Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of propidium monoazide treatment on the measured bacterial composition of clinical samples after the use of a mouthwash

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The use of an anti-microbial mouthwash results not only in a reduction of the number of viable cells in dental plaque but potentially also in a shift in the oral microbiome. DNA-based techniques may be appropriate to monitor these shifts, but these techniques amplify DNA from both dead and living cells. Propidium monoazide (PMA) has been used to overcome this problem, by preventing the amplification of DNA from membrane-damaged cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of PMA when measuring compositional shifts in clinical samples after mouthwash use.

Materials and methods

On two consecutive days, baseline samples from buccal surfaces, tongue, and saliva were obtained from six volunteers, after which they used a mouthwash (Meridol, GABA, Switzerland) twice daily for 14 days. Subsequently similar samples were obtained on two consecutive days. The microbial composition of the samples, with or without ex vivo PMA treatment, was assessed with 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

Results

Data showed a clear effect of mouthwash usage on the tongue and saliva samples. PMA treatment enhanced the observed differences only for the saliva samples. Mouthwash treatments did not affect the composition of the plaque samples irrespective of the use of PMA.

Conclusion

The necessity to use a PMA treatment to block the DNA from dead cells in clinical studies aimed at measuring compositional shifts after the use of a mouthwash is limited to salivary samples.

Clinical relevance

Measuring shifts in the oral microbiome could be hampered by the presence of DNA from dead cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marsh PD (2012) Contemporary perspective on plaque control. Br Dent J 212(12):601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mengel R, Wissing E, Schmitz-Habben A, Florès-de-Jacoby L (1996) Comparative study of plaque and gingivitis prevention by AmF/SnF2 and NaF. A clinical and microbiological 9-month study. J Clin Periodontol 23(4):372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lingström P, Zaura E, Hassan H, Buijs MJ, Hedelin P, Pratten J, Spratt D, Daglia M, Karbowiak A, Signoretto C, Rosema M, van der Weijden F, Wilson M (2012) The anticaries effect of a food extract (shiitake) in a short-term clinical study. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:217164

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bizzarro S, Loos BG, Laine ML, Crielaard W, Zaura E (2013) Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in periodontitis: an exploratory study using traditional targeted techniques and a next-generation sequencing. J Clin Periodontol 40(5):483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason MR, Nagaraja HN, Camerlengo T, Joshi V, Kumar PS (2013) Deep sequencing identifies ethnicity-specific bacterial signatures in the oral microbiome. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77287

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kistler JO, Booth V, Bradshaw DJ, Wade WG (2013) Bacterial community development in experimental gingivitis. PLoS ONE 8(8):e71227

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crielaard W, Zaura E, Schuller AA, Huse SM, Montijn RC, Keijser BJF (2011) Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various developmental stages of their dentition in the relation to their oral health. BMC Med Genomics 4:22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozok AR, Persoon IF, Huse SM, Keijser BJ, Wesselink PR, Crielaard W, Zaura E (2012) Ecology of the microbiome of the infected root canal system: a comparison between apical and coronal root segments. Int Endod J 45(6):530–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nocker A, Cheung C-Y, Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods 67:310–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nocker A, Sossa-Fernandez P, Burr MD, Camper AK (2007) Use of propidium monoazide for live/dead distinction in microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(16):5111–5117

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loozen G, Boon N, Pauwels M, Quirynen M, Teughels W (2011) Live/dead real-time polymerase chain reaction to assess new therapies against dental plaque-related pathologies. Mol Oral Microbiol 26(4):253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nocker A, Mazza A, Masson L, Camper AK, Brousseau R (2009) Selective detection of live bacteria combining propidium monoazide sample treatment with microarray technology. J Microbiol Methods 76(3):253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin WT, Luo JF, Guo Y (2011) Comparison and characterization of microbial communities in sulfide-rich wastewater with and without propidium monoazide treatment. Curr Microbiol 62(2):374–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Exterkate RAM, Zaura E, Buijs MJ, Koopman J, Crielaard W, ten Cate JM (2014) The effects of propidium monoazide treatment on the measured composition of polymicrobial biofilms after treatment with chlorhexidine. Caries Res 48:291–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kraneveld EA, Buijs MJ, Bonder MJ, Visser M, Keijser BJ, Crielaard W, Zaura E (2012) The relation between oral candida load and bacterial microbiome profiles in dutch older adults. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42770

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) Qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Meth 7:335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electr 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R (2007) Quantitative and qualitative {beta} diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1576–1585

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SY, Shin Y, Lee CY, Jung IY (2013) In vivo quantitative evaluation of live and dead bacteria in root canal infection by using propidium monoazide with real-time PCR. J Endod 39(11):1359–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasunaga A, Yoshida A, Morikawa K, Maki K, Nakamura S, Soh I, Awano S, Ansai T (2013) Monitoring the prevalence of viable and dead cariogenic bacteria in oral specimens and in vitro biofilms by qPCR combined with propidium monoazide. BMC Microbiol 13:157

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alvarez G, Gonzalez M, Isabal S, Blanc V, Leon R (2013) Method to quantify live and dead cells in multi-species oral biofilm by real-time PCR with propidium monoazide. AMB Express 3(1):1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The study was financially supported by GABA International AG (Therwil, Switzerland). There were no restrictions with respect to the design of the study or the publication of the results.

Author contributions

Study design: RE, WC, JC. Performed the experiment: RE, MB, JK. Analyzed the data: RE, EZ, BB. Wrote the paper: RE, EZ, WC, JC.

Ethical standards

This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. A. M. Exterkate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Exterkate, R.A.M., Zaura, E., Brandt, B.W. et al. The effect of propidium monoazide treatment on the measured bacterial composition of clinical samples after the use of a mouthwash. Clin Oral Invest 19, 813–822 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1297-z

Keywords

Navigation