Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship between the fungiform papillae number and dental caries in primary teeth: a cross-sectional study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Fungiform papillae (FP) contain numerous taste buds. A genetic susceptibility between tasting via FP and caries risk has been suggested. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between FP number and dental caries and to determine whether FP number may be considered as a test for caries risk.

Materials and methods

The study included 157 children who attended the pediatric dentistry department at a public university. Questionnaires, including the children’s medical health, oral health knowledge, fluoride exposure, and taste preferences, were filled in by their parents. The FP number on the dorsal surface of the tongue was counted according to the Denver Papilla Protocol. Caries was recorded using deft/DMFT indices. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS.

Results

The FP number decreased significantly according to age (r = −0.441, p = 0.001), and the mean of the girls’ FP number was significantly higher than the boys’ (p = 0.022). A greater number of FP was associated with increased deft score (p = 0.02, odds ratio [OR] = 1.164).

Conclusion

The caries risk increased in children who had more FP (FP > 30); therefore, FP number could be evaluated in terms of caries risk. FP number could be evaluated as a risk factor for determining dental caries since the risk of caries increased after a FP cut-off point of 29 was achieved.

Clinical relevance

Clinicians can start preventive treatments for caries earlier by determining the FP number for each child.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowden GH (2000) The microbial ecology of dental caries. Microb Ecol Health Dis 12:138–148

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xuedong Z (2015) Dental caries. In: Encyclopedia of Public Health. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_748

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Moynihan PJ (2005) The role of diet and nutrition in the etiology and prevention of oral diseases. Bull World Health Organ 83:694–699

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Birch LL, McPhee L, Steinberg L, Sullivan S (1990) Conditioned flavor preferences in young children. Physiol Behav 47:501–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jilani H, Ahrens W, Buchecker K, Russo P, Hebestreit A (2017) Association between the number of fungiform papillae on the tip of the tongue and sensory taste perception in children. Food Nutr Res 61:1348865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin BP (2003) 6-n-propylthiouracil ( PROP ): a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 25:37–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shetty V, Pooja BL, Hegde AM (2014) PROP test: prediction of caries risk by genetic taste perception among the visually impaired children. Spec Care Dentist 34:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wendell S, Wang X, Brown M, Cooper ME, DeSensi RS, Weyant RJ, Crout R, McNeil DW, Marazita ML (2010) Taste genes associated with dental caries. J Dent Res 89:1198–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haznedaroglu E et al (2015) Association of sweet taste receptor gene polymorphisms with dental caries experience in school children. Caries Res 49:275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller IJ, Reedy FE (1990) Variations in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiol Behav 47:1213–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delwiche JF, Buletic Z, Breslin PAS (2001) Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiol Behav 74:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinnella C, Monteleone E, Piochi M, Spinelli S, Prescott J, Pierguidi L, Gasperi F, Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Predieri S, Torri L, Barbieri S, Valli E, Bianchi P, Braghieri A, Caro AD, di Monaco R, Favotto S, Moneta E (2018) Individual variation in PROP status, fungiform papillae density, and responsiveness to taste stimuli in a large population sample. Chem Senses 43:697–710

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Correa M, Hutchinson I, Laing DG, Jinks AL (2013) Changes in fungiform papillae density during development in humans. Chem Senses 38:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuessle TM, Garneau NL, Sloan MM, Santorico SA (2015) Denver papillae protocol for objective analysis of fungiform papillae. J Vis Exp:e52860. https://doi.org/10.3791/52860

  15. Fogel A, Blissett J (2017) Past exposure to fruit and vegetable variety moderates the link between fungiform papillae density and current variety of FV consumed by children. Physiol Behav 177:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Schubert CR, Pinto A, Klein R, Pankratz N, Pankow JS, Huang GH (2013) Factors related to fungiform papillae density: the beaver dam offspring study. Chem Senses 38:669–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fekete T, Zidek R, Belej L (2017) Effect of ageing process on bitumen and rejuvenated bitumen. Constr Build Mater 136:474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Piochi M, Pierguidi L, Torri L, Spinelli S, Monteleone E, Aprea E, Arena E, Borgogno M, Cravero MC, Galassi L, Gatti E, Lozano L, Musi V, Piasentier E, Valli E, Dinnella C (2019) Individual variation in fungiform papillae density with different sizes and relevant associations with responsiveness to oral stimuli. Food Qual Prefer 78:103729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein N, Laing DG, Hutchinson I (1994) Topographical differences in sweetness sensitivity in the peripheral gustatory system of adults and children. Dev Brain Res 82:286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Segovia C, Hutchinson I, Laing DG, Jinks AL (2002) A quantitative study of fungiform papillae and taste pore density in adults and children. Dev Brain Res 138:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bajec MR, Pickering GJ (2008) Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiol Behav 95:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feeney EL, Hayes JE (2014) Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli. Chemosens Percept 7:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Masi C, Dinnella C, Monteleone E, Prescott J (2015) The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences. Physiol Behav 138:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Temple EC, Hutchinson I, Laing DG, Jinks AL (2002) Taste development: differential growth rates of tongue regions in humans. Dev Brain Res 135:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2008) Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol Behav 95:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pavlidis P, Gouveris H, Anogeianaki A, Koutsonikolas D, Koblenz KK (2013) Age-related changes in electrogustometry thresholds, tongue tip vascularization, density, and form of the fungiform papillae in humans. Chem Senses 38:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cavallari T, Arima LY, Ferrasa A, Moysés SJ, Tetu Moysés S, Hirochi Herai R, Iani Werneck R (2019) Dental caries: genetic and protein interactions. Arch Oral Biol 108:104522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu XP, Li ZQ, Zhou JY, Yu ZH, Zhang JM, Guo ML (2015) Analysis of the association between polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor ( VDR ) gene and dental caries in a Chinese population. Genet Mol Res 14:11631–11638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mistretta CM, Kumari A (2019) Hedgehog signaling regulates taste organs and oral sensation: distinctive roles in the epithelium, stroma, and innervation. Int J Mol Sci 20:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bar C et al (2019) Polycomb repressive complex 1 controls maintenance of fungiform papillae by repressing sonic hedgehog expression. Cell Rep 28:257–266.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laitala M, Alanen P, Isokangas P, Söderling E, Pienihäkkinen K (2012) A cohort study on the association of early mutans Streptococci colonisation. Caries Res 46:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nilsson B, Holm A-K (1983) Taste thresholds, taste preferences, and dental caries in 15-year-olds. J Dent Res 62:1069–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Egil E, Menteş A (2020) Taste perception in school children: is there an association with dental caries? Balk J Dent Med 24:102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to all participants for joining this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EEK, BY, and AM conceived the study. EEK and BY performed the clinical examinations. EEK, BY, and AM analyzed the data. AM performed statistical analyses. EEK wrote the paper. The final version of the manuscript was checked and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Ece Kalaoglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Key points

• Age was an important factor in determining the FP number in children.

• The mean FP number of the girls was significantly higher than that of boys.

•We detected a relationship between FP number and dental caries in primary teeth.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The work was conducted in Marmara University Dentistry Faculty Department of Pediatric Dentistry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalaoglu, E.E., Yazici, B. & Mentes, A. Relationship between the fungiform papillae number and dental caries in primary teeth: a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Invest 25, 6931–6937 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03983-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03983-9

Keywords

Navigation