Abstract
The current study examined attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) dimensions and cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) symptoms in relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) in an early adolescent sample. Participants were 341 adolescents ages 10–12 years (52.2% female; 37.8% people of color) recruited from the community. Caregivers reported on CDS and ADHD symptoms. Adolescents completed a rating scale and were administered an interview assessing SITBs. We estimated associations using logistic regression in a stepped fashion: (1) no adjustment, (2) adjustment for sex, race, family income, and psychotropic medication use, and (3) further adjustment for depressive symptoms. In this early adolescent community sample, 22.9% reported a history of suicidal ideation, 8.2% reported a history of a suicide plan, 6.2% reported a history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), and 16.4% met a clinical cutoff for current suicide risk. Across most analyses using rating scale or interview methods, higher mean CDS scores were related to endorsement of suicidal ideation and planning. ADHD inattentive (IN) and hyperactive-impulsive (HI) symptoms were associated with endorsement of NSSI, and ADHD-IN symptoms were associated with thoughts of suicide and/or plan measured via questionnaire, though effects were less robust and not significant, potentially due to low base rates impacting statistical power. This study adds to a growing body of research highlighting the importance of screening for CDS symptoms among individuals with and without ADHD. More research, especially longitudinal work, is needed that examines possible differential pathways to SITBs by ADHD and CDS symptoms to advance SITB prevention, early detection, and intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Inpatient encounters for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) have been increasing over the past decade [1], and death by suicide has been steadily increasing among youth [2] and is now the second leading cause of death for youth aged 10–14 years old [3]. SITBs in childhood are associated with higher risk for SITBs and other adverse outcomes (e.g., mood disorders, sexual trauma) in adulthood [4, 5]. Given these concerning statistics, suicide among young people has been deemed a major public health concern [6]. There is a particular need for research focused on suicidality in childhood and early adolescence, which may enable early identification of modifiable risk factors to alter this risk trajectory [7].
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders in children [8], with symptoms and functional difficulties often persisting throughout adolescence and into adulthood [9, 10]. By adulthood, individuals with ADHD often experience comorbid mood disorders [11]. Given high rates of psychiatric comorbidity, coupled with well-established difficulties with emotion regulation [12], social functioning [13], low self-esteem [14], and trait impulsivity [15], researchers have hypothesized that individuals with ADHD may be at increased risk for SITBs. A recent meta-analysis [16] found support for this hypothesis, as individuals with ADHD were approximately 3.5 times more likely than those without ADHD to experience suicidal ideation, 4.5 times more likely to endorse suicidal plans, over 2 times more likely to have a suicide attempt, and over 6 times more likely to die by suicide. Importantly, this meta-analysis did not find evidence of differences in SITB risk by age bins (i.e., 6–12, 13–17, and 18+) [16]. This suggests that individuals with ADHD may be a subgroup of individuals who develop risk for SITBs early in development, underscoring the need for more research and intervention among younger samples, including in early adolescence [17].
Given that few, if any, variables reliably predict SITBs [18], and completed suicide in particular [19], it is important that research specify as much as possible which risk factors and/or subgroups of individuals are most likely to engage in SITBs. Aside from ADHD status and symptoms, there is emerging indication that cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; formerly termed sluggish cognitive tempo) symptoms (e.g., slowed behavior and thinking, excessive daydreaming, mental confusion) may be important for understanding SITBs in children and adolescents. CDS symptoms are distinct from, yet strongly related to, ADHD symptoms, especially inattentive symptoms, and the CDS phenotype co-occurs in 27–39% of children meeting symptom criteria for ADHD [20,21,22,23]. CDS symptoms may increase in adolescence [24] along with internalizing symptoms and SITBs [25]. CDS is associated with a number of functional difficulties—beyond what is accounted for by ADHD—that may increase the risk of SITBs including emotional dysregulation, loneliness, lowered self-esteem, and internalizing symptoms [26,27,28].
