Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors help treat malignant melanoma, but show limited use in treating malignant vaginal melanoma, an aggressive, rare gynecological malignancy. We identified two patients treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab for vaginal melanoma; both were immunonegative for programmed cell death-ligand 1 and wild-type BRAF. Case 1, a 56-year-old female who underwent radical surgery for stage 1 malignant vaginal melanoma, experienced recurrence 15 months postoperatively. She briefly responded to ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy before showing disease progression. Tumor shrinkage occurred with nivolumab and local radiotherapy and, 45 months postoperatively, she survives with the melanoma. Case 2, a 50-year-old female, presented with a 4-cm blackish polypoid vaginal tumor with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes. She received ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy for stage III unresectable malignant vaginal melanoma. The vaginal tumor shrank after the third course of treatment, and the lymphadenopathy disappeared. The patient underwent radical surgery and is currently disease-free, using nivolumab for maintenance therapy. Both patients had immune-related adverse events coinciding with periods of high therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor resensitization may effectively treat advanced or recurrent vaginal melanoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Malignant vaginal melanoma—aggressive and rare—is a gynecological malignancy that accounts for 3% of all vaginal cancers and 0.3% to 0.8% of all malignant melanomas [1]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) help treat malignant melanoma; however, their use in treating vaginal malignant melanoma is limited. In particular, whether ICIs should be used alone or in combination to treat vaginal malignant melanoma [2, 3], whether they are useful as adjuvants [4] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) [5], and whether they have synergistic effects with radiotherapy [6] is controversial. Herein, we report two cases in which combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was used to treat advanced or recurrent vaginal melanoma. Our findings on the usefulness of NAC with ICI, resensitization to ICIs using radiation, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) suggest new therapeutic strategies for treating malignant vaginal melanomas.
Case reports
Case 1
A 56-year-old female, with a gravidity of two and parity of one, had a history of eosinophilic esophagitis. The clinical course is summarized in Fig. 1. The patient underwent extended stage I malignant vaginal melanoma surgery at our hospital. The tumor with melanin production was immunohistochemically positive for S-100, HMG-45, Melan-A, and SOX10 (Fig. 2a, b). BRAF was wild-type, and programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemical staining was negative. Adjuvant therapy was not administered. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations, performed 1 year and 3 months after surgery, revealed a recurrent pelvic mass 1–2 cm in size. The patient began triweekly combination therapy of nivolumab 80 mg/body and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg. At this time, the percentage of eosinophils was 7.2%. After three courses of nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy, the patient presented with a mood disorder and diarrhea. Blood tests showed that the adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels were < 1.50 pg/mL and 3.02 μg/dL, respectively. The patient was diagnosed with grade 3 pituitary dysfunction as an irAE and underwent hormone replacement therapy. The percentage of eosinophils was 37.8% at this time. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed stable disease, and she underwent a fourth course of nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy. After that, her treatment was switched to nivolumab monotherapy every 2 weeks. After 24 courses of single-agent nivolumab, 240 mg/body biweekly, contrast-enhanced CT revealed an enlarged pelvic tumor (Fig. 2c). The percentage of eosinophils at this point was 17.0%. Gene panel testing revealed microsatellite stability, low tumor mutation burden, and genetic mutations in SPEN and FGFR4. Therefore, we decided to continue nivolumab monotherapy and add radiation therapy. The patient was treated with pelvic radiation at a dose of 45 Grey in 25 fractions. Subsequently, she continued nivolumab monotherapy and the tumor showed shrinkage (Fig. 2d). At this time, the percentage of eosinophils was 49.0%. Symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis appeared but weakened without treatment. To date, the patient has undergone 49 doses of nivolumab monotherapy within the 3 years and 9 months since the initial surgery and has progression-free survival.
