Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel mini-open sublay hernioplasty combined with D10 mesh for primary lumbar hernia: a retrospective analysis of 48 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of a novel mini-open sublay hernioplasty with D10 mesh for primary lumbar hernias.

Methods

This retrospective study included 48 patients with primary lumbar hernias who underwent mini-open sublay hernioplasty with D10 mesh from January 2015 to January 2022 in our hospital. Observation indicators were intraoperative measured diameter of hernia ring defect, operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative follow-up, complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, chronic pain.

Results

The operations were completed successfully in all 48 cases. The mean diameter of hernia ring was 2.66 ± 0.57 cm (range 1.5–3.0 cm), the mean operation time was 41.54 ± 13.21 min (range 25–70 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 9.89 ± 6.16 ml (range 5–30 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 3.14 ± 1.53 days (range 1–6 days). The mean preoperative and postoperative VAS scores at 24 h were 0.29 ± 0.53 (range 0–2) and 2.52 ± 0.61 (range 2–6), respectively. All cases were followed-up for 53.4 ± 24.3 months (range 12–96 months) without seroma, hematoma, incision or mesh infection, recurrence, and obvious chronic pain.

Conclusion

A novel mini-open sublay hernioplasty with D10 mesh for primary lumbar hernias is safe and feasible. Its efficacy in the short term is favorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. van Steensel S, Bloemen A, van den Hil LCL, van den Bos J, Kleinrensink GJ et al (2019) Pitfalls and clinical recommendations for the primary lumbar hernia based on a systematic review of the literature. Hernia 23:107–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma A, Pandey A, Rawat J, Ahmed I, Wakhlu A et al (2012) Congenital lumbar hernia: 20 years’ single centre experience. J Paediatr Child Health 48:1001–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Carlo I, Toro A, Sparatore F, Corsale G (2007) Lumbar hernia repaired using a new technique. Am Surg 73:54–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou X, Nve JO, Chen G (2004) Lumbar hernia: clinical analysis of 11 cases. Hernia 8:260–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stamatiou D, Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Mirilas P (2009) Lumbar hernia: surgical anatomy, embryology, and technique of repair. Am Surg 75:202–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li HY, Gu Y, Wang MG, Zhang GY (2022) Chinese expert consensus on intraperitoneal patch repair (2022 edition). Chin J Pract Surg 42:721–729

    Google Scholar 

  7. Machairas A, Misiakos EP, Liakakos T, Karatzas G (2004) Incisional hernioplasty with extraperitoneal onlay polyester mesh. Am Surg 70:726–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eker HH, Hansson BM, Buunen M, Janssen IM, Pierik RE et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 148:259–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavallaro G, Sadighi A, Miceli M, Burza A, Carbone G et al (2007) Primary lumbar hernia repair: the open approach. Eur Surg Res Europaische Chirurgische Forschung Recherches Chirurgicales Eur 39:88–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suarez S, Hernandez JD (2013) Laparoscopic repair of a lumbar hernia: report of a case and extensive review of the literature. Surg Endosc 27:3421–3429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG (2002) The ASA physical status classification: inter-observer consistency. american society of anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intens Care 30:633–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed ST, Ranjan R, Saha SB, Singh B (2014) Lumbar hernia: a diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-202085

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Basnet K, Bhandari R, Shah SR, Limbu Y, Ghimire R (2022) Primary grynfeltt lumbar hernia: a case report. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc 60:192–195

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Burt BM, Afifi HY, Wantz GE, Barie PS (2004) Traumatic lumbar hernia: report of cases and comprehensive review of the literature. J Trauma 57:1361–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pang RR, Makowski AL (2019) Inferior lumbar triangle hernia with incarceration. Am J Emerg Med 37:1218.e1215-1218.e1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Köckerling F (2018) Onlay technique in incisional hernia repair-a systematic review. Frontiers Surg 5:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J et al (2014) Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg 207:980–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin R, Teng T, Lin X, Lu F, Yang Y et al (2020) Sublay repair for primary superior lumbar hernia with the Kugel patch. ANZ J Surg 90:776–780

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed M, Mehboob M (2019) Comparisons of onlay versus sublay mesh fixation technique in ventral abdominal wall incisional hernia repair. J College Phys Surg-Pakist 29:819–822

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naz A, Abid K, Syed AA, Baig NN, Umer MF et al (2018) Comparative evaluation of sublay versus onlay mesh repair for ventral hernia. JPMA J Pakistan Med Associat 68:705–708

    Google Scholar 

  21. Le H, Bender JS (2005) Retrofascial mesh repair of ventral incisional hernias. Am J Surg 189:373–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M, Bograd L, Neugebauer EA et al (2002) Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:50–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhemtulla IA, Fischer JP (2018) Retromuscular sublay technique for ventral hernia repair. Semin Plast Surg 32:120–126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun J, Chen X, Li J, Zhang Y, Dong F et al (2015) Implementation of the trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal (TAPE) technique in laparoscopic lumbar hernia repair. BMC Surg 15:118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. LeBlanc KA, Elieson MJ, Corder JM 3rd (2007) Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a review of the literature. JSLS 11:408–414

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, Berrevoet F, Bingener-Casey J et al (2019) Update of guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (international endohernia society (IEHS))-part A. Surg Endosc 33:3069–3139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, Berrevoet F, Bingener-Casey J et al (2019) Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Surg Endosc 33:3511–3549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Lv Y, Shen Y, Liu S, Wang M (2010) A prospective comparison of preperitoneal tension-free open herniorrhaphy with mesh plug herniorrhaphy for the treatment of femoral hernias. Surgery 148:976–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chou BP, Bentley K, LeBlanc KA (2022) A novel hybrid approach to the repair of flank hernias. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 5:53–58

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HDD and YMS contributed to the conception and design of the study; HQY and JC performed the experiments, collected and analyzed data; HDD and YMS wrote the manuscript; HDD and YMS revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the study subjects before enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, H., Shen, Y., Yang, H. et al. A novel mini-open sublay hernioplasty combined with D10 mesh for primary lumbar hernia: a retrospective analysis of 48 cases. Hernia 27, 1283–1288 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02812-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-023-02812-0

Keywords

Navigation