Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alternative heuristics equations to the Priestley–Taylor approach: assessing reference evapotranspiration estimation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The radiation-based Priestley–Taylor (PT) model is a common way of modeling evapotranspiration (ET0) when only air temperature and solar radiation records are obtainable. However, this method presents the crucial drawback of requiring an initial local calibration. Most of the existing calibration procedures usually utilize similar patterns (data) for calibrating and testing the ET0 models. In the current research, the PT model and its calibrated versions were evaluated by utilizing meteorological data from 29 weather stations in Iran. Thoroughgoing local and external data scrutinizing procedures (using k-fold validation) were adopted to evaluate the models. Additionally, the externally calibrated models were reevaluated considering vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and net radiation (Rn) records. A similar plan was replicated for assessing the performance of gene expression programming (GEP)–based equations fed with the air temperature and solar radiation data. Both local and external calibrations of the PT model generally improved the accuracy of original PT for estimating ET0, especially in humid and arid stations. External calibration using VPD and Rn data was found to be comparable to locally calibrated and non-calibrated PT models. Local GEP models generally performed more accurately than locally calibrated and non-calibrated PT models. Higher accuracy was also obtained using external GEP models in comparison with non-calibrated PT models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guide lines for computing crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 56, Rome, Italy

  • Bailey WG, Davies JA (1981) Bulk stomatal resistance contral of evaporation. Bound-Layer Meteorol 20:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf W, Nordin P, Keller PE, Francone FD (1998) Genetic programming. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA 512 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benli B, Bruggeman A, Oweis T, Ustun H (2010) Performance of Penman-Monteith FAO56 in a semiarid highland environment. J Irrig Drain Eng 136(11):757–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Berengena J, Gavilàn P (2005) Reference evapotranspiration estimation in a highly advective semiarid environment. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(2):147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman R, Pochop LO (1994) Evaporation, Evapotranspiration and climatic data. In: Developments in atmospheric science, 22. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, pp 278

  • Castellvi F, Stockle CO, Perez PJ, Ibanez M (2001) Comparison of methods for applying the Priestley–Taylor equation at a regional scale. Hydrol Process 15:1609–1620

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristea NC, Kampf SK, Burges SJ (2013) Revised coefficients for Priestley-Taylor and Makkink-Hansen equations for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. J Hydrol Eng 18:1289–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies JA, Allen CD (1973) Equilibrium, potential and actual evaporation from cropped surfaces in southern Ontario. J Appl Meteorol 12:649–657

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin HAR (1978) A simple model for shallow lake evaporation. J Appl Meteorol 17:1132–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin HAR, Holtslag AAM (1982) A simple parameterization of the surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat during daytime compared with the Penman-Monteith concept. J Appl Meteorol 21:1610–1621

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschaine LM (2014) Decision support for complex planning challenges: combining expert systems, engineering-oriented modeling, machine learning, information theory, and optimization technology. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg ,p 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding R, Kang S, Li F, Zhang Y, Tong L (2013) Evapotranspiration measurement and estimation using modified Priestley–Taylor model in an irrigated maize field with mulching. Agric For Meteorol 168:140–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2001a) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Comput Syst 13(2):87–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2001b) Gene expression programming in problem solving. In: 6th Online World Conference on soft computing in Industrial Applications (invited tutorial)

  • Ferreira C (2006) Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence. Springer, Berling 478 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Stewart JB (1975) The average surface resistance of a pine forest derived from Bowen ratio measurements. Bound-Layer Meteorol 8:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison –Wesley, Reading 432 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunston H, Batchelor CH (1983) A comparison of the Priestley-Taylor and Penman methods for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in tropical countries. Agric Water Manag 6(1):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Guven A, Kisi O (2010) Daily pan evaporation modeling using linear genetic programming technique. Irrig Sci 29:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0225-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guven A, Aytek A, Yuce MI, Aksoy H (2008) Genetic programming-based empirical model for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation. Clean Soil Air Water 36(10–11):905–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Irmak A, Allen RG, Jones JW (2003) Solar and net radiation-based equations to estimate reference evapotranspiration in humid climates. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):336–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA, Tanner CB (1975) Advection modification of the Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration formula. Agron J 67:840–842

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Guven A (2010) Evapotranspiration modeling using linear genetic programming technique. J Irrig Drain Eng 136(10):715–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge, p 840