To date, only four studies have examined CDS in relation to SITBs. In a sample of psychiatrically hospitalized children and early adolescents (ages 8–12), Becker et al. [29] found that parent-reported CDS symptoms were uniquely associated with parent- and child-reported suicide risk (determined by composite score) above and beyond demographics, loneliness, depression, anxiety, oppositional behavior, and parental internalizing symptoms. These findings were replicated and extended in a study with college students (ages 18–29), which also found CDS symptoms to be significantly independently associated with SITBs, including lifetime suicidal ideation/attempts, past-year suicidal ideation, and suicide risk status (composite), above and beyond demographics and other psychopathologies, including ADHD, depression, and anxiety [30]. Of note, ADHD symptoms were no longer associated with SITBs when internalizing and CDS symptoms were added to the model [30]. More recently, in a sample of adolescents with and without ADHD (ages 12–14), self-reported CDS symptoms, and not ADHD-inattentive symptoms, were independently associated with higher adolescent-reported suicidal ideation (ADHD-hyperactive/impulsive symptoms were not examined) [31]. These studies provide important initial support for an association between CDS symptoms and SITBs, even when accounting for ADHD and depression.
The fourth study that has examined CDS and SITBs examined CDS in relation to non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in a sample of 104 adolescents (ages 12–18) with ADHD [32]. Although adolescents endorsing NSSI in the past year had higher parent-reported CDS scores than adolescents who did not endorse past-year NSSI, CDS symptoms were not independently associated with NSSI above and beyond demographics and other relevant domains. Rather, higher ADHD symptoms were independently related to past-year NSSI. This initial finding coupled with results of other studies suggests that CDS and ADHD symptoms may be differentially related to suicidal ideation/risk or NSSI, though no study has directly tested this possibility.
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the association of ADHD symptom dimensions and CDS symptoms with numerous SITBs (e.g., total ideation, plans, attempts, NSSI) in a community-based sample of early adolescents (ages 10–12 years). Our study builds on prior research examining CDS and ADHD in relation to SITBs in important ways. First, previous studies relied on non-optimal measures of CDS and/or SITBs and the current study uses the most psychometrically-validated measure of CDS in addition to both rating scale and interview methods for assessing SITBs. Second, we examined composite SITB scores and specific domains of SITBs including suicidal ideation, suicidal plans, and NSSI. Third, studies examining ADHD and SITBs in children and adolescence have often used a composite measure of inattentive (IN) and hyperactive-impulsive (HI) symptoms (e.g., [33, 34]) though there is some indication that inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity may be differentially associated with specific SITBs domains (e.g., [35, 33]), and additional research is needed examining separate ADHD dimensions. Based on the research reviewed above, we hypothesized that ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and CDS symptoms would be correlated with SITB indices, though we expected that CDS symptoms would be most strongly associated with SITBs aside from NSSI [33] when ADHD symptom dimensions and other covariates were simultaneously regressed on outcomes.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 341 early adolescents (ages 10–12 years) enrolled in a broader study of attention problems and mental health. Participant and caregiver/family characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were approximately an equal number of female and male adolescents, with slightly over one-third of participants being people of color. Approximately half of the sample met diagnostic criteria for ADHD based on the K-SADS interview [37] conducted with the adolescent’s caregiver (primarily biological mothers).
Procedures
All procedures were approved by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Caregivers and adolescents provided informed consent and assent, respectively. Adolescents and their caregivers were recruited for a prospective longitudinal study on CDS from a variety of sources, including media advertisements (e.g., television, Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor), community flyers, e-mail distribution within a Midwestern children’s hospital, and letters to school/pediatrician partners. To assure a range of CDS symptomatology, several versions of advertising materials were generated (e.g., some specifying daydreaming, mental confusion, and slowed behavior/thinking, and some not targeting any attentional problems). Longitudinal data collection is ongoing; thus, only baseline data are used in the present study.
Interested caregivers completed a brief REDCap eligibility survey that included initial inclusion criteria. Families meeting initial inclusion criteria were scheduled for an in-person research visit, during which remaining eligibility criteria were assessed. In addition to being ages 10–12 years, inclusion criteria included a standardized score ≥ 80 for overall intelligence on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 5th Edition [38], willingness to discontinue stimulant medications for ADHD 24 h prior to their research visit, and sufficient English language ability to complete the measures. Adolescents were excluded if the caregiver reported a previous diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or psychosis, or a significant visual, hearing or speech impairment precluding their ability to complete the measures. For additional details, see Becker et al. [39].
Measures
Demographic characteristics and medication use
Caregivers completed a demographic form to gather the information reported in Table 1. Medication use and psychosocial treatment were assessed with an adaptation of the Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA) [40].
Kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (K-SADS)
The K-SADS [37] is a semi-structured diagnostic interview based on the DSM-5 with good reliability and validity [41]. In the present study, interviews conducted with the adolescent’s caregiver were used to assess ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD), whereas interviews conducted with the adolescent were used to assess generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression, and persistent depressive disorder modules. The K-SADS was administered by trained graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, or clinical psychologists.
