Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical efficacy of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) for treatment of multiple gingival recession defects: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

  • Review
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigated the efficacy of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) compared to other methods for treating multiple adjacent gingival recessions (MAGRs) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search was performed through June 2023, to identify clinical trials investigating VISTA for root coverage on MAGRs. A meta-analysis with meta-regression model was employed on the primary outcomes of mean and complete root coverages (MRC, CRC), comparing VISTA with other techniques. Clinical efficacy of various graft materials was assessed.

Results

Fourteen studies were included, 8 of which met the criteria for quantitative assessment. The cumulative MRC (88.15% ± 20.79%) and CRC (67.85% ± 21.72%) of VISTA were significantly higher compared to the tunneling technique (SMD = 0.83 (95% CI [0.36, 1.30], p < 0.01). The baseline recession depth showed a negative correlation with CRC, whereas baseline keratinized gingiva width exhibited a positive correlation with this outcome.

Conclusions

The VISTA technique, particularly with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or connective tissue graft (CTG) materials, offers superior outcomes compared to the tunneling technique. The capacity of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to substitute for connective tissue graft (CTG) in VISTA-root coverage was noteworthy, provided there is adequate keratinized tissue width.

Clinical relevance

VISTA in concert with acellular dermal matrix or CTG resulted in improved root coverage, surpassing the outcomes achieved through tunneling. PRF emerged as a viable alternative to CTG, when used in conjunction with VISTA, demonstrating comparable mean root coverage. This is particularly evident in situations where sufficient keratinized gingiva is available and when patient comfort is taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The collected and analyzed data in this study will be provided upon reasonable request from the corresponding or first author.

References

  1. Graziani F, Gennai S, Roldán S, Discepoli N, Buti J, Madianos P, Herrera D (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 41(Suppl 15):S63-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miron RJ, Moraschini V, Del Fabbro M, Piattelli A, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Zhang Y, Saulacic N, Schaller B, Kawase T, Cosgarea R, Jepsen S, Tuttle D, Bishara M, Canullo L, Eliezer M, Stavropoulos A, Shirakata Y, Stähli A, Gruber R, Lucaciu O, Aroca S, Deppe H, Wang HL, Sculean A (2020) Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 24:2543–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03400-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravidà A, Wang HL (2018) Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 89:1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.18-0066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL (2020) Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: a network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 91:1386–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barootchi S, Tavelli L (2022) Tunneled coronally advanced flap for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions with deficient papilla. Int J Esthet Dent 17:14–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandil O, Sabri H, Manouchehri N, Mostafa D, Wang HL (2023) Root coverage with apical tunnel approach using propolis as a root conditioning agent: a case report with 2-year follow-up and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dent Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.751

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M (2000) Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol 71:1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holtzman LP, Blasi G, Rivera E, Herrero F, Downton K, Oates T (2021) Gingival thickness and outcome of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a meta-regression analysis. JDR Clin Trans Res 6:295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420942171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Do JH (2019) Connective tissue graft stabilization by subperiosteal sling suture for periodontal plastic surgery using the VISTA approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 39(2):253–158. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.3529

  10. Zadeh HH (2011) Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 31:653–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mancini L, Romandini M, Fratini A, Americo LM, Panda S, Marchetti E (2021) Biomaterials for periodontal and peri-Implant regeneration. Materials 14:3319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Zhou Z, Liao Z, Zhang J, Yan J, Li W (2023) Comparative clinical evaluation of trapezoidal, envelope, and tunnel type coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 43:e61–e71. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahajan A, Goyal L, Asi KS, Walhe MS, Chandel N (2023) Clinical effectiveness of periosteal pedicle graft for the management of gingival recession defects-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent 24:93–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00898-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayta-Tovalino F, Barboza JJ, Pasupuleti V, Hernandez AV (2023) Efficacy of tunnel technique (TUN) versus coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the management of multiple gingival recession defects: a meta-analysis. Int J Dent 2023:8671484. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8671484

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 36:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Boeck P, Bakker M, Zwitser R, Nivard M, Hofman A, Tuerlinckx F, Partchev I (2011) The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R. J Stat Softw 39:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brożek J, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J (2009) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 64:669–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gameel M, El Battawy WA, Shoeib MA (2022) Root coverage with connective tissue graft associated with vista versus tunnel technique in miller class I and II recession defects: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Posit Sch Psychol 6:1783–1798

