Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infected subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atazanavir (ATZ) is a well-tolerated protease inhibitor that can be boosted with ritonavir (r) to treat infection with resistant strains of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and metabolic effects of ATZ/r regimen versus commonly used antiretroviral drugs such as lopinavir (LPV) and darunavir (DRV) in HIV-1-infected patients. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL, using relevant keywords. Data were extracted from eligible randomized trials and pooled as risk ratios (RR) or standardized mean differences (SMD) in a meta-analysis model using RevMan software. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (3292 patients) were eligible for the final analysis. After 96 weeks of treatment, the pooled effect estimate did not favor either ATZ/r or LPV/r in terms of virological failure rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI [0.74, 1.66]). However, ATZ/r was marginally superior to LPV/r in terms of increasing the proportion of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml (RR 1.09, 95% CI [1.01, 1.17]). The pooled effect estimate did not favor ATZ/r over DRV/r regarding the change in plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, or high-density lipoprotein at 24, 48, and 96 weeks. Moreover, no significant difference was found between the two regimens (ATZ/r and DRV/r) in terms of change in visceral (SMD -0.06, 95%CI [-0.33, 0.21]) or subcutaneous adipose tissue (SMD 0.12, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.39]). The ATZ/r regimen was generally as effective and well-tolerated as the LPV/r regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 patients. Compared to the DRV/r regimen, ATZ/r has no favorable effect on the plasma lipid profile or adipose tissue distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gazzard B, Bernard AJ, Boffito M et al (2006) British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy (2006). HIV Med 7:487–503. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2006.00424.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crum NF, Riffenburgh RH, Wegner S et al (2006) Comparisons of causes of death and mortality rates among HIV-infected persons: analysis of the pre-, early, and late HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) eras. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 41:194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy EL (2001) Highly active antiretroviral therapy decreases mortality and morbidity in patients with advanced HIV disease. Ann Intern Med 135:17. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Sighem AI, van de Wiel MA, Ghani AC, Jambroes M, Reiss P, Gyssens IC et al (2003) Mortality and progression to AIDS after starting highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 17:2227–2236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walmsley S (2007) Protease inhibitor-based regimens for HIV therapy: safety and efficacy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 45(Suppl 1):S5–S13. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600709 (quiz S28–31)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammer SM, Saag MS, Schechter M et al (2006) Treatment for adult HIV infection. JAMA 296:827. doi:10.1001/jama.296.7.827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Health and Human Services, Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-infected adults and adolescents. http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL. Accessed 10 Dec 2016

  8. The European AIDS Clinical Society. EACS guidelines. http://www.eacs.eu/guide/index.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2016

  9. Molina J, Journot V, Morand-Joubert L et al (2005) Simplification therapy with once-daily emtricitabine, didanosine, and efavirenz in HIV-1-infected adults with viral suppression receiving a protease inhibitor-based regimen: a randomized trial. J Infect Dis 191:830–839. doi:10.1086/428091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Molina J-M, Journot V, Furco A et al (2007) Five-year follow up of once-daily therapy with emtricitabine, didanosine and efavirenz (Montana ANRS 091 trial). Antiviral Ther 12:417–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Conway B (2007) The role of adherence to antiretroviral therapy in the management of HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 45(Suppl 1):S14–S18. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carr AAJ (2008) Reasons for treatment success with initial ART: an analysis of 2,635 participants in 64 randomized, controlled trials and 14 prospective cohorts. In: 15th conference on retrovirus and opportunistic infections, Boston, MA, pp 3–6

  13. Friis-Møller N, Sabin CA, Weber R et al (2003) Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 349:1993–2003. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa030218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DAD Study Group, Friis-Møller N, Reiss P et al (2007) Class of antiretroviral drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 356:1723–35. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa062744

