Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of an analytical method for the detection of ephedrine and its analogues in forensic samples using HPTLC–MS

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drug abuse is a global menace in the society. Strict measures are planned and effectuated to dismantle this crime yet a large number of cases of narcotics drugs are seized and referred to forensic science laboratories for analysis. Over the past few years, the misuse of precursor chemicals has increased substantially. Examination of these precursor chemicals, especially ephedrine and its analogues, is a major task for forensic analysts. Though gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is a well-established technique, it dwindles in the identification of the analogues of ephedrine as they have similarity in molecular weight and structure. The analysis involves time-consuming extraction and derivatization process in sample preparation when used for the identification of isomers. The present paper describes a use of high-performance thin-layer chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (HPTLC–MS) for the purpose. This technique requires minimum sample preparation; it is a quick and easy methodology with no derivatization and gives a conclusive result for the separation and identification of ephedrine analogues. The drug samples were dissolved in methanol and spotted on Si60 F254 thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate. Good separation of ephedrine from a mixture of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine was achieved using the solvent system n-butyl acetate–acetone–n-butanol–5 M ammonia–methanol (4:2:2:1:1, v/v). The separated spot on the TLC was subjected to MS, which identified ephedrine with confirmation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The work has been carried out on left over forensic seized samples.

References

  1. Bell DS, Cramer HM, Jones DA (2005) Rational method development strategies on fluorinated liquid chromatography stationary phase: mobile phase ion concentration and temperature effects on the separation of ephedrine alkaloids. J Chromatogr A 1095:113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong CH, Ho EN, Kwok WH, Leung DK, Leung GN, Tang FP, Wong AS, Wong JK, Yu NH, Wan TS (2012) Interconversion of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine during chemical derivatization. Drug Test Anal 4:1028–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moffat AC, Osselton MD, Widdop B (2011) Clarke’s analysis of drugs and poisons, 4th edn. Pharmaceutical Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Houck MM, Siegel JA (2015) Chapter 13, Illicit Drugs. In: Fundamentals of forensic science, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 315–352

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. King LA, Meer APD (2001) New synthetic drugs in the European Union. Sci Justice 8:200–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papoutsis II, Athanaselis SA, Nikolaou PD, Pistos CM, Spiliopoulou CA, Maravelias CP (2010) Development and validation of an EI–GC–MS method for the determination of benzodiazepine drugs and their metabolites in blood: applications in clinical and forensic toxicology. J Pharm Biomed Anal 52:609–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Srivastava M (2011) High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC). Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. UNODC (2006) Recommended methods for the identification and analysis of amphetamine, methamphetamine and their ring substituted analogues in seized materials. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang SM, Lewis RJ, Canfield D, Lia TL, Liu RH (2005) Enantiomeric analysis of ephedrines and norephedrines. DOT/FAA/AM-05/8, 14

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (1996, 2014) Indian pharmacopoeia. Government of India, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zuba D (2007) Medicines containing ephedrine and pseudoephedrine as a source of methcathinone. NCJRS, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Rockville, MD

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Adherence to national and international regulations

Yes

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

1 K. Goyal – study conception and design, acquisition of data, interpretation of data.

2 N. Tomar – drafting of manuscript, interpretation of data.

3 A. P. Singh – analysis of data.

4 R. K. Sarin – critical revision of manuscript.

5 S. K. Shukla – critical revision of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Tomar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, K., Tomar, N., Singh, A.P. et al. Validation of an analytical method for the detection of ephedrine and its analogues in forensic samples using HPTLC–MS. JPC-J Planar Chromat 33, 397–404 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-020-00049-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-020-00049-6

Keywords

Navigation