Case 2
A 50-year-old female with one gravidity and one parity visited a local doctor to examine a vaginal mass; through tumor biopsy, malignant melanoma was diagnosed. The patient visited our hospital for treatment and reported a history of duodenal ulcers and hypertension. Her grandfather had a history of gastric cancer. Internal examination revealed a 4 cm black protruding mass in the middle third of the left vaginal wall (Fig. 3a). Contrast-enhanced MRI revealed no extravaginal tumor invasion (Fig. 3b). Contrast-enhanced CT revealed left external iliac lymph node metastasis. Histological examination revealed infiltrative growth of atypical cells with melanin production (Fig. 4a, b). Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor cells were positive for S-100, HMG-45, Melan-A, and SOX10 and negative for AE1/AE3 (Fig. 4c, d). The BRAF gene was wild-type, and programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemical staining was negative. The patient was diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III (cT1, cN1, and cM0) malignant vaginal melanoma, deemed inoperable. The patient began triweekly combination therapy of nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg. After three courses, she was diagnosed with an irAE of grade 3 autoimmune hepatitis, and blood tests showed an AST of 520.2 IU/K and an ALT of 764.3 IU/L. After treatment with steroids and the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil, her liver dysfunction improved to grade 1. Three months after the initial treatment, contrast-enhanced MRI and internal examination revealed that the tumor had shrunk (Fig. 3c, d) and the left external iliac lymph node metastasis had disappeared. The tumor was considered operable, and the patient underwent a radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection. The excised specimen had a 10 mm-sized tumor in the vagina, located mainly on the left wall, with a black surface. Histological and immunohistochemical findings of the resected specimen were similar to those of the previous biopsy. The resection margins were negative. No uterine, adnexal, or pelvic lymph node metastases were observed. The patient continued postoperative steroid therapy and completed treatment with the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil. One month after surgery, nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg/body triweekly) was started as maintenance chemotherapy. Twelve months after the initial treatment, the patient had been administered eleven doses of nivolumab monotherapy and is alive and disease-free.
Discussion
The present case series suggests the following three novelties regarding malignant vaginal melanoma: (1) radiation promotes resensitization to ICIs when a vaginal melanoma becomes resistant, (2) radiation reactivates both antitumor effects and side effects, and (3) ICI adjuvant therapy can render unresectable cases resectable.
Malignant vaginal melanomas treated using ICIs are summarized in Table 1 [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In addition to those described in the current report, 17 cases have been identified, with patients ranging in age from 40 to 85 years. Only one BRAF mutation was identified, demonstrating the superiority of ICIs over BRAF inhibitors in treating vaginal melanoma. The two cases of vaginal malignant melanoma we encountered were successfully treated with a combination therapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab. However, currently, no standard treatment for progression during ICI therapy is available. In Case 1, nivolumab and local radiation showed antitumor effects after resistance to nivolumab was demonstrated, indicating resensitization to the ICIs. Yin et al. reported a case of recurrent malignant vaginal melanoma in a patient whose sensitivity to toripalimab and lenvatinib was improved using local radiotherapy [11]. Similarly, Schonewolf et al. reported resensitization to pembrolizumab after local radiotherapy in a case of advanced vaginal melanoma [7]. Here, we report the first case of radiation-induced resensitization to nivolumab, a key drug for treating malignant melanoma. Recently, the enhancement effect of ICI induced by local radiotherapy is referred to the abscopal effect. [6, 21,22,23].
The synergistic effects of ICI and irradiation have been observed in other mucosal malignant melanomas [21] and different cancer types [22, 23]. These findings suggest that adding radiotherapy, rather than changing the drug, can be effective for ICI-resistant vaginal melanoma. We encountered cases of serious irAEs coinciding with periods of high therapeutic efficacy of ICIs [24]: correlations between multisystem irAEs and improved patient survival have been shown [25]. Notably, in Case 1, aggravation of adverse events (elevation of eosinophils) was observed in parallel with radiotherapy-induced resensitization to ICIs. Mesko et al. reported severe cutaneous irAEs associated with ICI and radiotherapy [18], suggesting that radiotherapy activates the effect of ICIs and irAEs, and that the occurrence of irAEs may be a marker of good antitumor effects.