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geisinger ML, Howard JH, Abou-Arraj RV, Kaur M, Basma H, Geurs NC (2022) A Prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial to compare vestibular incision subperiosteal access and sulcular tunnel access root coverage procedures to treat gingival recession. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 42:e91–e102. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed AD, Marssafy LH (2020) Comparative clinical study between Tunnel and VISTA approaches for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with acellular dermal matrix allograft. Egypt Dent J 66:247–259. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2020.77540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hegde S, Madhurkar JG, Kashyap R, Kumar MSA, Boloor V (2021) Comparative evaluation of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with platelet-rich fibrin and connective tissue graft in the management of multiple gingival recession defects: a randomized clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 25:228–236. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_291_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandit HR (2017) Comparison of platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and connective tissue graft (CTG) utilizing vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) technique in the management of multiple gingival recession: a clinical study. Order No. 30278444 ed. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/comparison-platelet-richfibrin-prfconnective/docview/2786887259/se-2

  24. Sery Y, Hegab M, Keraa K, El Barbary A, Darhous M (2022) Platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) technique in multiple gingival recessions: randomized controlled trial. Perio J 6:12–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subbareddy BV, Gautami PS, Dwarakanath CD, Devi PK, Bhavana P, Radharani K (2020) Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique with platelet-rich fibrin compared to subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Contemp Clin Dent 11:249–255. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_405_19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Dandu SR, Murthy KR (2016) Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Treated with Coronally Advanced Flap and Either the VISTA Technique Enhanced with GEM 21S or Periosteal Pedicle Graft: A 9-Month Clinical Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 36:231–237. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mansouri SS, Moghaddas O, Torabi N, Ghafari K (2019) Vestibular incisional subperiosteal tunnel access versus coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft for root coverage of Miller’s class I and II gingival recession: a randomized clinical trial. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent 11:12–20. https://doi.org/10.15171/japid.2019.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajeswari SR, Triveni MG, Kumar ABT, Ravishankar PL, Rajula MPB, Almeida L (2021) Patient-centered comparative outcome analysis of platelet-rich fibrin-reinforced vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique and Zucchelli’s technique. J Indian Soc Periodontol 25:320–329. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_187_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jain KS, Vaish S, Gupta SJ, Sharma N, Khare M, Nair MM (2021) Minimally invasive treatment of gingival recession by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique with collagen membrane and advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a 6-month comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 25:496–503. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_590_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Patra L, Raj SC, Katti N, Mohanty D, Pradhan SS, Tabassum S, Mishra AK, Patnaik K, Mahapatra A (2022) Comparative evaluation of effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with collagen membrane compared with collagen membrane alone for gingival recession coverage. World J Exp Med 12:68–91. https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v12.i4.68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamal A, Moustafa AAM, Khalil AA (2021) Treatment of gingival recession class II defect using buccal fat pad versus platelet rich fibrin using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access technique. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 9:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zadeh HH, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Fotovat M, Kim SH (2019) Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) for surgically facilitated orthodontic therapy (SFOT). Contemp Clin Dent 10:548–553. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_720_18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pohl S, Buljan M (2023) VISTA approach in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative, cortico-cancellous bone, and connective tissue graft for periodontal defect surgery: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shenoy SB, Bhat V, Kottakkunnummal PB, Hegde C, Thomas B (2020) Interproximal papilla volumization using vestibular incision subperiosteal tunneling access technique in esthetic rehabilitation. Contemp Clin Dent 11:76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Górski B, Górska R, Szerszeń M, Kaczyński T (2022) Modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with enamel matrix derivative in addition to subepithelial connective tissue graft compared with connective tissue graft alone for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: prognostic parameters for clinical treatment outcomes. Clin Oral Investig 26:673–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04045-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozcelik O, Seydaoglu G, Haytac MC (2015) An explorative study to develop a predictive model based on avascular exposed root surface area for root coverage after a laterally positioned flap. J Periodontol 86:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gil A, Bakhshalian N, Min S, Nart J, Zadeh HH (2019) Three-Dimensional volumetric analysis of multiple gingival recession defects treated by the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 39(5):687–695. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4313

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H. S: Conceptualization, search strategy, statistical analysis, manuscript writing, F.SJ: search strategy, data collection, manuscript writing, F. S: conceptualization, critical review, manuscript writing, H–L. W: conceptualization, critical review, final approval, H. HZ: Conceptualization, manuscript writing, critical review, final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homayoun H. Zadeh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.H. Zadeh holds patent for VISTA instruments and discloses financial interest in REGENimmune and iKON Biomedical companies, which hold the patents and are involved in manufacturing of the instruments. Other authors declare no conflict of interest pertinent to this research article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

H.H. Zadeh holds patent for VISTA instruments and discloses financial interest in REGENimmune and iKON Biomedical companies, which hold the patents and are involved in manufacturing of the instruments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 4365 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabri, H., SamavatiJame, F., Sarkarat, F. et al. Clinical efficacy of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) for treatment of multiple gingival recession defects: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Clin Oral Invest 27, 7171–7187 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05383-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05383-7

Keywords

Navigation