Child and adolescent behavior inventory (CABI)
Caregivers completed the 18-item ADHD (i.e., 9 ADHD-IN items, 9 ADHD-HI items) module and 15-item CDS module from the CABI [42]. Symptoms were rated with 6-point anchors for the past month (0 = almost never [never or about once per month], 1 = seldom [about once per week], 2 = sometimes [several times per week], 3 = often [about once per day], 4 = very often [several times per day], and 5 = almost always [many times per day]). Earlier studies support the factor structure, reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater) and validity of CABI scale scores from the United States [21, 43, 44]. Other studies from Iran, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, and the United States also support the psychometric properties of CABI scale scores [45,46,47,48,49,50]. Studies also support using the CABI as a unidimensional measure of CDS symptoms [51, 52]. For a review of the CABI CDS measure, see Becker [53]. In the present study, mean ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and CDS symptom scores were the primary predictors of interest.
Depressive symptom index-suicidality scale (DSI-SS)
Adolescent’s self-reported intensity and frequency of suicidal ideation and impulses were assessed using the DSI-SS [54]. The DSI-SS consists of 4 items: thoughts of killing self, thoughts of suicide and/or plan, having little or no control over suicidal thoughts, and having impulses to kill self. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (e.g., “I do not have thoughts of killing myself”=0, “Sometimes I have thoughts of killing myself”=1, “Most of the time I have thoughts of killing myself”=2, “I always have thoughts of killing myself”=3), with a total composite score ranging from 0 to 12. For each individual item and the composite score, higher scores indicate a greater frequency and severity of suicidal ideation. The DSI-SS has been shown to have strong psychometric properties [55]. In the present study, we used a cutoff score of 1 to categorize suicide risk based on prior work that has normed this cutoff using the DSI-SS in outpatient settings [56], and we also examined associations with dichotomized individual items where scores > 0 were considered elevated.
Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview (SITBI)
History of lifetime suicidal ideation, suicide plan, aborted attempts, suicide attempts, and NSSI were assessed using the SITBI [57], a structured interview that assesses the presence, frequency, and characteristics of a wide range of SITBs. The SITBI has demonstrated strong interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and intraclass correlation over a six-month period, as well as concurrent validity with other measures of suicidal ideation [57]. As in previous research [58,59,60], adolescent’s responses to whether they had ever had thoughts of killing themself (i.e., suicidal ideation; 0 = never, 1 = once or twice, 2 = a few times, 3 = many times), ever thought or a way or method to kill themself (i.e., suicide plan; 0 = never, 1 = once or twice, 2 = a few times, 3 = many times) were dichotomized (i.e., scores > 0) and included as outcome variables. We also examined reports of history of ever purposely hurt themself without wanting to die (i.e., NSSI; 0 = no, 1 = yes). Very few participants endorsed aborted attempts (n = 5 of 334 participants who answered this item, 1.50%) or suicide attempts (n = 2 of 335 participants, 0.60%), and so these variables were not examined in the current study.
Behavioral assessment system for children (BASC-3) self-report of personality (SRP)
Adolescents completed the self-report BASC-3 SRP [61], a multidimensional measure with items rated on a four-point scale of frequency (0 = never, 3 = almost always). In the current study, the depression scale was used as a covariate (none of the BASC-3 SRP depression scale items directly assess SITBs).
Data analytic approach
We used SPSS version 29 for descriptive analyses and SAS version 9 for modeling. We first estimated bivariate associations between all study variables using Pearson correlations (including point-biserial correlations for correlations between dichotomous and continuous variables) and chi-square tests. Next, we estimated the likelihood (i.e., odds) of SITB indices associated with ADHD-IN, ADHD-HI, and CDS symptoms using logistic regression. We estimated the likelihood of score elevations in our outcome variables (i.e., dichotomized) in order to maximize power given the extremely low frequencies across ratings above 0. Initial estimates were unadjusted for any influence of covariates. Next, relevant participant characteristics including sex, race, family income, and medication status were included as covariates. Finally, we added mean adolescent-reported depressive symptoms as a covariate to provide the most stringent test of associations, independent of possible differences in depressive symptoms. Overall, we had low levels of missing data (total of 10 participants had missing on at least one measure used in this study, including 1 participant without SITBI data and 1 separate participant without DSI-SS data; see Table 1), analyses excluded individuals with missing information on an analysis by analysis basis.
Results
Descriptive analyses
On the DSI-SS, 16.4% (n = 56) met the cutoff for suicide risk on the DSI-SS. For individual items, 40 (11.7%) endorsed thoughts of killing themselves, 28 (8.2%) endorsed the suicide plan item, 26 (10.6%) endorsed at least some lack of control over suicidal thoughts, and 25 (7.3%) endorsed impulses to kill themselves. On the SITBI, 22.9% (n = 78) of participants reported a history of suicidal ideation, 8.2% (n = 28) reported a history of a suicide plan, and 6.2% (n = 21) reported a history of NSSI.
Correlations among study variables are presented in Table 2. Of note, higher mean CDS symptoms were weakly correlated with all SITB indices (rs = 0.14-0.22, ps < 0.05) with the exception of NSSI (p > .05). Higher mean ADHD-IN symptoms were weakly correlated with endorsement of thoughts of killing self and thoughts of suicide and/or plan on the DSI-SS, as well as NSSI (rs = 0.11-0.13; ps < 0.05) but not with other SITB indices (ps > 0.05). ADHD-HI symptoms were not significantly correlated with any SITB outcome (all ps > 0.05).
Logistic regression models
We present multivariate logistic regression results in Tables 3 and 4.
DSI-SS
In unadjusted models (i.e., those that only included our 3 predictors of interest), CDS symptoms were the only significant predictor of our composite DSI-SS variable, such that the odds of elevations on the DSI-SS were increased by 74% for each 1-point increase in CDS mean score (95% CI = 1.16–2.61). This association was attenuated, though still significant after adjustment for participant characteristics (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.10–2.58). However, although we still observed a 50% higher odds of DSI-SS elevations for each 1-point increase in CDS symptoms following further adjustment for depressive symptoms, this estimate could not be distinguished from the null hypothesis (Table 3). Neither ADHD-IN nor ADHD-HI symptoms were related to higher odds of elevated DSI-SS composite scores.
In examining individual items on the DSI-SS, we observed a similar pattern for most DSI-SS items. The odds of endorsement of suicidal thoughts or plans increased by 71% with each 1-point increase in mean CDS symptoms in unadjusted models (95% CI = 1.04–2.82), which increased to 77% after adjustment for participant characteristics (OR = 1.06–2.96). Though adjustment for depressive symptoms again attenuated this association to the point of non-significance (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.96–2.74). Higher mean scores in CDS symptoms, however, were related to elevations in thoughts of killing self (fully adjusted OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.22–2.95) and impulses to kill self (fully adjusted OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.16–3.72) across adjustment in all models. Although higher CDS symptom scores were associated with higher odds of a lack of control over suicidal thoughts, the association was not able to be differentiated from the null hypothesis in any model (fully adjusted OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.86–2.31. Finally, although neither ADHD-IN nor ADHD-HI symptoms were not significantly related to higher odds any DSI-SS item, higher ADHD-IN symptoms were still associated with non-significantly higher odds of suicidal thoughts and plans (fully adjusted OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.84–1.95; Table 3). Figure 1 provides a summary of CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI symptoms in relation to DSI-SS variables in the fully adjusted model (figures for non-fully adjusted models are presented in Supplemental Materials).
SITBI
Similar to our findings measuring suicidal thoughts and plans via questionnaire, our findings via interview examining suicidal thoughts (fully adjusted OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.06–2.28) and plans (fully adjusted OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.19–3.52) suggested that these outcomes were only significantly associated with CDS symptoms, but not ADHD-IN or ADHD-HI symptoms, across models. Finally, in contrast to most other outcomes, CDS symptoms were not related to NSSI (OR range = 0.98 − 0.91 across adjustment). Instead, higher mean scores of both ADHD-IN (fully adjusted OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.73–2.08) and ADHD-HI symptoms (fully adjusted OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.79–2.05) were related. However, model estimates were not distinguishable from the null hypothesis (Table 4). Figure 2 provides a summary of findings for CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI symptoms in relation to SITBI variables in the fully adjusted model (figures for non-fully adjusted models are presented in Supplemental Materials).
