Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preservation of cranial nerve function in large and giant trigeminal schwannoma resection: a case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Trigeminal schwannomas (TSs) are intracranial tumors that can cause significant brainstem compression. TS resection can be challenging because of the risk of new neurologic and cranial nerve deficits, especially with large (≥ 3 cm) or giant (≥ 4 cm) TSs. As prior surgical series include TSs of all sizes, we herein present our clinical experience treating large and giant TSs via microsurgical resection.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-surgeon case series of adult patients with large or giant TSs treated with microsurgery in 2012–2023.

Results

Seven patients underwent microsurgical resection for TSs (1 large, 6 giant; 4 males; mean age 39 ± 14 years). Tumors were classified as type M (middle fossa in the interdural space; 1 case, 14%), type ME (middle fossa with extracranial extension; 3 cases, 43%), type MP (middle and posterior fossae; 2 cases, 29%), or type MPE (middle/posterior fossae and extracranial space; 1 case, 14%). Six patients were treated with a frontotemporal approach (combined with transmastoid craniotomy in the same sitting in one patient and a delayed transmaxillary approach in another), and one patient was treated using an orbitofrontotemporal approach. Gross total resection was achieved in 5 cases (2 near-total resections). Five patients had preoperative facial numbness, and 6 had immediate postoperative facial numbness, including two with worsened or new symptoms. Two patients (28%) demonstrated new non-trigeminal cranial nerve deficits over mean follow-up of 22 months. Overall, 80% of patients with preoperative facial numbness and 83% with facial numbness at any point experienced improvement or resolution during their postoperative course. All patients with preoperative or new postoperative non-trigeminal tumor-related cranial nerve deficits (4/4) experienced improvement or resolution on follow-up. One patient experienced tumor recurrence that has been managed conservatively.

Conclusions

Microsurgical resection of large or giant TSs can be performed with low morbidity and excellent long-term cranial nerve function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are presented in this report.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Abou-Al-Shaar H, Cohen MA, Bi WL et al (2020) Surgical management of multifocal trigeminal schwannomas. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 19(6):659–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abou-Al-Shaar H, Krisht KM, Cohen MA et al (2020) Cranio-orbital and orbitocranial approaches to orbital and intracranial disease: eye-opening approaches for neurosurgeons. Front Surg 7:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Aftahy AK, Groll M, Barz M et al (2021) Surgical outcome of trigeminal schwannomas. Cancers (Basel) 13(6):1310

  4. Agarwal A (2015) Intracranial trigeminal schwannoma. Neuroradiol J 28(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agha RA, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, Franchi T, Kerwan A, O’Neill N (2020) The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasESeries in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines. Int J Surg 84:231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Gaber E (2002) Trigeminal schwannomas: removal of dumbbell-shaped tumors through the expanded Meckel cave and outcomes of cranial nerve function. J Neurosurg 96(3):453–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alyousif A, Almolani F, Almomen A (2020) Endonasal endoscopic removal of a large intracranial infratemporal fossa trigeminal schwannoma: A case report and literature review. Otolaryngol Case Rep 17:100220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arseni C, Dumitrescu L, Constantinescu A (1975) Neurinomas of the trigeminal nerve. Surg Neurol 4(6):497–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bordi L, Compton J, Symon L (1989) Trigeminal neuroma. A report of eleven cases. Surg Neurol 31(4):272–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulsara KR, Al-Mefty O (2004) Skull base surgery for benign skull base tumors. J Neurooncol 69(1–3):181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campero A, Baldoncini M, Román G, Villalonga JF (2021) Double-stage complete removal of dumbbell-shaped trigeminal schwannoma: 3-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 21(1):E51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen LF, Yang Y, Yu XG et al (2014) Operative management of trigeminal neuromas: an analysis of a surgical experience with 55 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(6):1105–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolenc VV (1994) Frontotemporal epidural approach to trigeminal neurinomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 130(1):55–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Feroze KB, Patel BC. Neurotrophic keratitis (2023) In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing

  15. Goel A, Muzumdar D, Raman C (2003) Trigeminal neuroma: analysis of surgical experience with 73 cases. Neurosurgery 52(4):783–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa T, Kato T, Iizuka H, Kida Y (2013) Long-term results for trigeminal schwannomas treated with gamma knife surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics 87(5):1115–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofstetter CP, Singh A, Anand VK, Kacker A, Schwartz TH (2010) The endoscopic, endonasal, transmaxillary transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, and the Meckel cave. J Neurosurg 113(5):967–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeong SK, Lee EJ, Hue YH, Cho YH, Kim JH, Kim CJ (2014) A suggestion of modified classification of trigeminal schwannomas according to location, shape, and extension. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2(2):62–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jusué-Torres I, Martinez-Gutierrez JC, Elder BD, Olivi A (2015) Giant trigeminal schwannoma presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus. Cureus 7(11):e386

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL et al (2009) The front door to meckel's cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach- technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery 64(3 Suppl):ons71–ons82; discussion ons82–ons83

