Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medial sural artery perforator free flap versus radial forearm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Radial Forearm Free flap (RFFF) is widely used in head and neck reconstruction, yet its donor site defect remains a significant drawback. The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Free Flap (MSAPFF) is considered an alternative flap to RFFF. This study aims to comprehensively analyze their characteristics, outcomes, and their impact on patient quality of life.

Methods

All patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction using RFFF and MSAPFF between February 2017 and April 2023 were included in this study. Flap characteristics, outcomes and post-operative complications were recorded and compared. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results, and quality of life were also analyzed.

Results

The study included 76 patients: 37 underwent reconstruction with RFFF, and 39 with MSAPFF. There was no significance difference between the RFFF and MSAPFF regarding the success rate (97.2% vs 97.4%), flap size (4.8 × 8.8 cm2 vs 5 × 9.8 cm2), hospital of stay (15.5 days vs 13.5 days) and recipient site complications (P > 0.05). However, MSAPFF showed larger flap thickness (P = 0.001), smaller arterial caliber (P = 0.008), shorter pedicle length (P = 0.001), and longer harvesting time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the pre-and postoperative ranges of wrist and ankle movements or in recipient site complications. MSAPFF showed a significant difference in donor site morbidity (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The MSAPFF is an excellent alternative to the RFFF for repairing oral cavity defects, with additional advantage of a well-hidden scar on the posterior calf, a larger flap thickness, accepted pedicle length and arterial caliber. However, one should consider the harvesting time and surgical skills required in comparison to the RFFF.

Clinical relevance

The study highlights the importance of the MSAPFF as an alternative option for RFFF with less donor site morbidity and high success rate in oral cavity reconstruction and improved patient Quality of life after ablative surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gibber MJ, Clain JB, Jacobson AS et al (2015) Subscapular system of flaps: an 8-year experience with 105 patients. Head Neck 37:1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bianchi B, Ferri A, Ferrari S et al (2010) Reconstruction of lateral through and through oro-mandibular defects following oncological resections. Microsurgery 30:517–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang GF, Chen PJ, Gao YZ et al (1997) Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg 50:162–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mashrah MA, Lingjian Y, Handley TP et al (2019) Novel technique for the direct closure of the radial forearm flap donor site defect with a local bilobed flap. Head Neck 41:3282–3289. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garg RK, Wieland AM, Poore SO et al (2017) The radial forearm snake flap: a novel approach to oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction that reduces forearm donor site morbidity. Microsurgery 37:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerawala CJ, Martin IC (2006) Sensory deficit in the donor hand after harvest of radial forearm free flaps. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:100–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.03.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Avery CME (2010) Review of the radial free flap: is it still evolving, or is it facing extinction? Part one: soft-tissue radial flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.09.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakayama B, Hyodo I, Hasegawa Y et al (2002) Role of the anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction: advantages of moderate skin and subcutaneous thickness. J Reconstr Microsurg 18:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-28463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavadas PC, Sanz-Giménez-Rico JR, la Cámara AG et al (2001) The medial sural artery perforator free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1609–1615. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200111000-00027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao W, Li Z, Wu L et al (2016) Medial sural artery perforator flap aided by ultrasonic perforator localization for reconstruction after oral carcinoma resection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kao H-K, Chang K-P, Wei F-C, Cheng M-H (2009) Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1125–1132. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b457cf

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agrawal G, Gupta A, Chaudhary V et al (2018) Medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Maxillofac Surg 8:61. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_137_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA (1993) Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880150603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mai L, Mashrah MA, Lin ZY et al (2022) Posterior tibial artery flap versus radial forearm flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.03.060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gulati A, Patel P, Maini N et al (2021) Medial sural artery perforator flap—indications, tips and pitfalls. Front Oral Maxillofac Med 3:26–26. https://doi.org/10.21037/fomm-2021-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatani B, Alhilal AI, Alzahrani HH et al (2023) Facial reconstruction using facial artery myomucosal flap: a comprehensive review. Cureus 15:e42060. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42060