Discussion
This study builds on prior literature examining CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI symptoms in relation to SITBs in a community-based sample of early adolescents. Although previous literature has demonstrated an association between CDS and SITBs, no study has included multi-informant rating scales and interviews for SITBs assessing many separate thoughts and behaviors along the SITB continuum (including but not limited to plans, methods, and NSSI). As hypothesized, CDS symptoms, but not ADHD-IN or ADHD-HI symptoms, were most strongly and robustly associated with early adolescent endorsement SITBs generally across our rating scale and interview, even when controlling for participant characteristics (i.e., sex, household income, race, and medication use) and adolescent-reported depressive symptoms. The only exception to this was for NSSI, though associations with ADHD-IN and ADHD-HI symptoms were not significant.
Across both rating scale and interview methods, higher mean CDS symptoms were related to endorsement of suicidal ideation across all adjustments. We also observed evidence that early adolescents with higher CDS symptoms may engage in suicidal planning more often than others, though we only observed a significant association from our questionnaire prior to adjustment for depressive symptoms (and ADHD-IN symptoms were also more weakly associated with endorsement on our questionnaire, though associations were not significant). Finally, we observed evidence that CDS symptoms may be uniquely related to adolescents’ impulses to kill themselves across adjustment for all covariates.
There are multiple possible reasons that rates of suicidal ideation may be uniquely related to CDS symptoms. One explanation may be the relevance of CDS to the interpersonal theory of suicide [62], which posits that thwarted belongingness (feeling socially disconnected and without support) and perceived burdensomeness (self-hatred and beliefs that one is a liability to others) contribute to suicidal thoughts/desire. The added presence of acquired capability for suicide (lowered fear of death and elevated physical pain tolerance) is when near-lethal and lethal attempts are most likely to occur [62]. In considering thwarted belongingness, social isolation is one of the strongest and most reliable predictors of SITBs [62], and studies have consistently found CDS to be uniquely associated with social withdrawal and isolation [52, 63,64,65,66]. In addition, low self-esteem is a core component of perceived burdensomeness [62] and is also significantly associated with CDS symptoms [67, 68] and ADHD [69, 70]. Considered together, it is plausible that adolescents with ADHD and co-occurring CDS symptoms experience social isolation and lowered self-esteem which make them more likely to also experience suicidal ideation and desire. However, we should also note that our findings regarding weaker and non-significant associations between ADHD-IN symptoms and thoughts of suicide and/or plan may warrant further investigation considering the low base rate and thus low power we had in estimating associations.
In contrast to our findings for suicidal ideation and suicidal planning, we did not find CDS to be associated with early adolescent endorsement of engaging in NSSI. Rather, ADHD-IN and ADHD-HI symptoms were both related to almost a 30% increase in odds for each 1-point increase in mean symptom scores, though these elevations were not significant. However, low power may have again limited our ability to observe meaningful associations. Our findings are in line with another recent study which found higher ADHD symptoms, but not CDS symptoms, to be associated with past-year NSSI in adolescents with ADHD [32].
If meaningful differences do exist among CDS and ADHD symptoms regarding NSSI and other SITB indices, findings may suggest differential pathways into SITBs that warrant further investigation with larger or higher-powered samples. More specifically, our findings might provide preliminary evidence that early adolescents with higher CDS symptoms are more likely to engage in suicidal ideation and plans, whereas early adolescents with higher ADHD symptoms are more likely to engage in non-suicidal (and perhaps even suicidal) self-harm behaviors. When CDS and ADHD-IN are considered simultaneously, CDS symptoms are often negatively associated with hyperactive-impulsive symptoms [71], and it is possible that the presence of hyperactive and impulsive behaviors distinctly contribute to behaviors such as NSSI. Further, ADHD and CDS are hypothesized to arise from different neural substrates [72, 73], and trait-impulsivity underlying externalizing psychopathology (including ADHD) may be important for understanding youth who are more likely to engage in self-harm behaviors. More research is needed that examines (1) possible differential associations between ADHD and CDS symptom dimensions and SITB indices, (2) CDS in relation to the proximal components of the interpersonal model of suicide, and (3) developmental trajectories that may be involved in the progression along the SITB continuum.
Further, if replicated in independent samples, our findings may have important implications for assessment, including incorporation of CDS in ADHD-focused assessments as well as the importance of assessing for a range of SITB indices. In addition, although CDS is as more trait-like than state-like [74, 75], symptoms may nevertheless fluctuate for a multitude of reasons (e.g., poor/insufficient sleep, peer difficulties; see [76, 77]) and be important to monitor as part of ongoing mental health screening or treatment.
