Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy outcomes following surgery for tumors involving the trigeminal nerve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To observe the evolution and outcomes of postoperative trigeminal neuropathy following surgery of tumor involving the trigeminal nerve.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted between October 2018 and February 2019 involving 25 patients with tumors confirmed to involve the trigeminal nerve during surgery by senior author. Pre- and postoperative trigeminal nerve function status and clinical data were recorded.

Results

This study included 18 cases of meningioma and seven of trigeminal schwannoma. Among the meningioma cases, 55.6% of the patients reported facial sensory dysfunction before surgery, 33.3% presented ocular discomfort, and 5.6% had masticatory muscle atrophy. Postoperatively, all patients experienced facial paresthesia, 94.4% complained of eye dryness, and one (5.56%) exhibited keratitis. Additionally, one patient (5.56%) showed new-onset masticatory weakness. During follow-up, 50.0% of patients reported improvement in facial paresthesia, and one (5.56%) experienced deterioration. Eye dryness resolved in 35.3% of patients, and keratitis remission was observed in one patient. However, one patient (5.56%) developed neurotrophic keratitis. Overall, 55.6% of patients displayed mild masticatory weakness without muscle atrophy. In the cases of schwannoma, 28.6% of patients had facial paresthesia before surgery, 42.9% showed ocular discomfort, and one (14.3%) complained of masticatory dysfunction. Postoperatively, 85.7% of patients reported facial paresthesia and eye dryness, with one patient (16.7%) experiencing keratitis. During follow-up, 66.7% of patients demonstrated improvement in facial paresthesia, 28.6% showed eye dryness remission, and one patient (16.7%) recovered from keratitis. However, one patient (16.7%) developed new-onset neurotrophic keratitis. One patient (16.7%) experienced relief of masticatory dysfunction, but 42.9% reported mild deterioration. Another patient (14.3%) had facial anesthesia that had not improved.

Conclusion

Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy is a common complication with a high incidence rate and poor recovery outcomes after surgery for tumors involving the trigeminal nerve. When trigeminal nerve damage is unavoidable, it is essential to provide a multidisciplinary and careful follow-up, along with active management strategy, to mitigate the more severe effects of postoperative trigeminal neuropathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, Gaber E (2002) Trigeminal schwannomas: removal of dumbbell-shaped tumors through the expanded Meckel cave and outcomes of cranial nerve function. J Neurosurg 96:453–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Almefty R, Dunn IF, Pravdenkova S, Abolfotoh M, Al-Mefty O (2014) True petroclival meningiomas: results of surgical management. J Neurosurg 120:40–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berra LV, Armocida D, Pesce A, Di Rita A, Santoro A (2019) Herpes simplex reactivation after surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective cohort study. World Neurosurg 127:e16–e21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borghei-Razavi H, Tomio R, Fereshtehnejad SM, Shibao S, Schick U, Toda M, Kawase T, Yoshida K (2015) Anterior petrosal approach: the safety of Kawase triangle as an anatomical landmark for anterior petrosectomy in petroclival meningiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 139:282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton JA (2018) Dry eye. N Engl J Med 378:2212–2223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeMonte F, Smith HK, al-Mefty O (1994) Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 81:245–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsayed N, Shimo T, Tashiro M, Nakayama E, Nagayasu H (2020) Disuse atrophy of masticatory muscles after intracranial trigeminal schwannoma resection: a case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 75:23–28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Giammattei L, di Russo P, Starnoni D, Passeri T, Bruneau M, Meling TR, Berhouma M, Cossu G, Cornelius JF, Paraskevopoulos D, Zazpe I, Jouanneau E, Cavallo LM, Benes V, Seifert V, Tatagiba M, Schroeder HWS, Goto T, Ohata K, Al-Mefty O, Fukushima T, Messerer M, Daniel RT, Froelich S (2021) Petroclival meningiomas: update of current treatment and consensus by the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163:1639–1663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jittapiromsak P, Sabuncuoglu H, Deshmukh P, Nakaji P, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2009) Greater superficial petrosal nerve dissection: back to front or front to back? Neurosurgery 64:253–258 discussion 258-259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larson JJ, van Loveren HR, Balko MG, Tew JM Jr (1995) Evidence of meningioma infiltration into cranial nerves: clinical implications for cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 83:596–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JY, Niranjan A, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2002) Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 97:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leroy HA, Tuleasca C, Reyns N, Levivier M (2018) Radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy for cavernous sinus meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 160:2367–2378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu X, Daugherty R, Konofaos P (2019) Sensory restoration of the facial region. Ann Plast Surg 82:700–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Luyk NH, Hammond-Tooke G, Bishara SN, Ferguson MM (1991) Facial pain and muscle atrophy secondary to an intracranial tumour. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:204–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathiesen T, Gerlich A, Kihlstrom L, Svensson M, Bagger-Sjoback D (2007) Effects of using combined transpetrosal surgical approaches to treat petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery 60:982–991 discussion 991-982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morisako H, Goto T, Ohata K (2015) Petroclival meningiomas resected via a combined transpetrosal approach: surgical outcomes in 60 cases and a new scoring system for clinical evaluation. J Neurosurg 122:373–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muto J, Kawase T, Yoshida K (2010) Meckel’s cave tumors: relation to the meninges and minimally invasive approaches for surgery: anatomic and clinical studies. Oper Neurosurg 67:ons291–ons299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pazin GJ, Ho M, Jannetta PJ (1978) Reactivation of herpes simplex virus after decompression of the trigeminal nerve root. J Infect Dis 138:405–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peciu-Florianu I, Regis J, Levivier M, Dedeciusova M, Reyns N, Tuleasca C (2021) Tumor control and trigeminal dysfunction improvement after stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 44:2391–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Phi JH, Paek SH, Chung HT, Jeong SS, Park CK, Jung HW, Kim DG (2007) Gamma knife surgery and trigeminal schwannoma: is it possible to preserve cranial nerve function? J Neurosurg 107:727–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL (2000) Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of the Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1013–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sacchetti M, Lambiase A (2014) Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol 8:571–579

