Abstract
Atazanavir (ATZ) is a well-tolerated protease inhibitor that can be boosted with ritonavir (r) to treat infection with resistant strains of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and metabolic effects of ATZ/r regimen versus commonly used antiretroviral drugs such as lopinavir (LPV) and darunavir (DRV) in HIV-1-infected patients. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL, using relevant keywords. Data were extracted from eligible randomized trials and pooled as risk ratios (RR) or standardized mean differences (SMD) in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (3292 patients) were eligible for the final analysis. After 96 weeks of treatment, the pooled effect estimate did not favor either ATZ/r or LPV/r in terms of virological failure rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI [0.74, 1.66]). However, ATZ/r was marginally superior to LPV/r in terms of increasing the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml (RR 1.09, 95% CI [1.01, 1.17]). The pooled effect estimate did not favor ATZ/r over DRV/r regarding the change in plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, or high-density lipoprotein at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Moreover, no significant difference was found between the two regimens (ATZ/r and DRV/r) in terms of change in visceral (SMD -0.06, 95%CI [-0.33, 0.21]) or subcutaneous adipose tissue (SMD 0.12, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.39]). The ATZ/r regimen was generally as effective and well-tolerated as the LPV/r regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 patients. Compared to the DRV/r regimen, ATZ/r has no favorable effect on the plasma lipid profile or adipose tissue distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gazzard B, Bernard AJ, Boffito M et al (2006) British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy (2006). HIV Med 7:487–503. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2006.00424.x
Crum NF, Riffenburgh RH, Wegner S et al (2006) Comparisons of causes of death and mortality rates among HIV-infected persons: analysis of the pre-, early, and late HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) eras. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 41:194–200
Murphy EL (2001) Highly active antiretroviral therapy decreases mortality and morbidity in patients with advanced HIV disease. Ann Intern Med 135:17. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00005
Van Sighem AI, van de Wiel MA, Ghani AC, Jambroes M, Reiss P, Gyssens IC et al (2003) Mortality and progression to AIDS after starting highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 17:2227–2236
Walmsley S (2007) Protease inhibitor-based regimens for HIV therapy: safety and efficacy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 45(Suppl 1):S5–S13. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600709 (quiz S28–31)
Hammer SM, Saag MS, Schechter M et al (2006) Treatment for adult HIV infection. JAMA 296:827. doi:10.1001/jama.296.7.827
Department of Health and Human Services, Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL. Accessed 10 Dec 2016
The European AIDS Clinical Society. EACS guidelines. http://www.eacs.eu/guide/index.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2016
Molina J, Journot V, Morand-Joubert L et al (2005) Simplification therapy with once-daily emtricitabine, didanosine, and efavirenz in HIV-1-infected adults with viral suppression receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen: a randomized trial. J Infect Dis 191:830–839. doi:10.1086/428091
Molina J-M, Journot V, Furco A et al (2007) Five-year follow up of once-daily therapy with emtricitabine, didanosine and efavirenz (Montana ANRS 091 trial). Antiviral Ther 12:417–422
Conway B (2007) The role of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in the management of HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 45(Suppl 1):S14–S18. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600766
Carr AAJ (2008) Reasons for treatment success with initial ART: an analysis of 2,635 participants in 64 randomized, controlled trials and 14 prospective cohorts. In: 15th conference on retrovirus and opportunistic infections, Boston, MA, pp 3–6
Friis-Møller N, Sabin CA, Weber R et al (2003) Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 349:1993–2003. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa030218
DAD Study Group, Friis-Møller N, Reiss P et al (2007) Class of antiretroviral drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 356:1723–35. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa062744
Colonno RJ, Thiry A, Limoli K, Parkin N (2003) Activities of atazanavir (BMS-232632) against a large panel of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates resistant to one or more approved protease inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1324–1333
Colonno R, Rose R, McLaren C et al (2004) Identification of I50L as the signature atazanavir (ATV)—resistance mutation in treatment-naive HIV-1–infected patients receiving ATV-containing regimens. J Infect Dis 189:1802–1810. doi:10.1086/386291
Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C et al (2005) Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures. AIDS (London, England) 19:685–694
Jemsek JG, Arathoon E, Arlotti M et al (2006) Body fat and other metabolic effects of atazanavir and efavirenz, each administered in combination with zidovudine plus lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 42:273–280. doi:10.1086/498505
Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C et al (2006) 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. AIDS 20:711–718. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000216371.76689.63
Andersson L-M, Vesterbacka J, Blaxhult A et al (2013) Lopinavir/ritonavir, atazanavir/ritonavir, and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals over 144 weeks: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Scand J Infect Dis 45:543–551. doi:10.3109/00365548.2012.756985
Mallolas J, Podzamczer D, Milinkovic A et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virological suppression receiving a LPV/r-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 51:29–36. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31819a226f
Miro JM, Manzardo C, Ferrer E et al (2015) Immune reconstitution in severely immunosuppressed antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients starting efavirenz, lopinavir-ritonavir, or atazanavir-ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine: final 48-week results (The Advanz-3 Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 69:206–215. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000567
Molina J-M, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J et al (2008) Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Lancet (London, England) 372:646–655. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61081-8
Molina J-M, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J et al (2010) Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 53:323–332. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c990bf
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol 4. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 315:629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469
Aberg JA, Tebas P, Overton ET et al (2012) Metabolic effects of darunavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV type 1-infected subjects over 48 weeks. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 28:1184–1195
Martinez E, Gonzalez-Cordon A, Ferrer E et al (2015) Differential body composition effects of protease inhibitors recomended for initial treatment of HIV infection: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 60(5):811–820. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu898
Ofotokun I, Na LH, Landovitz RJ et al (2015) Comparison of the metabolic effects of ritonavir-boosted darunavir or atazanavir versus raltegravir, and the impact of ritonavir plasma exposure: ACTG 5257. Clin Infect Dis 60(12):1842–1851. doi:10.1093/cid/civ193
Saumoy M, Ordóñez-Llanos J, Martínez E et al (2015) Atherogenic properties of lipoproteins in HIV patients starting atazanavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir: a substudy of the ATADAR randomized study. J Antimicrob Chemother 70(4):1130–1138. doi:10.1093/jac/dku501
Walmsley S (2007) Protease inhibitor-based regimens for HIV therapy. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 45:S5–S13. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600709
Hill A, Sawyer W (2009) Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patients. HIV Med 10:527–535. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00724.x
Flandre P (2011) Atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz as part of a 3-drug regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1. Ann Intern Med 155:402. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-6-201109200-00015
Riddler SA, Haubrich R, DiRienzo AG et al (2008) Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 358:2095–2106. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa074609
Murphy RL, Sanne I, Cahn P et al (2003) Dose-ranging, randomized, clinical trial of atazanavir with lamivudine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 48-week results. AIDS (London, England) 17:2603–2614. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000096930.51231.5d
Uy J, Yang R, Wirtz V et al (2011) Treatment of advanced HIV disease in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected patients receiving once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. AIDS Care 23:1500–1504. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.565033
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank their colleagues in the Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE) and NovaMed Medical Research Association for their continuos support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
Funding sources
None to declare.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menshawy, A., Ismail, A., Abushouk, A.I. et al. Efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infected subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Virol 162, 2181–2190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3346-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3346-9