  21. Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Papadogiorgakis N et al (2007) Giant dumbbell-shaped middle cranial fossa trigeminal schwannoma with extension to the infratemporal and posterior fossae. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149(9):959–964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacNally SP, Rutherford SA, Ramsden RT, Evans DG, King AT (2008) Trigeminal schwannomas. Br J Neurosurg 22(6):729–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariniello G, Cappabianca P, Buonamassa S, de Divitiis E (2004) Surgical treatment of intracavernous trigeminal schwannomas via a fronto-temporal epidural approach. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 106(2):104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCormick PC, Bello JA, Post KD (1988) Trigeminal schwannoma: Surgical series of 14 cases with review of the literature. J Neurosurg 69(6):850–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Neves MWF, de Aguiar PHP, Belsuzarri TAB, de Araujo AMS, Paganelli SL, Maldaun MVC (2019) Microsurgical management of trigeminal schwannoma: cohort analysis and systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 80(3):264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Niranjan A, Barnett S, Anand V, Agazzi S (2016) Multimodality management of trigeminal schwannomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 77(4):371–378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Paillas JE, Grisoli F, Farnarier P (1974) Trigeminal nerve neurinomas. Apropos of 8 cases. Neurochirurgie 20(1):41–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peciu-Florianu I, Régis J, Levivier M, Dedeciusova M, Reyns N, Tuleasca C (2021) Tumor control and trigeminal dysfunction improvement after stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 44(5):2391–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramina R, Mattei TA, Sória MG et al (2008) Surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas. Neurosurg Focus 25(6):E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Raza SM, Donaldson AM, Mehta A, Tsiouris AJ, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2014) Surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas: defining the role for endoscopic endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez Rubio R, Chae R, Vigo V, Abla AA, McDermott M (2019) Immersive surgical anatomy of the pterional approach. Cureus 11(7):e5216

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V (2014) Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach for surgical treatment of trigeminal schwannomas. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 4):565–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schisano G, Olivecrona H (1960) Neurinomas of the gasserian ganglion and trigeminal root. J Neurosurg 17(2):306–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheikh MM, De Jesus O (2022) Schwannoma. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing

  35. Taha JM, Tew JM, Jr., van Loveren HR, Keller JT, el-Kalliny M (1995) Comparison of conventional and skull base surgical approaches for the excision of trigeminal neurinomas. J Neurosurg 82(5):719–725

  36. Wanibuchi M, Fukushima T, Zomordi AR, Nonaka Y, Friedman AH (2012) Trigeminal schwannomas: skull base approaches and operative results in 105 patients. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 70:ons132–ons144

  37. Wu X, Xie SH, Tang B et al (2021) Single-stage endoscopic endonasal approach for the complete removal of trigeminal schwannomas occupying both the middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurg Rev 44(1):607–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang A, Kunigelis K, Youssef AS (2018) Retrosigmoid approach to the posterior fossa trigeminal schwannoma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79(Suppl 5):S393–S394

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Yasui T, Hakuba A, Kim SH, Nishimura S (1989) Trigeminal neurinomas: operative approach in eight cases. J Neurosurg 71(4):506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yoshida K, Kawase T (1999) Trigeminal neurinomas extending into multiple fossae: surgical methods and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 91(2):202–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Youssef S, Kim EY, Aziz KM, Hemida S, Keller JT, van Loveren HR (2006) The subtemporal interdural approach to dumbbell-shaped trigeminal schwannomas: cadaveric prosection. Neurosurgery 59(4 Suppl 2):ons270–ons277; discussion ons277–ons278

  42. Zhang Q, Feng K, Ge C, Hongchuan G, Mingchu L (2012) Endoscopic endonasal management of trigeminal schwannomas extending into the infratemporal fossa. J Clin Neurosci 19(6):862–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang L, Yang Y, Xu S, Wang J, Liu Y, Zhu S (2009) Trigeminal schwannomas: A report of 42 cases and review of the relevant surgical approaches. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111(3):261–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kristin Kraus, MSc, for editorial support.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MCF: data collection, data analysis, manuscript production; MTB: data collection, editing; RCR: data collection, video production, manuscript production; VM: video production; KPB: data collection, editing; WTC: editing, video production.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William T. Couldwell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This work was performed with the approval of the University of Utah institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent.

Consent to participate

The patient consented to participate.

Consent for publication

The patient consented to the publication of this case and video.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (MP4 419283 KB) Supplemental Video 1: Left frontotemporal craniotomy for resection of a giant trigeminal schwannoma

Supplementary file 2 (MP4 432377 KB) Supplemental Video 2: Staged intracranial and transmaxillary approach for resection of a giant trigeminal schwannoma

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Findlay, M.C., Bounajem, M.T., Mortimer, V. et al. Preservation of cranial nerve function in large and giant trigeminal schwannoma resection: a case series. Acta Neurochir 166, 198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06094-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06094-y

Keywords

Navigation