    Google Scholar 

  • Landeras G, Ortiz-Barredo A, Lopez JJ (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Agric Water Manag 95:553–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (1999) Evaluating the use of goodness-of-fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí P, González-Altozano P, López-Urrea R, Mancha LA, Shiri J (2015) Modeling reference evapotranspiration with calculated targets: assessment and implications. Agric Water Manag 149(2):81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • McAneney KJ, Itier B (1996) Operational limits to the Priestley-Taylor formula. Irrig Sci 17:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman WR (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond A 193(1032):120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira AR (2004) The Priestley–Taylor parameter and the decoupling factor for estimating reference evapotranspiration. Agric For Meteorol 125:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100(2):81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine J (2000) Consistent cross-validatory model-selection for dependent data: hv-block cross-validation. J Econ 99:39–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatore A, Mendicino G, Cammalleri C, Ciraolo G (2015) Regional-scale modeling of reference evapotranspiration: intercomparison of two simplified temperature- and radiation-based approaches. J Irrig Drain Eng 141:04015022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao J (1993) Linear model selection by cross-validation. J Am Stat Assoc 88(422):486–495

    Google Scholar 

  • She D, Xia J, Zhang Y (2017) Changes in reference evapotranspiration and its driving factors in the middle reaches of Yellow River Basin, China. Sci Total Environ 607-608:1151–1162

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Kisi O, Landeras G, Lopez JJ, Nazemi AH, Stuyt LCPM (2012) Daily reference evapotranspiration modeling by using genetic programming approach in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). J Hydrol 414-415:302–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Nazemi AH, Sadraddini AA, Landeras G, Kisi O, Marti P (2013) Global cross-station assessment of neuro-fuzzy models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 480:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Nazemi AH, Sadraddini AA, Landeras G, Kisi O, Fakheri Fard A, Marti P (2014a) Comparison of heuristic and empirical approaches for estimating reference evapotranspiration from limited inputs in Iran. Comput Electron Agric 108:230–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Marti P, Singh VP (2014b) Evaluation of gene expression programming approaches for estimating daily pan evaporation through spatial and temporal data scanning. Hydrol Process 28(3):1215–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ (1993) Evaporation. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner DM, Jacobs JM (2005) Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration. J Hydrol 308:81–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2011) Local calibration of the Hargreaves and Priestley-Taylor equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid and cold climates of Iran based on the Penman-Monteith model. J Irrig Drain Eng 16(10):837–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Traore S, Guven A (2013) New algebraic formulations of evapotranspiration extracted from gene-expression programming in the tropical seasonally dry regions of West Africa. Irrig Sci 31(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (1992) World atlas of desertification. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heerwaarden CC, Arellano JV, Moene AF, Holtslag AM (2009) Interactions between dry-air entrainment, surface evaporation and convective boundary layer development. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135:1277–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham Y, Silva Filho VP, Andre RGB (1991) The Priestly-Taylor parameter α for the Amazon Forest. Agric For Meteorol 38:211–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Li Z, Cribb M (2006) Estimation of evaporative fraction from a combination of day and night land surface temperatures and NDVI: a new method to determine the Priestley–Taylor parameter. Remote Sens Environ 102:293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Singh VP (2002) Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour Manag 16(3):197–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Yassin MA, Alazba AA, Mattar AA (2016) Artificial neural networks versus gene expression programming for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid climate. Agric Water Manag 163:110–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder RE, Odhiambo LO, Wright WC (2005) Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid Southeast United States. Appl Eng Agric 21(2):197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu TW (1977) Parameterization of surface evaporation rate for use in numerical modeling. J Appl Meteorol 16:393–400

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Jalal Shiri, Amir Hossein Nazemi, Ali Ashraf Sadraddini & Ahmad Fakheri Fard

  2. Departament de Biologia, Àrea d’Enginyeria Agroforestal, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7.5, 07022, Palma, Spain

    Pau Marti

  3. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

    Ozgur Kisi

  4. NEIKER, AB. Basque Country Research Institute for Agricultural Development, Alava, Basque Country, Spain

    Gorka Landeras

Authors
  1. Jalal Shiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amir Hossein Nazemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Ashraf Sadraddini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pau Marti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmad Fakheri Fard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ozgur Kisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gorka Landeras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalal Shiri.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiri, J., Nazemi, A.H., Sadraddini, A.A. et al. Alternative heuristics equations to the Priestley–Taylor approach: assessing reference evapotranspiration estimation. Theor Appl Climatol 138, 831–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02852-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02852-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation