Abstract
Discrete mechanics proposes an alternative formulation of the equations of mechanics where the Navier–Stokes and Navier–Lamé equations become approximations of the equation of discrete motion. It unifies the fields of fluid and solid mechanics by extending the fields of application of these equations to all space and time scales. This article presents the essential differences induced by the abandonment of the notion of continuous medium and global frame of reference. The results of the mechanics of continuous medium validated by fluid and solid observations are not questioned. The concept of continuous medium is not invalidated, and the discrete formulation proposed simply widens the spectrum of the applications of the classical equations. The discrete equation of motion introduces several important modifications, in particular the fundamental law of the dynamics on an element of volume becomes a law of conservation of the accelerations on an edge. The acceleration considered as an absolute quantity is written as a sum of two components, one solenoidal, the other irrotational, according to a local orthogonal Helmholtz–Hodge decomposition. The mass is abandoned and replaced by the compression and rotation energies represented by the scalar and vectorial potentials of the acceleration. The equation of motion and all the physical parameters are expressed only with two fundamental units, those of length and time. The essential differences between the two approaches are listed and some of them are discussed in depth. This is particularly the case with the known paradoxes of the Navier–Stokes equation or the importance of inertia for the Navier–Lamé equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batchelor, G.: An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967)
Buresti, G.: A note on Stokes is hypothesis. Acta Mechanica 226, 3555–3559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-015-1380-9
Caltagirone, J.P.: Discrete Mechanics, Concepts and Applications. ISTE John Wiley & Sons, London (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482826
Caltagirone, J.P.: Physique discrète et relativité. Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 44, 1–13 (2019)
Caltagirone, J.P.: Non-Fourier heat transfer at small scales of time and space. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 160, 120145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120145
Caltagirone, J.P.: On Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition of inertia on a discrete local frame of reference. Phys. Fluids 32, 083604 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0015837
Caltagirone, J.P.: Application of discrete mechanics model to jump conditions in two-phase flows. J. Comp. Phys. 432, 110151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110151
Caltagirone, J.P.: On a reformulation of Navier–Stokes equations based on Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition. Phys. Fluids 33, 063605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053412
Caltagirone, J.P., Vincent, S.: On primitive formulation in fluid mechanics and fluid-structure interaction with constant piecewise properties in velocity-potentials of acceleration. Acta Mechanica 231(6), 2155–2171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02630-w
Desbrun, M., Hirani, A., Leok, M., Marsden, J.: Discrete exterior calculus. arXiv:0508.341v2 pp. 1–53 (2005)
Gad-El-Hak, M.: Stokes hypothesis for a newtonian, isotropic fluid. J. Fluids Eng. 117(1), 3–5 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2816816
Guermond, J., Minev, P., Shen, J.: An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195, 6011–6045 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.10.010
Hamman, C., Klewick, J., Kirby, R.: On the Lamb vector divergence in Navier–Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 610, 261–284 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008002760
Happel, J., Brenner, H.: Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1963)
Harlow, F., Welch, J.: Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with a free surface. Phys. Fluids 8, 2182–2189 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1761178
Holmes, M., Parker, N., Povey, M.: Temperature dependence of bulk viscosity in water using acoustic spectroscopy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/269/1/012011
Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y.: Noether Theorems. Invariance and Conservations Laws in the Twentieth Century. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87868-3
Landau, L., Lifchitz, E.: Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon Press, London (1959)
Landau, L., Lifchitz, E.: The Classical Theory of Fields. Third Revised English Edition. Pergamon Press Ltd, Oxford (1971)
Rajagopal, K.: A new development and interpretation of the Navier–Stokes fluid which reveals why the Stokes assumption is inapt. Int. J. Non-Linear Mechan. 50, 141–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.10.007
Shaskov, M.: Conservative Finite-Difference Methods on General Grids. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1996). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315140209
Sod, G.: A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27, 1–31 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(78)90023-2
Truesdell, C., Rosenhead, L.: The present status of the controversy regarding the bulk viscosity of fluids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A (1954). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0237
Van Dyke, M.: Perturbation Methods in Fluids Mechanics. Academic Press, California University, California (1964)
Yuan, G., Jiulin, S., Kaixing, Z., Xindao, H.: Determination of bulk viscosity of liquid water via pulse duration measurements in stimulated brillouin scattering. Chin. Opt. Lett. (2013). https://doi.org/10.3788/COL201311.112902
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Author contributions
J.-P. Caltagirone was responsible for physical modeling, conceptualization, methodology, research code, validation, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing. The paper has been checked by a proofreader of English origin.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caltagirone, JP. An alternative to the concept of continuous medium. Acta Mech 232, 4691–4703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03070-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-021-03070-w