Strengths, limitations, and future directions
Strengths of the study include using a psychometrically-valid measure of CDS, employing multiple methods for assessing multiple domains of SITBIs, recruiting a diverse community sample, and recruiting outside the confines of ADHD specifically. However, there are several limitations that are important to note, which should influence further research. First, as already stated, there was a low base rate of NSSI and more serious SITB indices (e.g., plans, attempts) in our early adolescent sample, limiting statistical power. Second, because recruitment targeted youth to reflect the full range of CDS symptomology, the sample also reflected a larger proportion of adolescents with predominately ADHD-IN, such that findings regarding ADHD-HI symptoms may be limited. Third, although this study was more diverse both in race and sex than previous studies, the sample was still predominantly White (60%) with a relatively high socioeconomic status, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. Fourth, future research would benefit from longitudinal data to investigate possible differential developmental trajectories discussed above, including the possible mechanisms linking CDS and ADHD to SITBs including direct measurement of constructs within the interpersonal model of suicide.
In conclusion, the current study examined the associations between CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI symptoms and multiple SITB indices among early adolescents, finding that CDS symptoms were most strongly associated with suicidal ideation and suicidal plans, even after adjustment for participant characteristics and depressive symptoms. Additional research is needed to measure associations longitudinally and examine potential mechanisms between CDS, ADHD symptom dimensions, and SITBs throughout adolescence.
Data availability
Data is available from the corresponding author following execution of a data use agreement.
References
Plemmons G et al (2018) Hospitalization for suicide ideation or attempt: 2008–2015. Pediatrics, 141(6)
Curtin SC, Heron MP (2019) Death rates due to suicide and homicide among persons aged 10–24: United States, 2000–2017
Statistics NCfH (2021) Mortality 2018–2021. CDC WONDER, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, N.V.S. System, Editor
Copeland WE, Goldston DB, Costello EJ (2017) Adult associations of childhood suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a prospective, longitudinal analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 56(11):958–965e4
Goldston DB et al (2016) Developmental trajectories of suicidal thoughts and behaviors from adolescence through adulthood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55(5):400–407e1
Geoffroy M-C et al (2022) Prevalence of suicidal ideation and self-harm behaviours in children aged 12 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry
Ayer L et al (2020) Advancing research in child suicide: a call to action. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 59(9):1028–1035
Rowland AS et al (2015) The prevalence of ADHD in a population-based sample. J Atten Disord 19(9):741–754
Kumperscak HG (2013) ADHD through different developmental stages Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents, : pp. 3–19
Willoughby MT (2003) Developmental course of ADHD symptomatology during the transition from childhood to adolescence: a review with recommendations. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(1):88–106
Katzman MA et al (2017) Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach. BMC Psychiatry 17:1–15
Beheshti A, Chavanon M-L, Christiansen H (2020) Emotion dysregulation in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 20(1):1–11
Becker SP et al (2017) Rates of peer victimization in young adolescents with ADHD and associations with internalizing symptoms and self-esteem. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 26:201–214
Newark PE, Elsässer M, Stieglitz R-D (2016) Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and resources in adults with ADHD. J Atten Disord 20(3):279–290
Beauchaine TP, Zisner AR, Sauder CL (2017) Trait impulsivity and the externalizing spectrum. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 13:343–368
Septier M et al (2019) Association between suicidal spectrum behaviors and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 103:109–118
World Health Organization. Adolescent Health (2024) [cited 2024 April 30th]; https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_1
Franklin JC et al (2017) Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull 143(2):187
Belsher BE et al (2019) Prediction models for suicide attempts and deaths: a systematic review and simulation. JAMA Psychiatry 76(6):642–651
Barkley RA (2013) Distinguishing sluggish cognitive tempo from ADHD in children and adolescents: executive functioning, impairment, and comorbidity. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 42(2):161–173
Burns GL, Becker SP (2021) Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD symptoms in a nationally representative sample of US children: differentiation using categorical and dimensional approaches. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 50(2):267–280
Servera M et al (2018) Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. J Abnorm Psychol 127(8):818
Burns GL, Becker SP, Montaño JJ, Servera M (2024) Clinical distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome and ADHD presentations in a nationally representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14005
Leopold DR et al (2016) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo throughout childhood: temporal invariance and stability from preschool through ninth grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 57(9):1066–1074