The efficacy of ICI neoadjuvant therapy for vaginal melanomas remains controversial. Tarhini et al. reported a complete response to ipilimumab and nivolumab as preoperative therapy for locally advanced vaginal melanoma; however, the patient did not undergo surgery [8]. Schonewolf et al. reported the use of ipilimumab and nivolumab as NAC, but ultimately added radiotherapy after surgery [7]. Case 2 was the first case in which pure NAC with ICI therapy were administered: combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab caused an inoperable malignant vaginal melanoma with pelvic lymph node metastasis to became operable. The efficacy of combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab as NAC has been reported for malignant cutaneous melanoma [5], while the prognoses of surgical and nonsurgical cases of malignant cervical melanoma are similar [26]. In malignant vaginal melanomas, NAC with ICIs should be proactively introduced to avoid excessive surgical invasiveness.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant therapy with ICIs and radiotherapy for ICI resensitization may effectively treat advanced or recurrent vaginal melanoma. Adverse events may correlate with favorable treatment effects; therefore, premature termination of ICIs due to adverse events should be avoided.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Puri S, Asotra S (2019) Primary vaginal malignant melanoma: a rare entity with review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther 15:1392–1394
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Lao CD, Cowey CL, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Dummer R, Ferrucci PF, Smylie M, Hogg D, Hill A, Márquez-Rodas I, Haanen J, Guidoboni M, Maio M, Schöffski P, Carlino MS, Lebbé C, McArthur G, Ascierto PA, Daniels GA, Long GV, Bastholt L, Rizzo JI, Balogh A, Moshyk A, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD (2019) Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 381:1535–1546
D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, Lebbé C, Brady B, Neyns B, Schmidt H, Hassel JC, Hodi FS, Lorigan P, Savage KJ, Miller WH Jr, Mohr P, Marquez-Rodas I, Charles J, Kaatz M, Sznol M, Weber JS, Shoushtari AN, Ruisi M, Jiang J, Wolchok JD (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 35:226–235
Zimmer L, Livingstone E, Hassel JC, Fluck M, Eigentler T, Loquai C, Haferkamp S, Gutzmer R, Meier F, Mohr P, Hauschild A, Schilling B, Menzer C, Kieker F, Dippel E, Rösch A, Simon JC, Conrad B, Körner S, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Schwarz L, Garbe C, Becker JC, Schadendorf D, Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (2020) Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 395:1558–1568
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis C, Hwu WJ, Hanna E, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal R, Gross N, Weber R, Lai SY, Ehlers R, Blando J, Milton DR, Woodman S, Kageyama R, Wells DK, Hwu P, Patel SP, Lucci A, Hessel A, Lee JE, Gershenwald J, Simpson L, Burton EM, Posada L, Haydu L, Wang L, Zhang S, Lazar AJ, Hudgens CW, Gopalakrishnan V, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Spencer CN, Prieto V, Sharma P, Allison J, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA (2018) Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med 24:1649–1654
Welsh JW, Tang C, de Groot P, Naing A, Hess KR, Heymach JV, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Cushman TR, Subbiah V, Chang JY, Simon GR, Ramapriyan R, Barsoumian HB, Menon H, Cortez MA, Massarelli E, Nguyen Q, Sharma P, Allison JP, Diab A, Verma V, Raju U, Shaaban SG, Dadu R, Cabanillas ME, Wang K, Anderson C, Gomez DR, Hahn S, Komaki R, Hong DS (2019) Phase II trial of ipilimumab with stereotactic radiation therapy for metastatic disease: outcomes, toxicities, and low-dose radiation-related abscopal responses. Cancer Immunol Res 7:1903–1909
Schonewolf CA, Jaworski EM, Allen SG, McLean K, Lao CD, Schuchter LM, Tanyi J, Taunk NK (2022) Complete response after stereotactic body radiation therapy with concurrent immunotherapy for vaginal melanoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 7:100839
Tarhini AA, Hanayneh WB, Powers JJ, Segura CMM, Conejo-Garcia JR, Lam CA, Hakam A, Hoffman MS (2022) Case report: Durable complete pathologic response and organ preservation following ipilimumab and nivolumab for locally advanced primary vaginal mucosal melanoma. Front Oncol. 12:1044587
Ishiguro A, Ogata D, Okuma K, Kashihara T, Murakami N, Hiki K, Yamakawa K, Jinnai S, Takahashi A, Namikawa K, Igaki H, Yamazaki N (2023) Malignant melanoma treatment using brachytherapy: two case reports and 15 case series. J Dermatol 50:94–97
Walz DJ, Cautha S, Gupta S, Lombino M, Sulh M, Bello J, Smith H (2022) Vaginal malignant melanoma: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med 9:003427
Yin P, Ma X, Zhang Y, Song Y, Wang Y, Lu Z (2022) Primary vaginal malignant melanoma successfully treated with combination therapy: A case report. Oncol Lett 24:1–6
