Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the asymmetry and rate of SAT warming over the global land area under the 1.5 °C and 2 °C climate change targets

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Paris Agreement establishes targets for the increase in global mean temperature of 1.5 °C and 2 °C, relative to pre-industrial levels. Recent studies suggest that the climate change impacts of these two goals are markedly different, and the additional 0.5 °C increase in the global mean surface air temperature (SAT) may lead to drastic, non-linear increases in the extreme and average temperatures of most regions. In this study, we use model results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) to illustrate the asymmetric nature of the warming trends that will result over the global land area under these two climate change targets. The results show that the SAT increase reaches 1.5 °C by 2040 (2040 ± 6), considering RCP2.6 to RCP8.5, whereas the SAT increase reaches 2.0 °C by 2060 (2060 ± 12), considering RCP4.5 to RCP8.5. The SAT increase over land is meridionally and zonally asymmetric, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. What’s global warming and rising concentrations of emissions will exacerbate the asymmetric warming from north to south especially over land. In addition to the longitudinal changes, the magnitude of the SAT increase at higher latitudes is significantly greater than that of comparable areas at middle to low latitudes. Additionally, the time of the SAT increase over the high-latitude land areas occurs much earlier than elsewhere. In addition, the difference in the timing of this onset in the longitudinal direction is substantial, but the difference in the zonal direction is small. Furthermore, the SAT increase over most of the global land area reaches 1.5 °C before the middle of twenty-first century and reaches 2.0 °C before 2070. In addition, over 20% of the global land area, the SAT increase reaches 1.5 °C before 2006, whereas almost none of the land area exhibits a change of 2.0 °C before 2006.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data in the article is publicly available.

References

  • Anderson D, Mauk E, Wahl E, Morrill C, Wagner A, Easterling D, Rutishauser T (2013) Global warming in an independent record of the past 130 years. Geophys Res Lett 40:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhang Z, Tao F (2018) Impacts of climate change and climate extremes on major crops productivity in China at a global warming of 15 and 20 °C. Earth Syst Dyn. 9:543–562. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-543-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RT, Murphy JM, Brown SJ (2010) Do global warming targets limit heatwave risk? Geophys Res Lett 37:132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark PU et al (2016) Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. Nat Clim Change. 6:360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coumou D, Robinson A (2013) Historic and future increase in the global land area affected by monthly heat extremes. Environ Res Lett 8:34018–34016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton A et al (2015) Sea-level rise. Sea-level rise due to polar ice-sheet mass loss during past warm periods. Science 349:aaa4019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner R (2016) The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. Int Aff 92:1107–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieler K, Meinshausen M, Golly A, Mengel M, Lebek K, Donner SD, Hoeghguldberg O (2013) Limiting global warming to 2°C is unlikely to save most coral reefs. Nat Clim Change. 3:165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattuso JP et al (2015) Oceanography contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Scenarios Sci. 349:aac4722

    Google Scholar 

  • Guivarch A, Auvray P, Berthou L, Cun ML (1978) United nations framework convention on climate change conference of the parties: decisions adopted by the first session (Berlin). J Appl Phys 49(1):233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Yu H, Dai A, Wei Y, Kang L (2017) Drylands face potential threat under 2°C global warming target. Nat Clim Change. 7:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D et al (2018) Climate impacts in Europe under +1.5°C global warming. Earth’s Future. 6:264–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji F, Wu Z, Huang J, Chassignet EP (2014) Evolution of land surface air temperature trend nature. Clim Change 4:462–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi M, Hawkins E, Sutton R, Lowe J, Frame D (2011) Projections of when temperature change will exceed 2 [deg] C above pre-industrial levels. Nat Clim Change. 1:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis 40-year project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AD et al (2015) The timing of anthropogenic emergence in simulated climate extremes. Environ Res Lett 10:094015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg CT (2014) Perceptions of Climate Change. J Environ Resour Economics Colby. 1:30

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Rogelj J, Sedláček J, Fischer EM (2016) A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nat Geosci 9:13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leo PRK, Meyer (2015) Climate change 2014: synthesis report contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. J Romance Stud 4:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionello P, Scarascia L (2018) The relation between climate change in the Mediterranean region and global warming. Reg Environ Change 18:1481–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1290-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissner TK, Fischer EM (2016) Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 15-° C and 2-° C. Earth Syst Dyn. 7:327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marotzke J, Forster PM (2015) Forcing, feedback and internal variability in global temperature trends. Nature 517:565–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen M et al (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 degrees C. Nature 458:1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nations U (2015) Adoption of the paris agreement

  • Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Knutti R (2012) Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat Clim Change 2:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleussner CF et al (2016) Science and policy characteristics of the Paris agreement temperature goal. Nat Clim Change. 6:827–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF et al (2013) Technical summary. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker T, Plattner GK, Dahe Q IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis - Findings and Lessons Learned. In: EGU General Assembly Conference, 2014

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschakert P (2015) 1.5 °C or 2 °C: a conduit’s view from the science-policy interface at COP20 in Lima, Peru. Clim Change Responses. 2:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor DG, Kennel CF (2014) Climate policy. Nature 514:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Dillon ME (2014) Recent geographic convergence in diurnal and annual temperature cycling flattens global thermal profiles. Nat Clim Change 4:988–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Lin L, Zhang X, Zhang H, Liu L, Xu Y (2017) Scenario dependence of future changes in climate extremes under 1.5 degrees C and 2 degrees C global warming. Sci Rep 7:46432. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Yu H, Huang J, Zhou T, Zhang M, Ren Y (2019) Drylands climate response to transient and stabilized 2 ℃ and 1.5 ℃ global warming targets. Clim Dyn 53:2375–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ramanathan V (2012) Latitudinally asymmetric response of global surface temperature: Implications for regional climate change. Geophys Res Lett 39:13706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Zhou B-T, Wu J, Han Z-Y, Zhang Y-X, Wu J (2017) Asian climate change under 1.5–4 °C warming targets. Adv Clim Change Res. 8:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Wei Y, Zhang Q, Liu X, Huang J, Feng T, Zhang M (2019) Multi-model assessment of global temperature variability on different time scales. Int J Climatol 40:273–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X (2015) Conference of the parties to the united nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC COP20) - towards a new climate change agreement Unasylva

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National key Research and development program of China (2019YFC1510202) and the National Programme of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42071024).

Funding

The National key Research and development program of China, 2019YFC1510202, Tanlong Dai, the National Programme of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, 42071024, Tanlong Dai.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TD, SS and WD designed the research; TD and SS analysed the data; TD, SS and GW wrote the paper; All of the authors participated in the analysis of the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanlong Dai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Clemens Simmer, Ph.D.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, T., Dong, W., Sun, S. et al. Exploring the asymmetry and rate of SAT warming over the global land area under the 1.5 °C and 2 °C climate change targets. Meteorol Atmos Phys 135, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-023-00957-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-023-00957-2

Navigation