Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs): treatment satisfaction, medication adherence, and quality of life (QoL) and the associated factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) patients in Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide practical guides for treatment; however, studies that have evaluated PROs of women in Korea with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) are lacking. This cross-sectional, multi-center (29 nationwide hospitals) study, performed from March 2013 to July 2014, aimed to assess PROs related to treatment satisfaction, medication adherence, and quality of life (QoL) in Korean PMO women using osteoporosis medication for prevention/treatment. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, PROs, and experience using medication were collected. The 14-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) (score-range, 0–100; domains: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, global satisfaction), Osteoporosis-Specific Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (OS-MMAS) (score-range, 0–8), and EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaire (index score range, − 0.22 to 1.0; EuroQol visual analog scale score range, 0–100) were used. To investigate factors associated with PROs, linear (treatment satisfaction/QoL) or logistic (medication adherence) regression analyses were conducted. A total of 1804 patients (age, 62 years) were investigated; 60.1% used bisphosphonate, with the majority (67.2%) using weekly medication, 27.8% used daily hormone replacement therapy, and 12.1% used daily selective estrogen receptor modulator. Several patients reported gastrointestinal (GI) events (31.6%) and dental visits due to problems (24.1%) while using medication. Factors associated with the highest OS-MMAS domain scores were convenience and global satisfaction. GI events were associated with non-adherence. TSQM scores for effectiveness, side effects, and GI risk factors were significantly associated with QoL. Our study elaborately assessed the factors associated with PROs of Korean PMO women. Based on our findings, appropriate treatment-related adjustments such as frequency/choice of medications and GI risk management may improve PROs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baccaro LF, Conde DM, Costa-Paiva L, Pinto-Neto AM (2015) The epidemiology and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a viewpoint from Brazil. Clin Interv Aging 10:583–591. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S54614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi YJ, Oh HJ, Kim DJ, Lee Y, Chung YS (2012) The prevalence of osteoporosis in Korean adults aged 50 years or older and the higher diagnosis rates in women who were beneficiaries of a national screening program: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2009. J Bone Miner Res 27:1879–1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650

  4. Wactawski-Wende J (2001) Periodontal diseases and osteoporosis: association and mechanisms. Ann Periodontol 6:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watts NB, Manson JE (2017) Osteoporosis and fracture risk evaluation and management: shared decision making in clinical practice. JAMA 317:253–254. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoon HK, Park C, Jang S, Jang S, Lee YK, Ha YC (2011) Incidence and mortality following hip fracture in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 26:1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.8.1087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Woo C, Gao G, Wade S, Hochberg MC (2010) Gastrointestinal side effects in postmenopausal women using osteoporosis therapy: 1-year findings in the POSSIBLE US study. Curr Med Res Opin 26:1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007991003633603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patrick ARBM, Losina E, Schousboe JT, Cadarette SM, Mogun H, Solomon DH (2010) The complex relation between bisphosphonate adherence and fracture reduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:3251–3259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapurlat R, Delmas PD (2004) Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Rev Prat (Traitement de l’osteoporose post-menopausique) 54:2120–2126

