Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From the perspective of pseudo-progression rather than treatment failure, how long should we wait before considering treatment failure if large cystic enlargement occurs after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma?: insight into pseudoprogression based on two case reports

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been accepted as a safe and effective treatment for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, during follow-up, tumor expansion induced by irradiation can occur, and diagnosis of failure in radiosurgery for VS is still controversial. Tumor expansion with cystic enlargement causes some confusion regarding whether further treatment should be performed. We analyzed more than 10 years of clinical findings and imaging of patients with VS with cystic enlargement after GKRS. A 49-year-old male with hearing impairment was treated with GKRS (12 Gy; isodose, 50%) for a left VS with a preoperative tumor volume of 0.8 cc. The tumor size increased with cystic changes from the third year after GKRS, reaching a volume of 10.8 cc at 5 years after GKRS. At the 6th year of follow-up, the tumor volume started to decrease, up to 0.3 cc by the 14th year of follow-up. A 52-year-old female with hearing impairment and left facial numbness was treated with GKRS for a left VS (13 Gy; isodose, 50%). The preoperative tumor volume was 6.3 cc, which started to increase with cystic enlargement from the first year after GKRS, and reaching 18.2 cc by 5 years after GKRS. The tumor maintained a cystic pattern with slight changes in size, but no other neurologic symptoms developed during the follow-up period. After 6 years of GKRS, tumor regression was observed, eventually reaching a volume of 3.2 cc by the 13th year of follow-up. In both cases, persistent cystic enlargement in VS was observed at 5 years after GKRS, after which the tumors began to stabilize. After more than 10 years of GKRS, the tumor volume was less than that before GKRS. Enlargement with large cystic formation in the first 3–5 years after GKRS has been considered as treatment failure. However, our cases show that further treatment for cystic enlargement should be deferred for at least 10 years, especially in patients without neurological deterioration, as inadequate surgery can be prevented within that period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GKRS:

Gamma Knife radiosurgery

VS:

Vestibular schwannoma

CPA:

Cerebellopontine angle

SRS:

Stereotactic radiosurgery

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

IAC:

Internal acoustic canal

PTA:

Pure-tone audiometry

SDT:

Speech discrimination test

References

  1. Apicella G, Paolini M, Deantonio L, Masini L, Krengli M (2016) Radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma: review of recent literature results. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 21:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2016.02.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Breshears JD, Chang J, Molinaro AM, Sneed PK, McDermott MW, Tward A, Theodosopoulos PV (2019) Temporal dynamics of pseudoprogression after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas-a retrospective volumetric study. Neurosurgery 84:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlson ML, Habermann EB, Wagie AE, Driscoll CL, Van Gompel JJ, Jacob JT, Link MJ (2015) The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma management in the united states–a shift toward conservatism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 153:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815590105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Sanctis P, Green S, Germano I (2019) Communicating hydrocephalus after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: does technique matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 145:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03305-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delsanti C, Roche PH, Thomassin JM, Regis J (2008) Morphological changes of vestibular schwannomas after radiosurgical treatment: pitfalls and diagnosis of failure. Prog Neurol Surg 21:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldbrunner R, Weller M, Regis J, Lund-Johansen M, Stavrinou P, Reuss D, Evans DG, Lefranc F, Sallabanda K, Falini A, Axon P, Sterkers O, Fariselli L, Wick W, Tonn JC (2020) EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol 22:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayhurst C, Zadeh G (2012) Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol 14:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JH, Jung HH, Chang JH, Chang JW, Park YG, Chang WS (2017) Predictive factors of unfavorable events after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. World Neurosurg 107:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kshettry VR, Hsieh JK, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2015) Incidence of vestibular schwannomas in the United States. J Neurooncol 124:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1827-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau T, Olivera R, Miller T Jr, Downes K, Danner C, van Loveren HR, Agazzi S (2012) Paradoxical trends in the management of vestibular schwannoma in the United States. J Neurosurg 117:514–519. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.5.JNS111858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li LF, Yu CP, Tsang AC, Taw BB, Lui WM (2020) Near-complete regression 19 years after Gamma Knife radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma with massive pseudoprogression: case report. J Neurosurg 134:1455–1458. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.3.JNS20389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Linkov F, Valappil B, McAfee J, Goughnour SL, Hildrew DM, McCall AA, Linkov I, Hirsch B, Snyderman C (2017) Development of an evidence-based decision pathway for vestibular schwannoma treatment options. Am J Otolaryngol 38:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mackeith SA, Kerr RS, Milford CA (2013) Trends in acoustic neuroma management: a 20-year review of the oxford skull base clinic. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1342919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Malone J, Tiberi D, Sinclair J, Gaviolli E, Malone S (2020) Delayed pseudoprogression of a vestibular schwannoma postradiosurgery. Radiol Case Rep 15:749–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Marinelli JP, Lohse CM, Carlson ML (2018) Incidence of vestibular schwannoma over the past half-century: a population-based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 159:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818770629

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagano O, Higuchi Y, Serizawa T, Ono J, Matsuda S, Yamakami I, Saeki N (2008) Transient expansion of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 109:811–816. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasi D, Zunarelli E, Puzzolante A, Moriconi E, Pavesi G (2020) Early life-threating enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162:1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04434-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel MA, Marciscano AE, Hu C, Jusue-Torres I, Garg R, Rashid A, Francis HW, Lim M, Redmond KJ, Rigamonti D, Kleinberg LR (2017) Long-term treatment response and patient outcomes for vestibular schwannoma patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Front Oncol 7:200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollock BE (2006) Management of vestibular schwannomas that enlarge after stereotactic radiosurgery: treatment recommendations based on a 15 year experience. Neurosurgery 58:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000194833.66593.8B. (discussion 241-248)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Regis J, Delsanti C, Roche PH (2017) Editorial: Vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery: progression or pseudoprogression? J Neurosurg 127:374–379. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.JNS161236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shuto T, Inomori S, Matsunaga S, Fujino H (2008) Microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1486-5. (discussion 234)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shuto T, Matsunaga S (2016) Two cases of cystic enlargement of vestibular schwannoma as a late complication following gamma knife surgery. J Clin Neurosci 33:239–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wage J, Mignano J, Wu J (2021) Tufts medical center experience with long-term follow-up of vestibular schwannoma treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery: novel finding of delayed pseudoprogression. Adv Radiat Oncol 6:100687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu CP, Cheung JY, Leung S, Ho R (2000) Sequential volume mapping for confirmation of negative growth in vestibular schwannomas treated by gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):82–89. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.supplement

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Jeollanam-do, Hwasun, 58128, Republic of Korea

    Tae-Kyu Lee, Yeong-Jin Kim, Tae-Young Jung, Kyung-Sub Moon, In-Young Kim & Shin Jung

Authors
  1. Tae-Kyu Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yeong-Jin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tae-Young Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kyung-Sub Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. In-Young Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shin Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Jung.

Ethics declarations

Patient consent

The patients and guardians consented to the submission of the case report for publication in the journal.

Informed consent

The need for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest regarding the preparation or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, TK., Kim, YJ., Jung, TY. et al. From the perspective of pseudo-progression rather than treatment failure, how long should we wait before considering treatment failure if large cystic enlargement occurs after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma?: insight into pseudoprogression based on two case reports. Acta Neurochir 165, 2105–2109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05684-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05684-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation