Skip to main content
Log in

Mobile video literacy: negotiating the use of a new visual technology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we examine the practice of learning to produce video using a new visual technology. Drawing upon a design intervention at a science centre, where a group of teenagers tried a new prototype technology for live mobile video editing, we show how the participants struggle with both the content and the form of producing videos, i.e., what to display and how to do it in a comprehensible manner. We investigate the ways in which video literacy practices are negotiated as ongoing accomplishments and explore the communicative and material resources relied upon by participants as they create videos. Our results show that the technology is instrumental in this achievement and that as participants begin to master the prototype, they start to focus more on the narrative aspects of communicating the storyline of a science centre exhibit. The participants are explicitly concerned with such issues as how to create a comprehensible storyline for an assumed audience, what camera angles to use, how to cut and other aspects of the production of a video. We consider these observed activities to be candidate steps in an emerging mobile video literacy trajectory that involves developing a capacity to document and argue by means of this specific medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a term the participants themselves used, to describe the person who was interacting with the exhibits while being documented.

References

  1. Atkinson JM, Heritage J (1985) Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellotti V, Bly S (1996) Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. In: Ackerman MS (ed) Proceedings of CSCW ‘96. ACM, New York, pp 209–218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley FR, Groble M (2009) TuVista: meeting the multimedia needs of mobile sports fans. In: Proceedings of MM’09, Beijing, China, 19–24 Oct, pp 471–480

  4. Bergstrand F, Landgren J (2011) Visual reporting in time-critical work: exploring video use in emergency response. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI, pp 415–424

  5. Brown B, Reeves S, Sherwood S (2011) Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In: Proceedings of CHI. ACM Press

  6. Broth M (2009) Seeing through screens, hearing through speakers: managing distant studio space in television control room interaction. J Pragmat 41(10):1998–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. David G (2010) Camera phone images, videos and live streaming: a contemporary visual trend. Vis Stud 25(1):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Donald M (1991) Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dougherty A (2011) Live-streaming mobile video: production as civic engagement. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI, pp 425–434

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engström A, Esbjörnsson M, Juhlin O (2008) Mobile collaborative live video mixing. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI. ACM Press, pp 157–166

  11. Engström A, Perry M, Juhlin O (2012) Amateur vision and recreational orientation: creating live video together. In: Proceedings of CSCW

  12. Engström A, Juhlin O, Perry M, Broth M (2010) Temporal hybridity: mixing live video footage with instant replay in real time. In: Proceedings of CHI’10 ACM Press, pp 1495–1504

  13. Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gilje Ø (2011) Working in tandem with editing tools: iterative meaning-making in filmmaking practices. Vis Commun 10(1):45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gillmor D (2010) Mediactive. Dan Gillmor (Creative Commons)

  16. Greiffenhagen C (forthc.) Visual grammar in practice: negotiating the arrangement of speech bubbles in storyboards. Semiotica

  17. Ivarsson J (2010) Developing the construction sight: architectural education and technological change. Vis Commun 9:171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Iacucci G, Oulasvirta A, Salovaara A, Sarvas R (2005) Supporting the shared experience of spectators through mobile group media. In: Proceedings of group. ACM Press, pp 207–216

  19. Jenkins H (2006) Convergence culture: where old and new media collide. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkins H (2009) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge

  21. Jokela T, Lehikoinen JT, Korhonen H (2008) Mobile multimedia presentation editor: enabling creation of audio-visual stories on mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, pp 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy L, Naaman M (2009) Less talk more rock: automated organisation of community-contributed collections of concert videos. In: Proceedings of WWW 2009, pp 311–320

  23. Kirk D, Sellen A, Harper R, Wood K (2007) Understanding videowork. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI, pp 61–70

  24. Kress G (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Laurier E, Brown B (2011) The reservations of the editor: the routine work of showing and knowing the film in the edit suite. J Soc Semiot 21(2):239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lehmuskallio A, Sarvas R (2008) Snapshot video: everyday photographers taking short video-clips. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI ‘08, pp 257–265

  27. Lemke JL (1998) Metamedia literacy: transforming meanings and media. In: Reinking D, McKenna MC, Labbo LD, Kieffer RD (eds) Handbook of literacy and technology: transformations in a post-typographic world. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 283–301

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis S, Pea R, Rosen J (2010) Collaboration with mobile media: shifting from ‘participation’ to ‘co-creation’. In: Proceedings of WMUTE, IEEE, pp 112–116

  29. Licoppe C, Morel J (2009) The collaborative work of producing meaningful shots in mobile video telephony. In: Proceedings of MobileHCI’09, ACM Press, pp 254–263

  30. Luff P, Heath C (1998) Mobility in collaboration. In: Proceedings of CSCW ‘98. ACM Press, pp 305–314

  31. Mondada L (2003) Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions. Vis Stud 18(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mondada L (2009) Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: some systematic uses of the split-screen technique. Hum Stud 32(1):67–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Okabe D (2004) Emergent social practices, situations and relations through everyday camera phone use. In: Paper presented at mobile communication and social change, international conference on mobile communication in Seoul, Korea, 18–19 Oct 2004

  34. Reponen E (2008) Live @ Dublin: mobile phone live video group communication experiment. In: Proceedings of EUROITV ‘08

  35. Sacks H, Schegloff EA (1992) Lectures on conversation. In: Jefferson G (ed), vol 1. Blackwell, Oxford, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  36. Säljö R (2010) Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. J Comput Assist Learn 26(2):43–64

    Google Scholar 

  37. Toussi R, Zoric G, Engström A, Juhlin O (in submission) Mobile vision mixer: a system for collaborative live mobile video production, submitted manuscript, Mobile Life Centre

  38. Vihavainen S, Mate S et al (2011) We want more: human–computer collaboration in mobile social video remixing of music concerts. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, ACM Press, pp 287–294

  39. vom Lehn D, Heath C (2006) Discovering exhibits: video-based studies of interaction in museums and science centres. In: Knoblauch H, Schnettler B, Raab J, Soeffner H (eds) Video analysis: methodology and methods: qualitative audiovisual data analysis in sociology. Peter Lang Pub Inc., New York, NY, pp 101–113

  40. Weilenmann A (2001) Negotiating use: making sense of mobile technology. Pers Ubiquit Comput 5:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weilenmann A, Hillman T, Jungselius B (2013) Instagram at the museum: communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Weilenmann.

Appendix: Transcription notations

Appendix: Transcription notations

Based on Jefferson’s transcript notation, as related in [1].

Well:

Emphasis is indicated by underlining

e:hhh::

Colon indicates prolonged segment

(0.3):

A pause, timed in tenths of a second

(.):

Pause shorter than one-tenth of a second

Overlap []:

Simultaneous (overlapping) speech

-:

Interrupted speech

hhh:

Outbreath

.hh:

Inbreath

>what<:

Spoken faster

°yes°:

‘Degree’ signs enclose quieter speech

YES:

Capitals are spoken louder than surrounding talk

wha-:

Interrupted, cut-off speech

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weilenmann, A., Säljö, R. & Engström, A. Mobile video literacy: negotiating the use of a new visual technology. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 737–752 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0703-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0703-x

Keywords

Navigation