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramirez AT, Chiesa-Estomba CM, González-García JÁ (2021) Submental artery island flap in oral cavity reconstruction. An observational, retrospective two-centre study. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 25:e71–e76. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu S, Fan C, Pecchia B, Rosenberg JD (2020) Submental island flap vs free tissue transfer in oral cavity reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 42:2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fatani B (2023) Radial forearm free flap for head and neck defect reconstruction: an up-to-date review of the literature. Cureus 15:e35653. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoppe IC, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO (2012) The radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:379e–380e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823af059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Song Y, Chen G, Song Y (1984) The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 37:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S et al (1997) Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900120075012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koshima I, Hosoda S, Inagawa K et al (1998) Free combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula for wide, through-and-through oromandibular defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 14:529–534. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1040770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shaw RJ, Batstone MD, Blackburn TK, Brown JS (2010) The anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck reconstruction: “pearls and pitfalls.” Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.07.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim HH, Jeong JH, Seul JH, Cho BC (2006) New design and identification of the medial sural perforator flap: an anatomical study and its clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000207077.19601.86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thione A, Valdatta L, Buoro M et al (2004) The medial sural artery perforators. Ann Plast Surg 53:250–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000116242.26334.b5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taufique ZM, Daar DA, Levine JP, Jacobson AS (2020) Medial sural artery musculocutaneous perforator (MSAP) flap for reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal defects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (United States) 162:993–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820920829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng MJM, Goh CSL, Tan NC et al (2021) A head-to-head comparison of the medial sural artery perforator versus radial forearm flap for tongue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 37:445–452. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Al DNF, Hsiao J-C, Do NT et al (2020) The medial sural artery perforator flap: lessons learned from 200 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 146:630e–641e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee C-H, Chang N-JT, Hsiao J-C et al (2019) Extended use of chimeric medial sural artery perforator flap for 3-dimensional defect reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 82:S86–S94. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Song X, Wu H, Zhang W et al (2015) Medial sural artery perforator flap for postsurgical reconstruction of head and neck cancer. J Reconstr Microsurg 31:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1544180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cui Q, Mao C, Luan X et al (2018) Comparative study of donor site complications between the medial sural artery perforator flap. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis 26:514–518. https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2018.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Daar DA, Abdou SA, Cohen JM et al (2019) Is the medial sural artery perforator flap a new workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 143:393e–403e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chalmers RL, Rahman KMA, Young S et al (2016) The medial sural artery perforator flap in intra-oral reconstruction: a Northeast experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 69:687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi J, Nam S, Choi S et al (2013) Applications of medial sural perforator free flap for head and neck reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 29:437–442. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1343959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Danielian A, Cheng MY, Han PS et al (2023) Medial sural artery perforator flap: a middle ground between anterolateral thigh and radial forearm flaps. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 169:852–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang EI (2023) Alternate soft-tissue free flaps for head and neck reconstruction: the next generation of workhorse flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 152:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kao H-K, Chang K-P, Chen Y-A et al (2010) Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d180ac

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. He Y, Jin S-F, Zhang Z-Y et al (2014) A prospective study of medial sural artery perforator flap with computed tomographic angiography-aided design in tongue reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:2351–2365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mashrah MA, Aldhohrah TA, Abdelrehem Moustafa A et al (2021) Are hand biomechanics affected following radial forearm flap harvest? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Lianxi Mai, and Zhauyu Lin; Data curation, Lianxi Mai, Zhauyu Lin, and Chaobin Pan; Formal analysis, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, and Lianxi Mai; Investigation, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Shuang Wang and Lianxi Mai; Methodology, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Zhauyu Lin,, and Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah; Project administration Abdo Ahmed Saleh Ahmed, Fan Song, and Chaobin Pan; Resources, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Shuang Wang and Lianxi Mia; Software, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Supervision, Chaobin Pan and Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah, Validation, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Mai Lianxi, Shuang Wang, Zhauyu Lin; Visualization, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah, Zhauyu Lin and Lianxi Mai; Writing – original draft, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Lianxi Mai, and Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah; Writing – review and editing, Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed, Fan Song, Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah, and Chaobin Pan. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhaoyu Lin or Chaobin Pan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All participants gave informed consent to participate. This study was conducted with the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and received approval from the Ethics committee of the Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Ethical Approval Number: SYSKY-2023-027-01.

Consent to participate

The informed consent was obtained, the authors are attesting that participants were aware of the study purpose, risks and benefits.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, A.A.S., Mai, L., Mashrah, M.A. et al. Medial sural artery perforator free flap versus radial forearm free flap in oral cavity reconstruction and donor site morbidity. Clin Oral Invest 28, 269 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05618-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05618-1

Keywords

Navigation