Guo N, Zhang J (2021) Primary vaginal malignant melanoma: a rare case report of successful treatment with nivolumab. Medicine (Baltimore) 100:e25691
Lambert I, Fasolino G, Awada G, Kuijpers R, Ten Tusscher M, Neyns B (2021) Acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy during pembrolizumab treatment for metastatic melanoma: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol 21:1–8
Sezen D, Patel RR, Tang C, Onstad M, Nagarajan P, Patel SP, Welsh JW, Lin LL (2021) Immunotherapy combined with high- and low-dose radiation to all sites leads to complete clearance of disease in a patient with metastatic vaginal melanoma. Gynecol Oncol 161:645–652
Norwood TG, Wang MJ, Huh WK (2019) Combination checkpoint inhibitor therapy induces multiple immune major related adverse events in the treatment of vaginal melanoma: a cautionary case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 30:100508
Komatsu-Fujii T, Nomura M, Otsuka A, Ishida Y, Doi K, Matsumoto S, Muto M, Kabashima K (2019) Response to imatinib in vaginal melanoma with KIT p.Val559Gly mutation previously treated with nivolumab, pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. J Dermatol 46:e203–e204
Raad RA, Kannan R, Madden K, Pavlick A (2017) Ipilimumab-induced organizing pneumonia on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with malignant melanoma. Clin Nucl Med 42:e345–e346
Mesko S, Konecny GE, Tumeh PC, Kamrava M (2017) Enhanced skin toxicity with concurrent ipilimumab and radiation in vaginal/vulvar melanoma: a case report and literature review. BJR Case Rep 3:20160002
Chanal J, Kramkimel N, Guegan S, Moguelet P, Fourchotte V, Avril MF (2016) Locally advanced unresectable vaginal melanoma: response with anti-programmed death receptor 1. J Low Genit Tract Dis 20:e4–e5
Sano T, Uhara H, Mikoshiba Y, Kobayashi A, Uchiyama R, Tateishi K, Yamamoto H, Okuyama R (2016) Nivolumab-induced organizing pneumonia in a melanoma patient. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:270–272
Kim HJ, Chang JS, Roh MR, Oh BH, Chung KY, Shin SJ, Koom WS (2019) Effect of radiotherapy combined with pembrolizumab on local tumor control in mucosal melanoma patients. Front Oncol 9:835
Yano M, Aso S, Sato M, Aoyagi Y, Matsumoto H, Nasu K (2020) Pembrolizumab and radiotherapy for platinum-refractory recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma with an abscopal effect: a case report. Anticancer Res 40:4131–4135
Theelen WSME, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Aerts JG, Dumoulin DW, Bahce I, Niemeijer AL, De Langen AJ, Monkhorst K, Baas P (2019) Effect of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the PEMBRO-RT phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5:1276–1282
Yano M, Asami Y, Nishikawa T, Yoshida S, Kamada K, Katoh T, Teramoto Y, Nakamura Y, Yasuda M (2018) Immune checkpoint inhibitors of CTLA4 and PD-1 for malignant melanoma arising in ovarian cystic teratoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e12937
Shankar B, Zhang J, Naqash AR, Forde PM, Feliciano JL, Marrone KA, Ettinger DS, Hann CL, Brahmer JR, Ricciuti B, Owen D, Toi Y, Walker P, Otterson GA, Patel SH, Sugawara S, Naidoo J (2020) Multisystem immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 6:1952–1956
Yano M, Nasu K, Yasuda M, Katoh T, Kagabu M, Kobara H, Matsuura M, Tokuyama O, Yamawaki T, Wakahashi S, Noguchi T, Mizuno K, Shitsukawa K, Onohara Y, Nakabori T, Miyasaka A, Nakao T, Matsunaga T, Kunimi Y, Sakurai M, Uchiyama A, Itoh R, Ohike N, Hirakawa T, Watanabe T, Nishino K, Motohashi T, Ito K (2022) Clinicopathological features and programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemical expression in a multicenter cohort of uterine and ovarian melanomas: a retrospective study in Japan (KCOG-G1701s). Melanoma Res 32:150–158
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Editage (www.editage.jp) for editing and proofreading this manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Oita University. This research was supported by Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant number, 22K15409) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: KK and MY. Data curation: KK, MO, RT, and MY. Formal analysis: KK, MY, and KN. Funding acquisition: MY. Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, and Software: KK, MY, KN, and EK. Supervision: MY, KN, and EK. Validation: MO, RT, and MY. Visualization: KK, MO, RT, MY. Writing of original draft: KK and MY. Writing—review & editing: KN, and EK. Final approval of article: KK, MO, RT, MY, KN, and EK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Konishi, K., Okamoto, M., Tokumitsu, R. et al. Usage of nivolumab and ipilimumab for recurrent or advanced malignant vaginal melanoma: a two-case series. Med Mol Morphol 57, 83–90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-023-00377-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00795-023-00377-6