Skip to main content
Log in

The societal burden of chronic pain in Japan: an internet survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Objectives

Chronic pain affects between 10–20 % of the population of Japan and several specific types of chronic pain have been found to be associated with worse health outcomes. The aim of the current study was to investigate the economic burden of chronic pain as well as the health status among Japanese patients.

Methods

Data from the Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a cross-sectional health survey of adults, were used (N = 30,000). Respondents with chronic pain (N = 785) were compared with respondents without chronic pain (N = 29,215) with respect to health status (using the SF-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI questionnaire), and healthcare resource use using regression modeling, controlling for demographic and health history covariates. Indirect costs were calculated using wage rates and the human capital method.

Results

Back pain (72.10 %) and shoulder pain/stiffness (54.90 %) were the most prevalent pain types. Adjusting for demographic and health history differences, respondents with chronic pain reported lower health status [mental component summary (MCS): 44.26 vs. 51.14; physical component summary (PCS): 44.23 vs. 47.48; both p < 0.05], greater absenteeism (4.74 vs. 2.74 %), presenteeism (30.19 vs. 15.19 %), overall work impairment (31.70 vs. 16.82 %), indirect costs (¥1488,385 vs. ¥804,634), activity impairment (33.45 vs. 17.25 %), physician visits (9.31 vs. 4.08), emergency room (ER) visits (0.19 vs. 0.08), and hospitalizations (0.71 vs. 0.34) (all p < 0.05). Nearly 60 % of respondents with chronic pain were untreated. The mean level of pain severity in the last week was 5.26 (using a 0–11 scale); being female, being elderly, having low income, and having multiple pain types were significantly associated with greater pain severity (all p < 0.05). Regular exercise was associated with lower pain severity (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The results suggest that chronic pain has a significant association in an individual’s health status, work productivity, daily activity impairment, healthcare resource use, and economic burden in Japan. Along with low treatment rates, a multidisciplinary approach may lead to an improved quality of life and reduce the economic burden among patients with chronic pain in Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification for chronic pain. Pain. 1986; Suppl 3:S1–S225.

  2. Ospina M, Harstall C. Prevalence of chronic pain: an overview. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Health Technology Assessment. Edmonton, AB: 2002; Report No. 28.

  3. Ogawa S, Iseki M, Kikuchi S. A large-scale survey on chronic pain and neuropathic pain in Japan [Japanese]. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;47(6):565–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine Report, Institute of Medicine (US), Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Langley PC. The societal burden of pain in Germany: health-related quality-of-life, health status and direct medical costs. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1201–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald M, DiBonaventura MD, Ullman S. Musculoskeletal pain in the workforce: the effects of back, arthritis, and fibromyalgia pain on quality of life and work productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(7):765–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura M, Nishiwaki Y, Ushida T, Toyama Y. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic musculoskeletal pain in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(16):424–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishiwaki Y, Michikawa T, Yamada M, Eto N, Takebayashi T, Kurabuchi Study Group. Knee pain and future self-reliance in older adults: evidence from a community-based 3-year cohort study in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2011;21(3):184–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DiBonaventura MD, Fukuda T, Stankus AP. The effect of neuropathic pain on health status, work productivity loss, and healthcare resource use in Japan. ISPOR Asia-Pacific Conference, Taipei, Taiwan. Sept 2012.

  10. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lightspeed Research. Lightspeed Research Panel Book. Warren, NJ: Lightspeed LLC; 2011.

  12. Liu GG, DiBonaventura MD, Yuan Y, Wagner JS, L’Italien GJ, Langley P, Kamae I. The burden of illness for patients with viral hepatitis C: evidence from a national survey in Japan. Value Health. 2012;15:S65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker D, Gandek B. How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;4(5):353–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of health, labour and welfare. Summary report of basic survey on wage structure (Nationwide) 2011. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-l/dl/23gaikyo_zenkoku_Eng.pdf. Accessed April 11 2014.

  18. Crichton B, Green M. GP and patient perspectives on treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in osteoarthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18(2):92–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johannes CB, Le TK, Zhou X, Johnston JA, Dworkin RH. The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an Internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1230–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, Gater R. Persistent pain and well-being: a World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA. 1998;280(2):147–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Pfizer Japan, Inc. KF and NE are currently full-time employees of Pfizer Japan, Inc. The NHWS is a survey conducted by, with the associated data owned by, Kantar Health. Pfizer Japan, Inc. purchased access to the NHWS 2011 database and commissioned Kantar Health to analyze the data for this study and assist in the preparation of this manuscript. MD is a full-time employee of Kantar Health. TTak, TU, TK, and TTag each received a consultancy fee from Pfizer Japan, Inc. for their participation in the study advisory board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco daCosta DiBonaventura.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takura, T., Ushida, T., Kanchiku, T. et al. The societal burden of chronic pain in Japan: an internet survey. J Orthop Sci 20, 750–760 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0730-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0730-8

Keywords

Navigation