Abstract
Dry-wet variations are a hot topic in global climate change research. Climate warming has led to the changes of evapotranspiration and precipitation are unevenly distributed, which have and will undoubtedly affect the dry-wet variations. In this study, based on daily climatic data from 423 meteorological stations in Southwest China (SWC), we analyze the trends and spatial variabilities of dry-wet climatic factors during 1961–2017, such as potential evapotranspiration (ET0), precipitation, and humid index (HI). Also, we investigate the possible influencing factors causing dry-wet variations. The results show that the arid, semi-arid, and humid regions decreased in 1991–2017 compared with those in 1961–1990, but the sub-humid regions increased. During 1961–2017, there was a noticeable decreasing trend in precipitation, while the variation trend in the ET0 was not apparent, which contributed to the dry climate in the SWC. The ET0 was most sensitive to temperature, followed by relative humidity. The contribution to the change of the ET0 was most remarkable for the change of temperature, followed by sunshine hours and wind speed. On the seasonal scale, the climate became drier in summer and autumn during 1961–2017, but there were no obvious wet-dry variations in spring and winter. Temperature and wind speed were the major factors causing the ET0 variation in spring and winter. Temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity were the critical factors contributing to the ET0 variation in autumn. while sunshine hours played a primary role in the ET0 variation in summer. On the monthly scale, the climate tended to be dry in most months, except for January, March, June, and July. Temperature was the most prominent contributor to the ET0 increase in most months. Also, wind speed and sunshine hours were the main factors of the ET0 reduction in October–May and June–September, respectively. This study can provide a specific reference for drought monitoring and early warning in different climate zones of the SWC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data supporting findings in this study can be made available upon reasonable request.
References
Al-Faraj FAM, Tigkas D, Scholz M (2016) Irrigation efficiency improvement for sustainable agriculture in changing climate: a transboundary watershed between Iraq and Iran. Environ Process 3:603–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0148-0
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements, vol 56. FAO Irrigation and Drainage
Annandale JG, Stockle CO (1994) Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather: a sensitivity analysis. Irrig Sci 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00187789
Bertoldi G, Albertson JD, Kustas WP, Li F, Anderson MC (2007) On the opposing roles of air temperature and wind speed variability in flux estimation from remotely sensed land surface states. Water Resour Res 43:W10433. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005911
Beven K (1979) A sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration estimates. J Hydrol 44:169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(79)90130-6
Chen C, Pang YM, Xu FX, Guo XY (2020) Dry-wet evolution and its influencing factors in single cropping rice growing season in Southwest China. Chin J Eco-Agric 28:492–502 https://doi.org/10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190727
Compilation Committee of Southwest China assessment report on climate change (2021) Summary for policymakers. Southwest China assessment report on climate change: 2020. China Meteorological Press, pp 3–7
Cong ZT, Yang DW, Ni GH (2008) Does evaporation paradox exist in China? Hydrol. Earth Syst Sci 13:357–366. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-357-2009
Gong L, Xu CY, Chen D, Halldin S, Chen YD (2006) Sensitivity of the Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang(Yangtze river) basin. J Hydrol 329:620–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.027
Goyal RK (2004) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India). Agric Water Manag 69:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.03.014
Hobbins MT, Ramírez JA, Brown TC (2004) Trends in pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.: paradoxical or complementary? Geophys Res Lett 31:L13503. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019846
Hu ZZ (1997) Conspectus of grassland classification science. China Agriculture Press, pp 225–246
Hu Q, Dong B, Pan XB, Wang XX, Wei P, Zhao HH, Zhang XT (2017a) Spatiotemporal variation and causes analysis of dry-wet climate at different time scales in North China Plain. Chin J Agrometeorol 38:267–277. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2017.05.001
Hu Q, Dong B, Pan XB, Jiang H, Pan ZH, Qiao Y, Shao C, Ding M, Yin Z, Hu L (2017b) Spatiotemporal variation and causes analysis of dry-wet climate over period of 1961-2014 in China. Transactions of the CSAE 33:124–132. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.06.016
Hu Q, Pan FF, Pan XB, Hu LT, Wang XX, Yang PY, Wei P, Pan ZH (2018) Dry-wet variations and cause analysis in Northeast China at multi-time scales. Theor Appl Climatol 133:775–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2222-6
Hulme M, Marsh R, Jones PD (1992) Global changes in a humidity index between 1931-60 and 1961-90. Clim Res 2:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr002001
Iglesias A, Sánchez B, Garrote L, López I (2017) Towards adaptation to climate change: water for rice in the coastal wetlands of Doñana, southern Spain. Water Resour Manag 31:629–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0995-x
IPCC (2021) Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, p 22
Jhajharia D, Singh VP, Kumar R, Choudhary RR (2015) Searching evidence for the existence of evaporation paradox in arid environments of northwest India. Glob Nest J 17:3–11. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.001356
Limjirakan S, Limsakul A (2012) Trends in Thailand pan evaporation from 1970 to 2007. Atmos Res 108:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.01.010