  15. Colonno RJ, Thiry A, Limoli K, Parkin N (2003) Activities of atazanavir (BMS-232632) against a large panel of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clinical isolates resistant to one or more approved protease inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1324–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Colonno R, Rose R, McLaren C et al (2004) Identification of I50L as the signature atazanavir (ATV)—resistance mutation in treatment-naive HIV-1–infected patients receiving ATV-containing regimens. J Infect Dis 189:1802–1810. doi:10.1086/386291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C et al (2005) Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures. AIDS (London, England) 19:685–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jemsek JG, Arathoon E, Arlotti M et al (2006) Body fat and other metabolic effects of atazanavir and efavirenz, each administered in combination with zidovudine plus lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 42:273–280. doi:10.1086/498505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C et al (2006) 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. AIDS 20:711–718. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000216371.76689.63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andersson L-M, Vesterbacka J, Blaxhult A et al (2013) Lopinavir/ritonavir, atazanavir/ritonavir, and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals over 144 weeks: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Scand J Infect Dis 45:543–551. doi:10.3109/00365548.2012.756985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mallolas J, Podzamczer D, Milinkovic A et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virological suppression receiving a LPV/r-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 51:29–36. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31819a226f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miro JM, Manzardo C, Ferrer E et al (2015) Immune reconstitution in severely immunosuppressed antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients starting efavirenz, lopinavir-ritonavir, or atazanavir-ritonavir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine: final 48-week results (The Advanz-3 Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 69:206–215. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Molina J-M, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J et al (2008) Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir versus twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 48 week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Lancet (London, England) 372:646–655. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61081-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Molina J-M, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J et al (2010) Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1999) 53:323–332. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c990bf

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vol 4. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

  27. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 315:629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Aberg JA, Tebas P, Overton ET et al (2012) Metabolic effects of darunavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive, HIV type 1-infected subjects over 48 weeks. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 28:1184–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Martinez E, Gonzalez-Cordon A, Ferrer E et al (2015) Differential body composition effects of protease inhibitors recomended for initial treatment of HIV infection: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 60(5):811–820. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu898

  30. Ofotokun I, Na LH, Landovitz RJ et al (2015) Comparison of the metabolic effects of ritonavir-boosted darunavir or atazanavir versus raltegravir, and the impact of ritonavir plasma exposure: ACTG 5257. Clin Infect Dis 60(12):1842–1851. doi:10.1093/cid/civ193

  31. Saumoy M, Ordóñez-Llanos J, Martínez E et al (2015) Atherogenic properties of lipoproteins in HIV patients starting atazanavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir: a substudy of the ATADAR randomized study. J Antimicrob Chemother 70(4):1130–1138. doi:10.1093/jac/dku501

  32. Walmsley S (2007) Protease inhibitor-based regimens for HIV therapy. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 45:S5–S13. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180600709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hill A, Sawyer W (2009) Effects of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone on the efficacy of first-line boosted highly active antiretroviral therapy based on protease inhibitors: meta-regression analysis of 12 clinical trials in 5168 patients. HIV Med 10:527–535. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00724.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Flandre P (2011) Atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz as part of a 3-drug regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1. Ann Intern Med 155:402. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-6-201109200-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Riddler SA, Haubrich R, DiRienzo AG et al (2008) Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 358:2095–2106. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa074609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Murphy RL, Sanne I, Cahn P et al (2003) Dose-ranging, randomized, clinical trial of atazanavir with lamivudine and stavudine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 48-week results. AIDS (London, England) 17:2603–2614. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000096930.51231.5d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Uy J, Yang R, Wirtz V et al (2011) Treatment of advanced HIV disease in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected patients receiving once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir or twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. AIDS Care 23:1500–1504. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.565033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank their colleagues in the Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE) and NovaMed Medical Research Association for their continuos support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Funding sources

None to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1695 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Menshawy, A., Ismail, A., Abushouk, A.I. et al. Efficacy and safety of atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infected subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Virol 162, 2181–2190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3346-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3346-9

Keywords

Navigation