Nock MK et al (2013) Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication adolescent supplement. JAMA Psychiatry 70(3):300–310
Burns GL et al (2023) Cognitive disengagement syndrome symptoms from early childhood to adolescence in a nationally Representative Spanish Sample. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, : p. 1–15
Becker SP, Willcutt EG, Leopold DR, Fredrick JW, Smith ZR, Jacobson LA, Burns GL, Mayes SD, Waschbusch DA, Froehlich TE, McBurnett K (2023) Report of a work group on sluggish cognitive tempo: Key research directions and a consensus change in terminology to cognitive disengagement syndrome. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry 62(6):629–645
Becker SP, Leopold DR, Burns GL, Jarrett MA, Langberg JM, Marshall SA, McBurnett K, Waschbusch DA, Willcutt EG (2016) The internal, external, and diagnostic validity of sluggish cognitive tempo: a meta-analysis and critical review. J Am Acad Child Adolescent Psychiatry 55(3):163–178
Becker SP et al (2016) Sluggish cognitive tempo is associated with suicide risk in psychiatrically hospitalized children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 57(12):1390–1399
Becker SP, Holdaway AS, Luebbe AM (2018) Suicidal behaviors in college students: frequency, sex differences, and mental health correlates including sluggish cognitive tempo. J Adolesc Health 63(2):181–188
Becker SP et al (2020) Sluggish cognitive tempo in adolescents with and without ADHD: differentiation from adolescent-reported ADHD inattention and unique associations with internalizing domains. J Abnorm Child Psychol 48:391–406
Ergül B, Ersöz B, Alan (2024) The role of cognitive disengagement syndrome in non-suicidal self‐injury among adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Early intervention in psychiatry
Forte A et al (2020) Developmental trajectories of childhood symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention and suicidal behavior during adolescence. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29:145–151
Galéra C et al (2008) Hyperactivity-inattention symptoms in childhood and suicidal behaviors in adolescence: the Youth Gazel Cohort. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 118(6):480–489
Ojala O et al (2022) Associations of impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention with nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior: longitudinal cohort study following children at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders into mid-adolescence. BMC Psychiatry 22(1):679
Sarkisian KL, Van Hulle CA, Hill Goldsmith H (2019) Brooding, inattention, and impulsivity as predictors of adolescent suicidal ideation. J Abnorm Child Psychol 47:333–344
Kaufman J et al (2013) Schedule for affective disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL 2013, DSM-5). Western Psychiatric Institute and Yale University
Dunn DM (2019) Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fifth Edition. NCS Pearson, Bloomington, MN
Becker SP et al (2024) Cognitive disengagement syndrome – clinical interview (CDS-CI): psychometric support for caregiver and youth versions. Psychological Assessment
Stiffman AR et al (2000) The Service Assessment for children and adolescents (SACA): adult and child reports. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39(8):1032–1039
Jarbin H et al (2017) Predictive validity of the K-SADS-PL 2009 version in school-aged and adolescent outpatients. Nord J Psychiatry 71(4):270–276
Becker SP et al (2016) The internal, external, and diagnostic validity of sluggish cognitive tempo: a meta-analysis and critical review. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55(3):163–178
Burns GL, Becker SP (2022) Convergent and discriminant validity of the child and adolescent behavior inventory scale scores with well-established psychopathology and academic achievement measures in adolescents with ADHD. Assessment 29(5):1086–1098
Burns GL, Preszler J, Becker SP (2022) Psychometric and normative information on the child and adolescent behavior inventory in a nationally representative sample of United States children. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 51(4):443–452
Başay Ö et al (2021) Validity of sluggish cognitive tempo in Turkish children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 52(2):191–199
Jung S et al (2021) Internal and external validity of self-report and parent-report measures of sluggish cognitive tempo in South Korean adolescents. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 43(2):355–366
Sadeghi-Bahmani D et al (2022) Sluggish cognitive tempo among Iranian children and adolescents: a validation study of the Farsi child and adolescent behavior inventory (CABI)–Parent version. J Clin Med 11:6346
Sáez B et al (2019) Optimal items for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children across mother, father, and teacher ratings. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 48(6):825–839
Servera M et al (2018) Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. J Abnorm Psychol 127(8):818–829
Burns GL, Servera M, Becker SP (2021) Psychometric properties and normative information on the child and adolescent behavior inventory with ratings for Spanish children from parents and teachers. Psicothema, 33
Becker SP et al (2020) Assessing sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in elementary students: empirical differentiation, invariance across sex and grade, and measurement precision. Psychol Assess 32(11):1047–1056
