Abstract
Saturation-transfer difference (STD)-NMR spectroscopy has been widely used to screen potential ligands for binding to large receptor molecules. The STD-NMR experiment is typically based on a proton NMR spectrum, which can suffer from spectral overlap, leading to missing information in STD-based epitope mapping. Two-dimensional STD-NMR experiments can alleviate spectral overlap, but are time consuming. Here, we examine the feasibility of saturating protons in a receptor molecule and observing the STD effect on nearby carbon nuclei after transferring polarization from protons to carbons using the insensitive nuclei enhanced by polarization transfer (INEPT) pulse sequence. We show that under favorable conditions, a 1H→13C STD-INEPT experiment can give information similar to that obtained from a two-dimensional heteronuclear experiment, but in significantly less time. The STD-INEPT experiment could be especially useful when studying mixtures of ligands in which the peak positions in the proton and HSQC spectrum change significantly, and in particular, when using high-throughput, automated methods to analyze the data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.L. Wagstaff, S.L. Taylor, M.J. Howard, Mol. BioSyst. 9, 571–577 (2013)
M. Mayer, B. Meyer, B. Angew, Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 1784–1788 (1999)
M. Mayer, B. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 6108–6117 (2001)
J. Angulo, P.M. Enríquez-Navas, P.M. Nieto, Chem. Eur. J. 16, 7803–7812 (2010)
Y. Zhang, H. Xu, A.M. Parsons, L.B. Casabianca, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 24678–24686 (2017)
Y. Zhang, H. Xu, L.B. Casabianca, Magn. Reson. Chem. 56, 1054–1060 (2018)
Y. Zhang, L.B. Casabianca, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6921–6925 (2018)
A. Bax, D.G. Davis, J. Magn. Reson. 65, 355–360 (1985)
A.G. Palmer III, J. Cavanagh, P.E. Wright, M. Rance, J. Magn. Reson. 93, 151–170 (1991)
L.E. Kay, P. Keifer, T. Saarinen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10663–10665 (1992)
J. Schleucher, M. Schwendinger, M. Sattler, P. Schmidt, O. Schedletzky, S.J. Glaser, O.W. Sorensen, C. Griesinger, J. Biomol. NMR 4, 301–306 (1994)
C. Räuber, S. Berger, Magn. Reson. Chem. 48, 91–93 (2010)
T. Diercks, J.P. Ribeiro, F.J. Cañada, S. André, J. Jiménez-Barbero, H.-J. Gabius, Chem. Eur. J. 15, 5666–5668 (2010)
H. Min, G. Sekar, C. Hilty, ChemMedChem. 10, 1559–1563 (2015)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (grants CHE-1751529 and CHE-1725919). DL was supported by the Clemson Chemistry Research Experiences for Undergraduates grant from the NSF (CHE-1560300).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors designed experiments, HX and DL performed experiments, all authors analyzed data, LBC wrote the manuscript, all authors commented on the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, H., Lustig, D. & Casabianca, L.B. 13C Saturation-Transfer Difference (STD)-NMR Experiments Using INEPT Polarization Transfer. Appl Magn Reson 51, 277–286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-019-01182-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-019-01182-0