Skip to main content
Log in

Optimum design of large-scale truss towers using cascade optimization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High number of design variables, large size of the search space, and control of a great number of design constraints are major preventive factors in performing optimum design of real-world structures in a reasonable time. The present study intends to examine the computational performance of cascading in design optimization of truss towers with large numbers of design variables. The cascade optimization procedure utilized in this paper reduces the objective function value over a number of optimization stages by initially operating on a small number of design variables, which is gradually increased stage after stage. In fact, the early stages of optimization in the cascade procedure make use of the coarsest configurations with small numbers of design variables and the later stages exploit finer configurations with larger numbers of design variables. The optimization algorithm utilized in each stage of a cascade process is enhanced colliding bodies optimization. High solution accuracy and convergence speed of the proposed method are shown through three test examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holland J.H.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg D.E.: Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Eberhart, R.C., Kennedy, J.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Micromachine Human Science, pp. 39–43 (1995)

  4. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

  5. Dorigo M., Maniezzo V., Colorni A.: The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6(1), 29–41 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geem Z.W, Kim J.H., Loganathan G.V.: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, X.S.: Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications, SAGA 2009. Lecture notes in computer sciences, 5792, 169–178 (2009) (2009)

  8. Kaveh A., Talatahari S.: A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mech. 213, 267–286 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaveh A., Khayatazad M.: A new meta-heuristic method: ray optimization. Comput. Struct. 112–113, 283–294 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaveh A., Motie Share M.A., Moslehi M.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization: magnetic charged system search. Acta Mech. 224, 85–107 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaveh A., Javadi S.M.: Shape and size optimization of trusses with multiple frequency constraints using harmony search and ray optimizer for enhancing the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Acta Mech. 225, 1595–1605 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirjalili S.: The ant lion optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 83, 80–98 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaveh A., Mahdavai V.R.: Colliding bodies optimization: a novel meta-heuristic method. Comput. Struct. 139, 18–27 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaveh A.: Adavnces in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures. Springer, Switzerland (2014)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Charmpis D.C., Lagaros N.D., Papadrakakis M.: Multi-database exploration of large design spaces in the framework of cascade evolutionary structural sizing optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194, 3315–3330 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Charmpis, D.C., Lagaros, N.D., Papadrakakis, M.: Cascade structural sizing optimization with large numbers of design variables. Adv. Eng. Softw. (2016) (submitted)

  17. Kaveh A., Ilchi Ghazaan M.: Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables. Adv. Eng. Softw. 77, 66–75 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaveh A., Ilchi Ghazaan M.: A comparative study of CBO and ECBO for optimal design of skeletal structures. Comput Struct. 153, 137–147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patnaik S.N., Coroneos R.M., Hopkins D.A.: A cascade optimization strategy for solution of difficult design problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 40, 2257–2266 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC): Manual of steel construction–allowable stress design. 9th ed. AISC, Chicago (1989)

  21. Hasançebi O.: Adaptive evolution strategies in structural optimization: enhancing their computational performance with applications to large-scale structures. Comput. Struct. 86, 119–132 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kaveh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M. Optimum design of large-scale truss towers using cascade optimization. Acta Mech 227, 2645–2656 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-016-1588-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-016-1588-3

Keywords

Navigation