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Samii M, Tatagiba M (1992) Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 118:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seifert V (2010) Clinical management of petroclival meningiomas and the eternal quest for preservation of quality of life: personal experiences over a period of 20 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:1099–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Semeraro F, Forbice E, Romano V, Angi M, Romano MR, Filippelli ME, Di Iorio R, Costagliola C (2014) Neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmologica 231:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shibao S, Borghei-Razavi H, Yoshida K (2016) Anterior transpetrosal approach: epidural or subdural? Neurosurg Rev 39:531–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sindou M, Wydh E, Jouanneau E, Nebbal M, Lieutaud T (2007) Long-term follow-up of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus after surgical treatment alone. J Neurosurg 107:937–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith JH, Cutrer FM (2011) Numbness matters: a clinical review of trigeminal neuropathy. Cephalalgia 31:1131–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tenser RB (2015) Occurrence of herpes simplex virus reactivation suggests a mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia surgical efficacy. World Neurosurg 84:279–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tripathi M, Batish A, Kumar N, Ahuja CK, Oinam AS, Kaur R, Narayanan R, Gurnaani J, Kaur A (2020) Safety and efficacy of single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for benign confined cavernous sinus tumors: our experience and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 43:27–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Voss KM, Spille DC, Sauerland C, Suero Molina E, Brokinkel C, Paulus W, Stummer W, Holling M, Jeibmann A, Brokinkel B (2017) The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value? J Neurooncol 133:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Zhang Q, Weng JC, Chen LP, Li D, Jia GJ, Zhang LW, Wu Z, Jia W, Zhang JT (2020) A clinical study of ocular motor nerve functions after petroclival meningioma resection. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162:1249–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Westerlund U, Linderoth B, Mathiesen T (2011) Trigeminal complications arising after surgery of cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurg Rev 35:203–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu Z, Zhang JT, Jia GJ (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of cavernous sinus neurinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 41:103–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiao X, Zhang L, Wu Z, Zhang J, Jia G, Tang J, Meng G (2013) Surgical resection of large and giant petroclival meningiomas via a modified anterior transpetrous approach. Neurosurg Rev 36:587–593 discussion 593-584

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoshida K, Kawase T (1999) Trigeminal neurinomas extending into multiple fossae: surgical methods and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 91:202–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (PX2018024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun-Ting Zhang or Liang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Beijing Tiantan Hospital Research Ethics Committee (KY-2019–071-01).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal representatives before enrollment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, LP., Li, D., Li, XJ. et al. Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy outcomes following surgery for tumors involving the trigeminal nerve. Acta Neurochir 165, 2885–2893 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05735-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05735-y

Keywords

Navigation