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hellstein JW, Adler RA, Edwards B, Jacobsen PL, Kalmar JR, Koka S, Migliorati CA, Ristic H, American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs Expert Panel on Antiresorptive A (2011) Managing the care of patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 142:1243–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasion EG, Sivananthan SK, Kung AW, Chen SH, Chen YJ, Mirasol R, Tay BK, Shah GA, Khan MA, Tam F, Hall BJ, Thiebaud D (2007) Comparison of raloxifene and bisphosphonates based on adherence and treatment satisfaction in postmenopausal Asian women. J Bone Miner Metab 25:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-006-0735-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gennari L, Rotatori S, Bianciardi S, Nuti R, Merlotti D (2016) Treatment needs and current options for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 17:1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2016.1176147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, Revicki DA, Symonds T, Parada A, Alonso J (2008) The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 17:179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9295-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alan Brookhart JA, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Arnold M, Polinski JM, Patrick AR, Mogun H, Solmon DH (2007) Gaps in treatment among users of osteoporosis medications: the dynamics of noncompliance. Am J Med 120:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sweileh WM, Ihbesheh MS, Jarar IS, Taha AS, Sawalha AF, Zyoud SH, Jamous RM, Morisky DE (2011) Self-reported medication adherence and treatment satisfaction in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 21:301–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.04.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Morisky DE (2013) Relationship of treatment satisfaction to medication adherence: findings from a cross-sectional survey among hypertensive patients in Palestine. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Miyakoshi N, Kudo D, Hongo M, Kasukawa Y, Ishikawa Y, Shimada Y (2017) Comparison of spinal alignment, muscular strength, and quality of life between women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and healthy volunteers. Osteoporos Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4184-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Madureira MM, Ciconelli RM, Pereira RM (2012) Quality of life measurements in patients with osteoporosis and fractures. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67:1315–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baczyk G, Samborski W, Jaracz K (2016) Evaluation of the quality of life of postmenopausal osteoporotic and osteopenic women with or without fractures. Arch Med Sci 12:819–827. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.55012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ringe JD, Moller G (2009) Differences in persistence, safety and efficacy of generic and original branded once weekly bisphosphonates in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: 1-year results of a retrospective patient chart review analysis. Rheumatol Int 30:213–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-0940-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Cooper C (2006) Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey. Osteoporos Int 17:1638–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0166-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL, Colman SS, Kumar RN, Brod M, Rowland CR (2004) Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Reynolds K, Viswanathan HN, Muntner P, Harrison TN, Cheetham TC, Hsu JW, Gold DT, Silverman S, Grauer A, Morisky DE, O’Malley CD (2014) Validation of the Osteoporosis-Specific Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in long-term users of bisphosphonates. Qual Life Res 23:2109–2120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0662-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, Kim KY, Yang HK, Kwon IS, Kind P, Kweon SS, Kim YT (2009) South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health 12:1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Voko Z, Gaspar K, Inotai A, Horvath C, Bors K, Speer G, Kalo Z (2017) Osteoporotic fractures may impair life as much as the complications of diabetes. J Eval Clin Pract 23:1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuo SZ, Haftek M, Lai JC (2017) Factors associated with medication non-adherence in patients with end-stage liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 62:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4391-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso J (2000) Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 38:175–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Turbi C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC, Torrijos A, Grana J, Miguelez R, Sacristan J, Marin F (2004) Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 26:245–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barrett-Connor E, Wade SW, Do TP, Satram-Hoang S, Stewart R, Gao G, Macarios D (2010) Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™. Osteoporos Int 23:733–741

  30. Mulligan R, Sobel S (2005) Osteoporosis: diagnostic testing, interpretation, and correlations with oral health—implications for dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 49:463–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2004.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Warriner AH, Curtis JR (2009) Adherence to osteoporosis treatments: room for improvement. Curr Opin Rheumatol 21:356–362. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832c6aa4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1502-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah ND, Dunlay SM, Ting HH, Montori VM, Thomas RJ, Wagie AE, Roger VL (2009) Long-term medication adherence after myocardial infarction: experience of a community. Am J Med 122:961 e7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1652-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Robitaille J, Yoon PW, Moore CA, Liu T, Irizarry-Delacruz M, Looker AC, Khoury MJ (2008) Prevalence, family history, and prevention of reported osteoporosis in U.S. women. Am J Prev Med 35:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hong SM, Choi WH (2011) Osteoporosis and decrease in bone mineral density have associated with the reduced quality of life. Osteoporosis 9:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dhillon V, Hurst N, Hannan J, Nuki G (2005) Association of low general health status, measured prospectively by Euroqol EQ5D, with osteoporosis, independent of a history of prior fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1705-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cranney A, Tugwell P, Adachi J, Weaver B, Zytaruk N, Papaioannou A, Robinson V, Shea B, Wells G, Guyatt G, Osteoporosis Methodology G, The Osteoporosis Research Advisory G (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. III. Meta-analysis of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2001-3002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosen CJ (2005) Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 353:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp043801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Eekman DA, Vis M, Bultink IE, Derikx HJ, Dijkmans BA, Lems WF (2009) Treatment with intravenous pamidronate is a good alternative in case of gastrointestinal side effects or contraindications for oral bisphosphonates. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR, Group FR (2006) Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. JAMA 296:2927–2938. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.24.2927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Huas D, Debiais F, Blotman F, Cortet B, Mercier F, Rousseaux C, Berger V, Gaudin AF, Cotté FE (2010) Compliance and treatment satisfaction of post menopausal women treated for osteoporosis. Compliance with osteoporosis treatment. BMC Womens Health 10:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-10-26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by Pfizer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Ki Min.

Ethics declarations

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 43 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Byun, D.W., Moon, SH., Kim, T. et al. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs): treatment satisfaction, medication adherence, and quality of life (QoL) and the associated factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) patients in Korea. J Bone Miner Metab 37, 563–572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-018-0956-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-018-0956-6

Keywords

Navigation