Becker SP et al (2019) Toward establishing a standard symptom set for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children: evidence from teacher ratings in a community sample. Assessment 26(6):1128–1141
Becker SP (2021) Systematic review: Assessment of sluggish cognitive tempo over the past decade. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 60(6):690–709
Metalsky GI, Joiner TE (1997) The hopelessness depression symptom questionnaire. Cogn Therapy Res 21:359–384
Stanley IH et al (2021) Psychometric properties of the depressive Symptom Index-Suicidality Subscale (DSI-SS) in an adult psychiatric sample. Psychol Assess 33(10):987
von Glischinski M et al (2016) Depressive symptom inventory suicidality subscale: optimal cut points for clinical and non-clinical samples. Clin Psychol Psychother 23(6):543–549
Nock MK et al (2007) Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample. Psychol Assess 19(3):309–317
Farabaugh A et al (2015) Screening for suicide risk in the college population. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther 33:78–94
Barclay N et al (2023) Changes in the suicide risk behaviors of American college students over time: an analysis of three universities. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav 53(5):764–775
Heinz A et al (2020) Suicide prevention: using the number of health complaints as an indirect alternative for screening suicidal adolescents. J Affect Disord 260:61–66
Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW, Vannest KJ (2015) BASC3: Behavior assessment system for children. PscyhCorp Bloomington
Van Orden KA et al (2012) Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Psychol Assess 24(1):197
Carlson CL, Mann M (2002) Sluggish cognitive tempo predicts a different pattern of impairment in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 31(1):123–129
Fredrick JW, Becker SP, Langberg JM (2022) Low school support exacerbates the association between peer difficulties and sluggish cognitive tempo in adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 51(6):1024–1038
Marshall SA et al (2014) Social and academic impairment in youth with ADHD, predominately inattentive type and sluggish cognitive tempo. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:77–90
Willcutt EG et al (2014) The internal and external validity of sluggish cognitive tempo and its relation with DSM–IV ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:21–35
Watabe Y et al (2014) The relationship between sluggish cognitive tempo and impairment in children with and without ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:105–115
Becker SP et al (2018) Sluggish cognitive tempo in adults: psychometric validation of the adult concentration inventory. Psychol Assess 30(3):296
Mazzone L et al (2013) Self-esteem evaluation in children and adolescents suffering from ADHD Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health, vol 9. CP & EMH, p 96
Uçar HN et al (2020) Perceived family climate and self-esteem in adolescents with ADHD: a study with a control group. J Atten Disord 24(8):1132–1140
Bernad MdM et al (2014) A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of the external correlates of sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD-inattention symptoms dimensions. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42:1225–1236
Lee S et al (2016) Bifactor latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms. Psychol Assess 28(8):917
Burns GL et al (2020) Application of the bifactor S–1 model to multisource ratings of ADHD/ODD symptoms: an appropriate bifactor model for symptom ratings. J Abnorm Child Psychol 48:881–894
Burns GL et al (2020) Are sluggish cognitive tempo, ADHD, and oppositional defiant disorder trait-or state-like constructs from prekindergarten to fourth grade? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 49(4):460–468
Preszler J et al (2019) How consistent is sluggish cognitive tempo across occasions, sources, and settings? Evidence from latent state-trait modeling. Assessment 26:99–110
Becker SP et al (2019) Shortened sleep duration causes sleepiness, inattention, and oppositionality in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: findings from a crossover sleep restriction/extension study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 58(4):433–442
Fredrick JW, Langberg JM, Becker SP (2022) Longitudinal association of sluggish cognitive tempo with depression in adolescents and the possible role of peer victimization. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol 50(6):809–822
Funding
This research was supported by award number R01MH122415 from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). The use of REDCap in this project was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Award Number 5UL1TR001425-04. Dr. Wiggs’ effort while preparing this manuscript, was supported by the National Research Service Award in Primary Medical Care, T32HP10027 through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or HRSA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.E.T., K.K.W., and S.P.B. conducted analyses and wrote the main manuscript text. J.N.E. and L.T. provided edits to the text. K.K.W. prepared figures. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
Informed consent/Consent to publish
We obtained written informed consent and assent from participants to participate in this study and use their de-identified data in analysis and publications.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thornton, K.E., Wiggs, K.K., Epstein, J.N. et al. ADHD and cognitive disengagement syndrome symptoms related to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in early adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02556-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02556-x