Liu CM, Zhang D (2011) Temporal and spatial change analysis of the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to meteorological influencing factors in China. Acta Geogr Sin 66:579–588. https://doi.org/10.11821/xb201105001
Liu BJ, Chen CL, Lian YQ, Chen JF, Chen XH (2015) Long-term change of wet and dry climatic conditions in the southwest karst area of China. Glob. Planet Chang 127:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.01.009
Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531
Ma ZF, Liu J, Zhang SQ, Chen WX, Yang SQ (2013) Observed climate changes in Southwest China during 1961-2010. Adv Clim Change Res 4:30–40. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2013.030
McCuen RH (1973) The role of sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling. J Hydrol 18:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(73)90024-3
Nouri M, Homaee M, Bannayan M (2017) Quantitative trend, sensitivity and contribution analyses of reference evapotranspiration in some arid environments under climate change. Water Resour Manag 31:2207–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1638-1
O'Gorman PA, Schneider T (2009) The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:14773–14777. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907610106
Oueslati B, Bellon G (2015) The double ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models: interaction between SST, large-scale circulation and precipitation. Clim Dyn 44:585–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2468-6
Papaioannou G, Kitsara G, Athanasatos S (2011) Impact of global dimming and brightening on reference evapotranspiration in Greece. J Geophys Res 116:D09107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015525
Piao SL, Ciais P, Huang Y, Shen ZB, Peng SB, Li JB, Zhou LP, Liu HY, Ma YC, Ding YH, Friedlingstein P, Liu CZ, Tan K, Yu YQ, Zhang TY, Fang JY (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in china. Nature 467:43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09364
Rana G, Katerji N (1998) A measurement based sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration model for crops of different height and in contrasting water status. Theor Appl Climatol 60:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007040050039
Rayner DP (2007) Wind run changes: the dominant factor affecting pan evaporation trends in Australia. J Clim 20:3379. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4181.1
Ren GY, Guo J, Xu MZ, Chu ZY, Zhang L, Zou XK, Li QX, Liu XN (2005) Climate changes of China’s mainland over the past half century. Acta Meteor Sinica 63:942–956. https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2005.090
Schlichtholz P (2016) Empirical relationships between summertime oceanic heat anomalies in the Nordic seas and large-scale atmospheric circulation in the following winter. Clim Dyn 47:1735–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2930-5
Sharifi A, Dinpashoh Y (2014) Sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith reference crop evapotranspiration to climatic variables in Iran. Water Resour Manag 28:5465–5476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0813-x
Sheng SH, Zhang FM, Sheng Q (2009) Spatio-temporal changes of wetness index in China from 1975 to 2004. Transactions of the CSAE 25:11–15
Tang CQ (2015) The subtropical vegetation of Southwestern China: plant distribution, diversity and ecology. In: Plants and Vegetation, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9741-2
Vicente-Serrano SM, Begueria S, López-Moreno JI (2010) A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J Clim 23:1696–1718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a
Wang JZ, Georgakakos KP (2007) Estimation of potential evapotranspiration in the mountainous Panama Canal watershed. Hydrol Process 21:1901–1917. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6394
Wang P, Wu XQ, Hao YR, Wu CH, Zhang J (2020) Is Southwest China drying or wetting? Spatiotemporal patterns and potential causes. Theor Appl Climatol 139:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02935-4
Wang Y, Liu PX, Cao LG, Gao Y, Yong GZ (2014) Characteristics of southwestern China dry-wet condition based on wetness index in 1960-2011. J Nat Resour 29:830–838. https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.05.010
Xu JQ, Wang DD, Qiu XF, Zeng Y, Zhu XC, Li MX, He YJ, Shi GP (2021) Dominant factor of dry-wet change in China since 1960s. Int J Climatol 41:1039–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6728
Yang H, Wright JA, Gundry SW (2012) Boost water safety in rural China. Nature 484:318. https://doi.org/10.1038/484318b
Yin YH, Wu SH, Chen G, Dai EF (2010) Attribution analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes in China since the 1960s. Theor Appl Climatol 101:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0197-7
Zhang XT, Kang SZ, Zhang L, Liu JQ (2010) Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest China. Agric Water Manag 97:1506–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.004
Funding
This study was funded by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023YFS0376, 2021YFS0282), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan (2022NSFSC0230), Science and Technology Development Fund of Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Heavy Rain and Drought-Flood Disasters in Plateau and Basin (SCQXKJQN2020029), and Open Fund Project of Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Qinghai Province (QFZ-2021-Z08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.C. conceptualized this study and led the writing. Y.M.P analyzed the data and wrote the original draft. Y. L interpreted the results and revised the text. All authors contributed to this work and approved the final manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent for publication
All authors have read the manuscript and agreed to publish.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pang, Y., Chen, C. & Luo, Y. Dry-wet variations and the related influencing factors in Southwest China on multi-time scales during 1961–2017. Theor Appl Climatol 154, 453–466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04566-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-023-04566-2