbilical hernias concomitant to other procedures is safe: a propensity score-matched database study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Repair of an umbilical hernia is most often considered the less important condition when concomitant with other abdominal surgery. Despite this, the evidence for a concomitant umbilical hernia repair is sparse. The aim of this nationwide cohort study is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of primary umbilical hernia repair and umbilical hernia repair concomitant with other abdominal surgery.

Method

Data from the Danish Hernia Database and the National Patients Registry from January 2007 to December 2018 was merged, resulting in identification of patients receiving umbilical hernia concomitant to another abdominal surgery (laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and laparoscopic appendectomy). This group was propensity score matched with patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair as a primary procedure. Outcome data included 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and operation for recurrence.

Results

A total of 3365 primary umbilical hernia repairs and 2418 umbilical hernia repairs concomitant to other abdominal surgery were included. Readmission (10.5%, 255/2418) and reoperation (3.8%, 93/2418) rates within 90 days were decreased for umbilical hernia repairs concomitant to other abdominal surgery, compared with primary umbilical hernia repairs (22.7%, 765/3365) and (10.5%, 255/3365), P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. The rate of operation for recurrence was significantly increased for primary repairs (4.2%, 141/3365), compared with repairs concomitant to other abdominal surgery (3.2%, 77/2418), P = 0.014.

Conclusion

Outcome in umbilical hernia repair performed concomitant to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, elective or emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to umbilical hernia repair without concomitant surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henriksen NA, Montgomery A, Kaufmann R, Berrevoet F, East B, Fischer J et al (2020) Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society. Br J Surg 107:171–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Helgstrand F (2016) National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J 63:B5258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Madsen LJ, Oma E, Jorgensen LN, Jensen KK (2020) Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open 4:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Mo J, Kao LS, Liang MK (2016) Mesh location in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Surg 40:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3252-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baastrup NN, Hartwig MFS, Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Jensen KK (2019) Anastomotic leakage after stoma reversal combined with incisional hernia repair. World J Surg 43:988–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4866-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamer EUHR, Derici H, Tansug T, Onal MA (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accompanied by simultaneous umbilical hernia repair: a retrospective study. J Postgrad Med 53:176–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orr NT, Davenport DL, Roth JS (2013) Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ventral hernia repair compared to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. Surg Endosc 27:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2408-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boiko VV, Parkhomenko KY, Gaft KL, Feskov OE (2021) Simultaneous operations during umbilical and paraumbilical hernia repair: possible or necessary? Wiad Lek 74:220–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oma E, Baastrup NN, Jensen KK (2021) Should simultaneous stoma closure and incisional hernia repair be avoided? Hernia 25:649–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02312-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Helgstrand F, Jorgensen LN (2016) The Danish Ventral Hernia Database—a valuable tool for quality assessment and research. Clin Epidemiol 8:719–723. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S99501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Henriksen NA, Jensen KK, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2022) Suture or mesh repair of the smallest umbilical hernias: a nationwide database study. World J Surg 46:1898–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-022-06520-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Christoffersen MW, Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfelt P, Bisgaard T (2015) Long-term recurrence and chronic pain after repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias: a regional cohort study. Am J Surg 209:725–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad NZ, Byrnes G, Naqvi SA (2008) A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1928–1934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9867-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oma E, Jensen KK, Jorgensen LN (2017) Increased risk of ventral hernia recurrence after pregnancy: a nationwide register-based study. Am J Surg 214:474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfelt P, Bisgaard T (2012) Reoperation versus clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 256:955–958. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318254f5b9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Hegstad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BH and TJ declare no conflict of interest. FH and NH are members of the Danish Hernia Database steering committee. FH has received speaker fees from Gore, Medtronic and intuitive. NH has received speaker fees from Medtronic and Gore.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (REG-238-2018). Additional ethical approval was not required.

Human and animal rights

Not applicable

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hegstad, B., Jensen, T.K., Helgstrand, F. et al. Repair of umbilical hernias concomitant to other procedures is safe: a propensity score-matched database study. Hernia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-02977-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-02977-2

Keywords

Navigation